Due to limitations of research that evaluates the impact of body changes related to LS on the QoL of PLWHA, and knowing that these changes have a significant psychological impact on patients32,34 and affect QoL10,30,35, we aimed to evaluate the influence of LS on the QoL of PLWHA receiving ART. To determine lipodystrophy in different body segments, subjective assessment based on self-perception in relation to changes in the redistribution of body fat, and objective assessment through tactile and visual analysis of the face, were used.
In the present sample, low QoL was identified, which was more significant among subjects with body changes attributed to the use of ART. Furthermore, the degree of objectively assessed facial volume loss did not significantly affect QoL. Because the face was the segment evaluated using both methods, it enabled a comparison of the impact of objective and subjective changes on participant QoL, demonstrating that there was no difference between those who presented with higher degrees of objective facial volume loss and those who reported only self-perceived reduction in the facial region.
The low values regarding the concern about revealing the disease domain are consistent with previous results2,18,29,31,36–43 and demonstrate that, despite advances in reducing morbidity and mortality, stigmatization and prejudice remain major challenges. In this sense, the fear of experiencing rejection as others ascertain their serology remains among PLWHA36.
Regarding feelings toward physicians, low scores were also reported in previous research2,43; however, they conflict with other studies18,37–40,42, which found scores for this domain to be the most satisfactory. This result indicates that the levels of trust and satisfaction in relation to reception during medical care were lower than expected, which may indicate a need for more “humanized” care. Trust in the physician appears as a demonstration of the faith that the patient places in the professional, favoring the individual’s adherence and acceptance of the serological condition and treatment44.
The low scores in the financial concern domain coincided with those observed in previous investigations2,18,29,36–43,45. They may be associated with concerns about confidentiality regarding the status of the disease and stigma, which can negatively impact the patient’s ability to work and, consequently, harm their financial situation18. In the present study, financial concerns also warrant assessment considering the country’s economic situation in the immediate post-pandemic context when the research was performed.
The low score in the life satisfaction domain is consistent with other studies36,39,43,46. This can be justified by the impact of HIV diagnosis, which raises concerns about the disease and the need for adaptation to recent reality2, imposing new behaviors and feelings in relation to life.
Self-perception of body changes was reported by 76.84% of subjects, with a greater perception of lipohypertrophy than lipoatrophy. In previous studies from Brazil, the prevalence of LS ranged from 27.9–69.84%26,47,48,49,50. The diversity of results can be explained by differences in the definition of LS, the methodology used for the diagnosis, and in the medications used in the antiretroviral regimens47. The lack of a consensual and standardized method for defining and evaluating lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy led us to choose two research instruments to collect signs of LS: a questionnaire addressing self-perception of body changes48; and clinical assessment of the face using the FLI51. The definition of lipodystrophy based on patient assessment appears to better describe the impact of the severity of the syndrome on health status compared with the assessment(s) performed by a physician33.
Subjects who reported having noticed body changes exhibited lower scores in some QoL domains than those who reported not having noticed physical changes. Body modifications have the potential to cause a negative perception of self-image, reduced self-confidence, avoidance of social contacts, changes in mood states, and feelings of frustration in the absence of satisfactory results4. Self-evaluation in relation to body changes interferes more with the perception of dissatisfaction with the body image of PLWHA than anthropometric measurements52.
Among the subjects who reported body changes, 23 (31.51%) associated these changes with ART and exhibited compromised QoL compared with those who reported other causes of these changes. The impact on medication concerns in patients who relate body changes to ART has been established9,53. Lipodystrophy is often considered to be an important obstacle to adherence to ART, which highlights the threats to the health of these patients, as many consider abandoning treatment for fear of developing lipodystrophy and those who have not yet started ART hesitate to do so for fear related to changes in body image9. The influence on sexual function of patients who observe body changes related to LS has also been described14,54. The psychological effects of lipodystrophy can also have a negative impact on intimate and emotional relationships, including problems with libido13.
A minority of subjects reported that their body changes were addressed by a physician or they received medical advice regarding them. Guidance regarding engaging in regular physical exercise was among the most cited recommendations. In fact, the adoption of a physically active lifestyle has been shown to be a protective factor against body changes resulting from LS55,56. Despite having been the most recommended medical recommendation, it still appears with low frequency, which can justify the low score in the feeling toward the physician domain. This indicates that the relationship between health professionals and PLWHA needs to include an approach to body changes and guidance regarding preventive and mitigating measures aimed at alleviating body changes resulting from LS and, consequently, its negative impact on QoL.
The low prevalence of subjects with severe facial lipoatrophy in the present study can be explained by the antiretroviral regimen used, in which lamivudine, tenofovir, and dolutegravir were predominant. These medications are less likely to cause LS57,58. Furthermore, it must be considered that, because previous treatment for facial lipoatrophy was an exclusion criterion, it is possible that many patients who experienced a higher degree of facial lipoatrophy did not participate in the research because they had previously sought treatment for the condition.
When comparing subject QoL according to the severity of facial lipoatrophy, a lower mean score was observed for the Sexual function domain and a higher mean for the Acceptance of HIV domain in subjects with moderate or severe lipoatrophy. These results suggest that the impact on subject QoL is not always proportional to the severity of the disease; therefore, there is no direct correlation between the severity of facial lipoatrophy and psychological impact, and even individuals with low FLI may experience negative repercussions on their lives, both professional and social.
The present study revealed no significant differences in any QoL domain between subjects who presented with higher degrees of objective facial lipoatrophy and those who reported only self-perceived facial reduction. Although other investigations6,52 have reported that subjective body changes have a greater impact on patient QoL than objective changes, analyzing the face in isolation was not observed in our study. The presence of subjective body changes resulted in worse scores for some QoL domains. However, when the face was considered in isolation and compared with objective changes, this was not observed, suggesting that self-perception of fat loss on the face may have had a smaller impact than self-perceived changes in other parts of the body. Other studies indicate that the changes observed on the face as a result of LS are among the most impactful to PLWHA6,8,59 because they are more easily noticed by others than changes occurring in other parts of the body, thereby increasing stigmatization6.
The differences observed between studies reinforce the need for LS to be analyzed considering its complexity, both in terms of the way it manifests in the body and in relation to the way in which changes in each body segment can affect the patient in different, individual ways. Therefore, objective clinical findings must be analyzed in a manner that is associated with the subjectivity inherent to patient self-perception, especially when the purpose is to investigate their impact on PLWHA's QoL. Future research with the aim of comparing objective and subjective findings from other body segments without disregarding the influence of sociodemographic and cultural aspects of the population investigated has the potential to contribute to a better understanding of this issue.
In the present study, subjects with a higher educational level exhibited better overall QoL than those who completed high school. A higher educational level directly facilitates access to information regarding HIV infection and, therefore, promotes better internal and external resources for individuals to live with their serological conditions2,40.
It was also found that subjects who reported engaging in sporadic regular physical activity exhibited better overall QoL than those who engaged daily. These results need to be interpreted with caution because the proportion of subjects who reported sporadic physical exercise was very low and all had high QoL scores. Although there have been no studies relating the frequency of physical activity to QoL in this population, the regular practice of physical activity, whether through aerobic, weight, or flexibility exercises, promotes significant improvement(s) in the QoL of PLWHA60,61.
Some limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. LS was defined clinically and through subject and professional self-perceptions. There remains a shortage of studies in the literature that use the FLI as well as no uniformity or standardization for classifying the severity of cases. Despite being an evaluator-dependent method, its execution is low cost, applicable as a comparative method between different studies, and enables the evaluation of patients at different times, making it possible to monitor the evolution of facial involvement and compare the degrees of severity of facial lipoatrophy among different patients. Another limitation is that, due to the cross-sectional design, the study did not evaluate subject condition years before the research was performed, which makes it exceedingly difficult to determine subject biotype and body composition in the absence of HIV infection or which would be present in the absence of LS.
PLWHA receiving ART exhibited a low QoL, which was even more significant among those with body changes characteristic of LS. The degree of objectively assessed facial volume loss did not significantly impact QoL, suggesting that varying degrees of LS may affect individuals differently, which demands a more in-depth analysis of the socioeconomic and cultural contexts in which they occur. Results of the present study add new knowledge that supports the development of strategies focused on improving care practices and health monitoring of individuals receiving ART. The objective was to contribute to improving QoL by directing care to PLWHA experiencing body changes related to LS.