1. Basic Information
A total of 696 medical workers were included in the statistical analysis. Among them, 136 (19.6%) were male, and 559 (80.4%) were female. The age range was 24-89 years, with a mean age of 46.88 ± 15.31 years.
2. Detection Rate of Different Types of Dyslipidemia and Distribution in Different Age Groups
The total detection rate of dyslipidemia among medical workers was 37.5%, with 8.3% detected with hypercholesterolemia, 21% with hypertriglyceridemia, 4% with mixed dyslipidemia, and 8.6% with low HDL-C. The detection rates of total dyslipidemia in males and females were 57.7% and 32.6%, respectively, with statistically significant differences. The detection rates of high TG and low HDL-C in males were significantly higher than those in females, while the detection rates of high TC and mixed dyslipidemia in females were higher than those in males, but the differences were not statistically significant. The detection rates of dyslipidemia stratified by age groups were 5.7%, 37.2%, 11.9%, 16.1%, and 29.1% in the age groups of less than 30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, and 61 years and older, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the detection rate of dyslipidemia between age groups (χ² = 15.451, p = 0.004) (Table 1 and Table 2).
3. Comparison of Body Composition Between Normolipidemic and Dyslipidemic Groups
The dyslipidemic group had significantly higher values (p < 0.05) than the normolipidemic group in terms of BMI, body fat percentage, muscle mass, skeletal muscle mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, visceral fat area, and body water, protein(Table 3).
4. Correlation of Lipid Levels with Body Composition Indicators
Serum total cholesterol (TC) was positively correlated with BMI, body fat percentage, waist-to-hip ratio, and visceral fat area (all p < 0.05); Triglycerides (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were positively correlated with BMI, body fat percentage, protein, skeletal muscle mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, visceral fat area, and body water (all p < 0.05); High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was negatively correlated with BMI, protein, skeletal muscle mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, visceral fat area, and body water (p < 0.05). (Table 4).
5. Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Dyslipidemia
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age (OR=1.020, 95%CI 1.008~1.032, p=0.001), waist-to-hip ratio (OR=1.131,95%CI1.050~1.219, p=0.001) had statistically significant effects on dyslipidemia.(Table 5).
6. ROC Curve Analysis of Lipids
The Waist-to-Hip Ratio and age have respective ROC AUCs of 0.675 and 0.581 for diagnosing blood lipid abnormalities, with p-values less than 0.05. Refer to Table 6 and Figure 2 for details, all with a p-value of less than 0.05.
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study
Figure 2 The ROC curves for diagnosing blood lipid abnormalities using age and waist-to-hip ratio
Table 1 The detection rate of various types of dyslipidemia
Gender
|
Hypercholesterolemia
|
Hypertriglyceridemia
|
Mixed Hyperlipidemia
|
Hypoalphalipoproteinemia
|
Total Dyslipidemiaa
|
Male
|
8 (5.8)
|
49 (35.8)∗
|
4 (2.9)
|
28 (20.4)∗
|
79 (57.7)∗
|
Females
|
50 (8.9)
|
97 (17.4)
|
24 (4.3)
|
32 (5.7)
|
182 (32.6)
|
Total
|
58 (8.3)
|
146 (21.0)
|
28 (4.0)
|
60 (8.6)
|
261 (37.5)
|
*: p < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference in the detection rates of hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, and total
dyslipidemia between genders.
Table 2 Detection of Dyslipidemia in Different Age Groups
Age (years)
|
n
|
Normal Blood Lipids
|
Dyslipidemia
|
Detection Rate of Dyslipidemia (%)
|
Chi-Square (χ²)
|
p
|
≤30 years
|
44
|
29
|
15
|
5.7
|
15.451
|
0.004
|
31-40 years
|
311
|
214
|
97
|
37.2
|
41-50 years
|
87
|
56
|
31
|
11.9
|
51-60 years
|
99
|
57
|
42
|
16.1
|
≥ 61 years
|
155
|
79
|
76
|
29.1
|
Total
|
696
|
435
|
261
|
37.5
|
Table 3 Comparison of Body Composition Between Normolipidemic and Dyslipidemic Groups [Median (P25, P75), Mean ± SD]
Normal
|
Normal Lipid Group
(n = 435)
|
Dyslipidemia Group
(n = 261)
|
Z/T Value
|
p-Value
|
BMI
|
22.40 (20.70,24.10)
|
24.50 (22.60,26.50)
|
-8.89
|
0.000
|
Body Fat Percentage
|
29.88±6.00
|
31.20±5.53
|
2.88
|
0.004
|
Muscle Mass
|
38.20 (35.30,41.70)
|
41.20 (37.15,48.50)
|
-6.70
|
0.000
|
Skeletal Muscle Mass Index
|
6.33 (5.94, 6.84)
|
6.79 (6.21, 7.67)
|
-7.13
|
0.000
|
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
|
0.87 (0.83,0.90)
|
0.90 (0.86,0.93)
|
-7.76
|
0.000
|
Visceral Fat Area
|
75.10 (60.80, 88.30)
|
88.10 (73.80, 100.05)
|
-7.29
|
0.000
|
Body Water
|
29.70 (27.50, 32.50)
|
32.10 (29.00, 37.75)
|
-6.67
|
0.000
|
Protein
|
7.90(7.30,8.60)
|
8.50(7.70,10.00)
|
-6.55
|
0.000
|
Table 4 Correlation Analysis Between Body Composition and Lipid Levels
Variable
|
TC
|
|
TG
|
|
HDL
|
|
LDL
|
r
|
p-Value
|
|
r
|
p-Value
|
|
r
|
p-Value
|
|
r
|
p-Value
|
BMI
|
0.115
|
0.002
|
|
0.379
|
0.000
|
|
-0.294
|
0.000
|
|
0.209
|
0.000
|
Body Fat Percentage
|
0.131
|
0.001
|
|
0.192
|
0.000
|
|
-0.020
|
0.591
|
|
0.163
|
0.000
|
Protein
|
0.011
|
0.656
|
|
0.143
|
0.000
|
|
-0.184
|
0.000
|
|
0.0067
|
0.009
|
Skeletal Muscle Mass Index
|
0.008
|
0.843
|
|
0.238
|
0.000
|
|
-0.310
|
0.000
|
|
0.104
|
0.006
|
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
|
0.107
|
0.005
|
|
0.394
|
0.000
|
|
-0.270
|
0.000
|
|
0.188
|
0.000
|
Visceral Fat Area
|
0.128
|
0.001
|
|
0.353
|
0.000
|
|
-0.204
|
0.000
|
|
0.197
|
0.000
|
Body Water
|
0.011
|
0.769
|
|
0.217
|
0.000
|
|
-0.270
|
0.000
|
|
0.090
|
0.000
|
Table 5 Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Dyslipidemia
Factor
|
B
|
S.E,
|
Wals
|
Sig.
|
Exp (B)
|
95% CI for EXP(B)
|
Lower Limit
|
Upper Limit
|
Age
|
0.020
|
0.006
|
10.509
|
0.001
|
1.020
|
1.008
|
1.032
|
Skeletal Muscle Mass Index
|
0.587
|
0.603
|
0.948
|
0.330
|
1.799
|
0.552
|
5.867
|
BMI
|
0.141
|
0.122
|
1.339
|
0.247
|
1.152
|
0.907
|
1.463
|
Body Fat Percentage
|
0.083
|
0.089
|
0.874
|
0.350
|
1.086
|
0.913
|
1.293
|
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
|
0.124
|
0.038
|
10.485
|
0.001
|
1.131
|
1.050
|
1.219
|
Visceral Fat Area
|
-0.042
|
0.029
|
2.144
|
0.143
|
0.959
|
0.906
|
1.014
|
Body Water
|
-0.071
|
0.267
|
0.070
|
0.791
|
0.932
|
0.553
|
1.571
|
Protein
|
0.311
|
0.665
|
0.219
|
0.640
|
1.365
|
0.371
|
5.024
|
Table 6 ROC Curve Analysis of Waist-to-Hip Ratio, Age for Diagnosis of Dyslipidemia
Factor
|
optimal cut-off value
|
AUC
|
95 per cent CI
|
P-value
|
Sensitivity (%)
|
Specificity (%)
|
Waist-to-Hip Ratio
|
0.89
|
0.675
|
0.634~0.716
|
0.000
|
54.4
|
73.3
|
Age (Years)
|
46.5
|
0.581
|
0.537~0.625
|
0.000
|
49.0
|
64.0
|