Retinal degeneration is a heterogeneous group of diseases that generally characterized by apoptosis of photoreceptor cells.[5] Intense visible light exposure can lead to retinal photoreceptor cells damage, and light-induced apoptosis is the main pathway of cell death in these diseases.[25] However, owing to its complex pathophysiology associated with genetic and environmental factors, very few effective therapies exist for these diseases. Here, in order to investigate the effect of FTY720 on retinal degeneration, we used the LIRD model and established that pretreatment with FTY720 at a dose of 10 mg/kg effectively protected the retina by inhibiting apoptosis and suppressing CD3+ and CD8+ T cells in light-damaged retina.
LIRD is an ideal model for retinal degeneration research, such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration.[26] Since its discovery in 1966 by Noell et al.,[26] this animal model has been widely used to discover the underlying mechanisms of photoreceptor function and to screen various putative neuroprotective compounds.[3] However, the precise molecular mechanisms of LIRD are poorly understood.
There is now strong evidence that microglial reactivity is an early and common hallmark of retinal degeneration.[27] Zeng et al. pointed out that activated microglia and their signaling molecules (TNF-α and IL-1β) were involved in the photoreceptor cell death.[28] In the normal retina, microglial cells were exclusively localized to the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL) and inner retina, but not observed in the outer retina and the subretinal space. These cells were quiescent and typically ramified with small cell bodies and slender, varicose processes.[29] After light exposure, microglial cells were activated and migrated to the outer retina, and locally produced complement deposition, that triggered a chronic inflammatory process.[22] Light stimulation could affect the differentiation and survival of postnatal Müller cells, which could induce the immune response of the retina.[30] Moreover, the numbers of CD3+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were reported to increase in light-damaged retina of old mice.[18] These findings supported a role for local immune response in the pathogenesis of retinal degeneration.
In recent years, increasing attention has been focused on anti-inflammatory drugs in retinal degenerations, including a variety of antioxidants and immunosuppressants.[5, 8] FTY720, a structural analog of Sphingosin (Sph), can be phosphorylated to FTY720-P in vivo by sphingosine kinase 2 (SPHK2) to mimic the action of S1P, and then FTY720-P mediates S1P receptor signaling in lymphocyte homing and trafficking.[31] FTY720 served as an immunosuppressive agent and led to a significant reduction in blood lymphocyte counts by accelerating the homing of lymphocytes into lymph nodes.[32] FTY720 has been tested on various diseases, such as multiple sclerosis.[12, 13] However, the protective effect of FTY720 on retinal degenerations is not clearly known. Previously, our study found that systemic delivery of FTY720 effectively inhibited de novo ceramide biosynthesis and led to a 50% reduction of the number of circulating lymphocytes, providing a remarkable protection of retinal structure and function.[20]
In the current study, we found that 10 mg/kg FTY720 administered 0.5 h before light exposure had significant protection of retinal structure and function by histology analysis and F-ERGs test which is consistent with our previous results. Rats pre-treated with FTY720 have few TUNEL-positive nuclei in the ONL, indicating that FTY720 could effectively prevent retinal photoreceptor cells apoptosis following light damaging. Compared with the FTY720 pre-treated group, the processing of CD3+ and CD8+ T molecules were increased, and their relevant proteins were also highly expressed in vehicle-treated light-damage group, which was consistent with Camelo et al.[18]. Furthermore, three days after light exposure, microglial cells increased in number, and they were activated, became amoeboid and migrated toward the outer retina, whereas no activated microglial cells were observed in the FTY720-treated group. Thus, we speculated that our model of LIRD was significantly related to local immune response and microglial activation, and that FTY720 might inhibit this process by modulating the localization and expression of immune T cells and suppressing the activation of microglia after light stress.
In conclusion, light stress could induce photoreceptors apoptosis, and activate ocular immune response by increasing the processing of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and the expression of CD3+ and CD8+ proteins in rats retina, and microglial activation. Systemic administration of FTY720 (10 mg/kg) 0.5 h before light exposure could effectively protect the retina by inhibiting the apoptosis and suppressing immune T cells and microglial activation in retina.
Funding Declaration
This study was supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2015CB554100). The authors thank all the participants in this study.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have reviewed this manuscript and declared no competing financial or non-financial interests of this paper.
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Beneficial effect of FTY treatment on retinal electrophysiology by ERG analysis.
The scotopic a- and b- amplitudes were reducted significantly in vehicle-treated light-damaged (VLD) group compared to normal group (*, P < 0.01). For the rats treated with FTY, the a- and b- responses were preserved significantly compared to the vehicle group (**, P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference between the FTY-LD group and normal group.
FTY720 could suppress the activation of microglia after light stress.Three days after light exposure, the number of microglia increased and activated, became amoeboid and migrated to the outer retina in the VLD group (Fig. 6B). For rats pre-rejected with FTY720, activated microglial cells were not detected in the retina, which was similar to those in normal group (Fig. 6A, Fig. 6C).