Demographics and group comparisons
Table 1 summarizes the demographic and imaging characteristics stratified by Aβ status for all patients (n = 216, Fig. 1A) included in the cross-sectional analyses. The average age was 69.20 ± 8.00 years; 128 were females. Table 2 lists the characteristics of the 76 participants included in the longitudinal analyses. Their average age was 70.09 ± 7.29 years; 49 were females.
Table 1
Baseline Demographic and MRI Characteristics (n = 216)
| Aβ+ (n = 133) | Aβ- (n = 83) | p-value |
Age | 70.59 ± 7.62 | 66.98 ± 8.13 | 0.001 |
Female | 77 (58%) | 51 (61%) | 0.605 |
Education | 11.56 ± 4.08 | 12.16 ± 3.43 | 0.266 |
ApoE 4 carrier$ | 67 (62%) | 15 (23%) | < 0.001 |
MMSE | 21.07 ± 6.36 | 27.18 ± 4.02 | < 0.001 |
CP FWf | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.002 |
CPV | 0.98 ± 0.20 | 0.94 ± 0.23 | 0.143 |
CP FA# | -1.65 ± 0.25 | -1.64 ± 0.23 | 0.841 |
CP MD# | -7.64 ± 0.16 | -7.67 ± 0.10 | 0.091 |
CP CBF# | 3.80 ± 0.53 | 3.77 ± 0.85 | 0.746 |
DTI-ALPS | 1.15 ± 0.17 | 1.23 ± 0.16 | 0.001 |
pWMH# | -3.83 ± 1.52 | -4.78 ± 1.73 | < 0.001 |
dWMH# | -5.74 ± 1.70 | -6.44 ± 1.73 | 0.005 |
#, The log-transformed values were used |
$, Different sample size for ApoE genotype: Aβ+, n = 108; Aβ-, n = 66. |
Table 2
Month 12 Demographic and MRI Characteristics (n = 76)
| Aβ+ (n = 46) | Aβ- (n = 30) | p-value |
Age | 72.33 ± 6.22 | 66.67 ± 7.59 | 0.001 |
Female | 28 (61%) | 21 (70%) | 0.416 |
ApoE 4 carrier$ | 27(63%) | 5 (19%) | < 0.001 |
Baseline CP FWf | 0.77 ± 0.04 | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 0.020 |
Month 12 CP FWf | 0.80 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.06 | 0.001 |
ΔCP FWf | 0.03 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.04 | 0.046 |
Baseline DTI-ALPS | 1.20 ± 0.14 | 1.27 ± 0.15 | 0.081 |
Month 12 DTI-ALPS | 1.13 ± 0.18 | 1.23 ± 0.20 | 0.052 |
ΔDTI-ALPS | -0.08 ± 0.11 | -0.05 ± 0.10 | 0.226 |
Baseline pWMH# | -4.01 ± 1.52 | -4.83 ± 1.49 | 0.022 |
Month 12 pWMH# | -4.07 ± 2.20 | -4.82 ± 1.96 | 0.126 |
ΔpWMH | 0.01 ± 0.03 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | 0.078 |
Baseline Tau SUVR# | 0.64 ± 0.46 | -0.03 ± 0.14 | < 0.001 |
Month 12 Tau SUVR# | 0.67 ± 0.51 | -0.10 ± 0.16 | < 0.001 |
Baseline GFAP | 153.05 ± 93.36 | 76.94 ± 64.01 | < 0.001 |
Month 12 GFAP | 167.52 ± 84.90 | 128.61 ± 71.91 | 0.146 |
#, Nature logarithm was taken for normalization. |
$, Different sample size for ApoE genotype: Aβ+, n = 43; Aβ-, n = 26. |
At baseline, age (70.59 ± 7.62 vs 66.98 ± 8.13, p = 0.001) and ApoE 4 carrier status (62% vs 23%, p < 0.001) differed between Aβ + group and Aβ- controls. Increased FWf of CP (0.78 ± 0.04 vs 0.76 ± 0.06, p = 0.002), increased volume of WMH (pWMH, -3.83 ± 1.52 vs -4.78 ± 1.73, p < 0.001; dWMH, -5.74 ± 1.70 vs -5.74 ± 1.70, p = 0.005, both log-transformed), and decreased DTI-ALPS (1.15 ± 0.17 vs 1.23 ± 0.16, p = 0.001) were observed in Aβ + participants (Table 1, Fig. 2A-C). Conversely, the Aβ + group and Aβ- controls exhibited similar volumes of CP, as well as similar values for FA, MD, and CBF of CP (Table 1, all p > 0.050).
After adjusting for age, sex and ApoE genotype, FWf of CP (β = 10.02, p = 0.015), DTI-ALPS (β = -3.19, p = 0.007), pWMH (β = 0.33, p = 0.007) and dWMH (β = 0.28, p = 0.013) respectively demonstrated an independent association with Aβ positivity (Supplementary Table 1–4).
The relationship between CP FWf, glymphatic clearance and WMH
Across all participants, the CP FWf correlated with DTI-ALPS (r = -0.47, p < 0.001), pWMH (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), and dWMH (r = 0.21, p = 0.003). Mediation analysis revealed a partial mediation effect of DTI-ALPS for the association between CP FWf and pWMH (indirect effect standardized-β = 0.26, p < 0.001, mediated effect = 32.59%; Fig. 2D). However, no mediation effect of DTI-ALPS was observed for the association between CP FWf and dWMH (indirect effect standardized-β = 0.09, p = 0.236).
Within the Aβ + group, CP FWf correlated with DTI-ALPS (r = -0.45, p < 0.001), as well as between CP FWf and pWMH (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) but not dWMH (r = 0.11, p = 0.213). A partial mediation effect of DTI-ALPS for the association between CP FWf and pWMH was observed (indirect effect standardized-β = 0.25, p = 0.003, mediated effect = 35.76%; Fig. 2E).
The Aβ- controls displayed similar associations between CP FWf and DTI-ALPS (r = -0.44, p < 0.001), and pWMH (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). A marginal mediation effect of DTI-ALPS for the association between CP FWf and pWMH was observed (indirect effect standardized-β = 0.25, p = 0.034, mediated effect = 24.67%; Fig. 2F).
The impact of CP FWf across the AD continuum
The relationship between CP FWf, glymphatics and AD imaging markers
We observed significant associations between CP FWf and AD imaging markers (cortical Tau SUVR, cortical SV2A SUVR, hippocampus volume, cortex volume), as well as MMSE score (Fig. 2G, Supplementary Table 5).
After adjusting for age, sex, and ApoE genotype in multivariable linear regression models, an increase in CP FWf was correlated with increased Tau-PET accumulation (Tau SUVR, β = 9.27, p = 0.002, Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table 6) and decreased synaptic density (SV2A SUVR, β = -3.43, p = 0.017, Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table 7). However, CP FWf did not corelated with FBP SUVR (β = 0.98, p = 0.103). The vertex-wise GLM analysis revealed a negative correlation between CP FWf and cortical thickness primarily in the bilateral post cingulate gyrus, precuneus, temporal, and insular lobes. Conversely, CP FWf positively correlated with Tau SUVR in the bilateral insular, temporal regions, and precuneus (Fig. 2H). CP FWf negatively correlated with SV2A SUVR in the right inferior parietal gyrus (Extended Data Fig. 1)
The relationship between CP FWf and blood-based neural biomarkers
Due to restrictions imposed by variability in the availability of adequate blood samples in some patients of the Aβ + cohorts, we specifically marked the sample size in these analyses. Within the Aβ + group, CP FWf was associated with NFL (β = 3.12, p = 0.026, n = 92), GFAP (β = 5.28, p < 0.001, n = 92), NRGN (β = 5.70, p = 0.028, n = 82), and TNF-α (β = 10.83, p = 0.009, n = 81) (Supplementary Table 8–11).
The relationship between CP FWf, glymphatic clearance, WMH and cognition
Increased CP FWf was associated with worse cognitive performance, including overall cognition (MMSE, β = -53.36, p < 0.001), verbal function (AFT, β = -29.83, p = 0.014), and executive function (CDT20, β = -35.29, p = 0.025) within the Aβ + group (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Table 12–14). Similarly, DTI-ALPS and pWMH were also correlated with MMSE (DTI-ALPS, β = 13.17, p < 0.001; pWMH, β = -1.57, p < 0.001), AFT (DTI-ALPS, β = 8.19, p = 0.006; pWMH, β = -0.92, p = 0.003), and CDT20 (DTI-ALPS, β = 13.02, p < 0.001; pWMH, β = -1.60, p < 0.001)
We observed a partial mediation effect of Tau SUVR (indirect effect standardized-β = -0.18, p = 0.043, mediated effect = 40.88%, n = 110, Fig. 3B) and SV2A SUVR (indirect effect standardized-β = -0.21, p = 0.089, mediated effect = 21.73%, n = 64, Fig. 3C) on the association between CP FWf and MMSE. While GFAP exhibited a full mediation effect (mediated effect = 38.69%, n = 111, Fig. 3D), NFL, NRGN, and TNF-α did not significantly mediate the association between CP FWf and global cognitive performance assessed by MMSE (Fig. 3E-G). These findings suggest that the impact of CP FWf on cognitive performance is mediated via Tau- and GFAP-related pathways.
Longitudinal study
CP FWf increased faster in Aβ + than Aβ- participants.
We observed a significant increase in CP FWf during 12-month follow-up period than baseline (F-statistic = 16.673, corrected p < 0.001, Supplementary Table 15) in Aβ + patients. More importantly, Aβ + patients demonstrated a faster increment in CP FWf compared to Aβ- controls (time × group interaction effect: F-statistic = 4.118, corrected p = 0.046, Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table 15).
The rates of increase in CP FWf did not differ between ApoE 4 carriers (n = 27) and non-carriers (n = 16) in the Aβ + group (F-statistic = 0.004, p = 0.949, Fig. 4B).
ΔCP FWf paralleled ΔDTI-ALPS, and was faster than ΔpWMH, ΔTau-PET and ΔGFAP
In Aβ + participants, annual changes in CP FWf, DTI-ALPS, and pWMH volume from baseline to the 12-month follow-up were calculated as ΔCP FWf, ΔDTI-ALPS, and ΔpWMH, respectively. Through Spearman correlation analysis, it was found the ΔCP FWf during the 12-month follow-up period paralleled ΔDTI-ALPS (ρ = -0.42, p = 0.006, Fig. 4C), but not ΔpWMH (ρ = 0.21, p = 0.173). After adjusting for age and sex, the association between ΔCP FWf and ΔDTI-ALPS remained significant (β = -1.02, p = 0.016). The growth rate of CP FWf exceeded that of pWMH (interaction effect, F-statistic = 11.201, corrected p = 0.001), Tau SUVR (interaction effect, F-statistic = 6.804, corrected p = 0.011) and GFAP (interaction effect, F-statistic = 4.430, corrected p = 0.039, Fig. 4D-F).