Neural tube defects are among the most common congenital disabilities in children globally. NTDs are a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, and parental care plays a crucial role in neonatal prognosis. Different types of NTDs occur when the brain or spinal cord does not fully close during development. Multiple randomized control trials have shown a strong link between a lack of folic acid in the diet during pregnancy and the occurrence of neural tube defects (Oertel and Taping, 2022).
More than half of the studied parents aged 30 to 40 years. This finding is consistent with a study by Gedefaw et al. (2018), titled "Magnitude of Neural Tube Defects and Associated Risk Factors at Three Teaching Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," which reported that more than half of the parents studied (51.4%) were aged 30 to 39 years. On the other hand, it disagrees with Hassan (2021) in a study titled “Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcome of Neural Tube Defects: A Retrospective Study”, which revealed that 55.6% of neonates whose mothers were aged 20–29 years had NTDs.
Regarding the gender of the parents in the study, the findings indicated that almost two-thirds of them were female. This finding was consistent with that of O’Brien et al. (2019), who conducted a study entitled “A Comparison of Students and Parent Knowledge and Perceived Confidence About Brain Injury and Concussion” and reported that the proportion of female parents was more than two-thirds, while the proportion of male parents was more than one-third. From the researcher's point of view, this similarity in finding was related to mothers being the first and ultimate caregivers in this period and for this vulnerable age group.
Concerning parents’ level of education, the current study revealed that more than half of the studied parents had a medium level of education, which is not consistent with the findings of Gedefaw et al. (2018), titled "Magnitude of Neural Tube Defects and Associated Risk Factors at Three Teaching Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," who reported that almost half (41.4%) of the studied parents had only primary education. From the research prospection, this level of education in the current study is due to huge governmental efforts to enhance education.
Regarding the employment status of parents, more than half of the studied parents had unpaid jobs. This finding contrasts with Foster et al. (2020), who conducted a study titled "Parent Perspectives and Psychosocial Need Following Child Critical Injury: A Qualitative Inquiry" and found that most of the sample was unpaid employment. However, these results align with those of Gedefaw et al. (2018), as 52.3% of the mothers in their study were stay-at-home parents and were not employed. From the researcher's perspective, these findings are understandable, as neural tube defects are a critical condition affecting the central nervous system, requiring significant effort, time, and attention, especially for parents, particularly mothers.
Concerning the gender of the neonates studied, the present study revealed that females were the most affected gender, accounting for more than half of the studied neonates. This finding is consistent with Ehara et al. (1998), titled “Epidemiology of spina bifida in Tottori prefecture, Japan from 1976–1995”, which reported a reversal of male predominance and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1. Similarly, a Hungarian paper by Rab (2013) discussed “Prenatal diagnosis and further clinical characteristics of spina bifida” and reported a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.2, indicating female predominance. Additionally, a study by Gedefaw et al. (2018) revealed that 53.2% of the study sample was female and suggested that being male was associated with a 44% reduction in the risk of NTDs compared to being female. Controversially, a study conducted by Alatise et al. (2006) titled "Pattern and factors affecting management outcome of spina bifida cystica in Ile-Ife, Nigeria" a male-to-female ratio of 1.1:1 was reported. Similarly, a British group led by Malakounides et al. (2013) reported a similar sex distribution in their study titled "Single centre experience: long-term outcome in spina bifida patients", with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. From the researcher's point of view, there is no specific relation between neural tube defects incidence and gender of neonates.
Regarding the mode of delivery of the studied neonates, the current study revealed that more than two-thirds of them were delivered via NVD (Normal Vaginal Delivery). These findings were not compatible with those of Gedefaw et al. (2018), as 93% of these products were delivered via NVD and only 7% via CS. Furthermore, Hassan (2021) indicated that in her research titled “Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcome of Neural Tube Defects: A Retrospective Study” (58.9%) of neonates who underwent emergency CS, this could be because most of the NTDs in the studied sample were hydrocephalus and needed urgent CS.
For congenital anomaly history, almost all of the studied parents in the current study had no congenital anomaly birth history, which agreed with the findings of Gedefaw et al. (2018), who revealed that 97.3% of the studied parents had no congenital anomaly birth history.
Regarding the consumption of folic acid, in a recent study, it was found that the majority of the mothers surveyed did not consume folic acid during pregnancy. This aligns with a study by Bower C. (2013), titled “Prevention of neural tube defects with folate”, and De-Regil (2015), titled “Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects”, and Maged et al. (2015), titled “Periconceptional risk factors for spina bifida among Egyptian population: a case–control study,” which showed that 86.6% of the participants did not take folate supplements. From the researcher’s point of view, half of all cases of NTDs are believed to be related to a nutritional deficiency of folic acid, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. Correspondingly, most European health authorities recommend folic acid supplementation of 400 mg for pregnant women to prevent NTDs.
Regarding consanguinity, the current study demonstrated that the majority of the studied parents had consanguinity. This finding differs from that of Maged et al. (2015), who revealed that 49.5% of the study sample who had SB had positive consanguinity. Furthermore, Hassan, A. (2021) indicated that in her research titled 'Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcome of Neural Tube Defects: A Retrospective Study,' (44.4%) had parents' consanguinity. This finding was supported by Mohammed et al. (2013), who reported in their study 'Congenital Anomalies among Children: Knowledge and Attitude of Egyptian and Saudi Mothers' and Tayebi N. et al., (2010), who conducted a study 'The Prevalence of Congenital Malformations and its Correlation with Consanguineous.' From the research perspectives, This suggests that consanguinity is considered one of the most common contributing factors in transferring genetic traits related to congenital anomalies."
Furthermore, Maged et al. (2015) supported the findings of our study by reporting that 10% of the parents in their study had previous anomalies. However, they also found that 14.4% of the parents had a positive family history. Additionally, Ntimbani J. et al. (2020) conducted research titled “Myelomeningocele - A literature review” and reported that only 5% of myelomeningoceles occur in families with a positive family history, while 95% occur spontaneously in children of women with no family history.
In the present study, almost two-thirds of the participating mothers had a history of taking anticonvulsant drugs. This result contradicts the findings of Maged et al. (2015), as only 21.6% of the study group had a similar history. A history of taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), such as Depakine, Lamotrine, and Tegretol, was significantly more common in the SB (spina bifida) group (21.6%) than in the control group (1%) (P = 0.001). From the researcher's perspective, these drugs are believed to be linked to the occurrence of NTDs (neural tube defects), especially spina bifida.
Regarding the types of neural tube defects, in the current study, it was found that almost one-third of the newborns had myelomeningocele, almost two-thirds of whom needed surgical intervention. This study also revealed a different distribution of NTD types compared to that reported by Gedefaw et al. (2018), who reported 54.1% anencephaly, 40.5% spina bifida, and 5.4% encephalocele. In the current study, there were no cases of anencephaly; 37.5% had myelomeningocele, 30% had spina bifida, and only 10% had encephalocele.
When considering the education of parents before discharge from the hospital or during follow-up, as shown in Table (2), all the parents reported that they did not receive any information, suitable practices, or health education regarding the diagnosis or care of their children with neural tube defects. From the researcher's perspective, this lack of information could be due to healthcare providers not being fully aware of the importance of providing instructional guidelines and recognizing the crucial role that parents play in in-home care.
This finding aligned with that of Camp et al. (2015), who carried out a study entitled “Emergency Department Visits for Children with Acute Asthma: Discharge Instructions, Parental Plan, and Follow-through of Care-A Prospective Study”, which mentioned that no parent received or implemented any specific asthma strategies to reduce the impact of upper respiratory tract infections. Additionally, Kirk et al. (2015) studied “Supporting Parents Following Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury: A Qualitative Study to Examine Information and Emotional Support Needs across Key Care Transitions.” They reported that parents had unmet information and emotional support needs across the care trajectory from the time of the accident to their child’s return home. In the same context, El Tayar (2021), who conducted research titled “Discharge Plan for Parents Having Children suffering from Head Trauma”, showed that parents did not receive any information, suitable practices, or health education regarding the diagnosis or care of their children with head injury.
An evaluation of the knowledge of the studied parents regarding neural tube defects, as shown in Fig. 2, revealed an improvement after the implementation of the instructional guidelines compared to the pre-implementation of the guidelines. These findings corresponded with those of Sarmiento et al. (2022), who carried out a study about “Improving knowledge, attitudes, and practices on dengue and diarrhea in rural primary school students, their parents, and teachers in Colombia: A cluster-randomized controlled trial” that stated that the level of knowledge in parents whose children received the dengue intervention was greater than that in parents whose children did not receive the intervention. From the researcher's perspective, instructional guidelines and educational programs increased the level of knowledge among parents, which in turn had a positive impact on how they cared for their children.
According to the studied parents’ total reported practices, Fig. 3 shows that there was an improvement postimplementation of instructional guidelines compared to their implementation. These findings correspond to those of Rashed et al. (2021), who carried out a study entitled “Effectiveness of Maternal Training Program on Implementation of Care Provided to Their Children with Cerebral Palsy at Zagazig University Hospitals”, which reported that slightly less than a quarter of the studied mothers had satisfactory reported practice scores before the implementation of the educational module compared to half of them after the implementation of the educational module.
Regarding parental stress, as shown in Fig. 4, before receiving the instructional guidelines, more than three-quarters of the participants experienced high stress about having neonates with neural tube defects. However, after receiving the instructional guidelines, almost two-thirds experienced high stress. This difference was highly statistically significant, with a p value of less than 0.000. These results are like those of Oftedal et al. (2023), who conducted a study titled “Long-Term Impact of Diagnosed Fetal Anomaly on Parental Traumatic Stress, Resilience, and Relationship Satisfaction”, which revealed that parents of children with a congenital malformation experienced significantly elevated traumatic stress levels over time compared with parents of children without congenital malformation. In the same context, Fitzgerald, and Gallagher (2022) conducted a study titled “Parental Stress and Adjustment in the Context of Rare Genetic Syndromes: A Scoping Review”, which revealed that parents of children with rare genetic syndromes experienced greater distress related to other disabilities. From the researcher's perspective, these papers provide a comprehensive look at the various dimensions of parental stress associated with congenital anomalies and offer insights into both the short-term and long-term psychological impacts on parents that may affect their care for their neonates.
According to the current study, table 4 shows that there is a highly significant and positive correlation (P value ≤ 0.001) between the total knowledge, reported practices and parental stress indices of the studied parents postimplementation of the instructional guidelines. These findings follow Okelo et al. (2024), who investigated research titled “Parental stress and child stimulation practices: examining associations with child developmental outcomes over time in Kenya and Zambia”. This study explores the associations between parental stress, caregiving practices, and child developmental outcomes over time. This suggests that improved caregiver stimulation practices are likely to enhance children’s developmental outcomes. In the same context, Fang et al. (2022) conducted a study titled “Parent, child, and situational factors associated with parenting stress: a systematic review”, which provides an overview of factors related to parenting stress, which may include the impact of parental knowledge and practices.