Description of pathology from selected animals
Animals infected with SIV in this study developed perivascular inflammation, meningitis, and microglial nodules in the brain. The histological changes in the brains of chronically infected animals were more pronounced than that of the acutely infected animals. Detailed examination revealed minimal inflammation in the meninges and choroid plexus of acutely infected animals (Table 1), moderate inflammation in the chronically infected without cART, and minor inflammation in the cART treated SIV-infected animals (Fig. 1). Consistent with these findings, the percentage of Iba1 + cells were elevated in chronically infected animals compared to SIV-cART animals in multiple brain regions but no other significant differences in the percentage of Iba1 + cells were observed (Supplemental Fig. 1).
GFAP expression increases with SIV infection in a region-specific manner
To assess the role of astrocytes in SIV-induced neurodegeneration, we first wanted to assess changes in astrocyte activation across all six brain regions. We expected to see increased astrocyte activation, as measured by increased expression of GFAP, in both acutely and chronically SIV-infected animals across all brain regions. To test this hypothesis, we stained slides for DAPI (blue) and GFAP (green) and assessed the percentage of co-labeled cells (Fig. 2). We found the percentage of GFAP + cells increased with chronic SIV infection in the frontal lobe (Fig. 2b, p = 0.0002) and with acute SIV infection in the caudate and putamen (Fig. 2b, p = 0.0114 and p = 0.0118). However, changes in the percentage of GFAP + cells with SIV infection in the thalamus, hippocampus, or cerebellum did not reach statistical significance.
Recently, we found that increased GFAP intensity better correlated with increasing age than the percentage of GFAP-positive cells [13]. Therefore, we hypothesized that if SIV infection increases aging it would increase GFAP intensity as well. When assessing GFAP intensity relative to DAPI intensity, we found GFAP to increase with chronic SIV infection in the frontal lobe, putamen, and hippocampus (Fig. 2c, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0025, and p = 0.0178, respectively). We also found GFAP intensity was increased with acute infection in the putamen and hippocampus (Fig. 2c, p = 0.0112 and p = 0.0346, respectively). This data suggests that astrocytes in these regions may be more sensitive to infection with SIV or more directly impacted than astrocytes in the caudate, thalamus, and cerebellum.
To our knowledge, the effect of long-term cART on GFAP expression has not previously been assessed in vivo. Here, we show that treatment with cART significantly decreased both the percentage of GFAP + cells and relative intensity of GFAP from that of chronically SIV-infected animals in the frontal lobe (Fig. 2b, p = 0.0007; Fig. 2c, p = 0.0002). Additionally, cART-treated animals had a significantly lower percentage of GFAP + cells than acutely infected animals in the caudate and putamen (Fig. 2b, p = 0.0111 and p = 0.0315, respectively). Importantly, the only place we observed a significant increase in GFAP intensity in cART-treated animals relative to naïve animals was in the putamen (Fig. 2c, p = 0.0058). Overall, it appears as though treatment with cART reduces GFAP expression in SIV-infected animals and thus likely decreases inflammation in the brain.
p16INK4a expression increases with SIV infection across all brain regions
We have previously shown p16 increases with age in rhesus macaques, especially in the frontal lobe [13], thus we expected to see an SIV-induced increase in p16 throughout the selected brain regions indicative of premature or accelerated aging. To test this hypothesis, we stained slides from each brain region for DAPI, GFAP, and p16 (red), obtained whole-slide images, and assessed the percentage of p16 + cells in the total cell population and in the GFAP + cell population, as well as the relative intensity of p16.
Relative to young, naïve rhesus macaques (4–5 years of age), where there was minimal expression of the senescence marker, we observed robust increases in p16 expression with SIV infection across all brain regions (Fig. 3). In the caudate, putamen, and thalamus, we saw significant increases in the total percentage of p16 + cells after acute infection (Fig. 3b, p = 0.0182, p = 0.0036, and p = 0.0005, respectively), while for the frontal lobe, hippocampus, and cerebellum chronic infection was necessary to observe significant increases in the percentage of p16 + cells relative to naïve animals (Fig. 3b, p = 0.0015, p = 0.0002, and p = 0.0147, respectively). Additionally, in the frontal lobe and hippocampus, there was a significant increase in the percentage of p16 + cells between acute and chronic SIV infection (Fig. 3b, p = 0.0318 and p = 0.0170, respectively), suggesting a progressive effect in these regions. Interestingly, the increase in total percentage of p16 + cells seen with acute infection was lost with chronic infection in the caudate and putamen but remained in the thalamus (Fig. 3b, p = 0.0022). This may be due in part to the low number of tissues available from chronically infected animals for the caudate and putamen analyses. It is also important to note that only in the hippocampus did treatment with cART significantly reduce the percentage of p16 + cells from that in chronically SIV-infected animals (Fig. 3b, p = 0.0035), though levels were still significantly higher than in naïve animals (p = 0.0276). The percentage of p16 + cells was also significantly elevated in the frontal lobe, thalamus, and cerebellum of cART-treated animals relative to naïve animals (p = 0.0019, p = 0.0001, and p = 0.0151, respectively) and relative to acutely infected animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0474). This suggests that while cART was effective in reducing productive viral infection peripherally, it did not significantly alter the expression of p16 following chronic SIV-infection in the brain.
When looking at the percentage of astrocytes that were p16+, we saw a similar pattern (Fig. 3c). Again, we see that acute SIV infection in the caudate, putamen, and thalamus is sufficient to trigger a significant increase in the percentage of p16 + cells (Fig. 3c, p = 0.0092, p = 0.0008, and p = 0.0025, respectively). Again, this elevation is lost with chronic infection in the caudate and putamen but remains significant in the thalamus (p = 0.0024). We also saw significant increases in the percentage of p16 + astrocytes in the frontal lobe, hippocampus, and cerebellum of chronically infected animals (p = 0.0031, p = 0.0061, and p = 0.0015, respectively). The percentage of p16 + astrocytes was also significantly elevated in cART-treated animals across the frontal lobe, caudate, putamen, thalamus, and cerebellum (p = 0.0046, p = 0.0149, p = 0.0092, p = 0.0006, and p = 0.0007, respectively) and was not decreased in any brain region relative to that in chronically infected animals. Again, this suggests that cART does not significantly alter the expression of p16 in the brain from that seen in chronically infected animals.
To assess changes in the overall expression of p16, we analyzed the intensity of p16 staining relative to that of DAPI and again saw a similar pattern of increased p16 expression with SIV infection across the brain (Fig. 3d). One difference, however, was that with acute infection we only saw a significant increase in p16 expression in the putamen (p = 0.0003) and not in the caudate or thalamus. With chronic infection, we saw a significant increase in p16 expression in the frontal lobe, thalamus, hippocampus, and cerebellum (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0047, p = 0.0065, p = 0.0003, respectively). We also saw a significant increase in p16 expression in cART-treated animals relative to naïve animals in the frontal lobe, putamen, thalamus, and cerebellum (p = 0.0004, p = 0.0328, p = 0. 0014, p = 0.0010, respectively), with no significant reductions relative to SIV-infected, untreated animals. Thus, cART again appears to neither increase nor decrease p16 expression from that seen in untreated, SIV-infected animals.
SIRT1 expression varies based on brain region and infection status
The second aging marker we assessed was SIRT1. We previously found a positive correlation between SIRT1 expression and neurodegeneration in the frontal lobe of uninfected animals [13]. Additionally, it is known that the activity of SIRT1 is inhibited by the HIV protein Tat leading to hyperactivation of immune cells [19]. Thus, we were interested in how these interactions may impact expression in the brain, especially in astrocytes. Based on the reduction of SIRT1 at the mRNA and protein levels in the gut of SIV-infected animals [20], we expected to see similar reductions in the brain. To test this hypothesis, we stained slides for DAPI, GFAP, and SIRT1 (red), then obtained whole-slide scanned images and assessed the percentage of SIRT1 + cells, the percentage of SIRT1 + astrocytes, and the relative intensity of SIRT1 staining.
In general, the relationship between SIV infection and SIRT1 expression appears to be region specific even in naïve animals. When looking at the percentage of SIRT1 + cells, we saw a significant reduction relative to naïve animals in the hippocampus of acutely infected animals (Fig. 4b, p = 0.0005) that rebounded with chronic infection (p < 0.0001). In the cerebellum, we saw a significant increase in the percentage of SIRT1 + cells with chronic infection, relative to both naïve animals (p = 0.0063) and acutely infected animals (p = 0.0132). In the frontal lobe, caudate, putamen, and thalamus, we did not see any significant changes in the percentage of SIRT1 + cells with acute or chronic infection. Finally, cART had opposing effects in the frontal lobe and hippocampus. In the frontal lobe, we saw a significant increase in SIRT1 + cells in cART-treated animals relative to both naïve animals (p = 0.0128) and acutely infected animals (p = 0.0291). Whereas in the hippocampus, cART-treated animals had a significant reduction in SIRT1 + cells relative to naïve animals (p = 0.0001) and chronically infected animals (p < 0.0001) that more closely resembled levels seen in acutely infected animals.
Next, we assessed the effect of SIV infection on expression of SIRT1 in astrocytes specifically (Fig. 4c). Here, we saw a similar, region-specific effect. Similar to the total cell population, we saw a significant reduction in the percentage of SIRT1 + astrocytes in the hippocampus of acutely infected animals (p = 0.0006) that rebounded with chronic infection (p = 0.0004). Whereas we saw a significant increase in SIRT1 + astrocytes in chronically infected animals relative to naïve animals in the caudate (p = 0.0412) and cerebellum (p = 0.0109), with the increase in the cerebellum also being significantly higher than that in acutely infected animals (p = 0.0435). Finally, cART-treated animals had significantly reduced SIRT1 + astrocytes in the hippocampus relative to both naïve animals (p = 0.0002) and chronically infected animals (p < 0.0001) that resembled levels seen in acutely infected animals. However, cART-treated animals had elevated SIRT1 + astrocytes in the cerebellum relative to naïve animals (p = 0.0396).
To better understand how SIRT1 expression is altered with SIV infection, we also analyzed the intensity of SIRT1 staining relative to DAPI staining (Fig. 4d). Here, we saw more consistent patterns across the brain. To begin, there were no significant differences in SIRT1 expression between naïve and acutely infected animals in all brain region examined. Chronically infected animals had a significant increase in SIRT1 expression relative to naïve animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0104), putamen (p = 0.0018), and hippocampus (p = 0.0453) and relative to acutely infected animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0101), putamen (p = 0.0083), hippocampus (p = 0.0279), and cerebellum (p = 0.0215). Animals treated with cART also had increased SIRT1 expression relative to naïve animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0089) and putamen (p = 0.0117). Whereas in the hippocampus, SIRT1 expression was significantly reduced in cART-treated animals relative to chronically infected animals (p = 0.0296) to levels that resemble that seen in naïve and acutely infected animals.
FluoroJade C staining is increased in chronically SIV-infected animals in a region-specific manner
To assess generalized neurodegeneration, we performed FluoroJade C (FJC) staining on all tissues, followed again by whole-slide scanning and analyses using HALO® image analysis software. In general, we saw an increase in neurodegeneration, as measured by the percentage of FJC + cells or relative intensity of FJC staining, in chronically SIV-infected animals across several brain regions relative to naïve animals, but not in any other groups (Fig. 5). More specifically, when looking at the percentage of FJC + cells (Fig. 5b), we saw a significant increase relative to naïve animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0118) and thalamus (p = 0.0210) and a significant increase relative to acutely infected animals in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0044) and the cerebellum (p = 0.0104). When looking at the relative intensity of FJC staining, we saw a similar pattern (Fig. 5c). Relative FJC intensity increased with chronic infection relative to naïve animals again in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0031) and thalamus (p = 0.0285), as well as in the hippocampus (p = 0.0139) and cerebellum (p = 0.0131). Relative to acutely infected animals, chronically infected animals had elevated FJC staining again in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0021) and cerebellum (p = 0.0167). Interestingly, when using relative intensity of FJC as a measure of general neurodegeneration, cART-treated animals had significantly less neurodegeneration in the frontal lobe than chronically infected animals (p = 0.0031), suggesting a potential protective effect of cART in the frontal lobe. It is also important to note that neurodegeneration was not significantly elevated in cART-treated animals relative to naïve animals in any brain region by either measure used, and therefore does not appear to be eliciting additional neurodegeneration in the brain.
Neurodegeneration correlates with markers of accelerated aging
Finally, to assess the relevance of changes in p16 and SIRT1 expression to neurodegeneration, we performed Pearson correlation analyses between each marker and neurodegeneration (Fig. 6). Here we found a great deal of variability from one brain region to the next and depending on the measure of neurodegeneration used. When assessing the correlation of aging markers with the percentage of FJC + cells (Fig. 6a), the %p16 + cells and %p16 + astrocytes were only significantly correlated in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, p16 intensity correlated with %FJC + cells in the frontal lobe (p = 0.002), thalamus (p = 0.007), and hippocampus (p = 0.031). The %SIRT1 + cells only correlated with %FJC + cells in the cerebellum (p = 0.012) and the %SIRT1 + astrocytes did not correlate with %FJC + cells in any brain region. Yet SIRT1 intensity correlated with %FJC + cells in the frontal lobe (p = 0.004), thalamus (p = 0.003), hippocampus (p = 0.044), and cerebellum (p = 0.016). Finally, the %GFAP + cells correlated with %FJC + cells in both the frontal lobe (p = 0.014) and thalamus (p = 0.036), and the intensity of GFAP staining correlated with %FJC + cells in the frontal lobe (p = 0.004), thalamus (p = 0.007), and hippocampus (p = 0.013). When assessing the correlation of aging markers with the intensity of FJC staining (Fig. 6b), the %p16 + cells and p16 intensity were both significantly correlated in the thalamus (p = 0.022 and p = 0.001, respectively) and hippocampus (p = 0.043 and p = 0.001, respectively). The %p16 + astrocytes was also significantly increased in the thalamus (p = 0.023). The %SIRT1 + cells correlated with FJC intensity in the caudate (p = 0.049) and cerebellum (p = 0.004), while %SIRT1 + astrocytes was correlated with FJC intensity in the cerebellum only (p = 0.015). However, the intensity of SIRT1 staining correlated with FJC intensity in several brain regions, including the putamen (p = 0.010), thalamus (p = 0.00015), hippocampus (p = 0.004), and cerebellum (p = 0.002). Finally, the %GFAP + cells and GFAP intensity both correlated with FJC intensity in the frontal lobe (p = 0.0003454 and p = 0.0003499, respectively), thalamus (p = 0.004 and p = 0.00019, respectively), and hippocampus (p = 0.012 and p = 0.002, respectively), while only %GFAP + cells correlated with FJC intensity in the putamen (p = 0.001).
To determine if p16 and SIRT1 significantly predicted neurodegeneration, multiple linear regression was used. Here, we found both p16 expression and SIRT1 expression to predict FJC expression, but only in the frontal lobe and hippocampus. For the frontal lobe, when assessing if %p16 + cells and %SIRT1 + cells predicted %FJC + cells, the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.6152, F(3, 13) = 6.927, p = 0.0050) and the %p16 + cells significantly predicted %FJC + cells (ß = 1.403, p = 0.0024). For the frontal lobe, when assessing if %p16 + astrocytes and %SIRT1 + astrocytes predicted %FJC + cells, the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.5482, F(3, 13) = 5.258, p = 0.0135) and the %p16 + astrocytes significantly predicted %FJC + cells (ß = 0.9245, p = 0.0053). In the hippocampus, when assessing if %p16 + cells and %SIRT1 + cells predicted %FJC + cells, the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.5279, F(3, 10) = 3.727, p = 0.0494) and the %p16 + cells significantly predicted %FJC + cells (ß = -2.545, p = 0.0236), as did the %SIRT1 + cells (ß = -2.718, p = 0.0104), and the interaction between %p16 + cells and %SIRT1 + cells (ß = 0.06323, p = 0.0093). Similarly for the hippocampus, when assessing if %p16 + astrocytes and %SIRT1 + astrocytes predicted %FJC + cells, the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.7416, F(3, 10) = 9.567, p = 0.0028) and the %p16 + astrocytes significantly predicted %FJC + cells (ß = -3.258, p = 0.0007), as did the %SIRT1 + astrocytes (ß = -3.671, p = 0.0003), and the interaction between %p16 + astrocytes and %SIRT1 + astrocytes (ß = 0.01218, p = 0.0003). We saw similar results in the hippocampus when assessing if %p16 + cells and %SIRT1 + cells predicted FJC intensity, where the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.6871, F(3, 10) = 7.321, p = 0.0070) and the %SIRT1 + cells significantly predicted FJC intensity (ß = -0.03660, p = 0.0057), as did the interaction between %p16 + cells and %SIRT1 + cells (ß = 0.0008359, p = 0.0056). Similarly for the hippocampus, when assessing if %p16 + astrocytes and %SIRT1 + astrocytes predicted FJC intensity, the overall regression was significant (R2 = 0.6141, F(3, 10) = 5.306, p = 0.0191) and the %p16 + astrocytes significantly predicted FJC intensity (ß = -0.02875, p = 0.0414), as did the %SIRT1 + astrocytes (ß = -0.041492, p = 0.0075), and the interaction between %p16 + astrocytes and %SIRT1 + astrocytes (ß = 0.0007491, p = 0.0069). Together, these results demonstrate the importance of these aging markers in SIV-induced neurodegeneration in the frontal lobe and hippocampus.