RNA-seq analysis of differential gene expression in AML drug-resistant patients
To assess the profile of DEGs in AML relapse (reAML) patients, we performed RNA-seq analysis of bone marrow blood samples from reAML patients, AML remission patients (AML), and Healthy individuals. The results showed that the gene expression profile of reAML patients was significantly altered. Specifically, reAML patients had a total of 2,222 up-regulated genes and 2,413 down-regulated genes compared with Healthy controls. A total of 656 genes were up-regulated, and 1,115 genes were down-regulated compared with AML samples (Fig. 1A, B). Subsequent overlapping analysis revealed a total of 593 overlapped up-regulated genes and 999 overlapped down-regulated genes in the reAML group in comparison to the Healthy and AML groups (Fig. 1C).
Further analyses showed that the overlapped up-regulated GO biological processes were mainly enriched in signal transduction, angiogenesis, cell differentiation, and negative regulation of osteoblast differentiation, while the overlapped down-regulated processes were mainly enriched in immunoglobulin production, immune response, the cell surface or B cell receptor signalling pathway, inflammatory response, and T cell activation (Fig. 1D, E). In addition, the overlapped up-regulated KEGG pathways were largely cancer-associated pathways, such as the Rap1 signalling pathway, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, and the PI3K-Akt and MAPK signalling pathways, while the overlapped down-regulated pathways were largely immune-related and inflammatory pathways, such as hematopoietic cell lineage, primary immunodeficiency, the T cell receptor signalling pathway, graft-versus-host disease, Th17 cell differentiation, and natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A, B). The GO and KEGG results both indicated that the overlapped down-regulated genes were mainly focused on the regulation of immunity and inflammation. Subsequently, we used the known immune genes in the “Immport” immune gene bank as a control and further screened 237 total overlapped down-regulated immune-related genes (Fig. 1F).
Of particular interest, four overlapped up-regulated genes (EGFL7, CBX2, SOX4, and CDK6) and four overlapped down-regulated genes (LCN2, CYBB, RNAS, and CD48) were found to be significantly altered in their expression levels in the reAML group (p < 0.001) (Additional file 1: Fig. S1C). Similarly, the clinical data on acute myeloid leukaemia (LAML) from the TCGA database showed that the expression levels of IGF2BP2, CDK6, and SOX4 were significantly up-regulated in patients with AML relapse (p < 0.05) (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). This suggested that the expression profile of these DEGs is considerably changed in the disease state of AML relapse, which may be one of the prime reasons for progression and drug resistance in AML relapse patients.
RNA-seq analysis of differential RBP expression in AML drug-resistant patients.
In order to clarify the differential expression of RBP genes in reAML patients, we conducted overlapping analysis of overlapped up-regulated and down-regulated genes, as well as RBP genes. The results demonstrated that 33 RBP genes were overlapped up-regulated and 30 RBP genes were overlapped down-regulated (Fig. 2A). In-depth protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis confirmed a close relationship between the overlapped RBP genes (Fig. 2B). In particular, the expression levels of two overlapped up-regulated (NPM1 & IGF2BP2) and two overlapped downregulated (MYH9 & LGALS3) RBP genes were significantly varied (Fig. 2C). The results indicated that these differentially expressed RBPs are closely related to the development of AML and are very likely involved in the regulation of AML relapse, which may also be one of the key regulatory mechanisms of the progression of AML relapse and drug resistance.
WGCNA of differential AS in AML drug-resistant patients.
To explore the variations of AS in reAML patients, we then carried out in-depth analyses of bone marrow blood samples from the reAML, AML, and Healthy groups. The results demonstrated significant changes in AS in the reAML group in comparison to the AML and Healthy groups, and multiple differential regulatory alternative splicing events (RASEs) were also identified (Fig. 3A, B). We further conducted WGCNA of all the detected regulatory alternative splicing genes (RASGs) and found that these genes were divided into 9 modules (Fig. 3C). According to the different gene expressions in the modules, the turquoise and yellow modules were selected for specific gene expression analyses. The results showed that the expression level of RASG in the turquoise module was increased in the AML and Healthy groups, and decreased in the reAML group. However, in the yellow module, the expression level of RASG was down regulated in the AML and Healthy groups, and up regulated in the reAML group (Fig. 3C). The above results implied that both RASGs and RASEs are altered in reAML patients, showing that they are likely another important factor in the progression of AML relapse and resistance.
Clinical data analysis of differential RAS gene expression in AML drug-resistant patients.
In order to identify the biological processes that closely related to AML in the turquoise and yellow modules, we performed GO analysis on RASGs for both modules. The results clarified that the GO biological processes in the turquoise module were largely enriched in RNA splicing, mRNA processing, splicesomal complex assembly, positive regulation of DNA template transcription, DNA repair, phagocytosis, and protein stabilisation. However, the GO biological processes in the yellow module were mainly enriched in positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription and both the positive and negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II (Fig. 4A). To further identify the specific RASGs that were differentially expressed, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the relative expression levels of RASGs in both the turquoise and yellow modules. The results confirmed that three genes (GRK6, FLNA, and NCOR2) in the turquoise module and three genes (INF2, MGAT1, and NT5C2) in the yellow module in the reAML group were significantly down regulated compared with the AML and Healthy groups (Fig. 4B). Therefore, it is speculated that the differentially expressed RASGs may play a vital role in the regulation of key RASEs in the progression of AML relapse and drug resistance by altering numerous intricate biological processes, such as RNA splicing, transcriptional regulation, and protein stabilisation.