Authentic Leadership Education: An empirical discussion from Pakistani higher education

The authentic style encourages leaders to be mindful of their strengths, weaknesses, and emotions, using practical methods for improving their leadership abilities. Identifying an authentic leader is a description of those who have positive beliefs, lead from the heart, set the highest standards of ethics and morality, and go beyond their interests for their followers' well-being. It is critical to understand where one stands on important moral and professional issues to become an authentic leader and then act on that knowledge. Authentic leaders, although specic characteristics, such as positive psychology, self-awareness, morals and ethics, and a person, transparency, and balanced processing; this study explores authentic leadership strengths and weakness empirically. The link between theory and practice applied settings and helps practitioners add value to professional growth has been discussed. The study also shed light on the importance of workforce development action plans, but the ties outlined herein show that casual relations and additional tests would help conrm the connections.

authenticity, ethics, and moral conduct rather than as a panacea for corruption and greed. The principle has also been described as having direct relevance in the workplace's professional development of leaders. The more leaders are seen as authentic, the more workers recognize and feel mentally motivated, more involved, and more citizen-rated behavior (Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber, 2009;Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2008;Walumbwa, Hartnell, & Oke, 2010).

Literature Review
There is currently no thorough de nition of what leadership is, nor is there consensus among theorists about what constitutes a successful or effective leader, and many theories have been produced to this quest. These theoretical distinctions suggested leadership style and commonalities that indicate the need to analyze each approach more closely. Mumford, Zaccaro, Harding, Jacobs, and Fleishman (2000) noted as many as 65 classi cations or schemes to identify and establish leadership in the eld of leadership over the last 60 years. Leadership encompasses the individual and the followers, colleagues, subordinates, community, and culture (Avolio et al., 2009). Transformational leadership was the subject of one-third of the study, establishing it as a norm in leadership studies (Lowe & Gardner, 2000). It has been one of the most successful methods in the last two decades since it meets the needs of employers who want to motivate and encourage their workers to succeed in challenging times. When a leader encourages followers to share a vision and equips them with the tools they need to reach their full potential, this is known as transformational leadership (Bass & Avolio, 1994a, 1994bBass & Riggio, 2006). According to this theory, leaders raise followers' ambitions and stimulate their higher-order ideals (e.g., altruism), causing them to connect with the leader and his or her vision, feel better about their job, and therefore perform above and beyond basic transactions and base expectations (Avolio et al., 2009). Authentic leadership is a more modern, early-stage leadership theory holding a process of leadership that draws on both positive psychological capacities and a well-developed organizational background, even though there is no rm consensus on its meaning (Wang et al., 2014). If leaders are genuine, they will have greater self-awareness and self-regulated positive behaviors on both leaders and followers, which will result in positive self-growth Leroy et al., 2015).
Authentic leadership theory arose when companies were searching for someone to mentor and encourage their employees. Authentic leaders were found to have a profound impact on employee attitudes and actions, which would be highly bene cial to the company Avolio et al., 2009;Banks et al., 2016;Emuwa, 2013;Gardner, Avolio, Luthans, et al., 2005;. Due to the changing economic, geopolitical, and technological changes that leaders need to adapt, make them transparent and understand their principles, and lead organizations with an ethical perspective, the importance of authentic leadership extend across multiple areas. As a result, the subject of authentic leadership is creating more interest in the leadership literature, as well as providing practical value to practitioners (Banks et al., 2016;George, 2003b;Laschinger et al., 2013;Lee, Cho, Baek, Pillai, & Oh, 2019;Leroy et al., 2015;Leroy et al., 2012;Mira & Odeh, 2019;Nasab & Afshari, 2019;Opatokun, Hasim, & Hassan, 2013).
Authentic leadership is described in various ways, but all of them have in common that leaders are depicted as having self-awareness and a personal point of view that represents consistency regarding their beliefs and convictions (Luthans & Avolio, 2003b). Authentic leaders are deeply committed to their position as leaders and operate based on their strong beliefs and convictions (Shamir & Eilam, 2005). Avolio, Gardner, and Walumbwa (2007) establish a theory-based measure of authentic leadership that includes self-awareness, expressing oneself through transparency, objectivity through morals and ethics, and self-regulation through balanced processing for the leader. Since then, research using Authentic Leadership has found links between authentic leadership and critical work-related attitudes and behaviors (e.g., followers' organizational citizenship actions, engagement, happiness, and performance) that are close to those found for transformational leadership. This study undertakes the authentic leadership quest testing in pakistani higher education setting knowing the signi cance of Authentic leadership becoming phenomena of professionally successful, morally sound, and intentionally re ective education practices (Begley, 2006;Begley, 2007;Begley & Stefkovich, 2007). This leadership style entails a sincere approach to leadership and a positive, accessible, imaginative, and inventive response to social situations; this study implies the concept in Pakistan's higher education sector, which is in its early stages.

Psychology of authenticity (individual and leadership perspective)
Authenticity describes an individual who lives according to his true self, personal beliefs instead of external demands of society, such as social norms, relationships, and duties (Wood, Linley, Maltby, Baliousis, & Joseph, 2008). The integrity of the individual is dependent upon nding an authentic faith and therefore being true to himself and herself. That the moral compromises inherent in bourgeois and theological ideologies put a person's integrity in jeopardy if he or she wishes to live a natural, selfdetermined life. Ethically and existentially, people are being called to live authentic lives, both in their personal lives and professional lives (Holt, 2012). It entails resisting external forces and choosing a direction that the individual's inner conscience will protect. Being true to oneself and nding means acting in ways representing an authentic individual refers to authentic leadership that helps them create a lasting value (George, 2003b). In other words, it is like presenting just one aspect to others, authenticity articulating the entire self to say, to be honest, one must rst understand their true self, which necessitates self-awareness, mindfulness, and acceptance of oneself. Duignan and Bhindi (1997) noted that The aspiration for the "authentic self" is strongly depicted in the classical debate and contended that for authentic leadership, "authentic relationships" are not only desirable, but also essential. A nity of perceptions offers a framework in which to comprehend one's position in the "bigger picture." It helps to construct the "synthetic self" in an interlinked and interdependent context for meaningful interaction. Block (1993) suggested a leadership that informs authentic leadership helps in searching for an alternative to traditional leadership approaches with a critical examination of the principles and assumptions that underpin conventional leadership: power, direction, and supremacy. The leadership stewardess (care through building environment) as an alternative connects in con dence for another where leaders are accountable for using their in uence to expand the organization's and individual's overall interest (Duignan & Bhindi, 1997). Authenticity becomes a product of relationships and interrelationships, not just a characteristic of the leader. The quality of relationships has a signi cant impact on all else that occurs in organizations, including leadership quality. Many studies have recognized the importance of trusting and caring relationships in the creation of a community or environment (Bird, Wang, Watson, & Murray, 2012) in which values such as honesty, integrity, fairness, commitment, justice, equality, independence, and autonomy are internalized and expressed through daily practices and procedures (Bird, Wang, Watson, & Murray, 2009;Case & Smith, 2013;Craig & Gustafson, 1998;De Cremer, van Dijke, & Bos, 2006;Leroy et al., 2012;Liggans et al., 2019;Xiong, Lin, Li, & Wang, 2016). Authentic leadership connects authentic self, relationships, learning, governance and organization assumptions, views, and behavior, employing signi cant human values ethically and morally enhancing leadership and management practices.
The above literature helps us concluding that authentic leadership is an inner self-process that is bene cial for individuals and organizations.
Authentic leadership and commitment Hodgkinson (1991, p. 130) argues that his argument's central purpose that the ethical imperative of raising the personal consciousness of value-to advancing authenticity among administrators. He describes authenticity as being faithful to one's own set of beliefs then, become the submission of whatever morality resides within an individual. He claims that increased self-awareness is healthy and that it will contribute to the correct behavior. The wealth of Self-awareness implies and includes selfcritique of values, in which a leader must lead helping an active quest for individual worth. The leadership's legitimacy derives primarily from the consistency of personal devotion to a unique collection of values and then from the relationship of these values to followership through communication and interaction with others.
Therefore, the leader's relationship with the led must be authentic for all time (p, 133). Consistent leadership behaviors enable followers' inner motivation to build mutual trust (leader and follower). Under close supervision, followers are actively involved in productive group activities, showing self-drives towards job satisfaction (Allen & Meyer, 2000). The inner peace of followers and increased productivity with workgroups resiliently drive in a dynamic leadership role . It happens for leadership behavioral integrity and alignment between action and words to motivate followers-practical activities of authentic leaders and faithful self-appeal trigger followers' motivation (Simons, 2002).
Leaders' behavioral integrity has several outcomes in organizational studies, like practicing ethics and morality at the workplace. These factors are essential to align followers' perceived motivation to a leaders' vision. Leaders often talk about their character and idea to workplace ethics, self, and others' moral conduct. Leaders' words (speeches and formal communication) help followers understand the line of action required to follow, and leaders who are practicing morality, having higher self-ethics, and selfawareness drive followers' motivation to pursue their vision. A self-aware individual in a leadership position promotes value-based culture to practice at the workplace. Consistent and transparent moral values for self-and-others help build and inculcate cultures of higher ethical standards in a practical way. Leaders' balanced processing boosts followers' trust and behavioral alignments to accept diverse roles at work, meeting management expectations, creating values at the workplace, and moral cling to ful ll their promises. Leadership consistent ethical behavior can positively in uence their follower's psychology to transform their loyalties and feel "like home" at the workplace to increase productivity and reduce turnover intentions (Lee et al., 2019). Authentic leadership predictors, i.e., self-awareness, transparency, balanced processing, and moral ethics, stand for "knowing one-self in a better way" who can make the right decision at the right time and in the right direction for self and others. While communicating their vision, authentic leaders are still true to themselves and avoid activities that can mislead, which eventually enhances gaining followers' trust. Hence, leadership behavioral integrity induces followers decreased turnover intentions (Leroy et al., 2012;Xiong et al., 2016).
The above literature helps in determining that authentic leadership positively in uences followers to produce commitment.

Authentic Leadership and Performance
Bill George (2003) highlighted the importance of moral behavioral practices (authentic leadership essentials) to develop organizational leaders' con dence. The behavioral integrity of employees and leaders has of critical signi cance in corporate life to achieve goals. It drives the follower's motivation to achieve expectations about performance outcomes. Unfortunately, in many organizations, reality, authenticity, and spiritual experiences are the exception rather than the rule (Duignan & Bhindi, 1997).
Many people assume that the way to success must be cloaked in lies, if not outright deceit (Alon & Higgins, 2005;Buchanan & Fitzgerald, 2007). Some executives hide behind a mask of sincerity and a veneer of respectability, seldom exposing their true selves (Avolio, Gardner, Walumbwa, Luthans, & May, 2004). Some people have become so used to dramatic success that they cannot remember their true selves (Duignan & Bhindi, 1997).
It is critical to understand where one stands on important moral and professional issues to become an authentic leader and then act on that knowledge. Leaders' behavioral integrity must gain trust to accomplish a follower's performance so that comfort for being open in communication to share concerns between performance expectations and setting actual targets can amply establish. How can anyone expect to guide others toward a "vision" if they aren't sure where they stand on essential educational and moral issues? The term "morality" is used in this context to refer to the conduct of human affairs, not to any particular religious concept. Authentic leadership is a style of leadership that focuses on establishing a leader's credibility through open and truthful relationships with followers that respect their input and are founded on moral principles. Generally, authentic leaders are optimistic individuals with accurate selfconcepts that advocate transparency. Authentic leaders can increase individual and team success by building con dence and attracting enthusiastic support from their subordinates. Many leaders and leadership coaches have entirely adopted this strategy, seeing authentic leadership as a viable alternative to leaders who prioritize pro ts and stock price over people and ethics (Bannister, 1986;Bass, 1985;Buil, Martínez, & Matute, 2019;Chen, Kirkman, Kanfer, Allen, & Rosen, 2007). Authentic leadership is an increasing eld of academic leadership research that has recently evolved from obscurity to the beginnings of a fully mature de nition (Gardner, Cogliser, Davis, & Dickens, 2011;Sagnak, Ada, Kazancoglu, & Tayaksi, 2017) Leroy et al. (2012) found that leaders' integrity drives followers' speci c performance through trust in leaders. Leaders and individuals practicing balanced processing, morals, and ethics can set up social systems in organizations causing satisfaction among workers. Self-awareness helps through balanced processing in recognizing the need of developing an organizational culture for setting collective vision, behaviors, and morality for the common good, which supports understanding the strengths and weakness of themselves and others to in uence positively (Avolio, 2005;Walumbwa et al., 2008).
Transparency and morality increase followers' trust in leadership decision-making abilities to keep the balance between social groups and maintain sustainable culture to cope with the pressure of performance improvements Shamir & Eilam, 2005;Walumbwa et al., 2008).
The above's literature lines concluded that authentic leadership positively in uences followers' productivity or performance.
In the line of the above literature guide, the following framework has been reached for this study.

Materials And Methods
Sample, procedure, and method A Likert scale self-administered survey questionnaire was designed and circulated among public and private sector university employees in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Overall, 400 printed questionnaires oated randomly for convenience and quick data gathering, out of which 323 valid questionnaires were returned and selected for empirical testing and computational methods in SPSS (Blinded for review 4). Participants average age reported 40 years old (SD = 2.44) while 70 percent of the male. The average experience of selected respondents correctly was 9.75 years (SD= 0.74). Items randomly numbered, and anonymity of the respondents' personal information kept intact despite few demographic variables such as gender, age, organization type, job, and education level (Neuman, 2007;Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003). Participants receive the survey questionnaire to measure authentic leadership (15 items) containing self-awareness, balanced-processing, transparency, and moral/ethics developed by Walumbwa, Avolio, Gardner, Wernsing, & Peterson, 2007) & productivity and commitment (Fry & Matherly, 2006). The individuals reported frequency recorded by a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Table 1 through determining information about validity and reliability of the construct, i.e., Cronbach alpha, AVE (average variance extracted) convergent and discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981) popular in contemporary research (data reference blinded for review). The Cronbach alpha of authentic leadership (x) measure X 1 ) Balanced Processing (.863), X 2 ) Moral Ethics (.821) X 3 ) Self-awareness (.776) and X 4 ) Transparency (.856), Y 1 Commitment (.897), Y 2 Performance (.908). All values are above >.70 comes under an acceptable range of valid constructs (Ferdinand, 2006;Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2016). The average variance extracted is also above.50, which is within the required range (.40 to.70) (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2014). Discriminant validity also explains all sub-constructs validity of items representing construction (AL) for better understanding (Hair, Black, Babin, & Anderson, 2010). The discriminant validity threshold irrespective of negative or positive value and values in table 1 results meet criteria suggested 0.85 (Kline, 2011), which can be up to.90 (Gold, Malhotra, & Segars, 2001).  Figure 3 explains the total effect of authentic leadership construct by combining four sub-components to determine total effects, outer weight/loading of the model, highlighting the model's absolute values. Path authentic leadership à commitment .465 à Performance .686 showing the stronger predicted value of performance overcommitment. Henceforth, Table 3 including mean, t statistics, and p-value to determine the hypothesis. We conducted the con rmatory factor analysis (CFA) (Hu & Bentler, 1999) cutoff-criteria AMOS V 24 plugin developed by (Gaskin & Lim, 2018) to determine the model ts. The model t index for the model authentic leadership four sub-constructs, Self-awareness, Balanced processing, Moral/Ethics and Transparency, Commitment and Performance showed a good t: CFI = 1; P Close = 0.509; RMSEA = 0.000; SRMR = 0.008 ( see Table 2).  Table 3 explains the signi cance level of authentic leadership predictor and its constructs with performance and commitment. P-value and T-statistics outputs explain measurement model structural path signi cance and outer-loadings probability accurate values (Efron & Tibshirani, 1998 (Ribeiro, Duarte, Filipe, & Torres de Oliveira, 2019;Semedo, Coelho, & Ribeiro, 2016;Xiong et al., 2016).

Results And Discussions
The path coe cient t-values of performance were noted higher than the commitment; we assessed AL sub-constructs path coe cients separately to investigate reasons. It revealed that all subcomponents of the AL do not have positive and signi cant effects on outcome variables. General discussions and future directions Authentic leadership developments are essential and necessary for academic settings (Begley & Stefkovich, 2007) for practically learning about ethics (Opatokun et al., 2013) and causing enhanced motivations among staff (Ahmad et al., 2015). Opatokun et al. (2013) hypothesized AL attributes separately to test in academic settings replicated in the current study. Results of authentic leadership, a predictor of perceived commitment and performance of the employee in organizational settings, found consistent with the past several studies (Darvish & Rezaei, 2011;Emuwa, 2013;Mira & Odeh, 2019;Nasab & Afshari, 2019;Ribeiro, Gomes, & Kurian, 2018;Wang et al., 2014). However, a more substantial effect of performance and weaker commitment predictability has been reported as a critical nding of this study. The study has demographical limitations such as gender, age, experience, and sample size, because which results are not generalizable. Keeping public and private sectors intact as a target population in current research; however, future research may conduct separately and augmented control variables.
Getting awareness of one's thoughts can convert into a more vital ability to create an environment. In brief, today, higher education needs employees who can exemplify and implement Authentic action that builds and supports the organization's ethical climate. Analysis reveals that these leaders are present in Pakistani higher education settings. We expect that our result would add to the existing knowledge and Information on Authentic Leadership Development related to the educational workplace. It may help plan a growth strategy, allowing the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan to set up a leadership structure that would become a national academic employee development tool.

Conclusion And Recommendations
Authentic leaders are not a new phenomenon, but they are now more critical than ever in leading with dignity, fairness, ethical and moral conduct. Leaders are needed who are authentic to themselves and, therefore, capable of being faithful to others. The theory was also viewed as the direct implementation of leaders in the workplace's professional development. The study shows two aspects of authentic leadership 1) and con rms that authentic leadership is a positive and signi cant predictor of commitment and performance. While it has a comparatively weaker association than performance, i.e., authentic leadership combines effects (a composite average variable including self-awareness, balanced processing, transparency, and moral/ethics) 2) each AL predictor as a separate measure to determine effect over organizational outcomes commitment and performance. Findings support AL theory of moral reasonings showing authentic leadership predicts both outcomes positively and signi cantly. We can view the other aspect of critical life experiences or signi cant events of individuals that stimulates life changes from each predictor's different results. Self-awareness and morals/Ethics of a person do not help achieve commitment, while self-awareness also has an insigni cant relationship with performance. There is a need for indigenous theories that either can produce alternative views or align new meanings with the existing approach to nd a sense of self-awareness. Lack of empirical evidence in the current context generates recent phenomena to investigate and understand new assumptions by which individual life events might have molded their psychology to unknown paths. Self-awareness theory assumes that as we pay attention to ourselves, we measure ourselves by our beliefs by introspection or some other means. In line with its association with authentic leadership, self-awareness of one's leadership has various attitudinal and cognitive outcomes, including self-change without concern for expected results, i.e., commitment and performance. Individuals strong in self-awareness appear to be conscious of their emotions, behaviors, and motivations. There is a signi cant connection between selfawareness and the philosophy of mind, and both abilities tend strongly associated with self-deception as Internal self-awareness requires self-monitoring and understanding one's emotional condition. A change in self-awareness would contribute to a rise in successful deceit for personal gains only.

Practical and social implications
The link between theory and practice is essential in applied settings and helps practitioners add value to professional growth programs. Practitioners also recognize the importance of workforce development action plans, but the ties outlined herein show that casual relations and additional tests would help con rm the connections. The literature should be undertaken as a follow-up to this study to quantitatively quantify and aggregate the research centered on the research issue on behavioral integration theories of leadership. Theoretical and professional growth is bene cial in development environments where leaders and followers are willing to re ect and analyze themselves individually and to know which factor is helping in strengthening the theory and which not. A deeper understanding may be built by understanding how human integration theories approach the modern age or different demographic settings. Authentic leadership was not offered as a universal remedy for dishonesty and materialism but as a model of positive leadership emphasizing dignity, fairness, ethical and moral conduct. But in the 21st century, where things are changing drastically, it can be dealing with mistrust and gossip to productivity growth and lower inner appeal to commitment in the corporate world. Focusing on leadership, especially authenticity in leadership, can help organizations achieve a positive long-term outcome; knowing why morals and ethics and self-awareness are not helping increase either commitment or productivity and may help to understand psychological shifts of self-awareness individual authenticity. Standardized Regression weight for model t