While inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was initially believed to affect individuals of European ancestry primarily, there has been a significant shift in the epidemiological landscape, with an increasing prevalence observed among individuals in Latin America as well as the Latino population in the United States. In Latin America, IBD is currently in an accelerating stage, marked by rising incidence and prevalence rates.27 Meanwhile, the reported prevalence of IBD among Latin communities in the United States is approximately 383 per 100,000 person-year.28,29
Latin American populations differ from Caucasian populations as they are the result of genetic admixture among ancestral populations from Europe, Native Americans, and Africa.30 Each Latin American population presents a unique pattern of these three ancestral groups, contributing to their distinct genetic makeup. Mixing genetic backgrounds from multiple continents has led to a rich diversity within Latin American populations. This diversity is reflected in the wide range of genetic variations and phenotypic characteristics observed across Latin American countries and regions.30 Therefore, assessing how variations in ancestry may impact the phenotype of IBD across populations can reveal differences that could facilitate the implementation of personalized medicine approaches. In our cohort, the predominant subtype of IBD was UC, accounting for 74% of cases, which is similar to previously reported rates in Latin America. 31 The average age of onset was 36 years, and approximately 36% of patients reported extraintestinal manifestations, like in previous studies in Latin America. 28,32,33 When looking at the extension of the disease, it was found that pancolitis was the most common in UC patients (55%), which aligns with findings from other Latin American studies.32 Nevertheless, there is variation in the prevalence of UC extension across different regions in Latin America. In Puerto Rico, distal proctitis (Montreal classification E1) was found to be as high as 55.3%.34 Meanwhile, in Peru, the extent of left-sided colitis (Montreal classification E2) varied between 11.1% and 62.9% in different studies.35,36 As for extensive colitis (Montreal classification E3), one Brazilian study reported a prevalence of 12%.37 However, in Argentina, the prevalence of extensive colitis was reported to be as high as 77%.38In CD patients, colonic extension was the most prevalent disease localization (51%). In comparison, only 16% showed isolated ileal involvement. This differs from other IBD studies where Latin-American CD patients mainly developed ileocolonic disease.28,32 Another difference observed was the rate of upper gastrointestinal involvement, which was found in 9% of the population, twice the rate reported in other Latin American IBD studies.32 Previous studies have shown that African American or Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with CD tend to have a more extensive distribution of intestinal inflammation compared to White-non-Hispanic patients. Specifically, higher proportions of White-non-Hispanic patients were found to have isolated ileal disease when directly compared to African American, Hispanic, or Asian patients with CD in studies that examined disease location among different ancestries.39 Furthermore, the perianal CD was present in 43% of Crohn’s patients, higher than the 16.7% reported in other Latin American studies. 32 Interestingly, in Latin America, the perianal compromise varies from 12% in Brazil to 53% in Peru.40,41 Despite these differences, the inflammatory behavior in CD was the most prevalent, which is consistent with observations in other Latin American IBD populations. 28,32 Overall, our findings demonstrate both similarities and differences in the characteristics of IBD in our cohort compared to previous studies conducted in Latin America.
On average, Chileans are 42% Amerindian and 53% European (disaggregated into 25% Mapuche and 18% Aymara).42 The ancestry distribution in our IBD Chilean cohort was 58% European, 39% Amerindian, and 3% African. In our previous work, we discovered a significant association between a high Mapuche ancestry proportion and the risk of IBD.43 However, we did not observe risk differences according to Amerindian ancestry proportion in this cohort. In this study, we utilized a native American ancestry proportion derived from a reference panel that included a broader Latin population rather than specifically focusing on the Mapuche population, which could explain these differences. The proportion of native American ancestry in Chile represents a combination of various native American groups, including the Mapuche and Aymara populations.44 Therefore, the observed differences in this study may be attributed to including multiple Native American groups in the analysis rather than solely focusing on the Mapuche population. Considering this issue, we estimated the ancestry proportions for Mapuches and Aymara by utilizing the K = 4 clustering results, which included European, Aymara, Mapuche, and African groups, as opposed to the K = 3 clustering that only included European, Amerindian, and African groups. However, no significant differences in IBD risk were observed (Supplementary Table 4). Another potential explanation could be attributed to the utilization of a larger and different control group in our previous study (3,147 individuals of Chilean descent from a gallbladder cancer study). Hence, further investigation with a larger sample size is warranted to definitively explore the potential influence of ancestry on IBD risk.43,45 Thus, further investigation with a larger sample size to definitively explore the potential.
We made some notable observations when exploring the relationship between ancestry and clinical outcomes in UC. Firstly, we found a higher median Amerindian ancestry in the group of patients diagnosed before age 40, suggesting a potential association between ancestry and early-onset UC. On the other hand, patients who achieved prolonged clinical and endoscopic remission had a lower median Amerindian ancestry, indicating a possible negative correlation between Amerindian ancestry and UC sustained remission.
Furthermore, interesting findings emerged among UC patients who underwent pouch surgery. Approximately 70% of these patients had HAAP. Similarly, 57% of UC patients who required surgery exhibited HAAP. These findings may suggest an association between a high Amerindian ancestry and a more severe phenotype in UC. Conversely, a lower median proportion of Amerindian ancestry was observed in CD patients with perianal disease. Furthermore, among CD patients who required surgery, a significant majority (94%) had a lower Amerindian ancestry. These contrasting observations suggest that the influence of Amerindian ancestry on disease severity and surgical outcomes may differ between UC and CD patients. While a higher Amerindian ancestry appears to be associated with a more severe phenotype in UC, a lower Amerindian ancestry may be linked to perianal disease and the need for surgery in CD patients. The observed differences in the association between Amerindian ancestry and disease characteristics in UC and CD patients could be attributed to various factors, including genetic, environmental, and immunological influences. Maybe certain genetic variants or alleles associated with Amerindian ancestry contribute to an increased risk or severity of UC or are protective for CD in these patients. Additionally, environmental factors prevalent in populations with higher Amerindian ancestry may play a role in exacerbating disease severity. It is important to note that these associations between ancestry and disease characteristics are complex and multifactorial. Genetic and environmental factors interact in intricate ways, and additional research is needed to understand further the underlying mechanisms driving these differences.
When analyzing the IBD group, it is important to consider the divergent effects of ancestry on UC and CD. Interestingly, like the observations in UC, we found a higher median Amerindian ancestry in the subgroup of patients diagnosed younger than 40. In contrast, a lower median Amerindian ancestry was associated with prolonged clinical and endoscopy remission. However, it is worth noting that these results should be interpreted in the context of the sample size discrepancy between UC and Crohn’s disease, with the UC cohort being almost 3 times larger. Apart from the genetic variability linked to the general risk of developing IBD, there has been significant attention given to exploring the relationship between genetic variants and specific subtypes or characteristics of IBD, such as prolonged clinical and endoscopy remission. Tables 9 and 10.
Among the SNPs associated with prolonged clinical and endoscopy remission, the reference genotype was found to be the most prevalent for the following SNPs: rs6568421 (58% with 18 out of 31 individuals), rs11150589 (39% with 12 out of 31 individuals), rs6837335 (48% with 15 out of 31 individuals), and rs4656958 (45% with 14 out of 31 individuals). These findings potentially suggest a higher likelihood of a favorable disease course associated with the reference genotype for these SNPs.
The rs6568421 represents the most significant associated SNP at 6q21 (PRDM1) in the scan of the second GWAS meta-analysis on CD.46 PRDM1 encodes PR domain containing 1, also known as B-lymphocyte-induced maturation protein (Blimp-1). It is a zinc finger-containing transcriptional repressor, now known to be a master regulator of terminal B and T cell differentiation.47 In mice, the conditional deletion of PRDM1 specifically in T cells has been linked to an increase in the number of activated effector CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, hyperproliferation, elevated production of inflammatory cytokines, and the development of spontaneous colitis. This suggests a role for PRDM1 in regulating T cell function and preventing colitis in mice. Similarly, in human intestinal mucosa, PRDM1 expression was mainly observed in T cells and plasma cells, supporting the potential relevance of PRDM1 in human immune responses in the gut.48–50
In a Swiss cohort study, the SNP rs11150589, located on the ITGAL gene locus, showed significant implications for inflammatory disease progression. CD patients with this SNP exhibited a protective effect against transitioning from an inflammatory stage to a structuring or penetrating stage. However, it is essential to note that individuals carrying this SNP had a higher risk of developing fistulas in the presence of stenosis.51 In our CD cohort, consisting of 25/75 patients with a penetrating phenotype, 14 had the reference genotype, 10 were heterozygous, and only 1 had the risk genotype.
Functional analysis of genes derived from SNPs associated with IBD and HAAP revealed a significant association with cytokine and immune receptor activity, particularly the IL-6 response and the oncostatin M (OSM) complex. Increased levels of OSM and OSMR have been observed in the inflamed intestine of IBD patients, correlating positively with disease severity. OSM, a member of the IL-6 cytokine family, can activate multiple signaling pathways, including JAK-STAT, PI3K-Akt, and MAPK cascades. Importantly, OSM has been implicated in the failure of anti-TNF treatment.52 Further studies are required to evaluate the role of these pathways specifically about Amerindian ancestry proportion.
Interestingly, we made an intriguing observation during the development of classifiers for predicting clinical and endoscopy remission over the past five years. At least one outcome associated with a severe disease course emerged as the primary distinguishing feature. These outcomes encompassed surgery, failure of anti-TNFα treatment, pouch, or flares within the last five years. None of the SNPs exhibited an importance level exceeding 5% in these models. Our findings suggest that clinical features play a more significant role in predicting these outcomes within our population. These results motivate us to expand our sample size and plan for future whole-genome sequencing to identify new genetic variants that may be relevant to our population.
A limitation of our study is the relatively small size of the dataset. Due to this constraint, we focused on established genetic associations to address a specific query regarding the potential risk associated with previously identified variants in the phenotype of these IBD individuals.