Study area, period, and design
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 16th June to 23rd July 2023 in Konso zones, southern region of Ethiopia. The Konso Zone is one of the 12 zones in the southern region of Ethiopia. The Konso Zone is divided into five districts (K. zuriya, Kena, Koleme, Karat city administration and Segen Zuriya) with an estimated total population of 359,998 and a total of 43 Kebeles. It is situated 595 km away from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. Konso shares a boreder with the northwest Alle zone’s Burji zone in the east, the northeastern Amaro zone’s Gardula zone in the north, the ARI zone in the southwest, and the Borena zone of Oromia in the south (27). Mixed farming, or the production of both crops and animals, is the primary source of household income in many districts. The main cabbage tree in the area is Moringa stenopetala, also known as Shelaqta’an in Konso. Fresh green leaves are used in everyday meals as a vegetable that is cooked and consumed, and they can also be sold for cash in the neighborhood market. This area in Ethiopia is impacted by intercommunal conflict (28).
Population, Sample Size Calculation, and Sampling procedure
All school-age children paired with their parents or caregivers in conflicts affecting the community of southern Ethiopia were the source population, and all school-age children were systematically selected from randomly sampled households with their parents or caregivers in the selected Keble. Only households with at least one school-age child aged between 6 and 12 years of age with their parent/caregiver’s pair were included in this study. Study participants who were sick during the previous week and who had a special ceremony on the day before data collection and who were children who were new to that area were excluded from the study.
The sample size was calculated based on the single population formula by Epi-data version 4.6.0.2 considering the following assumptions: P (proportion of dietary diversity practice among school-age children) = 58.3% of the studies conducted with school children in the Gurage Zone, Ethiopia (25); margin of error (d) = 5%; confidence level = 95%; n= (Za/2)²p (1-p)/d²; n = sample size = 373; and a multiplier design effect of 1.5 = 560. After considering a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample size was 616.
Analogously, related studies (29, 30) have employed this methodology. Using a multistage simple random sampling technique, districts and kebeles within the study area were chosen. Four of the five districts—three rural districts and one district with an intentionally chosen karate city administration—were included in the study. Twelve kebeles (three in each) were chosen from these districts using a basic random sampling number. Next, in the chosen kebeles, every household was registered as a sampling frame. Ultimately, the sample size was distributed proportionally among the designated kebeles in the respective districts, and the respondents were selected through a computer-generated basic random sampling procedure.
Study variables
The dietary diversity score (DDS) was used as the outcome variable in this study. The independent variables were sociodemographic characteristics (age, maternal status, maternal and paternal education status, maternal and paternal occupational status, child sex, birth order, resident, family size, household head, household hanger scale), environmental characteristics (water source, type of water treatment, availability of latrine, hand washing practice), comorbidity of children (chronic disease conditions, acute illness for the last two weeks), and access-related characteristics (animal in household of their family, own farm land, media, home garden, access to fruit/vegetables, presence of a near market, and access to healthcare services). In this study, the household hanger scale was categorized into three levels based on the FANTA recommendation (21, 31).
Operational definition
The dietary diversity score was defined as the total count of different food groups irrespective of the amount consumed by children in the 24-hour period preceding the survey. A tool adopted from the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) with a ten-food group minimum diet for women (MDD-W) with the previous 24-hour dietary recall was used to assess the variety of food consumed (21, 31).
School age
children aged 6 to 12 years were included (25).
Data collection tools
The data were collected via face-to-face interviews using pretested questionnaires adapted from related literature (4, 6, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 30). It is collected from children and caregivers by allowing them to freely recall the type of food items they feed to their child or children within the last 24 hours. The data were collected from the child and their caregiver on a day where the days of the interview and the previous consecutive days were not holidays, special days such as the marriage ceremony birth date or others. When there are unusual holidays or others ascertained from the respondent, that respondent was not included in the survey, as it can overestimate dietary diversity. The questionnaire was prepared in English, translated to the local language and checked for consistency by translating it back to English by those who were well-oriented with the stated languages.
Adequate dietary diversity was defined as the consumption of at least five food groups in 24 of the ten contextualized food groups (31). The data collected from the primary caregivers and the gathered data were recorded. The response option of “yes” was scored as one point if at least one food item in each food group was consumed by the child, whereas food groups were not consumed at all, with a response option of “no”, and zero (0) points were given.
Data quality control
The data collectors were trained before the data collection for two days on how to ask questions and code answers. Close supervision was provided by the investigators and the assigned supervisors. Any quest related to clarity, ambiguity, incompleteness, or misunderstanding was resolved on the day following the next day. Pretests were performed on 5% of the sample, and necessary amendments were made accordingly. All finalized data collection forms were checked for completeness and clarity before and during data management, storage and analysis. The data were collected from the child and their caregiver on days where the days of the interview and the previous consecutive days were not holidays, special days such as the marriage ceremony birth date or others. When there are unusual holidays or others ascertained from the respondent, that respondent was not included in the survey, as it can overestimate dietary diversity.
Data processing and analysis
The data were entered into Epi-data version 4.6.0.2 and exported to STATA software version 14 for analysis. Binary logistic regression was performed to examine the association of each independent variable with the outcome variable. Variables with p values < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were selected and included in the final multivariate logistic regression analysis. Variables with a p value < 0.05 in the multivariate analysis were considered to be significantly associated with the independent variable. Model fitness was assessed using Hosmer and Lemeshow’s test, with a P value greater than 0.05 indicating a fitted regression model.
Ethical reviews
The institutional review board of the College of Health Science and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University approved the ethical statement. The study was conducted following the relevant guidelines, regulation, and principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Furthermore, official permission letter was obtained from the Konso Zone Health Department and the respective woreda health offices. Also Verbal and written informed consent was obtained from the respondents after they explained the purpose and objective of the study. The confidentiality of the participants in the study was considered.
Patients and public involvement
Patients and the public were not involved in the design of the study, the conduct of the study or the dissemination of the findings.