In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the changes in hs-CRP levels following OAGB in patients with obesity. Our findings demonstrated a significant reduction in hs-CRP levels from the pre-operative baseline to six months post-surgery. Initially, there was an expected increase in hs-CRP levels immediately post-surgery, likely due to the acute inflammatory response to the surgical intervention. However, this was followed by a significant decrease over the subsequent one and six-month follow-ups, indicating a significant decrease in systemic inflammation. A recent meta-analysis found a significant reduction in several inflammatory markers, including CRP and hs-CRP, after MBS [20]. Although the meta-analysis did not include a subgroup analysis specifically for OAGB regarding CRP changes, previous studies have reported outcomes consistent with our findings, indicating OAGB, like other MBS, can significantly decrease CRP levels and improve metabolic health in patients with obesity [21–24].
The significant reduction in hs-CRP levels in the present study aligns with the understanding that weight loss and improved metabolic profiles post-MBS can alleviate systemic inflammation. MBS has been shown to reduce adipose tissue mass, decrease macrophage infiltration, lower the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and significantly impact comorbidities associated with chronic inflammation [25]. Conditions such as T2DM, CVD, and metabolic syndrome, which are often exacerbated by inflammatory processes, tend to improve following MBS [25–27]. Furthermore, reducing inflammatory cytokines following MBS is associated with a lower risk of asthma, Alzheimer’s disease, and certain cancers [28].
Although this study aimed to evaluate the short- and mid-term effects of OAGB on hs-CRP levels, several studies have reported sustained long-term improvements in inflammatory markers following MBS. A retrospective cohort study of 163 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) over four years reported significant declines in CRP and hs-CRP levels, correlating with weight loss and T2DM remission. Inflammatory markers followed a U-shaped curve, with the lowest levels at two years post-MBS and a slight, non-significant increase at four years, normalizing in 84% of patients [29]. Another study of 1,180 patients post-RYGB found CRP levels dropped from 1.01 mg/L pre-surgery to 0.18 mg/L at two years, with a slight increase at seven years but remaining below pre-surgery levels. Only 3.2% had elevated CRP at seven years, compared to 32.9% pre-surgery. Factors such as higher pre-surgery CRP, BMI, smoking, and diabetes were linked to less favorable CRP trajectories, indicating the need for ongoing monitoring in these subgroups [30].
Although MBS significantly decreases CRP levels, concerns exist regarding the potential resurgence of inflammatory markers following recurrent weight gain, a common occurrence after MBS. Nevertheless, studies indicate that the anti-inflammatory benefits of MBS, including reduced CRP levels, persist even after recurrent weight gain. Specifically, a study on the metabolic profile of women after RYGB and LSG revealed that despite recurrent weight gain, the biochemical benefits, such as improved insulin sensitivity and lower CRP levels, were maintained compared to preoperative levels [31]. Considering the sustained weight loss and low percentage of recurrent weight gain observed after OAGB [32], it is a promising approach to improving inflammation. Consistently reducing excess body weight can significantly improve inflammatory markers, contributing to better overall health outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure.
In our study, we did not find any significant correlation between age, gender, and obesity-associated medical problems such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes status, ischemic heart disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and changes in hs-CRP levels following OAGB. Moreover, no significant correlation was found between weight loss outcomes (e.g., preoperative BMI, weight loss, BMI loss, %TWL, %EWL) and changes in hs-CRP. Although there are some discrepancies in the literature on the relationship between weight loss and reduction of hs-CRP and CRP after different bariatric surgery methods other than OAGB [29], our findings align with previous studies showing no significant correlation between weight outcomes and reductions in hs-CRP or CRP after OAGB surgery [22,24]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis found no relationship between baseline BMI and changes in CRP levels after MBS. It proposed that alternative mechanisms might contribute to this reduction, such as lower caloric intake, reduced nutrient absorption, or a decreased need for the liver to detoxify ingested substances [33].
Our study highlighted substantial weight loss and reduction in BMI among participants over six months, with a median %TWL of 29% and a median %EWL of 68.2%. The significant weight loss and reduction in BMI achieved through OAGB underscore its efficacy as a metabolic and bariatric procedure. The lack of a linear relationship between baseline BMI and hs-CRP reduction suggests that OAGB can benefit a broad range of patients, regardless of initial BMI. OAGB has shown similar efficacy to RYGB in terms of weight loss and remission of obesity-related medical problems [34], with advantages including shorter operative time, fewer early postoperative complications, and a more straightforward surgical learning curve [35].
Finally, a significant correlation was observed between preoperative hs-CRP levels and hs-CRP reduction following OAGB. Considering the significant correlation between elevated CRP and hs-CRP levels and the risk of coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality [36,37], this finding indicates that patients with higher hs-CRP levels stand to benefit more from OAGB. These results underscore the importance of OAGB as a valuable intervention for mitigating obesity-related systemic inflammation and reducing cardiovascular risk. Clinical trials are needed to elucidate if high hs-CRP could be an additional indication for MBS. Moreover, the effect of different MBS surgeries on hs-CRP should be compared to identify which procedures provide the most significant and sustained reduction in inflammatory markers. This comparative analysis could help tailor surgical interventions to individual patient profiles, optimizing outcomes and improving cardiovascular health in patients undergoing MBS.
Strengths and Limitations
This study boasts several strengths, including its prospective cohort design and the comprehensive six-month follow-up, which provides robust data on the short- to mid-term effects of OAGB on both hs-CRP levels and weight loss outcomes. Standardized surgical and post-operative care protocols ensure consistency, reducing potential biases and variability. Despite its strengths, the study has notable limitations. The six-month follow-up period, while valuable, does not capture the long-term sustainability of hs-CRP reduction and weight loss. The lack of a control group limits the ability to directly compare OAGB outcomes with other interventions. Additionally, while efforts were made to standardize protocols and control variables, other unmeasured confounding factors could influence the observed outcomes.
Future Directions
Future research should prioritize extending the follow-up period and comparing different types of MBS to delineate the specific advantages and potential drawbacks of OAGB. Moreover, examining differences within the cohort, particularly between patients who achieve significant weight loss and those who experience insufficient weight loss or recurrent weight gain, will provide valuable insights. Finally, Future research should focus on evaluating the broader implications of inflammatory markers reduction on overall health, CVD risk, and quality of life in the long term.