Sample Preparation
The sandstone used in the experiment was sourced from Sichuan Province. Following the requirements for standard specimen preparation, it was processed into a standard cylindrical shape with dimensions of 50 mm in diameter and 100 mm in height (Fig. 1). The flatness at both ends of the sandstone was maintained at less than 0.02 mm. Figure 2 shows the results of X-ray diffraction testing of the sandstone, revealing the predominant presence of three minerals: chlorite, sodium feldspar, and potassium feldspar, along with some quartz, muscovite, and calcite. Prior to the experiment, the sandstone was dried in a 105°C oven for 24 hours and then saturated in a vacuum saturation chamber. Subsequently, the sandstone's acoustic properties were tested using an ELB-UTD400 non-metal ultrasonic detector, with samples exhibiting abnormal wave velocities being discarded.
Test Equipment
All the tests were carried out on the Rock Top 50HT full-stress multi-field coupling triaxial test system (Fig. 3), which is located in the laboratory of Guangxi University of Science and Technology. The exceptional capabilities of this system include three independent loading systems: deviatoric stress, confining stress, and seepage stress loading system respectively. It can apply maximum axial shear stress of 750 MPa, maximum normal stress of 60 MPa, and maximum seepage pressure of 60 MPa. A detailed schematic of the triaxial pressure chamber device is shown in Fig. 5. Two axial dual-channel LVDT sensors are placed on both sides of the sample to record the axial and shear displacement of the sample during the test, and the measurement range of the LVDT is 0 ~ 12 mm with an accuracy of 0.001 mm.
Test Principle
The experiment employs the constant volume transient pressure pulse method (Zhang et al.2023) to measure the variation of permeability of sandstone under different temperatures and confining pressures during cyclic loading and unloading states. The permeability expression used in this paper (Zhang et al.2019) is based on the transient method and is as follows:
$$\Delta {P_t}=\Delta {P_0}{e^{ - \alpha t}}$$
1
$$k=\frac{{\alpha \mu L{C_1}{C_2}}}{{A({C_1}+{C_2})}}$$
2
Where: k is sandstone permeability (m2); \(\Delta {P_t}\) is upstream and downstream pressure difference measured value (MPa); \(\Delta {P_0}\)is initial pressure difference (MPa);\(\mu\)is fluid viscosity coefficient (Pa.s);is rock sample cross-sectional area (m2); L is water seepage length (m); t is time (s); \({C_1}\),\({C_2}\)are the water capacity of the upstream and downstream pressure vessels respectively; \(- \alpha\)is the slope of the semi-logarithmic pressure difference - time curve.
Test Programs
To ensure that the experiment is not disturbed by steam, the maximum temperature set in this study is 95°C, and the minimum pressure set for upstream and downstream seepage is 0.2 MPa. Additionally, the temperature range involved in the experimental setup is from 25°C to 95°C, with a temperature increment of 10°C. The confining pressure is set to 30 MPa, and the seepage pressure is set to 5 MPa. The specific experimental scheme is shown in Table 1. The experimental steps are as follows:
(1) Install the sandstone into the triaxial pressure chamber, install the circumferential sensor and axial sensor in turn, and connect their seepage channels. Finally, perform an installation check.
(2) After completing the oil filling of the confining pressure chamber, to prevent the saturated water in the sandstone from escaping due to a temperature rise, apply a confining pressure and maintain it at 5 MPa. Additionally, maintain the upstream and downstream seepage pressure difference at 0.2 MPa, raise the temperature of the stress chamber to the set value, and keep it stable for 12 hours.
(3) The confining pressure was gradually increased to 10 MPa using a stress loading rate of 1 MPa/min.
(4) The upstream and downstream seepage pressures were both increased to 5 MPa under the set confining pressure. After a period of stabilization, the downstream seepage pressure was reduced to 4 MPa. Subsequently, the upstream and downstream hydraulic pumps and their valves were turned off to form a confined space until the pressure inside the sandstone reached an equilibrium state. Eventually, the fluid attenuation law was used to calculate the permeability of the sandstone under these conditions.
(5) Upon completion of the above steps, the confining pressure was sequentially increased to 15, 20, 25, and 30 MPa at a loading rate of 0.2 MPa/min. Step 4 was then repeated to determine the permeability of the sandstone at the specified confining pressures.
(6) When step 5 was completed, the axial displacement was applied at a rate of 0.03 mm/min until failure, and the stress and strain of the sandstone specimen were measured during the process of testing.
Table.1The test program
No
|
Temperature (℃)
|
Confining pressure (MPa)
|
Seepage pressure (MPa)
|
S-1
|
25
|
30
|
5
|
S-2
|
35
|
S-3
|
45
|
S-4
|
55
|
S-5
|
65
|
S-6
|
75
|
S-7
|
85
|
S-8
|
95
|
Analysis of Sandstone Mechanical Properties
Stress-Strain Curve
To facilitate the analysis of stress-strain curve results of sandstone at different temperatures, this study divides them into two groups: 25°C to 55°C, and 65°C to 95°C, as shown in Fig. 4(a) and 4(b). Experimental findings reveal that the overall shape of the sandstone stress-strain curve is significantly influenced by temperature and can be divided into five distinct stages: (I) compaction stage; (II) linear elastic stage; (III) stable crack propagation stage; (IV) unstable crack propagation stage; and (V) post-peak failure stage. In the 25°C to 55°C range, the stress-strain curve of sandstone exhibits characteristics of brittle fracture. After reaching peak strength, the load-bearing capacity rapidly declines, accompanied by post-peak residual stress. In the 65°C to 95°C range, the curve shows a pronounced pre-peak yielding stage and post-peak ductility, indicating reduced brittleness and increased ductility of sandstone after 65°C. Additionally, compaction is more apparent at 95°C, suggesting increased microcracks and porosity within the sandstone at higher temperatures, leading to a decrease in density.
Mechanical Properties
In order to characterize the mechanical behavior depicted in the stress-strain curve, this study utilizes parameters including strength \(\sigma c\), peak strain \(\varepsilon c\), and elastic modulus \(Ec\) to evaluate the impact of temperature on the mechanical properties of sandstone. The calculated results are presented in Table 2.
Table.2 Mechanical parameters of sandstone at different temperatures
No
|
Temperature (℃)
|
\(\sigma c{\text{/MPa}}\)
|
\(\varepsilon c{\text{/% }}\)
|
\(Ec{\text{/GPa}}\)
|
S-1
|
25
|
209.13
|
0.99
|
25.28
|
S-2
|
35
|
212.11
|
1.03
|
24.17
|
S-3
|
45
|
215.88
|
1.13
|
23.51
|
S-4
|
55
|
221.52
|
1.15
|
22.57
|
S-5
|
65
|
230.86
|
1.29
|
20.68
|
S-6
|
75
|
219.45
|
1.46
|
16.97
|
S-7
|
85
|
210.64
|
1.71
|
12.01
|
S-8
|
95
|
200.18
|
2.14
|
10.71
|
Strength
Figure 5 illustrates the variation of strength for sandstone with temperature. The strength of sandstone shows an initial increase followed by a decrease with rising temperature. Compared to room temperature, as the temperature increases from 35°C to 65°C, the strength of sandstone increases by 1.43%, 3.23%, 5.92%, and 10.39%, respectively. This increase is primarily attributed to the thermal expansion of mineral grains within the sandstone at temperatures below 65°C, leading to a reduction in distance between adjacent grains and gradual closure of internal primary fissures. As a result, the load-bearing capacity of the sandstone is enhanced. As the temperature rises from 65°C to 95°C, the strength of the sandstone gradually decreases. Relative to sandstone at 65°C, its strength decreases by 4.94%, 8.76%, and 13.29%, respectively. This decrease is mainly due to the increased thermal stress on mineral grains, leading to the development of internal microcracks. Additionally, the erosive and lubricating effects of high-temperature water on mineral grains are intensified, thereby reducing the load-bearing capacity of the sandstone. (Zhang et al. 2020).
Peak Strain
Figure 6 illustrates the variation of peak strain in sandstone with temperature. The results demonstrate a significant impact of temperature on the peak strain of sandstone. As the temperature rises, the peak strain of sandstone tends to decrease. At room temperature, the peak strain of sandstone is approximately 0.993%, which is almost the same as the peak strain at 35°C, indicating minimal effect of lower temperatures on the peak strain of sandstone. However, as temperatures exceed 45°C, the peak strain of sandstone gradually increases, with a more noticeable increase after 65°C. This shift implies a transition of the sandstone from brittle failure to ductile failure.
Modulus of Elasticity
Figure 7 illustrates the variation of the elastic modulus of sandstone with temperature. The study reveals a gradual decrease in the elastic modulus of sandstone with increasing temperature, presenting a distinct contrast to the pattern observed in peak strain with temperature. As the temperature increases from 35°C to 65°C, the elastic modulus of sandstone decreases by 4.41%, 7.01%, 10.69%, and 18.22%, respectively, compared to specimens at room temperature. This indicates relatively low damage within the sandstone at temperatures below 65°C, attributed to the lower sensitivity of its elastic properties to temperature within this range. With temperatures rising above 65°C, the elastic modulus of sandstone notably decreases, indicating significant internal damage and deterioration in its mechanical properties. This conclusion aligns with the findings of Zhang et al. (Zhang et al. 2020) and others.
Test results on permeability characteristics of sandstone
Figure 8 illustrates the relationship between sandstone permeability, temperature, and confining pressure. The magnitude of sandstone permeability ranges from 10− 18 m2. As the confining pressure increases, the permeability of sandstone decreases nonlinearly. Particularly, under low confining pressure conditions, there is a significant reduction in permeability, while the rate of decrease lessens with further increases in confining pressure. For instance, at 95°C, the permeability of sandstone decreases by 14.33%, 21.71%, 23.48%, and 24.13% with increasing confining pressure. This reduction is mainly due to the significant compaction effects of microcracks within the sandstone under lower confining pressures, which gradually weaken under higher confining pressures, leading to a reduced rate of permeability decrease. The permeability of sandstone initially decreases and then increases with temperature, in line with the findings of Li et al (Li et al. 2020b). At lower temperatures, the closure of primary fissures within the sandstone blocks effective flow channels, resulting in a relative decrease in permeability. At higher temperatures, thermal stress encourages the development of microcracks within the sandstone, increasing the number of effective flow channels. Effective flow channels can lead to a relative increase in permeability, similar to the mechanism observed in strength.
Additionally, Pearson correlation coefficients reveal the relationships between temperature, confining pressure, and permeability variables, as shown in Fig. 9. It is observed that the correlation coefficient between confining pressure and permeability is -0.71, while the correlation coefficient between temperature and permeability is -0.13, indicating that sandstone permeability is more sensitive to confining pressure than to temperature.
Characteristics of Sandstone Damage and its Failure Mechanisms
Failure Modes
Figure 10 illustrates the failure modes of sandstone at different temperatures. The figure shows that the failure modes of sandstone under different temperature conditions are typically characterized by shear failure. At lower temperatures (25°C to 65°C), the failure mode of sandstone transitions from gradual-angle shear failure to steep-angle shear failure, with the fracture angle (angle between the failure plane and the horizontal direction) increasing continuously. At higher temperatures (75°C to 95°C), the predominant failure mode of sandstone is gradual-angle shear failure, with the fracture angle gradually decreasing. New fractures are evident on the surface of the sandstone between 85°C and 95°C, indicating that higher temperatures promote the development of microcracks in the sandstone and result in degradation of its macroscopic mechanical properties.
Microscopic Failure Characteristics Analysis
Figure 11 depicts the microscopic characteristics of sandstone under different temperature conditions. In Fig. 11(a), it can be observed that at room temperature, the internal structure of the sandstone consists of dispersed particles with numerous inherent microcracks and pores. The particles are primarily bonded through bridging. At this stage, the maximum width of cracks is only 2 µm. At temperatures ranging from 35°C to 65°C, thermal stress on the mineral particles induces thermal expansion, resulting in closer contact between particles and partial closure of inherent microcracks in the sample. As the temperature increases to 55°C, the surface becomes uneven with more prominent edges, and the majority of microcracks have widths less than 1 µm. This phenomenon is a primary reason for the observed increase in strength and decrease in permeability of the sample. However, at 75°C, the elevated thermal stress on sandstone particles leads to an increase in the number, length, and width of cracks. Mineral crystal structures are disrupted, evident by the presence of clear transgranular fractures. As the temperature exceeds 85°C, the number of pores and cracks in the sandstone continues to expand, resulting in significant cracks penetrating the network. By 95°C, the cracks have penetrated the crystal particles, and the surface microcrack width approaches 31 µm. Consequently, due to increased internal damage, the macroscopic mechanical behavior of the sandstone, such as strength and modulus, exhibits a decreasing trend, while permeability demonstrates an increasing trend.
Failure Mechanisms
To further elucidate the impact of temperature, confining pressure, and seepage pressure on the microstructure of sandstone, Fig. 12 illustrates the mechanism of sandstone's micromechanical behavior. Taking the microelement Y from the loaded specimen as the object, as shown in Fig. 12(a), the microelement contains numerous inherent defects in its original state, such as intragranular cracks, intergranular cracks, and inherent pores, with free water filling the voids and cracks. At lower temperatures (25°C to 65°C), the mineral particles within the sandstone undergo thermal expansion, leading to a reduction in the distance between the particles. Additionally, the sandstone is constrained by confining pressure, further reducing the interparticle spacing, gradually closing the inherent cracks, and narrowing the permeable channels. From a macroscopic perspective, the peak strength of the sandstone increases, and the permeability decreases, as shown in Fig. 12(b). At higher temperatures (75°C to 95°C), the mineral particles in the sandstone undergo uneven thermal expansion, generating significant thermal stresses and causing rapid propagation of intragranular and intergranular cracks. Furthermore, the erosive and lubricating effects of high-temperature water on mineral particles promote the softening of the sandstone and enhance its ductile failure. Consequently, the peak strength of the sandstone decreases, while the permeability relatively increases, as depicted in Fig. 12(c).