Several studies have examined the associations between hyperuricemia and periodontitis, yet the results have been inconclusive. The present cross-sectional study, conducted on the US population, is the first of its kind to definitively link hyperuricemia with a 30% increased risk of developing moderate/severe periodontitis, even after adjusting for potential confounders including demographic factors, lifestyles and systemic diseases. Specifically, when focusing solely on the risk of developing severe periodontitis, the increase jumps to 97.4% (OR = 1.974, 95% CI = 1.524 to 2.556).
Sensitivity analysis based on varied definitions of hyperuricemia and classifications of periodontal conditions reaffirmed the robustness of the primary findings, with the increased periodontal risks consistently above 20%, regardless of alternations in hyperuricemia definitions and periodontitis classifications. The increase in periodontal risk appears to be linked to a linear relationship with the serum UA/Cr ratio and a U-shaped relationship with serum UA levels. Taken together, the present study provides the first direct evidence suggesting that hyperuricemia may indeed be associated with a higher risk of periodontitis progression.
Numerous observational studies with small sample sizes have noted elevated blood UA levels in individuals with periodontitis compared to those without [16, 17]. However, these increases in blood UA levels have often fallen within the normal range, as indicated in the latest systematic review conducted by our research group [7].
A cross-sectional study in 2018, involving 1,123 individuals (295 with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ periodontitis vs. 828 with a healthy periodontium), suggested that increased serum UA levels may have adverse effects on periodontitis (OR = 1.100, 95% CI = 1.001 to 1.209). However, this significant association disappeared in the adjusted model (OR = 1.097, 95% CI = 0.998 to 1.206), and hyperuricemia diagnosis was not conducted in this study [9]. Two subsequent cross-sectional studies, conducted in 2020 and 2023 respectively and based on the Korean population, attempted to explore the associations between hyperuricemia and periodontitis. However, these two studies either failed to find any significant association between hyperuricemia and periodontitis or suggested hyperuricemia as a protective factor against periodontitis [10, 11]. Several reasons may account for these discrepancies. Firstly, the two cross-sectional studies identified periodontitis cases using Community Periodontal Index of limited examined teeth or self-reported diagnosis history, which could lead to a significant proportion of misdiagnosis [1]. Secondly, one of the cross-sectional studies excluded numerous individuals with missing covariates, potentially introducing biases into the results.
Another cross-sectional study based on NHANES data of 2009 to 2011, explored the relationships between hyperuricemia and periodontitis [18]. However, incorrect reporting of periodontitis prevalence in this study has raised concerns about its conclusions [19]. In contrast, the present study, involving over 10,000 individuals from the US population, rigorously diagnosed periodontal conditions and hyperuricemia using quantitative criteria. Moreover, the robustness of the findings was verified by multiple covariate adjustments and sensitivity analysis. In this context, the present study provides the first evidence of a positive association between hyperuricemia and the risk of periodontitis. Specifically, individuals with hyperuricemia were found to be more susceptible to periodontitis, particularly the severe form, compared to those without hyperuricemia. These findings suggest that hyperuricemia may be a novel risk factor for periodontitis.
Notably, the positive association between hyperuricemia and periodontitis differed from the relationship between serum UA levels and periodontitis. Existing studies have yielded conflicting conclusions regarding the correlation between serum UA levels and periodontitis. For instance, a cross-sectional study based of a Taiwan military population found a positive association between serum UA levels and periodontitis risk (OR = 1.100, 95% CI = 1.001 to 1.209). In contrast, a similar study in a Korean population implied that hyperuricemia was negatively associated with periodontitis risk (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.96).
The present study, based on a US community population, did not find a linear relationship between serum UA levels and periodontitis after adjusting for covariates. Instead, a U-shaped relationship emerged, a pattern also seen between serum UA levels and other diseases such as chronic kidney diseases and cardiovascular diseases. [20, 21]. The inflection point was determined to be 5.5 mg/dL through threshold effect analysis. Below this threshold, increasing serum UA levels were significantly associated with a decreased risk of periodontitis, while levels above 5.5 mg/dL were positively associated with periodontitis. Hence, within a certain range, serum UA may have a protective role against periodontitis due to its potential antioxidative effects under physiological conditions [22]. However, this protective effect appears to be limited. The use of higher thresholds (either 7.0 or 6.0 mg/dL) to define hyperuricemia might obscure the statistically significant protective effects of serum UA on periodontitis.
Gout is commonly recognized as symptomatic hyperuricemia. A retrospective cohort study with an average follow-up period of 6 years (gout vs. controls, N = 31,759 vs. N = 63,517) indicated that individuals with gout had a higher incidence of periodontitis (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.16). The study also suggested that the use of colchicine, a treatment for gout flare-ups and chronic gout, could reduce the incidence of periodontitis in gout patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.91), compared to those not receiving ULT. Interestingly, gout patients were found to have an increased abundance of Prevotella intermedia in their saliva [23]. Another study reported that tophus (gout nodules) could be found in the gingiva [24]. These studies support a positive correlation between gout and periodontitis.
In the present study, the prevalence of gout was approximately 20.5% among individuals with hyperuricemia. Subgroup analysis stratified by gout indicated that the effect of hyperuricemia on periodontitis was independent of gout. Besides, gout was not significantly associated with periodontitis when included in logistic regression models. This study did not observe any association between gout and periodontitis, possibly due to the complex relationship between hyperuricemia and gout. It is known that most individuals with hyperuricemia, whose serum UA levels exceed the threshold for urate crystallization, do not have a history of gout [25]. Conversely, patients experiencing gout flare-ups can exhibit normal UA level [26]. In the present study, 58.3% of individuals with a history of gout had normal UA levels at the time of examination, a proportion far exceeding that of those receiving ULT (28.9% of gouty individuals). The observation that most gout patients had normalized their serum UA levels made it difficult to identify a potential relationship between gout and periodontitis.
Notably, the present study found that the impact of hyperuricemia on periodontal risk was influenced by ULT. The increased periodontal risk associated with hyperuricemia in the ULT subgroup was much greater than that in the non-ULT subgroup. However, this does not necessarily mean that ULT amplifies the adverse effect of hyperuricemia on periodontitis. Instead, the higher proportions of hyperuricemia (18.6% vs. 13.6%), gout (91.8% vs. 2.7%) and self-reported kidney diseases (10.0% vs. 2.0%) in the ULT subgroup suggest that these individuals had more refractory hyperuricemia compared to those not receiving ULT (see the proportion of hyperuricemia in the subgroups with/without ULT in the Table 1).
Several studies have used the UA/Cr ratio as a surrogate for UA levels, considering kidney clearance function thus providing a better marker for net serum UA production [27]. Evidence shows that the serum UA/Cr ratio is positively associated with various diseases, including metabolic syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and cardiovascular events [28–30]. In the present study, the serum UA/Cr ratio exhibited a positive linear relationship with periodontitis, unlike serum UA levels. This suggests that the monotonic correlation between the serum UA/Cr ratio and periodontitis might be more predictable. However, the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the serum UA/Cr ratio was not effective in distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe periodontitis (Area under the curve = 0.502), likely due to the weak effect of the serum UA/Cr ratio on periodontitis (OR = 1.046) or confounding effects from other systemic conditions. Nonetheless, the relationship between the serum UA/Cr ratio and periodontitis might reflect the systemic metabolic responses of patients with periodontitis or the effects of systemic metabolic disorders on periodontitis.
Among individuals with hyperuricemia, the risk of developing severe periodontitis was significantly higher than the risk of developing mild/moderate forms, even after adjusting for multiple systemic conditions. Patients with severe periodontitis are generally exposed to specific inherited or multiple environmental factors. It is possible that hyperuricemia and periodontitis share some unknown hereditary basis. Other covariates not included in the current study, such as dietary factors, might also strengthen the association between hyperuricemia and severe periodontitis. The underlying mechanisms by which hyperuricemia exacerbates periodontitis remain unclear. Our recent review article hypothesized that hyperuricemia might worsen periodontitis by aggravating periodontal dysbiosis, inflammation and oxidative stress [8]. Therefore, combined animal models of these two conditions should be developed to explore the underlying mechanisms. The findings of the present study also suggest the toned for prompt systemic and periodontal intervention in patients with hyperuricemia to prevent the progression of periodontitis.
Serval limitations exist in the current study. Firstly, the cross-sectional design limits the ability to determine causal associations. Prospective cohort and interventional studies are warranted to validate these findings. Secondly, serum UA levels can exhibit circadian rhythms. Pacheco et al. reported that the estimated amplitudes of circannual variation for serum UA were 0.20 mg/dL in males and 0.17 mg/dL in females [31]. This variability could introduce some unpredictable but limited bias. Thirdly, the findings were derived from survey data collected in the US population between 2009 and 2014. The epidemiological features of hyperuricemia and periodontitis might vary over time and across regions. The prevalence of hyperuricemia has varied over the last decade and across different regions [3, 32, 33]. Treatment coverage rates and regimens might also differ globally. Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalizing these findings to other populations or regions.