In this nationwide study, we observed that infants born to mothers with AA had an increased risk of preterm birth, LBW, and cesarean section birth. Furthermore, maternal AA was associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations, including those of the urinary, circulatory, nervous, and musculoskeletal systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the birth outcomes of offspring of mothers with AA.
Although active studies have been conducted on the effect of maternal systemic autoimmune or autoinflammatory diseases on the birth outcomes of their offspring14–16, there is little information regarding autoimmune or autoinflammatory skin diseases, and most of them are limited to psoriasis. A Taiwanese record-linkage study demonstrated an increased risk of LBW in infants from mothers with severe psoriasis17, and a Swedish population-based study demonstrated that infants with maternal psoriasis had an increased risk of congenital malformation18. Jo et al. recently reported that maternal AA increased the risk of abortion and ectopic pregnancy. Nevertheless, the results of this study focused only on maternal outcomes and not on the outcomes of offspring. The present study used big data based on the NHI and created a unique mother–child database using familial relationship information. In this way, we obtained a large sample size, allowing us to have sufficient statistical power to analyze birth outcomes, including specific congenital malformations by the affected system.
Although the ORs of birth complications were not dramatically higher in infants from AA mothers, our results are expected to have certain clinical significance considering that AA is a common autoimmune disease, with a lifetime risk of approximately 2% that frequently affects women of childbearing ages. We believe our data provide evidence for the necessity of preconception counseling, active surveillance during pregnancy, and thorough neonatal care of offspring in pregnant women with AA. Meanwhile, in our results, mothers with AA showed a tendency to have worse maternal obstetric outcomes compared with mothers without AA, particularly for gestational DM and genitourinary infection. Considering that the strengths of association for birth outcome of the study group were attenuated after adjusting for these comorbid maternal obstetric conditions, close monitoring and thorough management of pregnancy morbidity of mothers with AA might improve the outcomes of their children.
The exact mechanism underlying the worse outcomes in infants from AA mothers is unclear. Previous studies have shown significantly higher T helper 1 (Th 1) and Th 17 cytokines and lower regulatory T-cell cytokine levels not only in the lesional skin of patients with AA but also in the peripheral blood19,20. Excessive immunity of effector T cells causes pathological inflammation at the maternal–fetal interface and may lead to preterm labor and birth, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine growth retardation, and pre-eclampsia.21–24 On the other hand, regulatory T cells regulate maternal alloreactive T cells and induce feto-maternal immune tolerance, which may reduce perinatal complications caused by effector T cells.25 And inadequate number or functional deficiency of regulatory T cells is associated with spontaneous abortion and pre-eclampsia.26 Taken together, abnormal regulation of particular T-cell cytokines in mothers with AA might be an important pathogenetic mechanism that causes worse birth outcomes of their children in our study.
Regarding congenital malformations, in utero exposure to AA medications may be considered a main factor. Unfortunately, medication history during pregnancy was not evaluated in this study. However, the effects of drugs are expected to be small as AA is not a life-threatening condition, and most patients do not take medications for AA during their pregnancy in Korea. In addition, the medications used in patients with severe AA, including corticosteroids and cyclosporine, have generally failed to cause adverse outcomes related to pregnancy in humans.27–31 Further investigations are necessary to elucidate the mechanism of higher teratogenicity in pregnancy of maternal AA.
Our study has some limitations. First, the NHI claims database may include misdiagnoses that can lead to misclassification bias. To reduce such errors, we defined patients with AA according to a previously validated algorithm.32 Second, we were unable to evaluate some factors associated with the outcomes, including medication, body mass index before pregnancy, and history of smoking and alcohol consumption which might influence pregnancy outcomes. Third, the NHI claims database did not provide detailed clinical information on individual patients, including disease onset, duration, severity, and activity or treatment histories. Finally, some congenital anomalies that are sometimes not identified early in life may not be included. However, we considered the risk significantly low to affect the results.
In conclusion, Infants born to mothers with AA had a significantly increased risk of birth comorbidities. Further investigation is required to clarify the causal association between maternal AA and these comorbidities in offspring. Preterm birth, LBW, and congenital anomalies are major factors contributing to neonatal mortality and morbidity. Considering that AA is a common skin disease that can occur in women of childbearing age, our results may provide evidence of the appropriateness of close perinatal monitoring and consultation in pregnancy for maternal AA.