We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 symptoms on airline crew. It is significant as the first study conducted to assess the effects of COVID-19 symptoms among airline crew in Korea.
Fatigue was found to be the most common symptom of COVID-19 in this study, which aligns with previous research.19 However, the previously reported symptoms of high fever and dyspnea were less prevalent.1, 20 There are several plausible explanations for this. Firstly, it may be because the study participants were airline crew who experienced fatigue due to jet lag or shift work, unrelated to COVID-19 infection. Secondly, there may be differences in the characteristics of the study participants. Only a small percentage (approximately 11%) of the subjects in this study had underlying diseases, whereas past studies included approximately 51% with underlying health conditions 20. High fever and dyspnea are risk factors that contribute to the severity of COVID-19, and healthy adults may exhibit fewer symptoms of high fever and dyspnea. Lastly, the timing of data collection may have influenced the results. The previous study collected data in 2020 during the early stage of the pandemic, whereas this study collected data in September 2022, when the pandemic had progressed. The coronavirus has also continued to spread worldwide since 2020, with ongoing mutations until the end of the pandemic, resulting in different symptom presentations among infected individuals. In 2022, variants such as Omicron BA4 and BA5 were prevalent, leading to common reports of fatigue even among individuals who had sufficient sleep at night.21
Nonsmokers or ex-smokers experienced more symptoms when diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to smokers. This unexpected finding suggests that smoking may have a protective effect. Similarly, individuals who drank less than once a month had a higher number of symptoms than those who drank more than twice a month. This could be because individuals who pay more attention to their symptoms are more likely to report them. Since symptoms are subjective and vary depending on how an individual perceives their health, considering factors such as sex and mood when interpreting symptom reports is important. In the previous study, it was discovered that nonsmokers and low drinkers were more likely to report physical symptoms, which can be influenced by sex and negative moods.2 In the present study, additional analysis revealed that approximately 80% of nonsmokers in the study were women, and approximately 83% of individuals who drank less than once a month were also women. Another possible explanation for these findings is that the symptoms experienced by the study participants were relatively mild. For instance, the rates of dyspnea and chest pain, which are considered serious symptoms of COVID-19, were low at 13.3% and 14.6%, respectively. Notably, previous studies that reported higher rates of complications and mortality in smokers or ex-smokers typically involved individuals with more severe symptoms.9, 22 However, making direct comparisons in this study was challenging because the smoking habits of the study participants were not directly measured; only 13 individuals in the study smoked daily. It has been reported that smoking and ex-smoking are associated with the severity of COVID-19, which aligns with previous research indicating higher rates of complications and mortality.9, 10, 22
The findings of this study demonstrated that the number of symptoms was higher in cases where COVID-19 symptoms persisted for a longer duration. This result is consistent with previous studies.23, 24 These studies found that when the number of symptoms reaches five or more, it increases the likelihood of developing long COVID syndrome, which lasts for > 4 weeks. In our study, individuals who experienced symptoms for > 4 weeks had an average of five symptoms during the acute phase. A larger number of symptoms can significantly impact daily life, potentially indicating a more severe illness and longer recovery period. Notably, previous research has shown that post-COVID syndrome lasting > 12 weeks after diagnosis negatively affects quality of life. Therefore, it is highly plausible that the duration of symptoms affects daily life. However, the number of symptoms in the individuals examined in this study did not influence their timing of returning to work. This is likely because most airlines allow employees to return to work after completing the 7-d national quarantine period, as long as their symptoms are not severe. Hence, it is crucial for internal health managers to continue monitoring symptoms even after employees have returned to work, especially in cases where individuals have experienced multiple COVID-19 symptoms.
The results of this study revealed that the number of symptoms was lower in obese or overweight patients compared to normal-weight patients, and these individuals also returned to work faster. This is in contrast to previous studies which reported that obesity affects COVID-19 severity through impaired respiratory function.25 There are several possible reasons for this discrepancy. First, the obese or overweight group may have had a higher proportion of men. It is known that women tend to complain of symptoms more frequently than men, and they also have a higher incidence of long COVID-19 syndrome, where symptoms persist for > 4 weeks 26. In fact, the results of this study showed that approximately 93% of the obese group consisted of men, which was higher compared to the 11% in the normal weight group. Second, the overweight or obese group included a larger proportion of flight attendants, approximately 50%, in contrast to the 7% in the normal weight group. Since flight attendants do not have direct contact with passengers, they could return to work as long as they were deemed capable of performing their duties, despite having persistent symptoms. On the other hand, cabin attendants, who interact with passengers directly, would not have been able to resume work until all major symptoms had disappeared. Lastly, the average BMI of subjects classified as obese in this study was 24.4, which is lower compared to previous studies where a BMI of 30 or higher was used to define obesity 27.
This study has certain limitations. First, it should be noted that the results are not easily applicable to the wider population, as the study was only conducted on Korean airline crews. Further studies are necessary to confirm the relationship between weight and COVID-19 symptoms specifically in airline crews. Second, there is a possibility of recall bias, as participants had to recall their symptoms at the time of COVID-19 infection when answering the questionnaire. Additionally, the proportion of obese or overweight participants was relatively low, accounting for only approximately 24% of the total participants.