Buspirone, a 5-HT1A agonist attenuates anger, aggression and suicidal tendencies in rats.


 The purpose of the work was to evaluate the effect of buspirone (BUS) on social isolation induced anger, aggression and suicidal tendencies in rats. The male Wistar rats were randomized in 6 groups (n = 6) and caged individually for 14 days to elicit anger and aggression. They were then divided into the following groups vehicle control (no isolation), Stress control (SC), fluoxetine (Flx; 30 mg/kg, p.o), BUS (10 mg/kg, p.o), BUS (20 mg/kg, p.o), BUS (40 mg/kg, p.o). All treatments were administered from day 14 through day 28. On the last day of treatment, assessment of anger, aggression and suicide-related traits were performed. Serum cortisol, blood pressure were measured and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the rat's brain and of BDNF expression were performed. SC group showed significant increase in anger (wheel rolling activity), aggression (increased number of attack bites, wrestling, chasing behavior), irritability score, learned helplessness (number of attempts of escape success and failure, escape latency), increased level of serum cortisol as compared to normal confirming induction of anger, aggression and suicidal ideation. BUS significantly reduced all behavioral traits associated with anger, aggression and suicidal ideation, reduced cortisol levels and significantly increased BDNF compared to stress control. Blood pressure increased substantially in stress control was significantly reduced by BUS, but not by Flx. Neuroimaging studies in stress control brains showed a reduction in amygdala size compared to normal, while animals under BUS treatment mitigated this reduction. Buspirone has been found to be effective in preventing anger, aggression and suicidal tendencies.


Introduction
Social isolation, a potent stressor in both humans and animals, is one of the important paradigms resulting in anger and aggression (Hartmann et al., 2019)and ultimately leads to suicidal ideation (Malkesman et al., 2009, Locci andPinna, 2019). Isolation of rats for one week or more can lead to alteration in neurochemical, physiological, anatomical and neuroendocrine system (Hatch et al., 1965). The isolation results in abnormal social behavior, hyper reactivity to handling, anxiety, depression , associated altered mood and aversions (Rivera-Irizarry et al., 2020). Similar symptoms are observed in human, social isolation in human is reported to result in reduced concentration during activities, continuous sadness, irritability and insomnia (Santini et al., 2020). Social isolation promulgates into disruption of serotonergic system (Tan et al., 2020), dysregulation of hypothalamus, pituitary and adrenal cortex (HPA axis) and release of high levels of cortisol (Ehlert et al., 2001, Tan et al., 2020, similar effects were observed in socially isolated rats (Mumtaz et al., 2018).
Antidepressants like sertraline, uvoxamine and uoxetine has shown to reverse the isolation-induced aggressive behavior (Sánchez and Meier, 1997). Fluoxetine (Flx) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that acts by blocking the reuptake transporter protein located in the pre-synaptic terminal which blocks the uptake of serotonin into pre-synaptic serotonin neurons. Recent studies suggest that Flx is responsible for an increase in hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity (Micheli et al., 2018). Chronic treatment with antidepressants initially inhibits aggression, but later results in neuro adaptive changes. These changes result in severe effects like anger, aggression and suicidal ideation that may be attributed to HPA axis dysregulation or the surge of serotonin at the synapse (Creaney et al., 1991, Teicher et al., 1993. In year 2004, US-FDA has issued a black box warning for use of SSRI as monotherapy in young adults (Kubiszyn and Mire, 2014).
The role of 5-HT1A auto receptor is implicated in aggression via regulation of serotonin level, thus considerable interest has been developed to study its agonists in modulating aggressive behavior (Centenaro et al., 2008). The evidences suggest that chronic treatment with antidepressants increases levels of serotonin locally in mid raphe nuclei hence promoting antidepressant action, but on the other side the rise in serotonin also activates 5-HT1A receptor which inhibit the rate of ring of serotonergic neurons resulting in low levels of serotonin in the raphe nuclei. Hence, to obtain optimum ring of serotonergic neurons, the 5-HT1A receptor must be modulated (Mezzomo et al., 2020). Considering, the role of 5-HT1A in aggression and potent role of buspirone (BUS), as a partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptor with signi cant intensity potential, we hypothesized that BUS may prove to be an effective treatment for anger, as an anti-aggressive agent and can be bene cial in the reduction of suicide ideation.
The present study is an attempt to evaluate the effect of 5-HT1A agonist, buspirone in suicidal ideation in socially isolated animals by analyzing negative emotions such as anger, aggression, impulsivity and despair. Anger and fear may encourage avoidance or defensive behavior while sadness and displeasure results into reduced exploratory activities (Guo et al., 2015, Perić et al., 2017. These traits are studied using wheel rolling activity (anger), resident intruder model (aggression and impulsivity), irritability, open eld test (OFT) (exploratory behavior) and active avoidance paradigm (behavioral despair).

Drugs and Chemicals
Buspirone hydrochloride was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Fluoxetine was gifted by Intas Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd, India, Urethane was purchased from Hi-media Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India, Cortisol kit was purchased from Ray Biotech, GA, USA. cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit was procured form Applied Biosystems, USA. All other chemicals were purchased from local distributors.

Approval of experimental protocol
The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) of Sinhgad Institute of Pharmacy, Narhe, Pune, constituted as per the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA). The CPCSEA reg. No of the institute is 1139/PO/a/07/CPCSEA and protocol approval number is SIOP/IAEC/2016/05.Adult male Wistar rats (250-300 g) were procured from the National Toxicology Centre, Pune and were housed in diurnal lighting condition (12h/12h) with a temperature of 25±1°C, relative humidity of 45-55%. Animals had free access to food (Standard chow pellet, Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) and water ad libitum.

Induction of social isolation induced anger, aggression and suicidal ideation and treatment schedule
The rats were divided into six groups containing 6 rats each. Group 1-Rats (Normal rats) were not isolated and were kept in their home cage with minimal handling. Group II-Stress control; isolated and administered with distilled water. Group III-Standard group was treated with FLX (30 mg/kg, once a day). Group IV to VI were socially isolated and treated with BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg), animals in Group II to VI were individually isolated in polypropylene cages for 14 days (two weeks) followed by treatment with the respective drugs for next 14 days (2 weeks) i.e., from day 14 to day 28 (Wei et al., 2010). At the end of treatments, the following behavior parameters were carried out, followed by non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement and MRI of the brain. The rats were then sacri ced; hippocampus was isolated and used for estimation of BDNF using PCR.

Behavior Parameters
Assessment of BUS on anger using roller rotation chamber The in-house roller rotation chamber was developed in the laboratory (Figure 1), the model has been reported previously to measure anger by Awathale et al., (Awathale et al., 2020) and was used for estimation of anger. Rats were fasted for 24 h and were placed in the Roller rotation chamber. The food was placed in front of rolling wheel in such a way that rat can see/smell food but had no access to it. To obtain food it rolls the wheel in anger and number of wheel rotation signi es anger here. The wheel rotations were recorded using video tracking system (ASTMT2467-SCH80, VJ Instruments, India) for the measurement of parameters like, duration of wheel rolling and number of time's wheel rolled by the animal.

Evaluation of BUS on aggression
Aggression related parameters were measured using the resident intruder paradigm (Wei et al., 2010). The aggressive behavior of the test experimental rats on exposure of naïve rat was video graphed for 10 m for following parameters-Attack bites: Biting to the intruder animal, Wrestling: taking upright posture in order to ght, usually showing by both the animals, Chasing behavior: Pursuit of intruder by test animal, with or without physical contact, Attack latency: Latency time to the rst attack (in seconds) from the introduction of intruder animal and Tail rattling: Rapid lateral quivering of the tail just before or after attacking. Total aggression score included addition of attack bites, wrestling, chasing behavior and tail rattling. The attack latency (latency time of the rst attack in seconds) from the introduction of the intruder mouse was noted and taken as a measure of impulsivity (Malkesman et al., 2009).

Evaluation of BUS on irritability
The rats were exposed to an uncomfortable stimulus (a puff of air was blown sharply through a straw onto the back of the animal) and observed for its response. Rats which exhibited enhanced reactivity to stimuli were considered to display irritable behavior and their irritability was rated using 6 category scale as follows (Ho et  Total irritability scores of an individual rat were calculated by adding the individual irritability score of that rat.

Evaluation of BUS on learned helplessness
Learned helplessness was performed immediately after irritability measurement using active avoidance paradigms. The rats were placed in avoidance chamber and underwent 15 attempts of avoidance paradigms of 33/ sec each. In each of 33 second attempt, the rst 3 second no shock was given (i.e., the rat could not have escaped to the platform before the onset of shock). If rat did not escape the rst 3 seconds, the shock for next 30 seconds was given (0.8 mA intensity). If rat jumped at any time during the attempt, is termed as escape and escape latency was measured. If rats failed to jump from the platform, that was called as "escape failure". The number of failed attempts of each rat was also measured Evaluation of standardized extract of Centella asciatica leaves on suicidal behavior related traits in laboratory rats.

Evaluation of BUS on OFT parameters
Open eld apparatus consisted 25 (5×5) identical squares (20×20 cm). The squares were virtually subdivided into a peripheral and central sector, (9 central squares (3×3)] and the peripheral sector contain the squares close to the surrounded wall (20 cm high). The animals were placed in the central sector and their activity was video-recorded for the 5 m. Locomotor activity was scored when the animal crossed a sector border with both hind-limbs. The peripheral activity, central activity, total activity, rearing and grooming activities were scored.

Evaluation of BUS on locomotor activity
Each animal was observed for a period of 5 m in a square closed eld arena (30x30x30 cm) equipped with 6 photocells in the outer wall. Interruption of beam (locomotor exploratory action) was recorded by means of digital counter Actophotometer (INCO, Ambala, India).

Measurement of hemodynamic parameter
Noninvasive blood pressure (BP) parameter in rat was carried out on the 29th day of the experiment. The rat was kept in the restrainer in such a way that the tail of rat remains outside (At most care was taken to avoid stress and struggle in animals). Pressure cuff was applied on the tail and which was further connected to 8 channel data acquisition system On the 30th day (to avoid the stress generated if any, during BP measurement) the blood was withdrawn through retro orbital puncture under anesthesia. Blood samples were collected in tubes and centrifuged at 2500 rpm, and serum was separated. Serum was used for cortisol estimation using the 96-well ELISA kit as per manufacturer's instructions (Bobade et al., 2015).

Quantitative real-time PCR for mRNA measurements
The expression of BDNF mRNA was analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) as previously described with minor modi cations (Sagarkar et al., 2017). Brie y, the tissues were homogenized in the Trizol reagent (Ambion, USA), clean-up was carried out using chloroform. The residual DNA was eliminated using a DNA-free™ DNA Removal Kit (Life Technologies, USA). The total RNA reconstituted in nuclease-free water (Invitrogen, USA) was quanti ed using Biospec Nano Micro-volume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The quality of the RNA was evaluated by measuring the 260/280 ratio. The 150 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using random hexamers and Multiscribe TM reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR conditions used for the reverse transcription were: 25 °C-10 mins; 37 °C-120 mins; and 85 °C-5 min. The cDNA was further subjected to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in StepOne TM RT-PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) by using the SYBR green qPCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scienti c, USA) and speci c primers for BDNF IX exon and β-actin. The primer sequences used in this study are as follows: BDNF (F-5′-ACCAGGTGAGAAGAGTGATGACCA -3'; R-5' TGGACGTTTGCTTCTTTCATGGGC-3') and βactin (F-5'-ACTATCGGCAATGAGCGGTTCC-3'; R-5'-CTGTGTTGGCATAGAGGTCTTTACG-3'). Thermal pro le used for ampli cation consisted of three stages: 95 °C-3 mins (1 cycle); 95 °C, 57 °C and 72 °C-30 sec each (40 cycles). All the reactions were performed in triplicates. β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene for the normalization of the data. Fold changes in the BDNF IX mRNA levels were analyzed using 2 −ΔΔCT method after normalizing to the b-actin mRNA levels as a housekeeping gene (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008). The results are represented as the fold changes in the mRNA levels (± SEMs).

Results
Effect of BUS (10, 20 and 40) on behavioral parameters Effect on anger using roller rotation chamber Table 1 depicts the wheel rolling activity in social isolated rats treated with BUS (10, 20 and 40). It was evident that socially isolated, stressed rats showed a signi cant (###P<0.001) increase in the duration of wheel rolling, number of time wheel was rotated and wheel biting score as compared to vehicle treated group, the test treatment groups BUS (10, 20 and 40) treatment but not Flx (30) showed reduced wheel rolling activity as compared to stress control. It was evident that BUS but not Flx signi cantly (***P<0.001, **P<0.01) reduced anger in all the 3 parameters viz. duration of wheel rolling, number of time wheel was rotated and wheel biting score.
Effect of BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) on aggression The resident intruder test showed a signi cant rise (P<0.001) in aggressive behavior as observed in increased attack bites, tail rattling, wrestling and chasing behavior in stress control socially isolated rats on day 14. Treatment with BUS dose dependently reduced tail rattling, wrestling, chasing behavior scores, attack bites and increased attack latency. Whereas Flx had no effect in wrestling. BUS (10, 20 and 40mg/kg) as well as Flx signi cantly (P<0.001) reduced the total aggression score as compared to stress control group (Figure 2a, b, c, d, e, f).

Effect of treatments on irritability
Irritability was measured by counting the total score towards reactivity to the uncomfortable stimuli. There was a signi cant increase in total irritability score on day 14 in stress control group (P<0.001) as compared to normal rats. Signi cant reduction in irritation as observed on day 14 in all the groups treated with BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg p.o.) (P<0.001), though no signi cant reduction was observed in Flx (30 mg/kg) as compared to stress control (Figure 2g).

Effect of treatments on learned helplessness
The data demonstrated signi cant (P<0.001) increase in escape failure with concomitant reduced escape success of stress control group. Treatment with Flx (30) as well as BUS (P<0.001, P<0.01) signi cantly improved escape success and reduced escape failure as compared to stress control group (Figure 2h, i).

Effect of treatments on OFT parameters
There was signi cant reduction in the number of squares crossed, grooming and rearing in stress control group as compared to vehicle treated group. Treatment with Flx (30 mg/kg) as well as BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) improved the OFT parameters signi cantly as compared to stress control rats ( Table 1).

Effect of treatments on locomotor activity
Signi cant reduction in the locomotor activity was observed in stress control group as compared to the vehicle control group. Treatment with Flx (30 mg/kg) as well as test groups, BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) signi cantly improved locomotor activity (P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001) (Figure 2j).
Effect of treatments on noninvasive B.P Stress controlled animal showed signi cant rise in blood pressure (P<0.01). Nonsigni cant rise in BP was also observed in Flx group. Treatment with BUS (20 and 40) normalized the blood pressure (P<0.05, P<0.001) ( Table 2).

Effect of treatments on size of amygdala
It was observed that, stress attenuated the size of the amygdala as compared to vehicle control group (P<0.05), BUS (40) normalized the size of the amygdala (P<0.05) (Figure 3) Effect of treatments on serum cortisol and BDNF Serum cortisol was signi cantly increased in stress control group (P<0.001) as compared to vehicle treated rats. Treatment with Flx as well as BUS reduced it signi cantly (P<0.001) (Figure 4). BDNF mRNA expression in the hippocampus of rat brain demonstrated its reduced expression in stress control rats while its expression was increased in Flx (30 mg/kg) and BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) dose dependently ( Table 2).

Discussion
Depression is a neuropsychiatric disorder associated with speci c mood alteration (regressive or aggressive), persistent irritability, melancholy, sadness, negative self-concept, and self-in icted desires (Aswar et al., 2020). The most commonly prescribed anti-depressant drug is an SSRI, but it is accompanied by a black box or a call for caution and is associated with suicidal ideation (Gibbons et al., 2012). Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials conducted by Brent et al., 2009 suggested the use of SSRI in depressed young adults is found to be associated with suicidal ideation (Brent et al., 2009). Postmortem studies have shown that suicide in depressed patients is more common than in those who do not take antidepressants (Isacsson et al., 2010). Elevated levels of serotonin in the synapse can cause suicidal traits (Graeff, 2004).
Although, there are continuing developments observed in the treatment guideline provided by USFDA and other agencies, which suggests closure monitoring of the treatment in suicidal patients, still there is an unmet need to develop the strategy to overcome suicidal ideation. Suicidal traits linked to humans can be modelled in rodents, including aggression, irritability, hopelessness, impulsivity, etc.  (Shimizu et al., 2016). After isolation, we evaluated behavioral parameters such as wheel rolling activity, resident intruder paradigm to measure anger, aggression, irritability and learned helplessness test demonstrating hopelessness (Sáenz et al., 2006, Malkesman et al., 2009, Aswar et al., 2013. Impulsivity is also characterized by elevated blood pressure and elevated cortisol, therefore the present study also measured non-invasive blood pressure and serum cortisol in rats (Smith and Vale, 2006).
The wheel rolling activity was carried out as per the instrument designed by Awathale et al.,(2020). The instrument was manufactured from a wooden box, covered on three sides and having a window at the front with a wheel. When the fasted rat was kept in the box it could see and smell food without having access to it. As already reported that fasting increases anger, and hence increase in wheel rolling activity and biting of the wheel in stress control group as compared to the vehicle control group which are in line with the previous studies (Awathale et al., 2020).
Aggressive behavior is a natural behavior in all animal species (Koolhaas et al., 2013). Flx and BUS, reduces anger as seen in the reduction of rolling activity of the wheels due to their anti-depressant and calming effect (Podhorna and Krsiak, 2000). Among several reported methods, RIT is an appropriate model for studying aggression in rats. The paradigm involves the introduction of an unfamiliar rat into the home cage of the resident rat, which result in aggressive behavioral pattern like, attack bites, wrestling, chasing behavior, tail tattling, and attack. In this study, 14 days of social isolation caused signi cant aggression in rats. The BUS treatment (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) showed a reduction in all RIT parameters relative to stress control indicating a reduction in aggression (Fig. 3). The serotonin system in the brain (particularly the modulation of the ring and the release of 5-HT of the serotonin neuron, via the 5-HT1A pre-synaptic automatic receptors) have striking in uences on aggression under certain conditions. Certain 5-HT1A and 1B receptor agonists such as uprazine, DU28412, DU27725, eltoprazine, batoprazine showed a prominent anti-aggressive and serene effect (Cremers et al., 2000, de Boer andNewman-Tancredi, 2016). Since BUS is a 5-HT1A agonist, its anti-aggressive effect could be attributed to the optimum release of serotonin in the synapse. Although a better understanding of 5HT receptor subtypes is required to use models of anger and aggression.
Irritability, a sensation characterized by the reduction of temperament control, generally leads to irreversible verbal or behavioral attacks. Many studies suggest that irritability is strongly associated with suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts (Conner et al., 2004). The measure of irritability in rodents is de ned as an extreme reaction to relatively minor tactile or auditory stimuli when the animal becomes wild or agitated. Different behavioral paradigms attempt to assess and monitor irritability in rats. We used total irritability score after applying a discom t stimulus in rats and scored them on 6 points (Ho et al., 2001). In the present study, social isolation stress was found to increase irritability (mean of total irritability score) in stress control group, while treatment with BUS showed the reduction in irritability scores. However, the uoxetine-treated rat did not prevent irritability due to stress. The lack of impact of uoxetine on irritability scores is consistent with previous reports (Jain et al., 1992, Koukopoulos et al., 2005. No signi cant changes were observed in rearing and grooming parameter of OFT by Flx (30 mg/kg) and BUS (10, 20 mg/kg) suggesting anti anger, anti-aggressive effects of BUS without concomitant sedative and motor impairment effect.
We carried out the active avoidance paradigm to study learned helplessness behavior in socially isolated rats. The principle underlying the test is based on the hypothesis that animals will normally attempt to escape an aversive stimulus (i.e., foot shock). When the stimulus is inevitable, they eventually stop trying to escape, displaying "desperation" or hopelessness (Banerjee et al., 2012). The current study shows signi cantly increased escape latencies, the number of failed attempts and successes, attempts in stress control group as compared with normal rats. The results demonstrated induction of learned helplessness in stress control groups while treatment with BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) treated group showed signi cant prevention of learned helplessness. The model means the role of stress adaptive behavior in normal animals due to the activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal hippocampus that are reported to mediate this behavior. High level of blood cortisol as a consequence of chronic social stress is known to impair stress adaptation mechanism, predisposing animals to learned helplessness (Joca et al., 2003).
The high cortisol level in stress control group evident in the present study indicated HPA axis activation. The signi cant decrease of cortisol level in BUS (all the doses) treated animals as well as reduction in learned helplessness behavior by BUS con rmed amelioration of the HPA axis. Prior to cortisol estimation NIBP measurement showed a signi cant rise in BP in stress control animals as assumed, there was a nonsigni cant rise in BP in Flx treatment group too, the result corroborates with the previous ndings (Griebel et al., 1999). Marked reduction in BP by BUS at higher dose indicated in stress control group is in accordance with previous and might involve 5-HT1A receptor in regulation of BP (Taylor et al., 1989). Important parts of the CNS, such as the amygdala, hypothalamus, orbitofrontal cortex and peri-aqueductal grey, have played a major role in the aggressiveness and related disorders. Various neuro-imaging studies, such as MRI, EEG, have shown that patients with aggressive behavior have either a small size of hippocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus (Siever, 2008, Rosell andSiever, 2015). Smaller amygdala was observed in the aggressive population (n=25) as compared to nonaggressive population (n=29) (Bobes et al., 2013). Bilateral amygdala ablation in dogs and primates showed a decrease in aggressiveness (Adolphs et al., 1995). The current studies are consistent with previous data; we found a reduction in amygdala size in the stress control group relative to normal animals. BUS (40) treated group improved the size of amygdala indicating amelioration of aggressive behavior (Gerritsen et al., 2017). Flx had no marked effect on its advocating its limited role in prevention of aggression.
Various biomarkers can be used to assess anger, aggression and vulnerability to suicide, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is one such factor (Molteni et al., 2010). BDNF is responsible for the function, sprouting, neuronal survival, differentiation and synaptic plasticity (Maynard et al., 2016). BDNF disruption in rodents and humans is associated with depression (Maynard et al., 2016) as well as stress (Notaras and van den Buuse, 2020) and treatment with antidepressants up-regulates it (Björkholm and Monteggia, 2016). Our ndings are consistent with the above evidences, the stress control group had reduced levels of BDNF and signi cant increase was demonstrated in BUS and Flx group.
Behavioral, biochemical, genetic expression of BDNF and neuro-imaging ndings in the present study strongly support the effectiveness and safe use of the BUS as compared to Flx for the reduction of anger and aggression and suicidal ideation.
A potential mechanism of preferential use of BUS versus Flx can be attributed to its partial agonist activity established on the serotonin receptor, while Flx is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Flx works by decreasing serotonin reuptake and ultimately increasing the accumulation of serotonin in the synaptic cleft. Excessive accumulation of serotonin in the synapses is associated with suicidal ideation (Stahl, 1998, Albert et al., 2011. Serotonin is released from the vesicle in the synaptic cleft, where it interacts with the post and presynaptic receptors. The feedback loop governs the concentration of 5HT in the synaptic cleft. However, chronic administration of the SSRI desensitizes this loop and the regulatory neurotransmission of serotonin is blocked (Sangkuhl et al., 2009).
Pre synaptically, the 5-HT1A receptor acts as a "brake" to inhibit the activity of the entire 5-HT system and is thought to delay the antidepressant response. Unlike SSRI, BUS does not block the reuptake of serotonin, it is a partial agonist, increases serotonin concentration at certain levels and periodically block 5-HT1A receptors located both at pre-synaptic and post-synaptic membrane, which result in a decrease in the accumulation of 5-HT. Because BUS is not causing serotonin accumulation in the synapse, hence BUS would be preferable over Flx for the prevention of anger, aggression associated with depression and the further ideation of suicide in human.

Conclusion
The current study has rst time demonstrated the effect of BUS as well as Flx on anger using preclinical model-using Roller rotation chamber and found both of them to be equipotent. Secondly, Flx which is already reported to induce suicidal ideations, has un-favorable effects on BP and was not found to prevent irritability hence 5-HT1A modulator BUS, reduced behavioral (Resident intruder paradigm, irritability, OFT, locomotor activity), improved serum cortisol level, size of amygdala, BDNF, may be considered as a treatment for anger, aggression and suicidal ideation. Funding Source-NA.
Con icts of interest/Competing interests-The authors declare that they have no con ict of interest.
Availability of data and material (data transparency)-The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used. The raw data is submitted with the manuscript in excel format.  Figure 1 Design of Roller rotation chamber used for wheel rolling activity. Locomotor activity. Data was expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6). Statistical signi cances were determined using two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test (a-g) while one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test was used for h-j. ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 compared to vehicle treated group, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 as compared to SC group. SC-Stress control, Flx-Fluoxetine, BUS-Buspirone Effect of BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) on the size of amygdale using MRI Data was expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6).

Figures
Statistical signi cances were determined using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. #P<0.05 compared to vehicle treated group, *P<0.05 as compared to SC group. SC-Stress control, Flx-Fluoxetine, BUS-Buspirone.

Figure 4
Effect of BUS (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) on serum cortisol level. Data was expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6). Statistical signi cances were determined using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. ###P<0.01 compared to vehicle treated group, ***P<0.001 as compared to SC group. SC-Stress control, Flx-Fluoxetine, BUS-Buspirone.

Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary les associated with this preprint. Click to download. ExcelSheetSupplementarymaterialNSAP.xlsx