This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research Article
Amer Harky
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The optimal timing, surgical technique and the influence of Trisomy 21 on outcome of surgical repair of Complete Atrio-Ventricular Canal Defect (CAVC) remain uncertain. We reviewed our experience in repair of CAVC to identify the influence of these factors on operative outcome.
Methods: A prospective study included 70 patients who underwent repair of CAVC at our institute between July 2016 to October 2019. Primary endpoint was mortality and secondary endpoint was degree of left atrio‐ventricular valve (LAVV) regurgitation.
Results: No significant difference noted between patients operated on, at the first 6 months of age versus later, regarding mortality or LAVV regurgitation. Surgical repair by modified single patch technique showed significant reduction in bypass time (71.13 ± 13.507 min vs 99.19 ± 27.092 min, P value =0.001). Comparison to closure of cleft only, posterior annuloplasty used for repair of LAVV resulted in significant reduction in the occurrence of post-operative valve regurgitation during the early period (LAVV 2+ 43 % vs 7 %, P value=0.03) and at 6 months of follow up (LAVV 2+ 35.4 % vs 0 %, P value=0.01) respectively.
Conclusion: Early intervention, in the first 6 months in patients with CAVC by surgical repair gives comparable acceptable results to later repair; Trisomy 21 was not found to be a risk factor for early intervention. Repair of common AV valve by cleft closure with posterior LAVV annuloplasty showed better results with significant decrease in postoperative LAVV regurgitation and early mortality in comparison to closure of cleft only.
Keywords
Complete Atrioventricular Canal, Down syndrome, Double patch technique, Modified Single patch, Posterior annuloplasty
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 30 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Pediatrics
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research Article
Amer Harky
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 30 Apr, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Pediatrics
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The optimal timing, surgical technique and the influence of Trisomy 21 on outcome of surgical repair of Complete Atrio-Ventricular Canal Defect (CAVC) remain uncertain. We reviewed our experience in repair of CAVC to identify the influence of these factors on operative outcome.
Methods: A prospective study included 70 patients who underwent repair of CAVC at our institute between July 2016 to October 2019. Primary endpoint was mortality and secondary endpoint was degree of left atrio‐ventricular valve (LAVV) regurgitation.
Results: No significant difference noted between patients operated on, at the first 6 months of age versus later, regarding mortality or LAVV regurgitation. Surgical repair by modified single patch technique showed significant reduction in bypass time (71.13 ± 13.507 min vs 99.19 ± 27.092 min, P value =0.001). Comparison to closure of cleft only, posterior annuloplasty used for repair of LAVV resulted in significant reduction in the occurrence of post-operative valve regurgitation during the early period (LAVV 2+ 43 % vs 7 %, P value=0.03) and at 6 months of follow up (LAVV 2+ 35.4 % vs 0 %, P value=0.01) respectively.
Conclusion: Early intervention, in the first 6 months in patients with CAVC by surgical repair gives comparable acceptable results to later repair; Trisomy 21 was not found to be a risk factor for early intervention. Repair of common AV valve by cleft closure with posterior LAVV annuloplasty showed better results with significant decrease in postoperative LAVV regurgitation and early mortality in comparison to closure of cleft only.
Loading...