Experiment 1. The effects on brain activity
Experiment 1 evaluated the effects of igusa water scent compared to that of distilled water (used as control), which has little odor. The experiment was conducted with nine healthy males and eight female young individuals using a questionnaire to assess mood and subjective impression of the scent. In addition, a visual stimuli test with an electroencephalograph (EEG) monitor was used to assess changes in work efficiency and brain waves caused by the scent. EEG is a non-invasive technique with excellent temporal resolution that is highly sensitive to fluctuations in human brain activity8. In the experiment, the subjects two sets of six sessions of visual stimuli tests, of 2.5 min each were performed on the subjects. One set smelled the scent of igusa water, and the other set smelled the scent of distilled water. Ultrasonic humidifiers were used to diffuse igusa water, which was diluted 100 times with distilled water and to diffuse distilled water. The VOC analysis conducted on samples collected from igusa water using an air collection pump for 15 s with an air flow rate of 0.15 L/min showed presence of Hexanal: 420 µg/m³, D-Limonene: 661 µg/m³, and 1,8-Cineol: 227 µg/m³.
The visual stimuli test was conducted to assess the level of participants’ focused attention to detail using a software “Presentation” by Neuro Behavioral System. In this test, three patterns of grayscale sinusoidal grating images – vertically straight pattern (T), tilted at 10 ° pattern (F), and tilted at 50 °pattern (I) appeared randomly on the screen. (T) appears with a probability of 15%, (F) with a probability of 70%, and (I) with a probability of 15%. The interstimulus intervals were also randomized between 850 and 1100 ms to make it difficult for the participants to anticipate. Participants were asked to press the button when (T) appeared (Fig. 3). The task involved pressing a button accurately and quickly in response to (T). In addition to the visual stimuli test, a shortened version of the Profile Of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire was performed before and after the test, and a questionnaire survey was conducted to examine the impression of the scent after the test (Fig. 4)9. The POMS questionnaire categorizes mood into six dimensions: "tension," "depression," "anger," "fatigue," "confusion," and "vigor." In addition, scores of each dimension were calculated to indicate negative mood states.
Individuals recognized the scent of igusa water much stronger than that of the distilled water (2.00 ± 0.411 vs.0.824 ± 0.231, p = 0.048); however, preference for the scent of igusa water was lower than that of water (0.118 ± 0.169 vs. 0.412 ± 0.193, p = 0.289) (Fig. 5). The results of the POMS questionnaire administered before and after the visual stimuli test did not show any significant differences compared to the distilled water condition. In contrast, toe results of the visual stimuli test, although no significant effect was found in the accuracy rate with the scent of igusa water (Fig. 6), the reaction time was significantly faster with the scent of igusa water than that of the distilled water in session 3 (510.44 ± 16.35 msec vs. 561.82 ± 16.40, p = 0.01). Furthermore, EEG monitoring during the visual stimuli task displayed that gamma power during the task with the scent of igusa water was significantly larger than the distilled water (46.80 ± 16.08 vs. 39.34 ± 17.02, p = 0.016) (Fig. 7). Gamma waves are known to appear during a state of high arousal (emotional and cognitive processing), and it can be said that the scent of igusa water enhances sensory and cognitive processing functions10.
Experiment 2. Effects to healthy individuals’ mood
Experiment 2 examined the effects of the igusa water scent emitted by a diffuser in a normal living environment on 40 healthy young college students (20 males and 20 females, with an average age of 21.3 years). In addition to distilled water, 1,8-cineole was used as a control, which has been confirmed to have an arousing effect in previous studies11. The scent of 1,8-cineole is described as a fresh, with slightly minty aroma, and is often used in aromatherapy for its relaxing properties. The participants were randomly divided into two groups, A and B, for a single-blind experiment in three environments: a room with the scents of distilled water, 1,8-cineole, and igusa water. Both groups performed the experiment once a day using one scent. Experiments with different scents were performed at least three days apart. Both groups undertook the experiment in a room with the scent of distilled water first, subsequently followed by group A undertaking the experiment in a room with the scent of igusa water first, and group B undertaking the experiment in a room with the scent of 1,8-cineole first.
The experiment used 1) a survey to evaluate the preference for the scent on a 5-point scale, measuring the liking or disliking of the scent, 2) a shortened version of the POMS questionnaire to measure mood changes, and 3) 100 square calculation tests to measure the change in mood owing to the scent. This was an arithmetic task involving single-digit additions to a 10 × 10 grid within a limited time of 1 min. In addition, the number of correct answers were also recorded (Fig. 8). In one experiment, the participants first completed the POMS questionnaire and 100 square calculation tests in a room with open windows that did not diffuse any scent. After completing the tests, they moved to the next room, where the scent was diffused. After they sat down and had a quiet time of 3 min, they completed a questionnaire about their scent preference, a calculation test, and a POMS questionnaire (Fig. 9).
Figure 10 presents the results of the questionnaire regarding scent preferences. Approximately 45% of participants very liked (18%) or liked (27%) the scent of 1,8-cineole, whereas none very liked (14%) the scent of igusa water. In contrast, 15% of the participants very disliked (11%) or disliked (4%) the scent of 1,8-cineole, whereas 48% of the participants very disliked (9%) or disliked (39%) the scent of igusa water. The smell of igusa water reminded the participants of old barns, countryside, and grass, and was less favored than 1,8-cineole. The results of the 100 square calculation tests displayed that the average score significantly improved after exposure to 1,8-cineole (p = 0.0046). In particular, all participants who answered that they disliked the igusa water scent performed worse in the 100 square calculation tests after exposure to the scent. However, despite the lower scent preference, igusa water demonstrated better results in the total mood disturbance (TMD) evaluation of the POMS questionnaire. The TMD was calculated by summing the scores of the first five subscales (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment) and subtracting the vigor-activity score. TMD provides an overall measure of mood disturbance, with higher scores indicating greater negative affect. The results of TMD in this experiment indicated that the scent of igusa water had a greater mood-enhancing effect than 1,8-cineole among young individuals.
Experiment 3. The effects to the elderly subjects’ well-being
Experiment 3 was conducted with the residents of two nursing homes, WR (Wakaba Residence)12 and WT (Wakaba Terrace),13 in Sasebo City, Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan. 34 participants (WR: 11 females, 3 males; WT1:10 females; WT2:10 females) were recruited from residents who had mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores between 10 and 27. The average age of participants was 92 years. Distilled water and 1,8-cineole were used as control. The experiment involved exposing the participants to one of the scents for 1 h before bedtime for seven consecutive days. As the participants' room doors were closed at bedtime, the scent components diffused by the diffuser lingered in the room while the participants were sleeping. All participants lived in a single room (approximately 3 m x 5 m) furnished with a bed, bedside table, closet, and a shelf (Fig. 11). Temperature was controlled with air conditioning, and the windows were typically kept closed.
The MMSE, dementia behavior disturbance scale (DBD), and Cohen–Mansfield agitation inventory (CMAI) were used as indicators to measure cognitive abilities and behavioral observations14,15,16,17. The MMSE is a questionnaire used to assess cognitive impairment by examining functions such as attention, calculation, recall, and language. It consists of 11 questions measuring cognitive ability. The DBD is a scale comprising 28 items that caregivers use to assess behavioral symptoms. The CMAI is a scale divided into aggressive behavior (11 items) and non-aggressive behavior (11 items), totaling 22 items, in which caregivers assess behavioral symptoms. The duration of the experiment was 6 weeks. The participants were exposed to scents for seven days during the 2nd and 5th week. The WT2 participants were exposed to the scent of distilled water for both weeks; while WT1 participants were exposed to igusa water during week 2 and 1,8-cineole during week 5; whereas WR participants were exposed to the scent of 1,8-cineole during week 2 and igusa water during week 5 (Fig. 12). None of the participants recognized the scents; however, all caregivers perceived the scents of 1,8-cineole and igusa water. During the 6 weeks of the experiment, four MMES tests were performed: week1 (before the first scent test), week 3 (after the first scent test), week 4 (before the second scent test), and week 6 (after the second scent test). Evaluation of DBD and CMAI was performed daily between 2 PM and 5 PM during weeks 2 and 5 respectively.
The effects on cognitive function
Figure 13 illustrates the changes in the normalized average MMSE scores of the three groups of participants (WR, WT1, and WT2) before and after the two exposure sessions. Although scent was not perceived by any participant, the MMSE score improved during the scent exposure periods. The effect of the scents is evident from the results that the average MMSE of WR and WT1 participants increased during the period of exposure and decreased during the 2 weeks of washout period. Although the caregivers preferred the smell of 1,8-cineol, the scent of igusa water had a more positive impact on the MMSE results compared to that of the scent of 1,8-cineole. The WR participants showed significantly improved MMSE scores with the scent of 1,8-cineole (p = 0.02) and igusa water (p = 0.001), while W1 participants showed a trend of improvement with the scents of igusa water (p = 0.34) and 1,8-cineole (p = 0.33). No significant change was observed in the MMSE scores of WT2 participants exposed to the scent of distilled water.
The effects on behavior
Figure 14 shows the average DBD and CMAI scores on day 1 (blue) and day 7 (red) of scent exposure. An increase in the values indicated an increase in behavioral issues. Comparing the results of days 1 and 7 of scent exposure, there was no significant change in the case of water; however, there was a significant improvement in DBD and CMAI for both igusa water (DBD, p = 0.0005; CMAI, p = 0.002) and 1,8-cineole (DBD, p = 0.025; CMAI, p = 0.013). In addition, the degree of improvement was greater for igusa water than for 1,8-cineole. While considering the details of the improvements, there was a particular improvement in items such as “trying to go to a different place,” “repeating the same actions,” “repeating the same words,” “urinary incontinence,” and “fecal incontinence.” According to caregivers’ records, there was an increase in requests from participants to use the toilet during the exposure period to igusa water and 1,8-cineole. These improvements could be because the scent had an effect on awakening the participants' consciousness.