In the present study, we evaluated a robustly randomized sample of medical students, employing several instruments to assess different aspects of their psychological, mental, and physical health and establish a multidimensional construct of their well-being. Previous studies from Palestine have yet to be conducted. Therefore, we discuss our findings in the context of insights from other countries and the global literature.
The prevalence of depressive symptoms was high in our study (69%, roughly representing two-thirds of the students), with nearly a fifth of students (22.6%) reporting scores suggesting severe or extremely severe symptoms. Pooled prevalence from different metanalyses was lower (37.9%, 18.1%, 28.0%, and 27.2%, respectively) (13, 28–30). Looking at individual studies, a lower prevalence was also reported from various regions (1, 12, 31, 32), including from neighboring Jordan, where a recent survey of female medical students using the DASS21 instrument reported a pre and post-COVID prevalence of any level of depression of 32.7% and 53.5%, respectively (33). Nonetheless, a high prevalence was not unheard of and has been seen in other regional countries that share a similar culture. For example, a 2018 study of 2562 students from Saudi Arabia using the PHQ9 instrument reported various levels of depressive symptoms in 66.6% of males and 87.6% of females, and nearly half (53.7%) showed symptoms of moderate severity and above (34). In another study from Egypt, 27.9% and 17.2% reported moderate and severe symptoms of depression, respectively (35). Part of the high prevalence in our study might be owed to differences in measurement tools and cutoff scores compared to other studies. Still, we also believe that the physical, social, and economic pressures of living in a poor enclave scarred by chronic conflict also contributed to these results.
Additionally, medical study is competitive by nature, and socioeconomic pressures naturally exacerbate this burden. This alarmingly high prevalence of depressive symptoms in our cohort must be addressed promptly and with seriousness. Stigma towards mental illness is pervasive in the medical field, which hampers student’s ability to seek help (36, 37). For instance, a meta-analysis showed that only 15.7% of positively screened medical students sought psychiatric treatment (30). Additionally, suicidal ideation is common, especially in severe depression, and has been reported in 4.9–35.6% of depressed medical students across the literature (30). Medical student depression has also been linked to substance abuse and negatively impacted their function and professionalism later in their careers (38).
Depressive symptoms in our study had no significant correlations with sex, academic year, marital status, or income. Other studies have reported mixed results in this regard. For instance, some studies and meta-analyses found that female students were significantly more likely to show symptoms of depression (13, 28), while others failed to demonstrate this relationship (29). The lack of a significant correlation between female sex and depression in our cohort may be due to cultural differences from other regions, and a similar lack of such correlation was noted in the aforementioned Saudi study from 2018 (34). The same study also did not find a significant relationship between marital status and depression.
On the other hand, studies have reported mixed results on the relationship between depression and the academic level. A higher academic level predicted depression in some studies (28), while others noted the opposite finding (29, 34), and in others, no correlations were found (30). Depression is a complex condition, and sociodemographic and cultural peculiarities may explain these interactions or lack thereof between different countries and regions. To curate depression among students, medical schools need to address the issue of stigma, guarantee high-quality psychiatric services to the students, and seek strategies to reduce stress in their environment.
Symptoms of anxiety and stress were also high among our students, found in 77.3% and 65.2% of participants, respectively. Such high levels are common among medical students and can be attributed to medical school's competitiveness, heavy workloads, responsibilities, and peer pressures. Still, the prevalence was higher than reported in several studies from neighboring countries. In the previously mentioned Jordanian survey, the rates of anxiety and stress after the pandemic were 53.2% and 35.8%, respectively. In the Saudi study, the prevalence of stress was 57%. Similarly, a prevalence of 53% was reported in an Indian study that used the DASS21 instrument (34, 39). Meanwhile, a mixed study from Pakistan revealed a 92.5% prevalence of moderate and severe stress (40). Stress negatively impacts students’ performance, worsens depression, and impacts the quality of life (34). Regarding anxiety, a meta-analysis reported a pooled prevalence of 33.8%, which was highest in Middle Eastern and Asian countries, but the range varies across individual studies (41). In India, anxiety was reported in 66.9%, while Egyptian and Saudi studies reported a prevalence of 78.4% and 60.8%, respectively, measured using DASS21 (41). On the other hand, the prevalence among Saudi clinical-level students was 31.7% when screened using GAD-7 (42). These numbers reflect the impacts of social and cultural factors and the variations in measurement tools and cohort demographics on results. Still, they do not nullify the impression that medical students are highly anxious. Stress and anxiety have been generally linked to lower academic performance among medical students, and, at the same time, a lower perceived performance was associated with higher anxiety and stress, laying forth a feedback loop that should be broken (40, 43). Potential measures include extracurricular activities, offering counseling and life coaching, practicing mindfulness, promoting mental health awareness, and advocating activities that promote personal engagement and positive interpretation and expression of emotion (44, 45).
Adequate sleep quality and quantity are important health indicators and represent physiological imperatives that must be fulfilled for an individual to achieve his or her cognitive potential (46). Poor sleep quality was highly prevalent in our sample (77.9%). In neighboring Jordan, 47.4% of medical students were found to have poor or just fair sleep quality when screened using the SQS instrument (47). An Iranian study that used PSQI and DASS21 instruments reported a 60% prevalence of poor sleep, which, similar to our study, was significantly correlated to depression and anxiety (48). Also, similarly, sex and academic level were not significantly linked to poor sleep. In Morocco, poor sleep was found in 81.7% of students (49). The trend of poor sleep among medical students is global, with a pooled prevalence in meta-analyses ranging from 52.7%-60.3% (2, 16, 50). Comparatively, insufficient sleep affects a quarter to a third of the adult population globally (51). The high prevalence of poor sleep among medical students is related to the high prevalence of mental health problems, particularly depression, anxiety, and stress, which are, in turn, associated with the remarkable burdens of medical study. These are known to influence sleep quality negatively, as demonstrated in our study and many others (48, 52, 53). Additionally, the clinical duties of medical training may include night shifts, which disturb the sleep schedule and impair sleep hygiene.
On the other hand, poor sleep itself may worsen depression, anxiety, and burnout, and it has been linked to lower performance in clinical examinations (54). It can also affect neurocognitive functioning, psychological well-being, academic performance, and metabolic and immunological systems; thereby, it is important to tackle this issue among medical students (55–58). Medical schools should address this problem by offering sleep hygiene and cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions (52). For example, a sunrise alarm clock intervention combined with electronic device removal at bedtime proved effective in improving sleep quality and a number of mental and psychological health indicators among medical students (59). Continuous surveillance is mandatory for the effective, evidence-guided administration of the interventions. Additionally, regardless of the directionality of causation, depression and anxiety need to be treated to improve sleep. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to moderate their caffeine consumption and avoid smoking and smartphone addiction (48).
Life satisfaction is a multidimensional, subjective construct representing an important indicator of the individual’s quality of life (60). It has been defined as a subjective judgment and feeling of contentment that an individual can identify when their needs or desires are being fulfilled (61). As such, stress, anxiety, depression, and poor sleep quality can be expected to contribute to feeling dissatisfied with life. Surveys of medical students have demonstrated such inverse relationships between life satisfaction and depression (62), anxiety (62), stress (63–65), and sleep quality (65). Thus, It is not surprising that life satisfaction is lower among medical students than in other disciplines (66). Also, a temporal trend was noted where life satisfaction lowered as students progressed through medical school (66). In our study, only 55.9% of students fell on the positive end of the life satisfaction spectrum. A high prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, poor sleep, and the burdens of living in a chronic conflict zone with a socioeconomically disadvantaged society surely contributed to this finding. In this regard, a recently published study on the general population in Gaza established a negative correlation between quality of life and rates of depression, anxiety, and stress (67). The correlation of life satisfaction with students’ academic level was not demonstrated by our cohort, which may be because the other factors mentioned played a relatively more significant role in students’ perceptions of their lives.
The present study is the first to be carried out in the Gaza Strip. It has the added strengths of a large sample size and stratified sampling. It also used different tools to provide a multidimensional overview of medical students’ well-being. On the other hand, although the study employed well-validated instruments, structured interviews remain the gold standard for a formal psychiatric diagnosis. Future studies are recommended to use mixed designs to provide deeper insights. Also, the cross-sectional design of the present study precludes the possibility of establishing causality for the findings, which future longitudinal studies should address.