TOLF is usually rare, insidious and progressive that may cause severe spinal cord compression in spite of mild symptoms(18).Patients with TOLF have various symptoms, which can result in muscle weakness, numbness and sensory disturbance in the lower limbs and different degrees of walking dysfunction, even in severe cases, complete paraplegia(12).Other symptoms also occur in disease, including back pain, gait disturbance, neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction, etc(19).Once the TOLF is symptomatic, it is generally refractory to conservative treatment and necessary to surgical decompression(20).The most common surgery of spinal cord decompression is laminectomy. Other techniques have also been reported, such as fenestration, laminoplasty, and hemilaminectomy(21).
Based on the characteristics of spinal stenosis and the continuity of ossification, Onishi et al.(22) proposed 5 types for TOLF: lateral type, extended type, enlarged type, fused type and tuberous type. French door laminectomy and fenestration are recommended for the first 3 types of TOLF, which are almost impossible not to damage the dura mater or spinal cord, as both require a longitudinal incision. An en bloc laminectomy is required for the latter two types of TOLF, which are the common cause of severe thoracic spinal cord compression. However, en bloc laminectomy is technically demanding and usually has a high incidence of early complications(23).In addition, direct manipulation of spinal canal can result in postoperative complications, such as dural tears or cerebrospinal fluid leakage, leading to unsatisfactory treatment outcomes(24).Simultaneously, manipulation of the posterior appendages of the spine may damage the stability of spine(25).
The idea of the floating island technique is to remove the lamina of ossified ligamentum flavum under the direct vision of the depth and boundary of the dural mater, reducing disturbance with the spinal cord during spinal canal manipulation. Decompressing the spinal canal can be controlled, because we separate the ossified ligamentum flavum and the dural mater from the surrounding area to form a floating island, which allows us to visualize the intraspinal situation during surgical resection. The key factors to ensure the effect of operation are to determine the location of the compression of OLF and the location of the fenestration. Our experience is that preoperative thoracic CT and thoracic MRI are accurately positioned, and X-ray is positioned again after anesthesia, so as to reduce the incidence of excessive laminectomy and dural tear caused by positioning errors. Complete decompression is marked by pulsation of the dura mater.
The outcome of surgery is closely related to postoperative complications and postoperative recovery is also closely related to the occurrence of complications. Sun et al.(24) have reported that the most common complications of spinal surgery are dural tears an CSF leakage because of adhesion or ossification of the dural mater, which can lead to CSF pseudocyst, respiratory obstruction, wound dehiscence, and meningitis. Dural adhesion makes it difficult to directly remove the ossified mass by traditional surgical methods, which results in a high incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage(26).The incidence of dural tear or CSF leakage was 32% and the incidence of patients who had dural ossification with CSF leakage was highly to 78.8%(24).Early neurological deterioration is not uncommon in traditional surgery(26).Hou et al.(14) have reported that the complication of thoracic spine surgery for ossification of ligamentum flavum are as follows: CSF leakage (32%)(78.8% had ossified dura), neurological deterioration (21%), infection (5%), dehiscence (3%), deep venous thrombosis (1%) and death (1%). Takahata et al.(27) have revealed that decompression and posterior instrumented fusion surgery is a reliable surgical procedure with stable long-term clinical outcomes. They found 15(60%) patients experienced late neurological deterioration, and 10 patients had a relapse of myelopathy due to OLF in the region outside the primary operative lesion. The causes of early neurological impairment were postoperative epidural hematoma and direct intraoperative spinal cord injury(28).The causes of late neurological deterioration or paralysis may include ischemia-reperfusion injury, microthrombi and changed perfusion due to internal recoil of the spinal cord structure after decompression, which were four patients among the results of the Li's study.(20) Kanno et al.(29) have reported that two extremely rare cases successfully treated by revision surgery for a recurrent of ossification of ligamentum flavum at the same intervertebral level in the thoracic spine after the primary surgery. In our study, postoperative complications included dural tear in 13 cases (41.9%), defect in 10 cases (32.2%) and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 10 cases (32.2%). All dural complications are due to the removal of the dural ossification along with the adhesion of the ossified ligamentum flavum. All patients with cerebrospinal fluid leakage were successfully pulled out the drainage tube 5 to 7 days after surgery, and wound healed 10 to 14 days without wound infection, etc. There was no recurrence of ossification or postoperative thoracic vertebra deformity in patients with aggravated neurological injury.
The advantages of our new technique are as follows: 1. Before longitudinal cutting of the lamina where ossification of the ligamentum flavum is located, partial excision of the upper and lower lamina, fenestration, and exposure of the dura mater were performed. Since the operation was performed in the normal space, the ossified mass was not dissociated, so the fenestration process would not cause shock to the ossified mass, which was very safe; 2. The spinal cord can be partly decompressed after the exposure of the upper and lower dural mater, which increases the space of retrodisplacement for the spinal cord at the compression site and makes subsequent operation safer; 3. The depth and boundary of the dural mater can be seen after laminectomy at the upper and lower margins, which can provide reference for the location and depth of the incision when making longitudinal osteotomy incision of the lamina with ossified ligamentum flavum. 4. When the lamina of the calcified ligamentum flavum is longitudinally incised, which can be gently lifted and shaken left and right to check whether the lamina is completely free, the ossification of the ligamentum flavum becomes a floating island. Although the ossification mass of the ligamentum flavum is adherent and fused with the dural mater, which is isolated from the subarachnoid space and the spinal cord, the dural mater is gently pulled upward without pulling the spinal cord. Only when the dural mater tension is too large, it will interfere with the spinal cord. The surgery under direct vision can’t cause severe compression or strain on the spinal cord; 5. There is only one incision in the traditional floating method. It is often found that there is still residual bone that has not been cut off or there is attachment of the joint capsule of the ligamentum flavum in operation, which requires further operations which can increase the surgery time and the risk of injury of spinal cord because the ossified mass of the ligamentum flavum has become loose. Compared with the traditional uncovering method, the new floating island technique can more accurately detach the lamina and completely free the lamina to form an island, which is more conducive to the traditional floating operation and reduce the uncovering time. 6. The dural mater is exposed directly above the ossified mass, allowing a better view of dural tension during uncovering. If the dural mater is not heavily adhesive to the ossified mass of the ligamentum flavum, it can be carefully separated from the ventral side with a nerve stripper during uncovering. On the contrary, if it is difficult to separate, the adherent dural mater on the surface of the ossified mass of the ligamentum flavum should be incised sharply in time to reduce the pull on the spinal cord and safely remove the ossified mass of the ligamentum flavum and the lamina.
However, the limitation of our new technique in this study is that a small number of patients for a relatively short period, resulting in a lack of judgment on the further clinical efficacy and safety of floating island laminectomy technology, limiting the generalization of the procedure and potentially undermining the validity of the long-term results of this technique. Therefore, further study with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period is entailed to approve our new technique.