In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between varied urban living environments and the prevalence of myopia among adolescents. And PSA was developed to approximate the residential environment of a community. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a negative correlation between shadow proportion and myopia development, with shadow proportions below 20% posing a risk, while proportions beyond 20% potentially exhibiting a protective effect (illustrated in Fig. 3).
Through a comprehensive review of the satellite images, we observed that communities primarily comprised of high-rise apartments tended to have higher shadow area ratios. These areas typically featured larger inter-architectural distances compared to those dominated by multistory flats or houses in our study city. Examples showcasing high and low proportions of shadows are depicted in Fig. 5. We postulate that taller floors and greater inter-architectural spacing may contribute to reduced myopia progression. However, it's noteworthy that our analysis only considered community-wide environments. Future research should explore the effects of specific living floor levels on myopia development. In addition, there are studies linking violet and blue light to less progression of myopia (17, 18). It is also intriguing to explore the impact of color distribution within a living environment on the progress of myopia in future studies.
Prior research has suggested conflicting findings regarding the influence of living conditions on myopia. A large-scale survey in China suggested that lower living floors may be protective against myopia (19), and a recent study in South India indicated a higher prevalence of myopia among children living in apartments compared to other types of housing (20). However, these studies did not account for rural-urban or socioeconomic disparities, which may influence housing type differences and the development of myopia. Future investigations should adjust for these disparities or adopt a more uniform survey population to elucidate the physical impact of city constructions on myopia.
Our study sample is notably homogenous, comprising solely 10th-grade students with an average age of approximately 16 years. These students predominantly hail from middle-class or affluent families, as they are enrolled in the international course class of a private high school, aiming to pursue higher education abroad. Additionally, the vast majority of participants originate from Xi’an city, providing a microcosmic representation of China's urbanization trends over the past two decades. Consequently, participants share similar educational and socioeconomic backgrounds, which are known to influence myopic development (21, 22). By sampling within these environmental conditions, we were able to minimize possible confounding effects from factors such as education and study.
The prevalence of myopia and high myopia of the sample was 80% and 8.3% each, which is comparable to the large-sample studies in China (4, 23). Some factor such as near work, parental myopia and time outdoors were not significantly correlated with myopia in this study, probably due to the limited sample and small variations of the factors. We also calculated the green space within both the residentials and the schools using the green color coding from the histograms of satellite maps, which was not associated with myopia either. One disadvantage of this method is that the green space within the shadows could not be calculated. In previous studies suggesting a protective effect of green space (12, 13), the normalized difference vegetation index was used as an indicator, although it could also be affected by the shadows (24).
Still, there were several limitations of this study. Firstly, our study population is limited in scope and the limited scope may increase the likelihood of selection bias. However, the homogeneity of the sample may mitigate bias. Moreover, despite the small sample size, a significant difference in myopia levels was observed between higher and lower shadow area groups, with adjustments made for other confounding factors. Secondly, our study relies primarily on questionnaire data rather than performing rigorous measurements, which may introduce inaccuracies. One study have pointed out the tendency of questionnaire to overestimate the outdoor time while underestimate near-work time (25). To enhance reliability, a lecture was conducted by an optometrist prior to questionnaire distribution. Thirdly, our metric for evaluating building height and density may not be universally applicable, particularly in communities with significant geographical disparities, necessitating measurements within the same season. Fourthly, the green space could be underestimated due to the overlap of the shadows and the shadow area could also be miscalculated resulting from its projections on the neighbor structures which composed of only a very small fraction. And we consider them as the systematic errors in this study.
In summary, our findings demonstrate a negative correlation between myopia levels and shadow areas within living communities among a sample of 10th-grade students in a megacity. These results alleviate concerns that high-rise constructions accompanying urban modernization may adversely affect adolescent eye health. On the contrary, high-rise apartments may offer a solution for megacities by maximizing ground space while potentially exerting a protective effect against myopia progression.