FTIR spectroscopy analysis
The FTIR spectra of the APEG monomer and the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) polymer are shown in Fig. 1.
The FTIR spectrum of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) showed the stretching vibration peaks of the N–H bond in the amide group and the O–H bond in the carboxyl group at 3192 cm− 1. The stretching vibration peaks of the saturated C–H bond and the C = O bond appeared at 2935 and 1668 cm− 1, respectively. The bending vibration peak of the N–H bond of the primary amine in the amide group appeared at 1552 cm− 1, and the stretching vibration peak of the sulfonic acid group was observed at 1329 cm− 1. The bending vibration peak of the C–O–C bond of the functional monomer APEG and p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) appeared at 1182 cm− 1. These results indicate that the functional monomer underwent successfully the polymerization reaction and the obtained molecular structure is consistent with the design polymer structure.
1 H NMR spectroscopy analysis
Figure 2 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) polymer.
The following peaks were observed: the deuterium oxide solvent peak at δ 4.78 (g); the peak of –CH3 in the –(CH3)2CCH2– side chain at δ 1.11 (d); the peak of the –CH2SO3– group in AMPS at δ 3.58 (e); the peak of the –OCH2CH2– repeating unit in the APEG monomer side chain at δ 4.15 (f); the –CH– peak of –CH2–CH– in APEG at δ 1.71 (c); the –CH2– peak of the–CH2–CH– repeating unit in the main chain of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) at δ 1.73 (a); the –CH– peak of the–CH2–CH– repeating unit in the main chain of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) at δ 1.43 (b). The results showed that the APEG monomer participated in the polymerization reaction, and the molecular structure of the obtained polymer was consistent with the design.
Particle size distribution analysis
The particle size of the emulsion before and after the polymerization was determined using a laser particle size analyzer. As shown in Fig. 3, the particle size distribution in the pre-emulsified solution before the polymerization reaction was not uniform, and the particle size was larger than that of the emulsion after the polymerization reaction. Conversely, the average particle size distribution of the water-in-oil emulsion of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) after the polymerization reaction was concentrated and uniform. The particle size (D50) of the emulsion before the polymerization reaction was 13.60 µm, and that after the polymerization reaction was 7.129 µm. During the pre-emulsification process, the emulsifier forms a surface-active film at the oil–water interface, encapsulating the functional monomer to form a water-in-oil droplet. Upon stirring, the free radicals formed by the decomposition of the initiator enter the solubilized micelles, and the polymerization is initiated, forming a stable structure with a uniform and concentrated particle size distribution.
Critical association concentration test
Figure 4 shows the effect of the mass fraction of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) on the apparent viscosity, revealing that the apparent viscosity of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution is proportional to the mass fraction. In the low concentration stage, the apparent viscosity of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution increases uniformly and slowly. With increasing polymer mass fraction after a certain value, which corresponds to the critical association concentration of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) (K in Fig. 4), the apparent viscosity increases sharply. When the polymer concentration is lower than the K value, there are fewer polymer macromolecules in the solution, thus decreasing the number of intramolecular association microregions, which are formed by the hydrophobic interaction between the hydrophobic groups of the polymer. When the polymer concentration is greater than the K value, the intermolecular entanglement and intermolecular association become stronger, inducing the formation of a multilayer spatial network structure with increased density in the aqueous solution. Therefore, when the polymer concentration exceeds the K value, the viscosity of the polymer solution increases substantially.
SEM analysis
Figure 5 SEM images of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) polymer in (a, b) water, (c) 10000 mg/L NaCl solution, and (d) 10000mg/L CaCl2 solution
Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show that the molecular chains of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) in aqueous solution are intertwined to form a tight spatial network structure. This is due to the intermolecular hydrophobic association of the polyethylene glycol groups and the hydroxyl groups in the polymer. According to Figs. 5(c), 5(d), and 6, a large number of sulfonic acid groups in the polymer can associate with metal salt ions. The addition of abundant salt ions hinders the formation of the original hydrogen bonds; however, the hydrodynamic volume increases. Figure 6 shows that the polymer surface has a hydrophobic layer, which renders it repulsive to water. In a high salinity environment, the hydrophobic groups or side chains of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) can form hydrophobic associations with water molecules, reducing the contact between salt ions and water molecules. As a result, p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) exhibits excellent salt resistance.
Analysis of salt tolerance
Figure 7 shows the apparent viscosity of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solutions with concentrations of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.8 wt.% as a function of the concentration of monovalent NaCl and divalent CaCl2 salt solutions.
With increasing NaCl concentration, the viscosity of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution gradually decreases until eventually stabilizing. When the concentration of the salt solution increases to 10000 mg/L, the viscosity of the polymer solution increases considerably. This is due to the fact that the emulsion contains abundant sulfonic acid and carboxylic acid groups that quickly stick and increase the viscosity at high salt concentration. These groups can form a network structure via hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interaction and can continuously associate and ion-exchange with metal cations, finally forming a stable structure that increases the apparent viscosity of the emulsion. When the concentration of the CaCl2 divalent salt is low, the thickening effect of the salt increases the viscosity of the solution, which makes the emulsifier ineffective at the oil–water interface, resulting in the destabilization of the emulsion and decreasing the apparent viscosity.
Analysis of temperature resistance
To determine the temperature resistance of the polymer, p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solutions with a concentration of 0.6 wt.% were prepared in water, 20000 mg/L NaCl solution, and CaCl2 solution, respectively. The heating rate was set to 0.1°C/s, the heating range was 30°C–160°C, and the shear rate was 170 s− 1. The test results are shown in Fig. 8.
For conventional water-soluble polymers, the viscosity of the solution decreases with increasing temperature. However, the hydrophobic association is an entropy-driven endothermic process. Within a certain range, the increase in temperature is beneficial for the association and formation of a network structure and improves the temperature resistance and shear resistance of the solution. With increasing polymer concentration, the viscosity retention rate increases. This is due to the increase in the polymer concentration enhancing the probability of hydrophobic monomer association [23]. Figure 8 shows the rheological properties of a 0.6 wt.% polymer solution in different salt solutions upon increasing the temperature up to 160°C. The viscosity of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution decreased with increasing shear temperature. When the temperature reached 160°C, the viscosity of each solution after shearing for 60 min was 63.52, 45.06, and 32.07 mPa·s, respectively. At lower temperatures, the intermolecular interaction is strong, resulting in an orderly arrangement of polymer molecules and the formation of a more compact structure, thereby increasing the viscosity. However, as the temperature increases, the intermolecular interaction weakens, and the polymer molecules become more loosely arranged, decreasing the viscosity. The Na+ and Ca2+ ions in the brine can interact with the hydroxyl groups of the polymer molecules, resulting in a stable final viscosity. Pu[24] et al. developed a new type of fracturing fluid with a self-made β-cyclodextrin-functionalized hydrophobic associating polymer and a viscoelastic surfactant as the main components. After continuous shearing for 120 min in clear water at 118°C, the apparent viscosity retention value of a 0.6 wt.% polymer solution was only 58.8 mPa·s. Under the same concentration and high temperature conditions, p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) showed better temperature resistance.
Analysis of shear resistance
Aqueous solutions of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) with mass fractions of 0.6 and 0.8 wt.% were prepared and tested for temperature and shear resistance. The results are shown in Figs. 9 and 10. Moreover, a p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution with a concentration of 0.8 wt.% was subjected to temperature and shear resistance tests at 120°C and 140°C in NaCl and CaCl2 media, respectively. The results are shown in Figs. 11 and 12.
As shown in Fig. 9, when the shear performance of the 0.6 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution was tested at 120°C, the viscosity of the polymer solution decreased with increasing temperature and shear time. After shearing for 60 min, the residual viscosity was 61.48 mPa·s. Upon increasing the temperature, the viscosity of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution increased due to the association of the polymer molecular chains. According to Fig. 10, the viscosity of the 0.8 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution was 76.32 mPa·s after shearing at 120°C for 60 min. The viscosity change trend is basically the same for the 0.6 and 0.8 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solutions, with the viscosity increasing slightly and then decreasing gradually.
The viscosity of 0.8 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) in a 20000 mg/L NaCl solution after shearing for 1 h at 120°C and 140°C was 72.11 and 64.88 mPa·s, respectively, which changed to 65.85 and 56.77 mPa·s after shearing in a 20000 mg/L CaCl2 solution for 1 h. This shows that the introduction of the APEG monomer improved substantially the temperature resistance of the polymer. The presence of allyl groups increases the linear entanglement between molecules, resulting in a denser spatial network structure. Therefore, the introduction of APEG in the polymer is conducive to the formation of a complex spatial network via linear entanglement and hydrophobic association, which helps increase the viscosity of the polymer solution. More importantly, at high polymer concentration, the spatial network structure is more conducive to the formation of a dynamic crosslinked intermolecular linear entanglement and hydrophobic association structure, resulting in a large-scale supramolecular structure with enhanced temperature and shear resistance.
Thixotropic properties of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) polymer
The thixotropic properties of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) aqueous solutions with mass fractions of 0.3、0.5and 0.7 wt.% were tested,and the results are shown in Fig. 13.
Thixotropy is a polymer property that refers to microstructure changes and a decrease in consistency that occur when the polymer is subjected to external force and the subsequent recovery of the original state when the external action disappears[25]. The larger the closed ring area, the better the thixotropy of the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution. The thixotropy of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) is shown in Fig. 13. As the shear rate increases, the shear stress in the polymer solution gradually increases, the spatial network structure is reversibly destroyed, and the polymer molecules are randomly oriented, resulting in a decrease in viscosity. As the shear rate decreases, the spatial network structure is reorganized, resulting in a viscosity recovery. A comparison between the thixotropic loops of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solutions at different concentrations revealed that the higher the concentration of the polymer solution, the greater the shear stress required. The maximum shear stresses of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solutions were 8.685, 23.97, and 34.54 Pa, respectively. This shows that the energy required to destroy the network structure at high concentration is larger than that at low concentration. Under the condition of enhanced association, the polymer exhibits better thixotropy, which can enhance not only the synergistic effect of the rigid hydrophobic association and linear entanglement, but also the tightness of the polymer space network structure.
Analysis of viscoelastic variation of polymer
Figures 14 and 15 show the changes in the energy storage/elastic modulus (G') and the energy dissipation/viscous modulus (G") of a 0.3 wt.% p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution with frequency and stress in clear water, 10000 mg/L NaCl and CaCl2 solutions, and 20000 mg/L NaCl and CaCl2 solutions.
The G′ and G′′ values reflects the elasticity and viscosity of the polymer, respectively. The viscoelasticity of a copolymer plays a key role in polymer fracturing. The G′ and G′′ values increase with increasing frequency. According to the results, the G′ of p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) in salt aqueous solutions is greater than G′′, reflecting the elastic behavior of the solution. With increasing salt concentration, the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) solution showed better viscoelastic properties. In clear water, the G′ value of the polymer solution exceeds the G′′, value as the frequency increases, with the elastic properties playing a leading role. At low frequencies, the p(AM/AA/AMPS/APEG) molecular chains become curled, and the intramolecular hydrophobic interaction dominates. At high frequencies, the molecular chains are stretched and the hydrophobic interaction between molecules is enhanced. As a result, G ′ increases rapidly.