*** [10]
Study of the pathogenicity of the KANSL1 variant
Since a pathogenic causative variant in the HNRNPU gene was identified in the patient, the presence of another variant described as pathogenic in the KANSL1 gene in both the patient and his healthy mother complicated the diagnosis and counseling of the patient. Since incomplete penetrance, as the most obvious cause, is not described for Koolen-de Vries syndrome, we began by investigating the likelihood of mosaicism for the variant. De novo mosaic variant has been previously described in the patient with atypical phenotype presentation [7, 8, 11]. The ratio of peaks of the heterozygous variant c.727C > T in the proband (wt/mut = 2/1) suggested the possibility of mosaicism. To test this hypothesis, we searched for the variant in genomic DNA samples extracted from the peripheral blood and buccal epithelial cells of the proband and the proband's mother. The presence of the variant with the same ratio of peaks was confirmed in all DNA samples tested, which ruled out mosaicism.
Additionally, the variant was sought in all available family members (Fig. 1C). Analysis revealed that the proband's mother and maternal grandmother is also a heterozygous carrier of the variant. In DNA samples from all family members carrying the variant, an unusual ratio of the heterozygous variant peaks c.727C > T (wt/mut = 2/1) was observed. Thus, the mosaic state of the c.727C > T variant was not confirmed
The allelic imbalance observed in variants detected during WGS and Sanger sequencing in the proband prompted us to consider the presence of a duplication spanning the KANSL1 locus. Subsequent copy number variation (CNV) reanalysis of the WGS data confirmed the duplication of this region, delineated by approximate boundaries of chr17:44,165,260_44,651,550dup (156 kb). According to GnomAD, such a duplication is common and has a population frequency of approximately 20%. This common duplication encompasses exons 1 and 2 of the KANSL1 gene, including the region where the c.727C > T variant was identified. We hypothesized that the c.727C > T variant listed in the patient's WGS report is located not in the KANSL1 gene, but in its duplicated locus. This duplicated region of the gene is highly likely to be non-functional. To determine the expression of the duplicated KANSL1 locus, we designed a set of primers to amplify the mRNA locus of the KANSL1 gene spanning exons 1 to 3.
Figure 2. Diagram showing the layout of the KANSL1 gene, with the duplication region marked in blue. Primer locations for RNA analysis are indicated as F2-R3 and F2-R7. Sequencing chromatograms of the RT-PCR products are also provided.
The boundaries of the locus were selected to ensure amplification occurs only from the main gene and not from the gene region included in the tandem duplication (Fig. 2). Sequencing of the RT-PCR product revealed that this mRNA locus is transcribed and contains the heterozygous c.727C > T variant.
A subsequent review of the duplication boundaries in the patient’s genome data indicated that the patient's duplication differs from the common duplication registered in gnomAD, as it includes exon 3 and part of intron 3. We developed a new PCR system to amplify the KANSL1 mRNA from exon 2 to exon 7. The analysis did not show the presence of the c.727C > T variant in the mRNA.
Due to the complexity of the region, we were unable to determine the exact boundaries of the duplication on the DNA level. Based on coverage and allelic imbalance, we estimate its approximate boundaries to be chr17:44165365–44375856 with a size of 210 kb.
Thus, we demonstrated that the variant c.727C > T in the KANSL1 gene resides within a duplication of this gene and is non-functional, enabling us to classify it as benign. The variant was submitted in ClinVar (accession number SCV005049516).