Background: The purpose of this descriptive study is to outline the Roseman University of Health Sciences (RUHS) College of Dental Medicines’ Patient Assistance Fund development, organization and outcomes. The description and reported results provide insight to others considering similar health professions programs.
Methods: The Patient Assistance Fund (PAF) affords dental students an opportunity to petition for and obtain financial assistance for their most disadvantaged patients. This study used a mixed methods research design using quantitative analyses for data collected as part of the PAFs operation and qualitative analyses to evaluate the patient experiences.
Results: A total of 16 student advocates, consisting of 6 males and 10 females from the D3 and D4 classes made 26 presentations to the PAF board committee. The combined amount requested from the PAF was $47,428.00 (“Cost of Treatment Plan”) representing an average request per patient of $1,824.15 (range $324.00 to $4070.00). The approved procedures and treatment plans totaled $21,278.36 (“Cost of Approved Procedures”) with an average of $818.40 (range $204.00 to $2434.00) per patient. Patients and students expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the program.
Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the structure, funding sources, expenditures and patient services supported by a dental student managed patient assistance fund. The experiences at RUHS College of Dental Medicine (CODM) suggest that other healthcare professions schools can develop similar type programs that yield benefit both to students and to patients in need.
Trial Registration: Not applicable
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
On 08 Dec, 2020
On 03 Dec, 2020
On 31 Oct, 2020
Invitations sent on 28 Oct, 2020
On 27 Oct, 2020
On 26 Oct, 2020
On 26 Oct, 2020
Posted 12 Aug, 2020
On 12 Oct, 2020
Received 10 Oct, 2020
Received 28 Sep, 2020
On 05 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 31 Aug, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
On 21 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
On 08 Dec, 2020
On 03 Dec, 2020
On 31 Oct, 2020
Invitations sent on 28 Oct, 2020
On 27 Oct, 2020
On 26 Oct, 2020
On 26 Oct, 2020
Posted 12 Aug, 2020
On 12 Oct, 2020
Received 10 Oct, 2020
Received 28 Sep, 2020
On 05 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 31 Aug, 2020
On 31 Aug, 2020
On 21 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
On 20 Jul, 2020
Background: The purpose of this descriptive study is to outline the Roseman University of Health Sciences (RUHS) College of Dental Medicines’ Patient Assistance Fund development, organization and outcomes. The description and reported results provide insight to others considering similar health professions programs.
Methods: The Patient Assistance Fund (PAF) affords dental students an opportunity to petition for and obtain financial assistance for their most disadvantaged patients. This study used a mixed methods research design using quantitative analyses for data collected as part of the PAFs operation and qualitative analyses to evaluate the patient experiences.
Results: A total of 16 student advocates, consisting of 6 males and 10 females from the D3 and D4 classes made 26 presentations to the PAF board committee. The combined amount requested from the PAF was $47,428.00 (“Cost of Treatment Plan”) representing an average request per patient of $1,824.15 (range $324.00 to $4070.00). The approved procedures and treatment plans totaled $21,278.36 (“Cost of Approved Procedures”) with an average of $818.40 (range $204.00 to $2434.00) per patient. Patients and students expressed a high degree of satisfaction with the program.
Conclusions: This study provides an overview of the structure, funding sources, expenditures and patient services supported by a dental student managed patient assistance fund. The experiences at RUHS College of Dental Medicine (CODM) suggest that other healthcare professions schools can develop similar type programs that yield benefit both to students and to patients in need.
Trial Registration: Not applicable
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...