Biodegradable plastic film mulch increased nitrous oxide emissions in organic leek but decreased emissions in organic cabbages

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4710284/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Biodegradable plastic film mulch increased nitrous oxide emissions in organic leek but decreased emissions in organic cabbages

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4710284/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Plastic film mulch (PFM) controls weeds and increases yields, making them attractive to vegetable growers; biodegradable PFMs potentially reduce the harms associated with conventional PFMs. PFMs increase soil biological activity, accelerating the decomposition of soil organic matter and potentially increasing emissions of some greenhouse gases (GHGs). Conversely, they are a barrier to rainfall infiltration and gas exchange, reducing harmful nitrate (NO₃⁻) leaching and ammonia (NH₃) volatilisation. The effects of PFMs on the processes resulting in GHG emissions are not well explored outside conventionally grown commodity crops in major growing regions. To address this, we conducted a field plot-scale experiment on an organic vegetable farm in SW Wales (UK). We measured nitrous oxide (N₂O), methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂) and potential NH₃ emission from the soil, growing leeks or cabbages, with or without biodegradable PFM and amended with poultry manure or green-waste compost. Averaged across both crops, yield was 26% higher with PFM; potential NH₃ emissions were 18% lower (43% on a yield-scaled basis) in mulched treatments than unmulched; CH₄ emissions were not significantly affected. Yield-scaled N₂O emissions were 62% higher in mulched leeks than unmulched but 56% lower in mulched cabbages than unmulched; this coincided with higher soil NO₃⁻ concentrations in mulched leeks than either unmulched crop or mulched cabbages. Results were not obtained for CO₂, so partial global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) were determined mainly by N₂O emissions. Thus, biodegradable PFM is potentially useful in reducing harmful gaseous N emissions in organic horticulture.

Sustainable plasticulture

Organic farming

Soil quality

PLA

Nitrogen dynamics

Enhancing crop yield has been the primary imperative of agronomists; however, it is increasingly recognised that this must be balanced against the harms caused to the environment and human health, particularly those associated with nitrogen (N) losses (Fowler et al., 2023). Recent years have seen a rapid expansion in the use of plastic film mulches (PFM) within agricultural production due to their ability to increase crop yields (Nachimuthu et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2020). These increases have been attributed to increased water and nutrient use efficiency, protection against soil erosion, the suppression of weeds and pests and thermal insulation of the soil (Gao et al., 2019; Kasirajan & Ngouajio, 2012a; Lamont, 2005). They can act as a barrier to rainfall infiltration and gas exchange at the soil surface and affect the system's energy balance by regulating radiation, convection, and evaporation, which can influence soil moisture, temperature, and gas exchange. These, in turn, may affect crop growth, soil biological processes and soil carbon (C) and N cycling in numerous ways (Fig. S1).

However, the legacy of plastic left in the soil at the end of the cropping season and its potential to generate nano- and micro-plastics has led to significant concerns about the sustainability of plastic mulch film use in agriculture (Salama & Geyer, 2023; Steinmetz et al., 2016). One potential solution to this has been the adoption of biodegradable mulch films, which rapidly biodegrade in the soil at the end of the growing season (Kasirajan & Ngouajio, 2012b). Recently, mesocosm-based experiments have suggested that biodegradable plastic mulch films may, however, negatively alter soil functioning and N dynamics, while others have shown minimal effect (Brown et al., 2023; Rauscher et al., 2023; Reay et al., 2023). The potential effect of residual micro-plastics is in contrast to the positive impact of using the films as a mulch in field experiments (Lee et al., 2021; Samphire et al., 2023). The relative importance of positive effects on N cycling and yield and the adverse effects of biodegradable PFM in long-term use are poorly explored. This has led to the call for more research to better understand how PFMs alter soil and plant functioning when used in the field, particularly with biodegradable mulch films (Qi et al., 2020; Salama & Geyer, 2023; Serrano-Ruiz et al., 2021)

Most previous studies have indicated that conventional LDPE-based PFMs can reduce NH₃ emissions despite the increases in soil temperature and NH₄⁺ concentration under the film (Chae et al., 2022; Fang et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022; Mo et al., 2020). This has been ascribed to the PFM reducing gas exchange, increasing the partial pressure of NH₃ in the air under the mulch, preventing soil drying and tipping the equilibrium towards the retention of dissolved NH₄⁺. In contrast, there is no consensus on the effect of PFM on N₂O fluxes. Fang et al. (2022) found that PFM reduced N₂O emissions, while Nan et al. (2016) found the opposite effect. Three meta-analyses in China have also reported different results: (i) PFM reduces N₂O emissions under moderate N fertilisation rates but increases emissions at high N application rates (Mo et al., 2020); (ii) PFM use increases N₂O emissions (Yu et al., 2021), but only in paddy fields or with non-biodegradable PFM; or (iii) PFM has no significant effect on N₂O emissions (Wei et al., 2022). The differences in these analyses were probably due to the inclusion of different crops, management practices and climate regimes, but all involved major staple crops under continental conditions.

PFM often leads to increased microbial activity and, hence, respiration and breakdown of soil organic matter (SOM). This can lead to increased CO₂ emissions (Li et al., 2022) and a net loss of soil C. However, increased crop growth and C returns (e.g., rhizodeposition and crop residues) can mitigate this (Wang et al., 2016). A meta-analysis found that although PFM increased CO₂ emissions, it resulted in net C sequestration in dry upland areas (Mo et al., 2020). Several studies have also shown that PFM can increase CH₄ emissions which has been attributed to higher soil water contents under the PFM (Cuello et al., 2015; Wang H. et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2021), although occasionally, the opposite trend is found (Nan et al., 2016). As the use of PFM usually results in increased crop yields, it is important, however, to yield-scale greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Islam Bhuiyan et al., 2021) For example, the higher GHG emissions under PFM management were shown to be lower than the unmulched control when crop yield was taken into account (Li et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022).

Most previous studies on the effects of biodegradable PFM on GHG emissions have focussed on major commodity crops, conventional farming using mineral fertilisers, and regions with drier or warmer climates. In contrast, there is very little information regarding their performance under organic management regimes, in vegetable crops, or in moist temperate climates, contexts which present particular challenges with yield-scaled environmental impacts from gaseous N emission (Hergoualc’h et al., 2021; Skinner et al., 2014; Tei et al., 2020). However, PFM may play a significant role in these conditions: it may speed up the breakdown of organic matter (Jin et al., 2018), reduce the impacts of high rainfall, such as leaching (Quemada & Gabriel, 2016) and waterlogging (Snyder et al., 2015), and increase nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in vegetable crops, some of which are known to be poor in this respect (Samphire et al., 2023). While the effects of PFM on the soil microclimate, crop yield and N availability are relatively well studied, little is known about the effect of biodegradable PFMs on gaseous emissions, particularly with horticultural crops, in wetter climates, and the interaction with organic amendments.

To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the effect of biodegradable PFM on gaseous N fluxes in field-grown organic vegetables (N efficient cabbages vs. N inefficient leeks) under two contrasting organic fertiliser regimes (poultry manure vs. green waste compost). We hypothesised that (i) PFM would increase crop growth and yield due to more consistent soil moisture availability and higher soil temperature; (ii) PFM would result in higher NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations due to greater rates of SOM turnover and reduced leaching; (iii) the increases in mineral N would result in higher gaseous losses of NH₃ and N₂O, but (iv) net GHG losses would be lower when expressed on a yield-scaled basis.

2.1. Experimental site

The experimental field site was at a commercial organic horticultural farm in SW Wales, UK (51°47’N, 4°12’E; 130 m a.s.l.). The soil is classified as a free-draining, silty clay loam textured Eutric Cambisol developed on a carboniferous sandstone and shale parent material (NSRI, 2016). The main soil chemical and physical properties (n = 5) for the top 10 cm of soil at the start of the experiment are summarised in Table S1. pH and available P, K, and Mg content were determined by a commercial laboratory (Cawood Scientific Ltd., NRM Laboratories, Berkshire, UK).

The mean annual rainfall (1981–2010) is 1380 mm and the annual mean air temperature is 10.4°C (Met Office, 2021). During the experimental period (June 1st to Sept. 10th, 2022), daily temperature and precipitation data were measured at a nearby weather station (within 2 km), giving a mean air temp of 16.5°C and total rainfall of 355 mm (The Weather Company, 2022).

The experimental site has been under commercial organic horticulture since 2010, growing mixed vegetable crops in rotation with green manures. The experimental plot had been planted with a mixed ley of grass, clovers, and herbs in the previous seasons; this was incorporated by plough in January, and the seedbed was prepared by secondary cultivation and rolling to create beds running across the slope.

2.2. Experimental treatments

The experiment consisted of two crops, namely leeks (Allium ampeloprasum L. cv. Jolant) and cabbages (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata cv. Stanton). These were chosen to represent typical horticultural crops with contrasting N uptake profiles (D’Haene et al., 2018; Everaarts, 1993; Karic et al., 2005; Thorup-Kristensen and Sorensen, 1999)Cell-grown transplants raised by a commercial nursery (Delfland Nurseries Ltd. Doddington, March, Cambridgeshire, UK) were used. The mulch film was a 15 µm thick, black biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA)- based PFM, Gro-clean Bio-Mulch® (Gromax Industries Ltd., Hadleigh, Suffolk, UK).

Two organic fertilisers were used: pelleted sterilised poultry manure (Greenvale Farms limited, Middleton Tyas, North Yorkshire, UK) was spread at a rate of 1 t ha^− 1 (total N, 44 kg N ha^− 1), and municipal green waste and food waste compost (Cwm Environmental Ltd., Nantycaws, Carmarthenshire, UK) at a rate of 25 t ha^− 1 (total N, 163 kg N ha^− 1); the equivalent field spreading rate was 0.8 and 20 t ha^− 1 respectively as fertilisers were only applied on the beds and not the wheelings between beds. The nutrient analysis of these amendments is shown in Table S2.

2.3. Experimental design

A randomised block design was used with 32 plots and four blocks with all combinations of the three treatments in each block. Beds were created by rolling on 2nd July, and the biodegradable PFM was laid on the plots on 4th July 2022. The main treatments consisted of plots with and without biodegradable PFM. The subplots used two treatments: poultry manure (m) and green waste compost (c). Cabbages were planted at 40 × 40 cm spacing (6.25 plants m^− 2 on the bed, 50,000 plants ha^− 1 on field scale including wheelings) and leeks at 30 × 30 cm spacing (11.1 plants m^− 2 on the bed, 88,000 plants ha^− 1 on field scale including wheelings) on 5th July 2022. These planting densities are typical for commercial organically grown cabbages and leeks (Davies & Lennartson, 2005). To avoid sampling affecting subsequent results, all measurements were taken at least 20 cm from holes made in the PFM for previous observations. When multiple samples were taken on a single occasion (for soil mineral N analysis), these were taken from a defined area rather than the whole plot.

2.4. Plant measurements

During the experiment, rows of plants were harvested, and their fresh weight was determined before oven-drying (80°C, 8 h). The dried samples were ground using a Retsch stainless steel ball mill and then analysed for total C and N using a TruSpec® CN analyser (Leco Corp., St Joseph, MI). Only above-ground parts were analysed; we did not test the N content of the roots, but it is unlikely to be significant for these crops (Huett & Dettmann, 1991). The yield was calculated as fresh and dry matter yield per plant and economic yield, which was the weight of the fresh plants trimmed of outer leaves and stems to the standard of the farm on which the experiment was conducted and scaled per hectare. Mid-season measurements were taken from plants adjacent to the gas sampling area, but at harvest, measurements were taken from plants both within and adjacent to this area.

2.5 Soil measurements

Soil temperature and volumetric moisture sensors (TDT-SDI-12; Acclima Inc., Meridian, ID) were installed at a depth of 5 cm. One sensor was placed within the gas sampling area and one in an adjacent area of the plot (Fig. S2). Readings were recorded hourly using SDI-12 DataSnap data loggers (Acclima Inc.). Volumetric soil moisture content was converted to gravimetric soil water content and then to Water-Filled Pore Space (WFPS) as follows:

WFPS = Ɵ_v / Φ (Eq. 1)

where Ɵ_v is volumetric soil water content, and Φ is total soil porosity. Φ was calculated by:

Φ = (1 - Ρ_b/Ρ_p) (Eq. 2)

where Ρ_b is soil bulk density, and Ρ_p represents soil particle density (2.47g cm^− 3) (Sumner, 2000)

The tea bag method of Keuskamp et al. (2013) was used to estimate soil biological activity. For this, the mass loss of the relatively easily degraded 'green' tea (C:N of 12) and the more recalcitrant rooibos (‘red’) tea (C:N of 60) were measured to determine the rate of decay k ( the exponential rate of decay calculated from the proportion of mass lost from the ‘red’ tea), and stabilisation factor S (the proportion of the mass of green tea remaining relative to the fraction thought to be degradable estimated from chemical hydrolysis) (Duddigan et al., 2020). The equations to calculate k and S are:

k = ln(a_r / (W_(t) – (1-a_r))) / T (Eq. 3)

S = (1 - (a_g / H_g)) (Eq. 4)

where a_r = the decomposable fraction of red tea assumed to be the same fraction of hydrolysable material as that calculated for green tea so:

a_r = Hr(a_g / H_g) (Eq. 5)

where T = length of time buried in days, W_(t) = fraction of red tea remaining after burial for time T, a_g is the fraction of green tea lost, and Hg and H_r are the easily degradable fractions of green and red tea, respectively, determined by hydrolysis (Hr = 0.522, H_g = 0.842; (Keuskamp et al., 2013) Three pairs of Lipton Green Sencha (‘green’ tea) or Lipton Rooibos and Hibiscus tea bags (‘red’ tea) (Unilever Ltd., London, UK) were buried at a soil depth of 5 cm, spaced 20 cm apart (Fig. S2). These were recovered at the end of the experiment. The mass loss relative to the starting weight was determined after oven-drying the remaining tea in the litter bags at 60ºC until constant weight.

To assess soil available NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations, five soil cores (0–10 cm) were taken every 14 days from between the plants in each subplot. After sample homogenisation, 5 g of soil was extracted with 25 ml of 1 M KCl (200 rev min^− 1, 1 h), the extracts filtered, and the filtrate stored at -18°C prior to analysis. Soil moisture was determined by oven drying (105°C, 12 h). NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ in the KCl extracts were measured colourimetrically using the vanadate methods of Miranda et al. (2001) and the salicylic acid method of Mulvaney (1996), respectively. To avoid damaging the PFM within the gas sampling area, samples were taken from area adjacent areas during the growing season, but at the end of the experiment, samples were taken from both within the gas sampling area and adjacent to it.

2.6. Measurement of gaseous fluxes

Measuring gaseous emission through a PFM under field conditions has several challenges. Gases may escape through planting holes or damaged film and by diffusion through the film or from the edge of the bed. Gas may build up in spaces under the film and be concentrated in the soil profile. Any penetration of the film to place a measuring chamber could measure a release of the accumulated gases rather than the steady state flux from the soil. Placing a chamber for a prolonged period may also affect soil conditions (Rochette and Hutchinson, 2005). If a hole in the film is made for one set of observations, the conditions may be changed for the following observations. The apparatus for sampling gases is shown in Figure S3. GHG emissions and potential NH₃ emissions were measured using a static chamber method similar to that employed by (Li et al., 2022). Before mulch and fertility treatments were applied, a UPVC collar was pushed into the soil so the rim was flush with the soil surface. Adhesive tape was then used to fix the mulch film to the collar. A UPVC sampling chamber (internally 390 mm × 390 mm × 300 mm) was placed on the collar and sealed using wet clay for each sampling occasion. The chambers were removed from the collars after each GHG and potential NH₃ emission measurement to prevent any differences in the microclimate in the area when the chamber was not in use.

GHG sampling was conducted at least weekly at first, but after mid-season, the frequency was reduced to approximately every two weeks; in all, there were 11 sampling occasions over the course of the experiment. Unfortunately, the cabbages grew too large for the chambers in August, so the two penultimate observations were for leeks only. The final GHG flux measurements were taken immediately after the crop harvest so all plots could again be sampled,

Gas samples were withdrawn through the rubber septum using a 25 ml syringe and injected into pre-evacuated 20 ml vials. GHG flux was calculated from the change in concentration in the headspace gases between initial samples and samples taken after 60 min. Additional samples were taken from one randomly selected chamber on each occasion, at 15, 30, and 45 mins, to check for linearity of change in headspace gas concentrations; these were satisfactory. Samples were analysed on a Perkin Elmer 580 Gas Chromatograph with a TurboMatrix 110 auto sampler (PerkinElmer, CT, USA). Gas samples passed through two Elite-Q mega bore columns via a split injector, with one connected to a ⁶³Ni electron-capture detector for N₂O determination and the other connected to a Flame Ionisation Detector for CH₄ and CO₂ determination. Fluxes were estimated using the slope of the linear regression between 0 min and 60 mins, considering the temperature and the ratio between chamber headspace volume and soil surface area. Cumulative GHG fluxes were estimated by linear interpolation between sampling points.

Potential ammonia emission was measured using the same chamber on different occasions. A sponge (80 × 80 × 10 mm was soaked with 10 ml of 1 M H₂SO₄ mixture containing 5% glycol (Shigaki and Dell, 2015). This was suspended from the lid of the gas chamber and left in the closed chamber for 4 h. The sponge was kept in a closed vessel before and after collection to avoid absorption of background atmospheric NH₃. After being returned to the laboratory, the sponges were shaken with 40 ml 1 M KCl for 20 min, and the extract was subsequently stored at -18°C. Subsequently, 10 ml of the extract was placed in a 50 ml polypropylene tube, and an excess of 1 M NaOH was added to promote NH₃ release. The NH₃ released was trapped in 0.015 M H₃PO₄ over 16 h, and the NH₄⁺ in the traps was determined colourimetrically using the salicylic acid method of Mulvaney (1996).

Yield-scaled emissions were calculated by:

E_ys = E_t/Y_ec (Eq. 6)

where E_ys is the yield-scaled emissions, E_t is total emissions, and Y_ec is the economic yield.

To investigate the effect of PFM on nitrification and denitrification rates, we examined the relationship between soil NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ concentrations and N₂O efflux. N₂O efflux as a proportion of soil NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ concentration was calculated by:

E_nn = E_n/C_n (Eq. 7)

where E_nn is the N₂O efflux as a proportion of soil NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ concentration, E_n = N₂O efflux, and C_n is the concentration of either NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ in the top 10 cm of soil at the nearest sampling period (10 out of 12 of these where within 24 h, the other two within 48 h of N₂O efflux measurement).

As nitrification dominates N₂O in drier soils, switching to denitrification at between 60 and 70% soil moisture (Wang et al., 2023a), we also analysed the relationship between soil NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ concentrations and N₂O efflux separately for drier and wetter soil conditions.

Global Warming Potential (GWP) over a 100-year period was calculated by (Forster et al. 2021):

GWP = 27 (N₂O flux) + 273 (CH₄ flux) + CO₂ flux (Eq. 8)

and Greenhouse Gas Intensity (GHGI) was calculated by:

GHGI = GWP/Y_ec (Eq. 9).

2.7. Statistical analysis

Data were analysed in R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020). Mixed effects modelling was carried out using the Lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015). The best-fit model was determined by a comparison of models using the experimental variables (mulch and density or fertility) as fixed effects and the block and bed and where relevant date as random effects in random intercept models; comparisons of log-likelihood were used to determine which models were best, using ANOVA to determine the significance of the differences where necessary. A summary of coefficients and significance levels was extracted with the lmeTest package (Kuznetsova et al., 2017). Results are assumed to be significant where p < 0.05.

3.1. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on crop yields and N content

Fresh and dry matter yield per plant (for both leeks and cabbage) was significantly higher when grown with biodegradable PFM (30% and 26%, respectively; Fig. 1). The interaction of PFM with poultry manure fertiliser increased cabbage yield further. The details of the interactions are presented in Table 1. The economic yield of cabbage was more affected by PFM than leeks (Fig. 1). Poultry manure resulted in slightly higher yields when used with PFM and lower without PFM compared to compost in the same combination (Fig. S4); however, this was not statistically significant (Table 1). The fresh and dry yield per plant was not significantly different between the GHG monitoring areas and the other areas of the plot.

Table 1

Yield characteristics of cabbages and leeks grown with or without biodegradable PFM combined with either poultry manure or green-waste compost. Values represent means ± SEM (n = 4).
Mulch	Crop	Fertiliser	Fresh yield (g plant^− 1)	Dry matter yield (g plant^− 1)	Economic yield^a (Mg ha^− 1)
No Mulch	Leek	Compost	243 ± 12	22.4 ± 2.2	14.4 ± 1.0
No Mulch	Leek	Poultry Manure	244 ± 11	24.8 ± 1.0	12.6 ± 0.4
	Cabbage	Compost	1117 ± 93	137.3 ± 11.5	19.5 ± 2.5
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	925 ± 52	119.1 ± 1.1	16.5 ± 1.5
Biodegradable PFM	Leek	Compost	314 ± 14	28.5 ± 1.9	17.3 ± 0.9
	Leek	Poultry Manure	306 ± 22	27.8 ± 2.2	16.8 ± 1.6
	Cabbage	Compost	1338 ± 79	145.2 ± 5.3	29.4 ± 4.1
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	1482 ± 77	170.0 ± 15.4	31.1 ± 3.8
Statistical analysis
Mulch			***	*	**
Fertiliser			ns	ns	ns
Crop^b			NA	NA	***
Mulch*Fertiliser			ns	ns	ns
Mulch*Crop			ns	ns	*
Crop*Fertiliser			0.06	ns	ns
MulchCropFertiliser			*	*	ns
ns -not significant, Significant differences: * - p < 0.05, - p < 0.005, * - p < 0.001. p-value is given for the marginal case.
^a Economic yield is the yield of the fresh crop, trimmed to the standard of the farm on which the experiment was conducted, including wheelings between beds in the area.
^b For dry and fresh yield per plant, analysis was carried out on % of crop mean yield of each crop type as crops gave very different yields.

Cabbages had significantly higher N content and a lower C: N ratio at harvest; this, combined with higher yield, resulted in N uptake that was three to five times higher than that of leeks (Table 2). Biodegradable PFM increased crop N content and reduced the C: N ratio, but the effect was smaller in cabbages than in leeks. The choice of organic amendment did not significantly affect these metrics.

Table 2

Crop N content, C/N ratio and N uptake. Values represent means ± SEM (n = 4).
Mulch	Crop	Fertiliser	Crop N content at Harvest (%)	Crop C/N ratio at harvest	Crop N uptake mid-season (g m^− 2)	Crop N uptake at harvest (g m^− 2)
No Mulch	Leek	Compost	3.59 ± 0.35	11.75 ± 0.94	0.27 ± 0.03	9.06 ± 1.47
No Mulch	Leek	Poultry Manure	3.68 ± 0.41	11.82 ± 0.68	0.21 ± 0.04	10.10 ± 0.44
	Cabbage	Compost	5.29 ± 0.35	7.61 ± 0.08	3.65 ± 1.08	45.59 ± 4.59
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	4.92 ± 0.23	8.13 ± 0.21	2.45 ± 0.49	36.61 ± 1.24
Biodegradable PFM	Leek	Compost	4.70 ± 0.41	8.98 ± 0.39	0.45 ± 0.06	14.79 ± 0.63
	Leek	Poultry Manure	4.72 ± 0.46	8.79 ± 0.19	0.40 ± 0.04	14.59 ± 1.20
	Cabbage	Compost	5.31 ± 0.22	7.45 ± 0.34	3.45 ± 0.22	48.35 ± 3.44
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	5.43 ± 0.31	7.14 ± 0.14	3.06 ± 0.42	57.56 ± 4.82
Statistical analysis
Mulch			***	***
Fertiliser			ns	ns
Crop			***	***
Mulch*Fertiliser			ns	ns
Mulch*Crop			**	***
Crop*Fertiliser			ns	ns
MulchCropFertiliser			ns	ns
ns -not significant; Significant differences: * - p < 0.05, - p < 0.005, * - p < 0.001.

3.2. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil gas fluxes

On most occasions, measured fluxes of N₂O were significantly higher from PFM plots with leeks, but the size of the effect varied (Table 3, Fig. 2). There was a notable emission peak for all treatments three days after the start of the experiment. Over the growing season, PFM resulted in significantly higher cumulative N₂O emissions than unmulched treatments for leeks; however, for PFM with cabbages, this situation was reversed (Table 3, Fig. 3). Crop type did not affect cumulative N₂O emissions from the unmulched plots. The organic amendment did not significantly impact N₂O emissions.

Table 3

Cumulative seasonal emissions and yield-scaled emissions of N₂O, CH₄ and NH₃ from soils with PFM mulch or No mulch combined with a crop of cabbages or leeks and fertilised with poultry manure or green-waste compost. Values represent means ± SEM (n = 4).
Mulch	Crop	Fertiliser	Seasonal N₂O emission (mg N m^− 2)	Yield-scaled N₂O emission (kg N Mg^− 1)	Seasonal CH₄ emission (mg m^− 2)	Seasonal GHGI (N₂O + CH₄) (g CO₂ eq m^− 2)	Yield-scaled GHGI (N₂O + CH₄) (kg CO₂ eq Mg^− 1)	Seasonal NH₃ emissions (mg N m^− 2)	Yield-scaled NH₃ emissions (kg N Mg^− 1)
No Mulch	Leek	Compost	71.5 ± 15.7	0.065 ± 0.017	-75.0 ± 25.0	17.5 ± 4.9	16.0 ± 5.0	336.1 ± 64.8	0.291 ± 0.056
No Mulch	Leek	Poultry Manure	77.1 ± 22.6	0.076 ± 0.021	-65.7 ± 23.7	19.3 ± 6.1	19.0 ± 5.7	299.6 ± 58.2	0.299 ± 0.058
	Cabbage	Compost	53.5 ± 23.5	0.038 ± 0.016	-91.8 ± 16.5	12.2 ± 6.7	8.9 ± 4.3	423.0 ± 38.9	0.282 ± 0.037
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	88.7 ± 15.2	0.070 ± 0.014	-70.2 ± 29.9	22.3 ± 4.0	17.8 ± 3.8	598.4 ± 147.3	0.480 ± 0.126
Biodegradable PFM	Leek	Compost	149.5 ± 51.9	0.109 ± 0.040	-64.0 ± 31.0	39.1 ± 14.6	28.5 ± 11.2	242.1 ± 86.5	0.178 ± 0.066
	Leek	Poultry Manure	163.4 ± 30.7	0.121 ± 0.017	-44.8 ± 41.6	43.4 ± 8.7	33.4 ± 5.2	239.6 ± 39.0	0.178 ± 0.022
	Cabbage	Compost	51.6 ± 18.5	0.023 ± 0.007	-25.1 ± 47.9	13.4 ± 4.7	5.8 ± 1.7	368.3 ± 48.8	0.173 ± 0.044
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	85.8 ± 8.5	0.036 ± 0.006	-80.6 ± 28.2	21.2 ± 2.0	8.9 ± 1.2	546.5 ± 58.6	0.236 ± 0.051
Statistical analysis
Mulch			**	*	ns	**	*	**	0.07
Fertiliser			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Crop			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	*
Mulch*Fertiliser			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
Mulch*Crop			*	**	ns	*	**	ns	ns
Crop*Fertiliser			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	*	*
MulchCropFertiliser			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns
ns -not significant; Significant differences: * - p < 0.05, - p < 0.005, * - p < 0.001.

On most occasions, the measured daily CH₄ fluxes were very low and not significantly different between treatments. Despite a peak in emissions in the second week of the experiment, the cumulative effect was a net CH₄ consumption. However, there was no significant difference between the treatments (Fig. 4).

Measured potential NH₃ fluxes were higher overall in the unmulched than in the PFM treatments, but the significance was low (p = 0.055). Daily NH₃ fluxes were significantly different in the first week and at the end of the experiment but not at other times (Fig. 5). This resulted in cumulative seasonal emissions, which were also numerically higher in the unmulched plots, but again with weak significance (p = 0.07). However, a crop of cabbages and the interaction of cabbages grown with poultry manure fertiliser resulted in higher cumulative emissions. On a yield-scaled basis, PFM led to significantly lower NH₃ emissions (Fig. 6).

N₂O emission as a proportion of NO₃⁻ concentration in the topsoil (0–10 cm) was significantly lower in mulched plots (p < 0.05); the occasions when there was a significantly higher proportion of emissions in unmulched plots appear to coincide with peaks of %WFPS (Fig. S5). In contrast, N₂O emission as a proportion of the soil NH₄⁺ content was significantly higher in mulched plots (p < 0.05). When WFPS was < 60%, there was a significant positive correlation between N₂O flux and soil NH₄⁺ concentration in PFM plots (p ≤ 0.05) but not unmulched plots, and PFM increased the rate of emission (Fig. S6A); on the other hand, there was no relationship between N₂O flux and soil NO₃⁻ (Fig. S7A). In contrast, when WFPS was > 60%, PFM did not significantly affect the relationship between N₂O flux and soil NH₄⁺ concentration (Fig. S6B). However, there was a strong positive correlation between N₂O flux and soil NO₃⁻content (p < 0.05), which was not present in the PFM plots (Fig. S7B).

3.3. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil mineral N dynamics

There was an initial peak in soil NH₄⁺ concentrations in the first 4 weeks, after which the concentrations remained low. This pattern was the same in all treatments, but this initial peak was higher in the poultry manure amended plots (Fig. 7A&B). Overall, PFM and poultry manure significantly increased soil NH₄⁺ concentrations. Initially, soil NO₃⁻ concentrations were also high but decreased after four weeks in all treatments other than PFM with leeks, which had a substantial surplus by harvest of 99 ± 18 mg NO₃⁻-N kg^− 1 (Fig. 7C&D). The unmulched plots had the lowest soil NO₃⁻ concentrations at harvest, averaging 2.4 ± 0.4 mg NO₃⁻-N kg^− 1. The soil in mulched cabbage plots (8.2 ± 3 mg NO₃⁻-N kg^− 1) was higher than that in unmulched plots but less than 10% of that of mulched leeks. Table 4 shows the measured N inputs and outputs and the changes in soil mineral N concentration over the course of the experiment: unmulched plots had a reduction in soil mineral N content over the experiment, mulched leeks resulted in an increase, but mulched cabbages resulted in a reduction. Cabbages resulted in significantly higher crop N uptake due to their higher yield and N content; PFM also increased N uptake because of increased yield and N concentration.

Table 4

Changes in soil mineral N concentration and known N inputs and outflows. Values represent means ± SEM (n = 4).
Mulch	Crop	Fertiliser	Change in soil mineral N conc. (0–10 cm) (g N m^− 2)	Crop N uptake (g N m^− 2)	Measured losses of N₂O and NH₃ (g N m^− 2)	Added N in fertiliser (g N m^− 2)
No Mulch	Leek	Compost	-2.56 ± 0.04	9.06 ± 1.47	0.41 ± 0.03	16.5
No Mulch	Leek	Poultry Manure	-2.77 ± 0.07	10.10 ± 0.44	0.38 ± 0.03	4.4
	Cabbage	Compost	-2.57 ± 0.03	45.59 ± 4.59	0.48 ± 0.02	16.5
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	-2.48 ± 0.25	36.61 ± 1.24	0.69 ± 0.07	4.4
Biodegradable PFM	Leek	Compost	6.17 ± 0.23	14.79 ± 0.63	0.39 ± 0.05	16.5
	Leek	Poultry Manure	6.39 ± 1.14	14.59 ± 1.20	0.40 ± 0.02	4.4
	Cabbage	Compost	-2.13 ± 1.85	48.35 ± 3.44	0.42 ± 0.03	16.5
	Cabbage	Poultry Manure	-1.56 ± 0.30	57.56 ± 4.82	0.63 ± 0.03	4.4

3.4. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil biological activity

The teabag biodegradation assay showed that biodegradable PFM caused a significantly higher rate of decay, k, and a significantly lower stabilisation index, S (Fig. 8). These parameters were not significantly affected by organic amendment or crop type.

3.5. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil microclimate

Table S3 shows the mean soil temperature and moisture for mulch and crop treatments over the season, while Figure S8 shows the fluctuation of these parameters plotted alongside air temperature and precipitation. Biodegradable PFM moderated temperature and moisture fluctuations, resulting in lower soil moisture and higher average soil temperature relative to the unmulched soil over the growing period. Cabbages resulted in drier and cooler soil on average than leeks; these differences were larger than those for the mulch treatments.

4.1. Soil hydrothermal conditions

The application of a PFM resulted in relatively small overall changes in soil hydrothermal conditions; however, it was effective in reducing fluctuations in soil moisture and preventing extremes of both soil temperature and moisture. This contrasts with previous studies where black PFMs are often found to raise mean soil temperatures by 2ºC or more (Locher et al., 2005; Schonbeck & Evanylo, 1998a). This is possibly due to less film-soil contact and the insulating effect of air gaps between mulch and soil (Liakatas, 1986; Tarrara, 2000), as well as reduced sunlight hours and, thus, incident UV radiation in the maritime climate. PFM reduces evaporation and rainfall infiltration, reducing the rate of both wetting and drying (Snyder et al., 2015; Tarara, 2000). The effects of PFM on soil moisture are likely to vary spatially with both depth and distance from the planting holes (Chen et al., 2018; Saglam et al., 2017). It is likely that at shallower depths, the differences that PFM causes to soil wetting and drying will be more pronounced than those measured in deeper soil layers. The difference in soil moisture between cabbages and leeks was larger than between mulch treatments; we ascribe this to the greater relative leaf area of cabbages, which resulted in shading and increased transpiration. Further, the mulched cabbage plots had fewer planting holes as they were planted less densely than the leeks, and it is possible that the canopy architecture of cabbages directed rainfall away from the planting holes (Chen et al., 2018; Haraguchi et al., 2003; Li et al., 2005). This heterogeneity of soil moisture response to wetting and drying is likely to have influenced the highly moisture-dependent biotic (e.g., plant N uptake, microbial N cycling) and abiotic (e.g., N leaching, NH3 volatilisation) processes in this study. This is supported by Berger et al. (2013), who observed lower N₂O emissions in dry soil away from planting holes and higher emissions in the wetter areas around the planting holes, resulting in an insignificant net effect of PFM.

4.2. Crop yield

The average economic yield of cabbages was slightly lower than the standard benchmark for UK organic producers but higher than expected for leeks (Lampkin et al., 2017), possibly reflecting the slightly shorter growing period for the cabbages. Economic yield showed bigger differences between the treatments than yields per plant; this probably reflects enhanced maturity of the crops in mulched plots, resulting in lower leaf-to-head or leaf-to-pseudostem ratio, which comprise the marketable product.

PFM increased dry matter yield per plant by 26%, which is in the range typically found for horticultural crops grown with PFM for leeks (Benoit & Ceustermans, 2002; Golian & Anyszka, 2015), cabbages (Ponjičan et al., 2021; Trdan et al., 2008) and other horticultural crops (Nachimuthu et al., 2017; Samphire et al., 2023; Wojciechowska et al., 2007). The yield differences are often attributed to the effect of PFM on soil temperature or moisture; however, in this experiment, the differences in these are relatively small, suggesting that other factors were more important (e.g., enhanced NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations).

In the unmulched plots, there was no significant difference between the effect of organic amendment type on the yield between the two crops; however, the use of PFM and poultry manure caused a significant increase in yield, particularly for leeks (> 48%). This effect was not detected with compost. This is perhaps related to the relative growth rate of the two crops, leeks being slow to establish (Davies & Lennartson, 2005) and perhaps unable to take advantage of the initial short-lived higher available N.

4.3. Soil microbial activity

The tea bag index results indicate that biodegradable PFM causes significantly higher rates of SOM turnover. This replicates previous findings on the same site (Samphire et al., 2023). The size of the effect is large, given the relatively small changes in mean soil moisture and temperature. However, the relative stability of soil moisture may also be a factor affecting SOM turnover. It is commonly observed that PFM increases soil microbial activity with consequent increases in mineralisation and soil DOC (Bandopadhyay et al., 2018; Han et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2023). This may be relevant to our soil mineral N and N₂O emissions findings.

4.4. Soil mineral N

PFM increased both soil NO₃⁻ and NH₄⁺ concentrations. However, we are not able to attribute this to increased mineralisation or N losses (e.g. NO₃⁻ leaching and gaseous N₂ from denitrification), as these were not measured in this experiment. Overall, the concentrations of soil NH₄⁺ were low, indicating a high soil nitrification rate, which is commonly found in cultivated soils with high C and N content when temperature and pH are not limiting (Elrys et al., 2021). The highest concentrations were found in the initial period following poultry manure amendments, indicating rapid hydrolysis of readily available N compounds such as urea. PFM also had the largest effect at this time, probably partly by reducing N volatilisation losses.

Soil NO₃⁻ concentrations were higher in the first month for all treatments but became very low in the unmulched plots towards the end of the experiment. This pattern was also present in the mulched cabbages but to a lesser extent, although it was still twice that of the unmulched plots by the end of the experiment. Soil NO₃⁻ concentrations in mulched plots with leeks were several times higher than in other treatments. Crop uptake was the largest measured factor affecting soil mineral N in this experiment; as it significantly exceeds the total N in inputs from the organic amendments, there must have been significant mineralisation of SOM. The soil in the mulched leek plots increased in soil mineral N concentrations; all other treatments resulted in losses. The difference between this and mulched cabbages can be explained by the greater crop N uptake; the difference between this and unmulched leeks is consistent with biodegradable PFM causing increased mineralisation and reducing unmeasured losses. We only measured mineral N content in the top 10 cm of soil, and it is likely that the crops took up N from deeper soil profiles. This may have been a bigger factor in cabbages than leeks as they are significantly deeper-rooting (Thorup-Kristensen and Sorensen, 1999). Nevertheless, as there is no obvious reason to believe that more N was mineralised in the cabbage plots, it looks like there were substantially higher losses in leek plots, particularly those that were unmulched.

The small differences in soil temperature and moisture suggest that mineralisation is unlikely to account for the very low NO₃⁻ concentrations in unmulched plots with both crops. Considering the lower N uptake caused by lower yield, it must be concluded that there were substantially higher losses in unmulched crops. The measured losses of N₂O and NH₃ cannot explain these losses. Given the high rainfall events at various times in the experiment, it is likely that leaching was responsible for substantial N loss (Chen et al., 2020; Schonbeck & Evanylo, 1998b).

Excess soil mineral N in leeks grown with PFM could be lost by leaching or denitrification. Steps could also be taken to mitigate these losses after harvest, such as growing a green manure or incorporating a high C: N ratio organic material (Constantin et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2022; Xie & Kristensen, 2017). However, it is likely that mineral N, equivalent to a significant portion of this, was lost from unmulched leeks through the growing period. This loss cannot be mitigated and is likely to contribute to environmental impacts elsewhere, for example, eutrophication in aquatic environments (Nixon et al., 1996) and N₂O emissions from aquatic systems (Pätsch & Kühn, 2008), negating the lower on-farm emissions. Thus, the lower on-farm emissions may not represent the overall environmental impact. It should be noted that leeks would often be grown later in an organic horticultural rotation than cabbages when there is lower available N in the soil (Thorup-Kristensen, 1999).

Other than initially higher soil NH₄⁺ concentration with poultry manure, there was little difference in soil mineral N concentrations between the two organic amendments despite total N inputs from the compost being nearly four times as much as that from poultry manure. Up to 50% of N from poultry manure is estimated to be available to the crop in the same season, but the N supply from compost is deemed negligible (AHDB, 2021). The total amount of mineral N in the top 10 cm of soil and crop was significantly greater than the total added by either amendment, suggesting that the contribution of N accumulated from the previous ley was an important source. The ploughing-in of a two-year-old grass and red clover ley may have an N fertiliser replacement value of about 100 kg ha^− 1 N (Eriksen et al., 2006).

4.5. Gaseous emissions

4.5.1. Methane emissions

Net CH₄ flux did not appear to be affected by the treatments. In all treatments, there was a small peak in CH₄ fluxes one week after the start of the experiment; however, this was balanced by net consumption at other times. It is likely that our results are due to the relatively small difference in soil hydrothermal conditions between the treatments. Cuello et al. (2015) found that PFM significantly increased CH₄ production in Chinese maize cultivation, reflecting the higher soil moisture in their study. In that study, PFM increased CH₄ emissions with both NPK fertiliser and a vetch residue amendment (low C: N ratio) and decreased absorption with barley straw (high C: N ratio). However, this effect was larger with a higher C: N ratio amendment (Cuello et al., 2015). Our study found no difference between different organic amendments, but this may be because native SOM and inputs from the ley were much larger. Similarly, the crop grown had no significant effect, which is more unexpected given the significant differences this caused to soil moisture.

4.5.2. Carbon dioxide emissions

Unfortunately, equipment failure resulted in no CO₂ emissions data from the soil. Hence, we can only provide a partial GHG intensity of production (N₂O + CH₄, expressed as CO₂ equivalent). However, soil emissions would reveal little about the net global warming because they miss the effects of changes in crop photosynthesis, return of crop residues and rhizodeposition; future experiments to calculate Net Ecosystem Exchange could quantify these (Oertel et al., 2016).

4.5.3. Nitrous oxide emissions

N₂O emissions were increased by PFM when the crop was leeks but decreased when the crop was cabbages. The higher emissions in mulched leeks are likely partly due to higher soil NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations. Soil hydrothermal conditions could also have contributed as the differences between cabbages and leeks were greater than those between mulched and unmulched treatment, particularly later in the growing season.

The only research on PFM mulch and N₂O emissions in a related climate examined the establishment of Miscanthus for biofuel production (Holder et al., 2019). They found that PFM caused no significant difference in N₂O emissions over two years compared to the other establishment methods. PFM resulted in greater soil NO₃⁻ concentrations and drier soil, and these two factors may have had opposite effects of a similar magnitude, resulting in no significant overall effect on N₂O fluxes. In our study, the differences in mean soil moisture were minor. Two studies in South Korea (which has a similar but warmer climate) were conducted using organic inputs (Cuello et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2017). Both found that PFM significantly increased N₂O emissions and emission factors for organic amendments. These studies found a positive correlation between emissions and soil NO₃⁻ and soil NH₄⁺ concentrations. In their experiments, differences in soil mineral N were less significant than ours. However, differences in soil hydrothermal conditions (that were more significant than in our experiment) and significantly higher DOC likely played an important role. We did not measure DOC, although indications of increased SOM breakdown rate from the TBI assay suggested it might also have been greater. However, other studies in less similar conditions have reported different results (Dong et al., 2018; Jin et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2022).

Our finding that PFM had a positive interaction with soil NH₄⁺ concentration at WFPS < 60% and a negative interaction with soil NO₃⁻ concentration at WFPS > 60% indicates that PFM positively affects the nitrification rate and the denitrification process when soil moisture conditions are favourable. It is known that nitrification is the dominant process where the average WFPS is < 60%, and denitrification is the dominant process where the average WFPS is > 60–70% (Wang et al., 2023b). Nitrification is favoured by higher temperatures (Sahrawat, 2008). The difference in mean soil temperature in our study was only 0.6°C, but this may be a factor. On the other hand, when the % WFPS suggests that denitrification is dominant, higher emissions from unmulched soils could be due to higher peaks and increased amplitude of the fluctuations in soil moisture during heavy rainfall, reducing saturation and ‘hot moments’ not represented in the averaged figures (Barrat et al., 2021; Barrat et al., 2022; Dobbie et al., 1999; Song et al., 2022). Our results tend to confirm the speculation of Berger et al. (2013) that the rainfall-shedding effect of PFM can reduce N₂O emissions by reducing micro-sites with conditions that favour denitrification in the covered bed areas. Another study showed that biodegradable PFM increased the abundance and diversity of genes associated with ammonia-oxidising bacteria while simultaneously reducing emissions of N₂O (Wang, W. et al., 2021). As we made no observations to discriminate between these microbial pathways, further research would be needed to confirm this effect.

The different organic amendments did not significantly affect N₂O emissions. This is unsurprising as the effects on mineral N concentration were small and not significant for NO₃⁻. Other characteristics of organic fertilisers, such as the C: N ratio, can be significant in determining the N₂O emission factor (Charles et al., 2017). Soil C content and the probable larger contribution to soil mineral N from residues from the ley may have obscured any differences.

4.5.4. Potential ammonia emissions

Although we did measure a reduction in potential NH₃ emissions from the PFM treatments, this was not significant, and the reduction was smaller than reported in other studies (Chae et al., 2022; Li et al., 2021). However, the reduction was more significant when expressed on a yield-scaled basis due to the higher yield. We ascribe the relatively low rates of NH₃ loss to the slightly acidic and relatively moist soil (Whitehead & Raistrick, 1990; Hargrove, 1990).

Poultry manure was expected to have higher potential NH₃ emissions than compost because it contains ammoniacal compounds, uric acid and urea, which are readily hydrolysed. (Sommer & Hutchings, 2001). However, this response was only observed in the plots with cabbages. The reason for this is not apparent. Peaks of emissions occurred in the first few days, during a warm, dry period in mid-July and immediately after harvest in early September. The potential NH₃ emission results should be viewed with some caution. Whilst useful for comparative purposes between treatments, the emissions measured should not be considered absolute fluxes for comparison with other studies that have used flow-through chamber methods, as the lack of air movement would have limited emissions (Wang et al., 2004). Also, the extra step in our method for measuring NH₃ emissions may have introduced additional uncertainty. Condensation on the walls of the collection chamber and the crop leaves, caused by high humidity in the closed chamber, may have absorbed ammonia; higher measurements post-harvest could be because the crop leaves were no longer present (Chae et al., 2022).

As we hypothesised, PFM increased crop yield and resulted in higher soil NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations. However, this did not result in higher gaseous losses of NH₃, and although N₂O losses were higher in mulched leeks than unmulched, this was not the case in mulched cabbages despite higher soil NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations. Our results also revealed that biodegradable PFM can reduce the emissions of both N₂O and NH₃, without a negative impact on CH₄ emissions. N₂O fluxes were positively related to soil NH₄⁺ and NO₃⁻ concentrations, but without knowing the relative contributions of mineralisation and leaching to the differences observed, it is not possible to fully understand the wider environmental impacts of PFM use. These results indicate that the use of PFM to moderate soil moisture fluctuations may be beneficial in reducing GHG emissions in climates with extreme rainfall events that are predicted to become more frequent and widespread with climate change. Developing a static chamber method that allows the chamber to be removed between sampling occasions and allows PFM to shed rainfall away from the mulched area could be an important development. Adopting micrometeorological GHG measurement approaches, e.g. eddy covariance, would allow fluxes to be measured at a larger scale without interfering with the integrity of the mulch film, although measurements from replicated treatments would be limited. PFM may reduce denitrification associated with high rainfall, which is an encouraging observation that deserves further investigation.

Acknowledgements

This study was part of a project funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council Global Challenges Research Fund programme on Reducing the Impacts of Plastic Waste in Developing Countries (NE/V005871/1).

Funding

This work was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council Global Challenges Research Fund programme on Reducing the Impacts of Plastic Waste in Developing Countries (NE/V005871/1).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.

Author contributions

MS conceived and designed the study with advice from DLJ and DRC. MS conducted the experiment, data collection, and analysis. MS prepared and wrote the first draft. DLJ and DRC advised and commented on the content, edited, and made corrections. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Funding

This work was supported by the UK Natural Environment Research Council Global Challenges Research Fund programme on Reducing the Impacts of Plastic Waste in Developing Countries (NE/V005871/1).

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.

Author contributions

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board,. (2021). Nutrient Management Guide (RB209. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board,.
Bandopadhyay, S., Martin-Closas, L., Pelacho, A. M., & DeBruyn, J. M. (2018). Biodegradable plastic mulch films: Impacts on soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 819.
Barrat, H. A., Charteris, A. F., Le Cocq, K., Abadie, M., Clark, I. M., Chadwick, D. R., & Cardenas, L. (2022). N2O hot moments were not driven by changes in nitrogen and carbon substrates or changes in N cycling functional genes. European Journal of Soil Science, 73(1), e13190.
Barrat, H. A., Evans, J., Chadwick, D. R., Clark, I. M., Le Cocq, K., & M Cardenas, L. (2021). The impact of drought and rewetting on N2O emissions from soil in temperate and Mediterranean climates. European Journal of Soil Science, 72(6), 2504-2516.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Benoit, F., & Ceustermans, N. (2002). Effect of coloured mulch on production and thrips control with leek. Plasticulture, , 36-47.
Berger, S., Kim, Y., Kettering, J., & Gebauer, G. (2013). Plastic mulching in agriculture—friend or foe of N2O emissions? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 167, 43-51.
Brown, R. W., Chadwick, D. R., Zang, H., Graf, M., Liu, X., Wang, K., Greenfield, L. M., & Jones, D. L. (2023). Bioplastic (PHBV) addition to soil alters microbial community structure and negatively affects plant-microbial metabolic functioning in maize. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 441, 129959. https://10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129959
Chae, H. G., Song, H. J., Bhuiyan, M. S. I., Kim, P. J., & Lee, J. G. (2022). Unexpected high suppression of ammonia volatilization loss by plastic film mulching in Korean maize cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 335, 108022. https://10.1016/j.agee.2022.108022
Charles, A., Rochette, P., Whalen, J. K., Angers, D. A., Chantigny, M. H., & Bertrand, N. (2017). Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 236, 88-98. https://10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021
Chen, B., Liu, E., Mei, X., Yan, C., & Garré, S. (2018). Modelling soil water dynamic in rain-fed spring maize field with plastic mulchinghttps://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.007
Chen, N., Li, X., Šimůnek, J., Shi, H., Ding, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The effects of biodegradable and plastic film mulching on nitrogen uptake, distribution, and leaching in a drip-irrigated sandy field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 292, 106817. https://10.1016/j.agee.2020.106817
Constantin, J., Mary, B., Laurent, F., Aubrion, G., Fontaine, A., Kerveillant, P., & Beaudoin, N. (2010). Effects of catch crops, no till and reduced nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen leaching and balance in three long-term experiments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 135(4), 268-278. https://10.1016/j.agee.2009.10.005
Cuello, J. P., Hwang, H. Y., Gutierrez, J., Kim, S. Y., & Kim, P. J. (2015). Impact of plastic film mulching on increasing greenhouse gas emissions in temperate upland soil during maize cultivation. Applied Soil Ecology, 91, 48-57.
D’Haene, K., Salomez, J., Verhaeghe, M., Van de Sande, T., De Nies, J., De Neve, S., & Hofman, G. (2018). Can optimum yield and quality of vegetables be reconciled with low residual soil mineral nitrogen at harvest? Scientia Horticulturae, 233, 78-89. https://10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.034
Davies, G., & Lennartson, M. (2005). Organic Vegetable Production, A Complete Guide
. Crowood Press Ltd.
Dobbie, K. E., McTaggart, I. P., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D21), 26891-26899.
Dong, Q., Yang, Y., Yu, K., & Feng, H. (2018). Effects of straw mulching and plastic film mulching on improving soil organic carbon and nitrogen fractions, crop yield and water use efficiency in the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 201(C), 133-143.
Duddigan, S., Shaw, L. J., Alexander, P. D., & Collins, C. D. (2020). Chemical Underpinning of the Tea Bag Index: An Examination of the Decomposition of Tea Leaves. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2020, 1-8. https://10.1155/2020/6085180
Elrys, A. S., Wang, J., Metwally, M. A., Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Cai, Z., Chang, S. X., & Müller, C. (2021). Global gross nitrification rates are dominantly driven by soil carbon‐to‐nitrogen stoichiometry and total nitrogen. Global Change Biology, 27(24), 6512-6524.
Eriksen, J., Pedersen, L., & Jørgensen, J. R. (2006). Nitrate leaching and spring wheat bread making quality following cultivation of grasslands of different composition, age and management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 116, 165-175.
Everaarts, A. P. (1993). General and quantitative aspects of nitrogen fertilizer use in the cultivation of Brassica vegetables. Acta Horticulturae, (339), 149-160. https://10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.339.13
Fang, H., Li, Y., Gu, X., Yu, M., Chen, P., Li, Y., & Liu, F. (2022). Optimizing the impact of film mulching pattern and nitrogen application rate on maize production, gaseous N emissions, and utilization of water and nitrogen in northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 261, 107350. https://10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107350
Forster, P., T. Storelvmo, K. Armour, W. Collins, J.-L. Dufresne, D. Frame, D.J. Lunt, T. Mauritsen, M.D. Palmer, M. Watanabe, M. Wild, and H. Zhang, 2021: The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 923–1054, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.009
Gao, H., Yan, C., Liu, Q., Ding, W., Chen, B., & Li, Z. (2019). Effects of plastic mulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: A meta-analysis. The Science of the Total Environment, 651, 484-492. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.105
Golian, J., & Anyszka, Z. (2015). Effectiveness of different methods of weed management in chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) and transplanted leek (Allium porrum L.). Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 60(3)
Han, Y., Sun, W., Si, P., Lou, C., & Wang, J. (2020). Application of biodegradable plastic mulch improves manure N availability and tomato yield in an organic cropping system. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(8), 1120-1130. https://10.1080/01904167.2020.1845372
Haraguchi, T., Marui, A., Mori, K., & Nakano, Y. (2003). Movement of water collected by vegetables in plastic-mulching field. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture-Kyushu University (Japan).
Hargrove, W.L. (1988), Evaluation of Ammonia Volatilization in the Field. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1: 104-111. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1988.0104
Hergoualc’h, K., Mueller, N., Bernoux, M., Kasimir, Ä, van der Weerden, T. J., & Ogle, S. M. (2021). Improved accuracy and reduced uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories by refining the IPCC emission factor for direct N2O emissions from nitrogen inputs to managed soils. Global Change Biology, 27(24), 6536-6550.
Holder, A. J., McCalmont, J. P., Rowe, R., McNamara, N. P., Elias, D., & Donnison, I. S. (2019). Soil N2O emissions with different reduced tillage methods during the establishment of Miscanthus in temperate grassland. GCB Bioenergy, 11(3), 539-549.
Huett, D. O., & Dettmann, E. B. (1991). Nitrogen response surface models of zucchini squash, head lettuce and potato. Plant and Soil, 134(2), 243-254.
Islam Bhuiyan, M. S., Rahman, A., Kim, G. W., Das, S., & Kim, P. J. (2021). Eco-friendly yield-scaled global warming potential assists to determine the right rate of nitrogen in rice system: A systematic literature review. Environmental Pollution, 271, 116386. https://10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116386
Jin, X., An, T., Gall, A. R., Li, S., Filley, T., & Wang, J. (2018). Enhanced conversion of newly-added maize straw to soil microbial biomass C under plastic film mulching and organic manure management. Geoderma, 313, 154-162.
Kang, L., Chen, S., Liang, B., Qin, W., & Chen, Q. (2022). Catch crop planting and residue incorporation to reduce nitrogen leaching in intensive vegetable greenhouse field. Journal of Environmental Quality, 51(1), 44-54. https://10.1002/jeq2.20306
Karic, L., Vukasinovic, S., & Znidarcic, D. (2005). Response of leek (Allium porrum L.) to different levels of nitrogen dose under agro-climate conditions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Agric.Slovenica, 85, 219-226.
Kasirajan, S., & Ngouajio, M. (2012a). Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(2), 501-529. https://10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3
Kasirajan, S., & Ngouajio, M. (2012b). Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(2), 501-529.
Keuskamp, J. A., Dingemans, B. J., Lehtinen, T., Sarneel, J. M., & Hefting, M. M. (2013). Tea Bag Index: a novel approach to collect uniform decomposition data across ecosystems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(11), 1070-1075.
Kim, G. W., Das, S., Hwang, H. Y., & Kim, P. J. (2017). Nitrous oxide emissions from soils amended by cover-crops and under plastic film mulching: Fluxes, emission factors and yield-scaled emissions. Atmospheric Environment (1994), 152, 377-388. https://10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.007
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1-26. https://10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Lamont, W. J., Jr. (2005). Plastics: modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.), 15(3), 477-481. https://10.21273/HORTTECH.15.3.0477
Lee, J. G., Chae, H. G., Hwang, H. Y., Kim, P. J., & Cho, S. R. (2021). Effect of plastic film mulching on maize productivity and nitrogen use efficiency under organic farming in South Korea. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147503. https://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147503
Lee, J. G., Cho, S. R., Jeong, S. T., Hwang, H. Y., & Kim, P. J. (2019). Different response of plastic film mulching on greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) between chemical and organic fertilization in maize upland soil. Science of the Total Environment, 696, 133827.
Li, H., Wang, L., Peng, Y., Zhang, S., Lv, S., Li, J., Abdo, A. I., Zhou, C., & Wang, L. (2021). Film mulching, residue retention and N fertilization affect ammonia volatilization through soil labile N and C pools. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 308, 107272. https://10.1016/j.agee.2020.107272
Li, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, W., & Shao, M. (2005). Soil evaporation under perforated plastic mulch. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(3), 445-449. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943354
Li, Y., Feng, H., Wu, W., Jiang, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H., Li, C., Dong, Q., Siddique, K. H. M., & Chen, J. (2022). Decreased greenhouse gas intensity of winter wheat production under plastic film mulching in semi-arid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 274, 107941. https://10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107941
Liakatas, A., Clark, J.A. and Monteith, J.L., 1986. Measurements of the heat balance under plastic mulches. Part I. Radiation balance and soil heat flux. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 36(3), pp.227-239.
Locher, J., Ombódi, A., Kassai, T., & Dimeny, J. (2005). Influence of coloured mulches on soil temperature and yield of sweet pepper. Eur.J.Hort.Sci, 70(3), 135-141.
Met Office. (2021, uk climate averages- carmarthen
. Met Office. Retrieved 11/11/2021, from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/uk-climate-averages/gchzjb39w
Mo, F., Han, J., Wen, X., Wang, X., Li, P., Vinay, N., Jia, Z., Xiong, Y., & Liao, Y. (2020). Quantifying regional effects of plastic mulch on soil nitrogen pools, cycles, and fluxes in rain-fed agroecosystems of the Loess Plateau. Land Degradation & Development, 31(13), 1675-1687. https://https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3548
Nachimuthu, G., Halpin, N. V., & Bell, M. J. (2017). Productivity Benefits from Plastic Mulch in Vegetable Production Likely to Limit Adoption of Alternate Practices that Deliver Water Quality Benefits: An On-Farm Case Study. Horticulturae, 3(3), 42. https://10.3390/horticulturae3030042
Nan, W., Yue, S., Huang, H., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2016). Effects of plastic film mulching on soil greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) concentration within soil profiles in maize fields on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(2), 451-464. https://10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61106-6
Oertel, C., Matschullat, J., Zurba, K., Zimmermann, F., & Erasmi, S. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review. Geochemistry, 76(3), 327-352.
Ponjičan, O., Kiss, F., Ilin, Ž, Adamović, B., Sabadoš, V., Sedlar, A., & Višacki, V. (2021). Influence of plastic mulch and fertilization on the environmental impact of spring cabbage production. European Journal of Agronomy, 122, 126170.
Qi, R., Jones, D. L., Li, Z., Liu, Q., & Yan, C. (2020). Behavior of microplastics and plastic film residues in the soil environment: A critical review. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134722. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134722
Quemada, M., & Gabriel, J. L. (2016). Approaches for increasing nitrogen and water use efficiency simultaneously. Global Food Security, 9, 29-35. https://10.1016/j.gfs.2016.05.004
Rauscher, A., Meyer, N., Jakobs, A., Bartnick, R., Lueders, T., & Lehndorff, E. (2023). Biodegradable microplastic increases CO2 emission and alters microbial biomass and bacterial community composition in different soil types. Applied Soil Ecology, 182, 104714. https://10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104714
Reay, M. K., Greenfield, L. M., Graf, M., Lloyd, C. E. M., Evershed, R. P., Chadwick, D. R., & Jones, D. L. (2023). LDPE and biodegradable PLA-PBAT plastics differentially affect plant-soil nitrogen partitioning and dynamics in a Hordeum vulgare mesocosm. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 447, 130825. https://10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130825
Rochette, P. and Hutchinson, G.L., 2005. Measurement of soil respiration in situ: chamber techniques. Micrometeorology in agricultural systems, 47, pp.247-286.
Saglam, M., Sintim, H. Y., Bary, A. I., Miles, C. A., Ghimire, S., Inglis, D. A., & Flury, M. (2017). Modeling the effect of biodegradable paper and plastic mulch on soil moisture dynamics. Agricultural Water Management, 193, 240-250.
Salama, K., & Geyer, M. (2023). Plastic Mulch Films in Agriculture: Their Use, Environmental Problems, Recycling and Alternatives. Environments (Basel, Switzerland), 10(10), 179. https://10.3390/environments10100179
Samphire, M., Chadwick, D. R., & Jones, D. L. (2023). Biodegradable plastic mulch films increase yield and promote nitrogen use efficiency in organic horticulture. Frontiers in Agronomy, 5, 1141608.
Schonbeck, M. W., & Evanylo, G. K. (1998a). Effects of mulches on soil properties and tomato production I. Soil temperature, soil moisture and marketable yield. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 13(1), 55-81.
Schonbeck, M. W., & Evanylo, G. K. (1998b). Effects of Mulches on Soil Properties and Tomato Production II. Plant-Available Nitrogen, Organic Matter Input, and Tilth-Related Properties. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 13(1), 83-100. https://10.1300/J064v13n01_07
Serrano-Ruiz, H., Martin-Closas, L., & Pelacho, A. M. (2021). Biodegradable plastic mulches: Impact on the agricultural biotic environment. Science of the Total Environment, 750, 141228. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141228
Shigaki, F. and Dell, C.J. (2015), Comparison of Low-Cost Methods for Measuring Ammonia Volatilization. Agronomy Journal, 107: 1392-1400. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0431
Skinner, C., Gattinger, A., Muller, A., Mäder, P., Flieβbach, A., Stolze, M., Ruser, R., & Niggli, U. (2014). Greenhouse gas fluxes from agricultural soils under organic and non-organic management — A global meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 468-469, 553-563. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.098
Snyder, K., Grant, A., Murray, C., & Wolff, B. (2015). The Effects of Plastic Mulch Systems on Soil Temperature and Moisture in Central Ontario. HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.), 25(2), 162-170. https://10.21273/HORTTECH.25.2.162
Sommer, S. G., & Hutchings, N. J. (2001). Ammonia emission from field applied manure and its reduction—invited paper. European Journal of Agronomy, 15(1), 1-15. https://10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00112-5
Song, X., Wei, H., Rees, R. M., & Ju, X. (2022). Soil oxygen depletion and corresponding nitrous oxide production at hot moments in an agricultural soil. Environmental Pollution, 292, 118345. https://10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118345
Steinmetz, Z., Wollmann, C., Schaefer, M., Buchmann, C., David, J., Tröger, J., Muñoz, K., Frör, O., & Schaumann, G. E. (2016). Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of the Total Environment, 550, 690-705.
Sumner, M. E. (2000). Handbook of soil science / editor-in-chief, Malcolm E. Sumner. CRC Press.
Sun, D., Li, H., Wang, E., He, W., Hao, W., Yan, C., Li, Y., Mei, X., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2020). An overview of the use of plastic-film mulching in China to increase crop yield and water-use efficiency. National Science Review, 7(10), 1523-1526.
Tarara, J. M. (2000). Microclimate Modification with Plastic Mulch. HortScience, 35(2), 169-180. https://10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.169
Tei, F., De Neve, S., de Haan, J., & Kristensen, H. L. (2020). Nitrogen management of vegetable crops. Agricultural Water Management, 240, 106316.
The R Foundation for Statistical Computin. (2020). R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10) -- "Bunny-Wunnies Freak Out" [computer software]
The Weather Company, L. (2022, DAX Weather Sensor Array - ILLANELL6. The Weather Underground. Retrieved `10/12/22, from https://www.wunderground.com/dashboard/pws/ILLANELL6
Thorup-Kristensen, K. (1999). An organic vegetable crop rotation aimed at self-sufficiency in nitrogen. Designing and Testing Crop Rotations for Organic Farming, (1), 133-140.
Thorup-Kristensen, K., & Sørensen, J. N. (1999). Soil Nitrogen Depletion by Vegetable Crops with Variable Root Growth. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, 49(2), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719950135597
Trdan, S., Žnidarčič, D., Kač, M., & Vidrih, M. (2008). Yield of early white cabbage grown under mulch and non-mulch conditions with low populations of onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman). International Journal of Pest Management, 54(4), 309-318.
Wang, H., Zheng, J., Fan, J., Zhang, F., & Huang, C. (2021). Grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions from maize and wheat fields under plastic film and straw mulching: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 270, 108210.
Wang, H., Yan, Z., Ju, X., Song, X., Zhang, J., Li, S., & Zhu-Barker, X. (2023a). Quantifying nitrous oxide production rates from nitrification and denitrification under various moisture conditions in agricultural soils: Laboratory study and literature synthesis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 1110151.
Wang, H., Yan, Z., Ju, X., Song, X., Zhang, J., Li, S., & Zhu-Barker, X. (2023b). Quantifying nitrous oxide production rates from nitrification and denitrification under various moisture conditions in agricultural soils: Laboratory study and literature synthesis. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 1110151.
Wang, W., Han, L., Zhang, X., & Wei, K. (2021). Plastic film mulching affects N2O emission and ammonia oxidizers in drip irrigated potato soil in northwest China. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142113. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142113
Wang, Y. P., Li, X. G., Zhu, J., Fan, C. Y., Kong, X. J., Turner, N. C., Siddique, K. H., & Li, F. (2016). Multi-site assessment of the effects of plastic-film mulch on dryland maize productivity in semiarid areas in China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 220, 160-169.
Wang, Z., Liu, X., Ju, X., Zhang, F., & Malhi, S. S. (2004). Ammonia volatilization loss from surface-broadcast urea: comparison of vented-and closed-chamber methods and loss in winter wheat–summer maize rotation in North China Plain. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 35(19-20), 2917-2939.
Wei, H., Zhang, F., Zhang, K., Qin, R., Zhang, W., Sun, G., & Huang, J. (2022). Effects of soil mulching on staple crop yield and greenhouse gas emissions in China: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 284, 108566. https://10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108566
Whitehead, D.C. and Raistrick, N. (1990), Ammonia volatilization from five nitrogen compounds used as fertilizers following surface application to soils. Journal of Soil Science, 41: 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00074.x
Wojciechowska, R., Siwek, P., & Libik, A. (2007). Effect of mulching with various films on the yield quality of butterhead lettuce and celery stalks with special reference to nitrate metabolism. Folia Hort, 19(1), 37-44.
Xie, Y., & Kristensen, H. L. (2017). Intercropping leek (Allium porrum L.) with dyer’s woad (Isatis tinctoria L.) increases rooted zone and agro-ecosystem retention of nitrogen. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 21-32. https://10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.017
Yang, J., Qin, R., Shi, X., Wei, H., Sun, G., Li, F., & Zhang, F. (2022). The effects of plastic film mulching and straw mulching on licorice root yield and soil organic carbon content in a dryland farming. Science of the Total Environment, 826, 154113. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154113
Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiao, M., Zhao, C., & Yao, H. (2021). A meta-analysis of film mulching cultivation effects on soil organic carbon and soil greenhouse gas fluxes. Catena, 206, 105483.
Zhang, K., Li, Z., Li, Y., Wan, P., Chai, N., Li, M., Wei, H., Kuzyakov, Y., Filimonenko, E., Almwarai Alharbi, S., Li, F., Zhang, W., & Zhang, F. (2023). Contrasting impacts of plastic film mulching and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic matter turnover. Geoderma, 440, 116714. https://10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116714
Zhang, L., Qin, R., Wei, H., Zhang, K., Yu, C., Li, F., & Zhang, F. (2022). Optimum plastic mulching application to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without compromising on crop yield and farmers' income. Science of the Total Environment, 809, 151998. https://10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151998

No competing interests reported.

SuppInfoms.docx

Download PDF

Editor assigned by journal
10 Jul, 2024
Submission checks completed at journal
10 Jul, 2024
First submitted to journal
09 Jul, 2024

You are reading this latest preprint version

Biodegradable plastic film mulch increased nitrous oxide emissions in organic leek but decreased emissions in organic cabbages

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental site

2.2. Experimental treatments

2.3. Experimental design

2.4. Plant measurements

2.5 Soil measurements

2.6. Measurement of gaseous fluxes

2.7. Statistical analysis

3. Results

3.1. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on crop yields and N content

3.2. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil gas fluxes

3.3. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil mineral N dynamics

3.4. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil biological activity

3.5. Effect of biodegradable mulch film on soil microclimate

4. Discussion

4.1. Soil hydrothermal conditions

4.2. Crop yield

4.3. Soil microbial activity

4.4. Soil mineral N

4.5. Gaseous emissions

4.5.1. Methane emissions

4.5.2. Carbon dioxide emissions

4.5.3. Nitrous oxide emissions

4.5.4. Potential ammonia emissions

5. Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1