SDS-PAGE was performed according to the Laemmli method to detect changes in molecular weight after bovine keratin hydrolysis. Sample (4 mg) was dissolved in 1000 µl of pure water. For Tris / Glycine / SDS Gels, the sample was diluted with Laemmli Buffer at a ratio of 1:3 (4x sample buffer). The sample protocol was prepared as a total volume of 12 µl. The sample (5 µl) was loaded into the individual lanes in the freshly pre-pared 17% acrylamide gel prepared with TEMED initiator [21]. After 1 hour of electrophoresis at 200 V, the gel was fixed at 50 rpm when shaking in 10% Acetic acid, 40% Ethanol buffer for 45 minutes. The gel was then washed with distilled water and incubated with 100 mL of Coomassie brilliant blue staining solution for 16 hours at 50 rpm on a shaker. The gel was then washed with distilled water, allowed to dry under room conditions, and images of the bands were obtained. Molecular weight of keratin hydrolysate measured as 10-15 kDa according to stains, and which is accordance with the literature [22].
The chemical structure of hydrolyzed keratin hydrogels was determined by Fourier Transform Infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) by using Agilent 600-IR Series equipment in the range of 4000 – 650 cm−1.
FTIR results given in Figure 1 for all synthesized samples and keratin hydrolysate. Fig.1a shows the changing amount of AAm inside the hydrogel structure whereas, Fig.1b shows the different ratios of AA and Fig.1c shows the blend concentrations of AAm/AA. Characteristic peaks of the keratin hydrolysate and keratin hydrogels are shown in Fig.1d Due to the α-helix and unordered structure of the hair keratin peak around 1650 cm-1 related to Amide I [1]. Around 3314 cm -1 Amide A band is located [20] and Amide I-II-III peaks located at around 1660 cm -1, 1553 cm -1 due to the C=O stretching , and 1330 cm -1 (NH2), respectively [23]. AA also represents characteristic peaks at 1712 cm -1, 1580 and 1403 cm -1 which are related to –COOH stretching, COO- asymmetric stretching and COO- stretching, respectively [22] and overlapped with the amide peaks of the biopolymer.
Measurement of Gel Content (%)
For the gel content calculation of hydrolyzed keratin hydrogels, the initial mass of the dried sample was determined as 0.1 g. The samples were swollen in distilled water for 48 hours and then filtered through coarse filter paper. The extracted gel samples were dried under vacuum at 40 °C for 24 hours. The final product obtained was weighed for weight determination. Gel content (% gel) was calculated by Eq. (1):
% Gel= (final mass/initial mass) x 100 (1)
The gel contents (%) of sample 4, 14, and 15 were observed as 46.9%, 20.9%, 23.3%, respectively. Increasing the keratin concentration did not contribute to the gel content of the sample.
Swelling Measurements
The keratin hydrogel could swell in medium solution at neutral pH and room temperature. At regular intervals, the mass measurements were performed. The swelling behavior of Hydrogel was investigated for ... minutes. The Swelling ratio or swelling capacity (S%) of keratin hydrogels was calculated according to following Eq. (2):
% swelling = (Wt-W0)/ W0 x 100 (2)
where Wt and W0 specify the weight of the swollen superabsorbent collagen hydrogel at equilibrium and the weight of the initial dry superabsorbent at time 0, respectively.
Swelling in Different Media
The swelling properties of the keratin hydrogel samples at different NaCl concentrations were measured using the method applied in the "Swelling Measurements" section. At the same time, the swelling properties of keratin hydrogel samples were investigated in different pH environments and these pH values were determined as 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. pH environment was prepared using 5 M HCl and 1 M KOH.
Swelling Properties
Swelling in Distilled Water
Swelling of hydrogels relies on the anion-anion electrostatic repulsion force. The experimental method was determined by reference publications showing the highest swelling degrees for biobased AA hydrogels as; 501 g/g [22], 674 g/g [24], 920 g/g [25], 197 g/g [26] and for biobased AAm hydrogel 775 g/g [27]. The swelling ratios of this work were recorded in between 137.2% to 1430.7%. Maximum swelling ratio was obtained for 48 hours for sample 14. The swelling capacity increases with time, but with further increase in time reaches a limiting value which is the equilibrium value [24]. The increase in the swelling values of keratin hydrolysate hydrogel samples in water over time can be explained by the fact that water is a good solvent for keratin hydrolysate hydrogels. An interaction occurs between the water molecules that rapidly enter the polymer chains and the polymer chains, and due to this interaction, the groups of molecules repel each other, and the molecules move away from each other. This situation can be enhancing the swelling values. When AAm and AA monomers are compared, it is proved by high swelling capacity values that keratin hydrolysate has better molecular interaction with AAm monomer.
In addition, the effect of keratin hydrolysate weight on hydrogel swelling is shown in Figure 2. Swelling capacity was generally increased by increasing the keratin hydrolysate weight from 1.5 to 4.5 g from 955.5 to 1430.7%. It is seen that the active sites can easily react with the monomers as the keratin hydrolysate weight increases. However, increasing the keratin hydrolysate content by more than 3.0 g causes a decrease in diffusion of monomers to active sites to produce crosslinked hydrogels [28].
Moreover, it can be said that with the increase of NMBA, the amount of crosslinking agent increases, the polymeric structure becomes tighter. The increase in the amount of cross-linking makes it difficult for water molecules to enter the hydrogel and to move the polymer chains apart, and therefore a decrease in swelling values occurs. A slight increase in the degree of crosslinking in all hydrogels results in a significant decrease in swelling capacity values [25] ,[26] , [28], [29], [30]. Swelling values of the samples during different time periods were given in Table 2 and for sample 6 hydrogel formation can not obtained thus swelling performance could not recorded.
Table 2: Swelling ratio of the hydrogel samples.
|
Swelling ratio (%)
|
|
1 hour
|
6 hours
|
12 hours
|
24 hours
|
48 hours
|
Sample 1
|
196.7
|
645.2
|
729.5
|
900.6
|
1115.7
|
Sample 2
|
284.1
|
654.7
|
800
|
686.2
|
807.2
|
Sample 3
|
508.4
|
603.9
|
666.1
|
635.3
|
702.1
|
Sample 4
|
184.6
|
630.6
|
799.8
|
973.3
|
1040.9
|
Sample 5
|
241.5
|
796.7
|
858.4
|
990.5
|
1198.1
|
Sample 6
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Sample 7
|
200.0
|
251.0
|
342.6
|
272.0
|
245.5
|
Sample 8
|
137.5
|
285.5
|
293.2
|
306.9
|
291.1
|
Sample 9
|
155.3
|
190.4
|
198.2
|
211.2
|
245.5
|
Sample 10
|
149.6
|
217.5
|
233.6
|
115.4
|
170.8
|
Sample 11
|
143.3
|
167.6
|
154.3
|
132.2
|
137.2
|
Sample 12
|
106.2
|
286.3
|
213.6
|
356.7
|
473.5
|
Sample 13
|
139.7
|
260.8
|
263.7
|
258.2
|
273.7
|
Sample 14
|
139.2
|
328.6
|
874.2
|
1020
|
1430.7
|
Sample 15
|
185.2
|
548.1
|
639.2
|
978.6
|
955.5
|
Effect of Salinity on Swelling
The swelling capacity is mainly related to the charge number and ionic strength of the solution, as well as the flexibility of the polymer network, the presence of hydrophilic functional groups and the crosslink density [25], [30]. The addition of salt can affect hydrogel formation, stability, and properties by changing the magnitude and range of electrostatic interactions in the system. It is thought that the interactions that hold the hydrogel particles together increase with increasing NaCl concentration, which confirms the increase in swelling capacity values. At the same time, the weight of the hydrogels gradually increased with increasing salt concentration. This can be attributed to the increase in hydrogel particle size [31]. Figure 3 represents the swelling capacity of the samples during 24h and 48h for changing NaCl concentrations.
Effect of pH on Swelling
The swelling capacity of the keratin hydrogels was studied at various pH, ranging from 1.0 to 11.0 (Fig.4) and keratin hydrogels exhibit swelling changes at a wide range of pH values. Stock solutions 1 M KOH and 5 M HCl were diluted with distilled water to reach desired basic and acidic pH values. Ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic bonds has a significance on the properties and stability of the keratin thus, ionic bonds make it pH dependent [15]. Maximum swelling ratio was obtained at pH 9 for 48 hours for sample 4 (1791%) and sample 15 (1502.8%). The hydrolysis of certain chains of the sample at pH 9 may have allowed the hydrogel to swell further. Evidence for this can be given the loss of mass between 24 and 48 hours measurements [22], [32].
It is well known that swelling of a hydrogel is induced by electrostatic repulsion of the ionic charges of its network. Under acidic pH (≤4) most of the carboxylate anions are protonated, thus removing the major anion-anion repulsive forces and consequently reducing swelling values [26], [25], [33]. The minimum swelling is observed at low pH due to a collapsed and disordered protein network with water tightly adsorbed to the hydrophilic sites [34]. As the pH of the swelling medium increases, the hydrogel swells due to anion-anion-repelling electrostatic forces. This results in a more hydrophilic polymer network. As the pH increases, higher water absorption occurs [26], [35].
Thermal characterization of samples was investigated via Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), Mettler Toledo DSC-1 Star System instrument under N2 atmosphere. DSC conditions are 25 to 300 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The DSC was used to compare the thermal properties of grafted keratin hydrogels and keratin hydrolysate (Fig.5a). The denaturation temperature observed around 80 °C for keratin hydrolysate. The second endothermic peak observed at approximately 210 °C, which was reported as helix denaturation in keratin [36]. Denaturation temperatures of graft copolymers are higher than keratin hydrolysate. The second endothermic peak of the grafted copolymers was observed at about 265 °C. These results show evidence of the improved thermal properties of grafted keratin hydrogels compared to keratin hydrolysate.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) was performed via Mettler Toledo TGA 1 Star system. Samples were heated from room temperature to 600 °C under the nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The TGA was used to compare the thermal stability of grafted keratin hydrogels and keratin hydrolysate (Fig.5b) The thermal stability of the grafted keratin hydrolysate was improved as is obvious from the TGA curve. The TGA curve shows that the main degradation stage of keratin consists of several overlapping stages. TGA of keratin hydrolysate shows a weight loss in 3 distinct stages. The first stage ranges between 25-140 °C, a loss of about 4.9% in weight was observed, which corresponds to absorbed water [16]. Degradation of keratin hydrolysate was started slowly at around 180 °C. The two main stages, partially separated at about 280 °C, follow maximum degradation rates at 222.1 and 315.6 °C, respectively. Mass loss is 20% by weight below 280 °C. If it is over 300 °C, it is a maximum of 25% by weight.
The decomposition temperatures of grafted copolymers are higher than keratin hydrolysate. The second stage of weight loss starts at about 200 °C, and continues up to 300 °C, during which time, about 50% weight loss occurs due to the degradation of keratin. Generally, keratin hydrolysate degradation is higher than grafted keratin hydrolysate. The third stage of weight loss starts at approximately 340 °C and continues up to 440 °C. Approximately 20% weight loss occurs between this temperature range. All this shows that the copolymers have better thermal stability than pure keratin hydrolysate [27]. The total weight loss of grafted keratin hydrolysate is higher than that of keratin hydrolysate.
The morphology of hydrolyzed keratin hydrogels networks was investigated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), (Quanta 400F Field Emission). The samples were coated with a thin layer of gold before analysis under high vacuum. Figure 6 shows scanning electron microscopic images of grafted keratin hydrogels. These pictures confirm that the graft copolymers have a porous structure. Sample 4, 14, and 15 contains 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5g keratin, respectively and increased amount of keratin and pore size relationship was investigated. When sample 8 which contains AA, is compared with the others which contains AAm did not represent sponge like structure thus, swelling properties of sample 8 and AA content samples are lower. Pore diameter values for samples 4, 14, and 15 were calculated as 4.7±1.8 μm, 3.7±1.1 μm, 4.6 ± 3.1 μm, respectively. Increased amount of keratin reduces the pore diameter and enhance the pore amount which is an advantage for swelling behavior of the hydrogel samples. For sample 14, higher amount of keratin containing samples, represents higher swelling capacity thanks to its smaller pore diameter and expanded pore distribution.