Consistent with prior research, the frequency of lightning-related deaths has continued to decline across the US overall and US South over time (Duclos and Sanderson 1990; Curran et al. 2000; Adekoya and Nolte 2005; Holle et al. 2005; Jensenius and Franklin 2014; Jensenius et al. 2023). The declines in lightning deaths by year are particularly notable given increases in the US and Southern US populations, which are reflected by the decreases in the mortality rates. Furthermore, these decreases are potentially more notable if there has been a true increase in the frequency of cloud-to-ground lightning attributable to warmer air temperatures (Williams et al. 2005; Price 2008; Romps et al. 2014; Yair 2018; Price and Rind 2024). While there may have been fewer lightning fatalities during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, which speculatively could be attributable to different outdoor- and work-related human behaviors, the trend towards a lower mortality rate was already apparent prior to 2020. Furthermore, in 2022 and 2023, the reduced frequency of lightning mortality for the entire US population was sustained with 17 and 13 deaths, respectively (National Weather Service 2024b).
The findings demonstrate significant public health achievements associated with the ongoing and historical activities of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Weather Service, Lightning Safety Alliance, U.S. National Lightning Safety Council, emergency medical care providers, the individuals part of these organizations, among others. Globally, the high-income countries have had annual lightning mortality rates below 0.3 victims per million (Ströhle et al. 2018). The US results illustrate a mean mortality rate of 0.115 per million from 1999 through 2022 (Table 2). While these improvements have been notable, the hazard remains and warrants continued vigilance with respect to monitoring and active preventive measures. Targeted and ongoing education for the general public, and males in particular, remains warranted. Furthermore, education for younger populations and families ought to continue for maintaining awareness of the danger presented by outdoor activities proximal to thunder.
In a recent case series analysis of fatal lightning victims from 2006 through 2022, Jensenius (2023) noted that males represented 80% of all the victims, and 90% of the lightning victims when stratifying for those who were engaged in fishing, work, and sports, during the period. Among all the victims, 63% were engaged in leisure or recreational activities at the time of death, including water-related activities (fishing, beach, boating, and swimming), outdoor sports, and camping. In addition to leisure activities, work-related fatalities have consistently represented about 18.5–25% of the lightning mortality in the US since the 1980s (Duclos and Sanderson 1990; Adekoya and Nolte 2004). From 2006 through 2022, 19% of the lightning deaths were work-related with farming/ranching, roofing, and construction being the highest risk groups (Jensenius 2023). The results of this case series remain useful for informing ongoing education and outreach.
While emergency medical care for victims has been considerable and has reduced lightning mortality (Zimmerman et al. 2002), the Wilderness Medical Society emphasizes prevention in their practice guidelines for preventing and treating lightning injuries (Davis et al. 2014). The guidelines embrace the National Weather Service maxim, “When the thunder roars, go indoors.” The guidance also clarifies that estimating a safe distance from the time between hearing thunder and seeing a lightning flash has contributed to false presumptions of safety. Accordingly, the prevailing guidance is as follows, “Individuals should wait a minimum of 30 minutes after hearing the last thunderclap before resuming outdoor activity. Waiting 30 minutes should allow for the trailing edge of the thunderstorm to move the estimated 10 miles needed to establish an appropriate buffer zone.” (Davis et al. 2014). Furthermore, the time necessary to evacuate at-risk locations should be incorporated into lightning action plans, with adults (teachers, lifeguards, sporting officials/coaches, etc.) assuming responsibility for the safety of any children (Zimmerman et al. 2002).
Some limitations of our study relate to the focus on mortality. Specifically, injury is also an important health-relevant outcome from lightning strikes. Previous research estimates 70–90% of victims from lightning will survive; however, many (76%) of the survivors will endure long-term sequelae (Ritenour et al. 2008). The lightning victim survival rates in high-income countries are estimated to be near 90% (Holle et al. 2021), and if that estimate remains reliable, then approximately 170 and 130 persons were struck by lightning in 2022 and 2023, respectively, based upon an extrapolation from the 17 and 13 deaths observed in 2022 and 2023 (National Weather Service 2024b). Additionally, if 130 to 170 persons in each of the last two years experienced long-term sequelae in 76% of those events, then it is plausible that in the last two years there have also been approximately 99 to 129 persons in the last two years who have had, or continue to have, long-term adverse health effects from those events. The sequalae likely include disorders with their central nervous system, vision/eyes, skin, muscles, and more (Ritenour et al. 2008). For comparison, using 2019 data, the National Weather Service estimated 243 injuries from 27 lightning deaths (National Weather Service 2024c).
Another limitation of our data analysis focusing on annual US mortality is that it could lead to an underestimation of the lifetime risk of being struck by lightning or dying from a lightning strike. While the annual and lifetime rates are considerably higher for males, in 2008, the risk for the average US person being struck in a lifetime was one in 3,000, and the risk of death was one in 35,000 (Ritenour et al. 2008). Using data through 2018, the National Weather Service (2024c) estimated the lifetime risk (80 years) of being struck at one in 15,300. Using similar extrapolations, if 27 deaths were linked to a lifetime risk of 1:15,300 being struck in 2018, then if the 17 deaths remained constant from 2022 into the future, the updated lifetime risk in the US would be approximately one lighting strike per 24,300 persons, in which nearly 10% of those persons would succumb to the lightning. These risks are considerably higher for males and persons in the US South. Modern lifetime lightning strike risk estimates are reliant on the assumption that the incidence of lightning strikes will remain at all-time lows.
Potential barriers for sustaining these all-time low lightning mortality rates in the US or preventing the further reduction in lightning injuries and mortality in the US include (1) changes in the climate and other atmospheric conditions that promote more lightning (Romps et al. 2014, Banerjee et al. 2014), (2) complacency or overconfidence by the most at-risk citizenry regarding the hazard (Casteel 2023), (3) increases in the number of unsheltered or poorly sheltered citizens (Settembrino 2017; Bezgrebelna et al. 2021; Richards and Kuhn (2023), and (4) changing population demographics that could impact public alerts, warning messages, and educational campaigns (Sadiq et a. 2023).
There was one documented lightning-related death in a homeless individual in the case series of lightning deaths for 2006 through 2022, which represented one (0.21%) case out of 466. Additionally, among work-related lightning victims, there has been overrepresentation of Hispanic workers in historical studies; whereby from 1995 to 2022, Hispanic workers represented nearly one-third of those work-related lightning deaths despite being 12% of the population at-risk (Adekoya and Nolte 2005).
The ongoing work by Vagasky et al. (2024) and others that map the distribution, including the frequency and intensity of lightning events impacting the ground, could be used for informing interventions and ascertaining if the hazard is intensifying across the entire US or within certain regions of the US. Overlaying these maps with population demographics could also inform educational campaigns aimed at preventing lightning-related injuries and deaths. Continued vigilance and active reporting of lightning hazards by the media and government sources remains warranted to prevent complacency from the public health successes related to lightning over the last several decades, all while the incidence and intensity of lightning has likely been increasing in growing US population centers.