Oil yield
Statistical analysis showed a high variability between the five studied subspecies (p < 0.0001). The highest yield was recorded by needles of nigra subspecies (Table 2). The lowest values were reached by both calabrica and salzmannii subspecies. Furthermore, a significant variability was recorded between the nineteen provenances. The most important oil yield (0.68%) was reached by needles from P6 (Pinus nigra austriaca; Puget-Théniers-France). P2 (Pinus nigra calabrica; Trenta-Italy) showed the lowest oil yield with 0.17%.
Table 2
Essential oil yield of Pinus nigra needles
Provenance | Oil yield (%) |
P1 | 0.24j ± 0.01 |
P2 | 0.19k ± 0.01 |
P3 | 0.30 g ±0.02 |
P4 | 0.37f ± 0.01 |
P5 | 0.41e ± 0.03 |
P6 | 0.68a ± 0.05 |
P8 | 0.38f ± 0.01 |
P9 | 0.41e ± 0.02 |
P10 | 0.51c ± 0.05 |
P11 | 0.26i ± 0.04 |
P12 | 0.47d ± 0.08 |
P13 | 0.41e ± 0.01 |
P14 | 0.46d ± 0.03 |
P16 | 0.30 g ±0.01 |
P17 | 0.66b ± 0.02 |
P18 | 0.40e ± 0.01 |
P19 | 0.27h ± 0.02 |
P20 | 0.37f ± 0.01 |
Chemical Composition
The results of identified compounds by GC–MS are shown in Table 3. Twenty-three constituents accounting about 98% of total oil composition were identified.
Table 3
Chemical composition of essential oils from P. nigra
| p 1 | p 2 | p 3 | p 4 | p 5 | p 6 | p 8 | p 9 | p 10 | p 11 | p 12 | p 13 | p 14 | p 16 | p 17 | p 18 | p 19 | p 20 |
α-pinene | - | - | - | - | - | 19.34 | - | - | - | - | 2.16 | 2.12 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Verbenol | 0.40 | 2.17 | 0.81 | - | - | - | 0.66 | - | - | 0.62 | - | - | 0.80 | - | 0.15 | - | 0.03 | - |
Myrcenol | 4.19 | 3.56 | 1.86 | - | 0.80 | - | - | - | - | 1.41 | - | - | 1.60 | 1.05 | - | - | 0.05 | 0.12 |
3-udecyne | 0.23 | 0.77 | 0.88 | - | - | - | 0.98 | - | - | 0.30 | - | - | 0.36 | - | 0.23 | - | - | - |
geranyl acetate | 3.51 | 1.20 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 1.20 | - | - | - | - | 1.13 | - | - | 0.84 | - | - | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.18 |
camphenol acetate | 0.95 | 2.20 | 0.60 | 1.39 | - | - | 0.95 | - | 0.40 | 0.53 | - | - | 1.70 | - | 0.31 | - | 0.07 | 0.11 |
Camphene | 19.95 | 8.40 | 6.70 | 9.17 | 3.25 | - | - | 0.73 | 38.07 | 16.77 | 0.42 | - | 5.08 | 5.61 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 2.06 | 0.43 |
5,9 tetradecane | 0.53 | - | 0.85 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.59 | 0.50 | - | - | - | - | 0.05 | 0.09 |
β-caryophyllene | 13.72 | 4.75 | 1.27 | - | 42.82 | 15.65 | - | 0.80 | 23.28 | 12.89 | 32.16 | 30.29 | 32.93 | 0.79 | - | 1.28 | 51.10 | 0.70 |
Limonene | 1.82 | 1.49 | 0.91 | - | 2.53 | 0.47 | - | - | 1.33 | 1.71 | 2.96 | 1.64 | 2.85 | - | - | 0.12 | 1.40 | 0.21 |
α-caryophyllene | 1.59 | 1.52 | 5.29 | 1.92 | 1.98 | - | 1.79 | 0.64 | - | 1.58 | 8.84 | 9.44 | 1.74 | 1.11 | 1.20 | - | - | 0.57 |
α-amorphene | 6.69 | 7.38 | 0.59 | - | 11.22 | - | - | - | 2.60 | 26.04 | 0.52 | 2.46 | 8.30 | - | - | 3.98 | - | - |
β-phenethyl butyrate | 2.81 | 2.33 | 0.53 | - | 0.89 | 23.17 | - | 0.48 | 8.32 | 5.39 | 2.61 | 0.83 | 4.82 | - | 0.35 | 0.34 | 15.88 | - |
germacrene D | 3.28 | 3.09 | 2.46 | 2.51 | 0.77 | 27.13 | - | 0.76 | 10.89 | 0.41 | 1.08 | 0.86 | 0.44 | 7.11 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 23.75 | 2.46 |
bicyclogermacrene | 0.82 | 3.14 | 5.24 | - | 1.44 | 0.21 | 1.05 | 0.65 | 1.21 | 2.20 | 3.33 | 3.80 | 0.72 | 1.25 | 0.57 | - | 0.12 | 0.09 |
γ-muurolene | 2.92 | 1.36 | 2.07 | 0.98 | 3.82 | 1.92 | - | 0.90 | 2.16 | 4.02 | 1.49 | 1.44 | 2.23 | - | - | 1.53 | 2.08 | 0.43 |
γ-cadinene | 0.29 | 2.28 | 3.85 | - | 0.64 | - | - | 0.94 | - | 1.22 | - | 0.46 | 1.01 | - | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
caryophyllene oxide | 16.10 | 22.86 | 41.53 | 80.54 | 8.14 | 1.22 | 88.51 | 75.11 | 8.33 | 10.33 | 38.71 | 41.85 | 23.75 | 66.49 | 90.05 | 87.74 | 0.99 | 90.85 |
3-decyne | 0.89 | 2.17 | 8.19 | - | 0.52 | 0.29 | 1.74 | 9.72 | 0.37 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.82 | 0.85 | 5.39 | 3.42 | 1.88 | 0.08 | 0.42 |
limonene oxide | 14.21 | 8.14 | 6.88 | - | 4.18 | 0.19 | 0.84 | 1.87 | 0.40 | 7.09 | 0.75 | 0.49 | 4.15 | 5.38 | 0.87 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.23 |
α-cadinol | 2.05 | 5.23 | 2.80 | 0.62 | 13.23 | 8.41 | 1.02 | 2.34 | 0.64 | 1.72 | 0.77 | - | 2.08 | 3.82 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.81 |
farnesene epoxide | 0.59 | 8.13 | 1.34 | - | - | - | - | 1.17 | - | 0.45 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Linalool | 0.45 | 5.83 | 2.97 | - | 0.58 | - | 0.46 | 1.08 | - | 1.06 | 0.43 | - | 0.74 | - | 0.16 | - | - | 0.16 |
Monoterpenes % : | 47,81 | 33,88 | 23,32 | 12,55 | 13,31 | 47,13 | 1,96 | 4,44 | 50,69 | 30,2 | 7,8 | 5,11 | 16,5 | 19,15 | 1,49 | 0,81 | 27,52 | 3,79 |
Sesquiterpenes % : | 44,77 | 56,65 | 63,98 | 84,06 | 83,29 | 27,41 | 92,37 | 82,55 | 38,22 | 60,45 | 85,82 | 89,74 | 72,76 | 73,46 | 92,2 | 94,96 | 54,4 | 93,57 |
The essential oil compositions appeared to be very different in the different provenances. The major essential oil components were especially variable in occurrence and concentration among the different provenances, ranging from almost absent in some samples to more than 90% of the total essential oil composition in others.
There appear to be five basic essential oil chemotypes in P. nigra plants investigated (Fig. 1): (a) caryophllene oxide as the major component (provenances Trenta (22.86%), Les Barres (41.53%), Cosenza (80,54%), Kustendil (88.51%), Alaçam (75.11%), Crimée (41.85%), St Guilhem (38.71%), Cazorla (66.49%), Olette (87.74%), Tavola (90.05%) and Marghese (90.85%), (b) camphene as the major compound (provenances Brouzet-lès-Alès (19.95%) and Cantanzaro (38.07%)), (c) β caryophyllene (provenances Bois Frerot (42.82%), Grancia (32.93%) and les Barres (51.10%)), (d) α amorphene (les Barres (leint) (26.04%)) and (e) Germacrene D (Puget Théniers (27.13%)).
Only the essential oils from Brouzet-lès-Alès (P1), Puget Théniers (P6) and Cantanzaro (P10) provenances were more rich in monoterpenes than sesquitepenes, while the oils from the other provenances (P2, P3, P4, P5, P8, P9, P11, P12, P13, P14, P16, P17, P18, P19 and P20) had more sesquiterpenes than monoterpenes.
The results of principal component analysis showed that β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, linalool, myrcenol and γ-muurolene were the most significant variables for classification of the P. nigra essential oils. These parameters were considerably loaded into the two major principal components (Dim1 and Dim 2) explaining more than 50% of the variance. According to the analysis, five different groups were revealed (Fig. 2). The first group contained P6, P19 and P10 samples which had the main concentrations of β-caryophyllene and the lowest rate of caryophyllene oxide. The second group contained only P12 and P13 samples which showed the highest amount of both β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide. The third group regrouped P1, P5, P11 and P14 which showed the most important amount of γ-muurolene. The fourth group contained P2 and P3 oils characterized by the highest amount of linalool. The fifth group regrouped all the other samples studied which showed the highest rate of caryophyllene oxide.
When considering the variability between the four studied subspecies, statistical results showed that oils from nigra subsp. were the richest in α-pinene. This richness is related to the high amount found in P6 (Puget Théniers) oil (19.34%).
The results of principal component analysis showed the presence of three groups (Fig. 3); the first group regrouped laricio and salzmannii subspecies which showed the highest rate of camphene and limonene, the second group contained pallasiana subsp. which showed the most important amount of caryophyllene oxide and the third one enclosed only nigra subsp representing the highest amount of α-pinene.