A significant percentage of patients in the first line, have their respective medical conditions registered as CIs by community pharmacists and GPs. However, in secondary care, these medical conditions are frequently either unregistered or as plain text entered in the warning box of EHRs, posing a potential medication safety risk. While there is room for improvement in the registration of CIs in primary care, a more substantial enhancement is required in secondary care.
In our hospital, the correct registration of medical conditions shows a lower percentage compared to the 69% of the contraindication bariatric surgery at the Albert Schweitzer Hospital, the Netherlands [8]. Nevertheless, the registration of the contraindication bariatric surgery in public pharmacies and GPs is lower compared to our study. We speculate that the observed variations between the regions in the Netherlands may be attributed to potential discrepancies in the education of prescribers in primary and secondary care regarding the registration of CIs. Additionally, differences in the implementation of medication reconciliation at both admission and discharge, incorporating information about CIs, could also be contributory. However, as noted by Laura et. al, the registration in the hospital appears not to significantly impact the completeness of the registration in primary care, which is also shown in our study [8]. This underscores the need for substantial improvement in the exchange of information between primary and secondary care.
When examining the prescribed medication for the patients diagnosed with hemophilia, a relatively large percentage (16%) received medication causing an increased risk of bleeding. In only one patient no registration of the CI was present in primary care. Therefore, we presume that careful consideration has been made in the majority of patients between the risk of bleeding and the risk of clotting when prescribing medication. Additionally, Aguilar et. al conclude that there is no difference in cardiovascular risk factors between patients with and without hemophilia and treatment of cardiovascular indications is necessary under strict control [16].
For patients with LQTS who were prescribed medication carrying the potential risk of developing TdPs, alternative medication could have been prescribed without the risk of QT interval prolongation (for example oxycodone instead of tramadol and a histamine 2 receptor blocker instead of pantoprazole). It is unknown which considerations were made when prescribing the medication and whether the QT interval was monitored in these patients after initiating the therapy. Additionally, the medical condition was registered as a CI by either the GP or the pharmacist, indicating expected additional monitoring in these cases.
The prescription of contraindicated medication to patients in this study was significantly lower compared to the study involving patients with Brugada Syndrome (53%) [9]. This difference could be attributed to a longer study period (median of 5.8 years), potentially leading to a higher frequency of (contraindicated) medication prescriptions.
This research indicates that the majority of patients with hemophilia disclose their medical condition when visiting healthcare providers and are aware of the potential risks of over-the-counter (OTC) medication. However, a substantial percentage of patients seem unaware of the possible risks linked to OTC medication. This is in line with a study by Westerlund et. al. that many patients underestimate the potential risks of OTC medication [17]. Given the potential risks of using OTC medication (e.g. NSAIDs) in the context of this rare condition, these findings emphasize the urgent need to inform hemophilia patients about these risks.
A large percentage of patients with LQTS do not disclose their medical condition when visiting healthcare providers and are not aware of the potential risks associated with OTC medication compared to patients with hemophilia. A possible explanation of this difference can be that a complication such as QT prolongation is not noticed by patients with LQTS, compared to bleeding in patients with hemophilia, raising more awareness about the latter condition. In addition, other factors can contribute to this difference, such as other personal characteristics, patient educational level, and information provided by healthcare providers, but these were not investigated in our study [18]. Our findings, with high percentages of patients considering OTC medication safe, highlight the need to raise more awareness about its potential risks.
To improve better registration of CIs, pharmacy technicians will register these rare CIs in the EHRs during medication verification upon patient admission at our hospital, ensuring monitoring in secondary care for these rare conditions. Also, the prescribers have been educated on how to register CIs in the EHR of patients.
A strength of this study is the relatively large study population of studied patients, considering these rare medical conditions. Second, few studies have been performed on the awareness of patients of the medication safety risks when going to health care practitioners or buying OTC medication, providing a more comprehensive view of medication safety risks.
A limitation of the study is the low absolute number of included patients. Furthermore, only patients from one hospital were included, which may affect the generalizability of the results to patients with similar conditions in other regions or healthcare settings.