2.1. Materials
Synozol Red KHL (R K-HL) and Synozol Blue KHL (B K-HL) are a water-soluble, reactive dyes supplied by Kisco International, Turkey, are used as a simulated textile adsorbate effluent. A separate stock solution of 1000 ppm is initially prepared from the two dyes, which is then diluted to the required concentrations as required. Also, diluted NaOH and H2SO4 are used to adjust the pH of the aquoues effluent, if needed, to the desired values. Cadmium nitrate (tetrahydrate) Cd(NO3)2.4H2O, ferric nitrate nonahydrate Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, cupric nitrate trihydrate Cu(NO3)2.3H2O, silver nitrate AgNO3 and sodium chloride (NaCL) are of analytical grade and used for nanoferrite preparation. All chemicals are used as received without any further purification.
2.2. Preparation of AS400-ferrite composites:
AS as an Aluminium- based waterworks residue was collected from the largest water treatment plant in Southern Shebin El-Kom City, Menoufia governorate, Egypt. The plant is based on using raw water from the River Nile reservoir by pumping. Such plant generates roughly 40,000 m3 of drinkable water per day for the western part of the city, where reservoir water is flocculated via the use of aluminium sulphate as the main coagulant. The fresh sludge was immediately removed from the sedimentation tank's underflow channel and taken to a lab for analysis. The excess water is then removed from the sludge by gravity settling, and the moisture content is then reduced to 10.8% using air drying. The resulting sludge cake is then washed to get rid of contaminants. Subsequently, such sludge is treated through an overnight oven drying (105°C) process to remove any water content. The resulting dried sludge is ground into a fine powder though a ball mill for one hour. The sample is labeled as raw alum sludge (AS). Afterwards, AS is then calcined in an electrical furnace for 2 h of calcination time at 400°C and the sample is named as (AS400).
On the other hand, nanosized Cd0.5Cu0.5Fe2O4 ferrite particles is prepared by co-precipitation routes as a fast simple method prepared at mild temperature range. The required metal reagents masses of Cd(NO3)2.4H2O, Cu(NO3)2.3H2O and Fe(NO3)3.9H2O were attained and dissolved in distilled water in a (1: 2) molar ratio. Then, NaOH (3 mol L) was gradually added until a precipitate was produced. The reaction mixture was heated for 2 hours at 80°C and then the mixture is vigorously stirred for 1 hour at room temperature. The samples are then first dried, followed by magnetic decantation and many washes with distilled water to produce soft ferrite particles. Subsequently, the attained powder is exposed for overnight drying at 80°C and the attained material is signified as CdAgF. Furthermore, it is essential to mention that Cd0.5Ag0.5Fe2O4 ferrite (CdCuF) are prepared by the same technique [16]. Then, the prepared ferrites are mixed with AS400 in (1:1) ratio to attain AS400F-CdAg and AS400F-CdCu that is then used as recyclable adsorbents.
2.3. Determination of Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc)
The point of zero charge (pHPZC) is signified as a crucial characteristic and applied to investigate the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent surface and the type of surface binding active center. pHPZC is determined through by salt addition method to investigate the electro kinetic properties of a surface referred as pH level at which the charge on the adsorbent surface approaches zero. In such method, approximately, 0.15 g of adsorbent was added to 25 mL of 0.01 M NaCl in 50-mL plastic tubes. The pH was adjusted using a pH meter (C5010, Consort, Belgium) to 2–12 (± 0.1) via 0.1 H2SO4 and 0.1M NaOH. The mixture was agitated for 24 h in a shaker (Orbi shaker BT3000, Benchmark, USA). The final pH was located and the difference between the initial and final pH are plotted against initial pH.
2.4. Characterization of the prepared adsorbents
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) is signified as an effective tool for analyzing the phase structure of the prepared samples as well as the crystalline and amorphous characteristics of the material under study. In this regard, the samples were analyzed through X-ray powder diffractometry (XPERT-PRO diffractometer) using Cu-Kλ radiation at room temperature (λ = 1.54060Å) run at 40 kV and 30 mA. The specific surface was obtained from measurements of adsorption–desorption isotherms of N2 at 80 K (BEL SORP MAX- Made in Japan). The SEM-EDX analyses were acquired at an accelerating voltage of 25–30 kV. Scanning electron microscopy was performed using an SEM model Philips XL 30 (Eindhoven, Netherlands) equipped with an EDX device (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy). The morphology examination was investigated using a high-resolution Talos F200i-transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Eindhoven, and the Netherlands). A transmission electron microscope (TEM) instrument (Talos F200i) operating at 20–200 kV was used to analyze the nanoparticle morphology. The hand-made VSM DMS-880 device, from the Physics Department of the Faculty of Science at Tanta University in Egypt, was used to measure the magnetic characteristics.
2.5. Experimental methodology:
The adsorption test is conducted through a jar test using an orbital shaker. The variety of operating conditions are carried out including contact time (0–300 min), initial pH of the aqueous (2–10), adsorbent dosage (0.5-5 g/L), initial Synozol Red KHL dye and Blue KHL dye concentrations in the range of 20 to 100 ppm, and solution temperature (40–60°C). Initially, the aqueous dye solution in a certain concentration is poured into sealed bottles. Thereafter, the essential amount of adsorbent material is added in order to conduct the adsorption experiments. H2SO4 or NaOH solutions were added to the dye solutions to change their initial pH values. The residual dye remaining after treatment in the aqueous effluent after treatment is measured and compared with the initial concentration using spectrophotometric technique (Model Unico UV-2100, USA) at the highest absorbance wavelength of 525 nm and 620 nm for Synozol Red KHL dye and Synozol Blue KHL dye, respectively. Then, the adsorption capacity of the prepared samples (qe) was determined according to the following equation:
\(\:{\text{q}}_{\text{e}}\) = ( \(\:{\text{C}}_{\text{o}}-{\text{C}}_{\text{i}}\:\))\(\:\frac{\text{V}}{\text{m}}\) (1)
Where Co and \(\:{\text{C}}_{\text{i}}\) (mg/L) are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of dye solution, m (g) is the mass of the adsorbent used, and V (L) is the volume of dye solution. The percentage of dye removal R (%) was calculated with the Eq. (2)
R = \(\:\frac{(\:{C}_{o}-{C}_{i})}{{C}_{o}}\) x 100% (2)
The adsorption test and the material preparation are illustrated graphically represented in Fig. 1.
2.6. Mathematical models:
Adsorption isotherm models:
Four isotherm models were used to determine the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent materials namely those of the Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R).
Langmuir adsorption. The Langmuir adsorption is based on the notion that the adsorbent's homogenous sites are the only places where adsorption may take place. No more adsorption takes place at a site after a dye molecule has occupied it. To get the maximal adsorption capacity that corresponds to complete monolayer coverage on the homogeneous adsorbent surface without any interaction between the adsorbent and dye, the Langmuir equation is used. Both chemical and physical adsorption can be explained using the Langmuir equation. The following equation often describes this equation's linearized version [18].
$$\:\frac{{C}_{e}}{{q}_{e}}\:=\:\frac{1}{{Q}_{0}}\:{C}_{e}+\frac{1}{b{Q}_{0}}$$
3
Where \(\:{q}_{e}\:\)is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent (mg/g), Ce is the retained adsorbate concentration at equilibrium (mg/L), \(\:{Q}_{0}\) is a measure of adsorption capacity (mg/g) and b is the Langmuir constant, which is a measure of energy of adsorption.
The equilibrium constant \(\:{R}_{L}\), also known as a separation factor and can be used to define the key properties of the Langmuir isotherm. It can be calculated by
$$\:{R}_{L}=\:\frac{1}{(1+b{C}_{0})}$$
4
where \(\:{C}_{0}\) is the initial concentration of adsorbate (mg/L) and b is the Langmuir constant. The separation factor \(\:{R}_{L}\:\)indicates the isotherm shape and determines whether adsorption is favorable or not. If \(\:{R}_{L}\) = 0, adsorption is irreversible; if 0<\(\:\:{R}_{L}\)<1, adsorption is favorable; if \(\:{\text{R}}_{\text{L}}\) = 1, adsorption is linear; and if \(\:{R}_{L}\)>1, adsorption is unfavorable [18].
Freundlich Isotherm the Freundlich model is an empirical equation that assumes the interaction between the adsorbed molecules and the adsorbent's diverse surface. Furthermore, a multilayer adsorption process is described by the Freundlich isotherm model [19]. The heterogeneity constant (1/n) classifies the Freundlich model as being applicable to highly heterogeneous surface systems. The linear form of the Freundlich isotherm is written as the following equation by plotting log \(\:{C}_{e}\) versus log qe [20].
\(\:\text{ln}{q}_{e}\) = \(\:\text{ln}{K}_{f}\)+ \(\:\frac{1}{n}\) \(\:\text{ln}{C}_{e}\) (5)
Where \(\:{K}_{f}\) is Freundlich constant that relates to the adsorption capacity of the solid (L/g). The heterogeneity constant, 1/n, assesses the strength of adsorption and indicates whether or not it is favourable. Advantageous adsorption conditions are represented by n larger than unity [20].
Temkin isotherm. The Temkin isotherm model is based on a variety of hypotheses and includes a component that explicitly considers the interactions between adsorbing species and adsorbate. The study's use of the linear form is indicated by the following equation [21],[10].
\(\:{q}_{e}\) = B \(\:\text{ln}A\) + B \(\:\text{ln}{C}_{e}\) (6)
where B is related to the heat of adsorption (B = \(\:\frac{RT}{b}\:\)), T is the absolute temperature (K), R is a gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), A is the equilibrium binding constant [10].
Dubinin–Radushkevich (D–R) Isotherm. This model, which is restricted to a monolayer, is used to examine the nature of adsorption and can estimate adsorption energy. It does not, therefore, model a homogenous adsorption surface or assume a constant sorption potential.
$$\:\text{ln}{q}_{e}\:=\:\text{ln}{Kq}_{m}+\:{K}_{DR}{\varepsilon\:}^{2}$$
7
$$\:{\varepsilon\:}^{2}\:=\:\text{R}\text{T}\:\text{ln}(1+\frac{1}{{C}_{e}})$$
8
Where \(\:{q}_{e}\) is the monolayer saturation capacity (L/g) and \(\:{K}_{DR}\:\)is the constant of adsorption energy used to calculate the average free energy (E). E value confirms the chemical or physical type of adsorption [22]
E = \(\:\frac{1}{\sqrt{2{K}_{DR}}}\) (9)
2.7 Kinetic models
Pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were employed in this study to fit the experimental data points. The linear form can be used to express the pseudo-first-order kinetic model as follows:
\(\:\text{ln}({\text{q}}_{\text{e}}-\:{\text{q}}_{\text{t}}\) )
Where;\(\:\:{\text{K}}_{\:1}\:\)is pseudo-first-order constant (min− 1). The values of the adsorbed amount of dyes at the equilibrium (\(\:{\text{q}}_{\text{e}}\)) and \(\:{\text{K}}_{\:1}\) were calculated from the intercept and slope of \(\:\text{ln}({\text{q}}_{\text{e}}\)- \(\:{\text{q}}_{\text{t}}\)) versus t plot, respectively.
The linear version of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is as follows.
\(\:\frac{t}{{q}_{t}}\) = \(\:\frac{1}{{K}_{2{{q}_{e}}^{2}}}\) + \(\:\frac{1}{{q}_{e}}\)t (11)
Where; \(\:{\text{K}}_{\:2}\) (g/mg min) is pseudo-second-order kinetic model constant. The plot of \(\:\frac{t}{{q}_{t}}\) versus t was used to calculate the value of\(\:{\:\text{K}}_{\:2}\) from the intercept and the value of \(\:{\text{q}}_{\text{e}}\) from the slope [23].