This study explored the awareness and perception Christian religious leaders have about SCD in Accra, Ghana. The finding indicates a high awareness of SCD among the religious leaders interviewed. All 16 participants had heard about the existence of SCD, and the majority stated that SCD is a genetic disease. Most participants could correctly state some signs and symptoms of SCD, indicating their understanding of the condition. The findings were consistent with the literature, as some studies conducted on religious leaders found a high level of awareness and knowledge of SCD among the participants (Abubakar et al., 2019; Awe, 2018). It was also observed that out of the majority who said SCD was a genetic disease, a few said SCD was a disease of the blood group instead of a defective hemoglobin gene. This implies that although Ghanaian Christian leaders may have a high awareness of SCD, some may have some vital details distorted about the condition, such as the specific genetic mutation that causes SCD or the potential complications it can lead to. This may include leaders of other religious organizations in the country. It is also an indication that when a religious leader is knowledgeable about a health condition, it makes it easier for them to engage their followers and advise on its control or prevention. Therefore, awareness creation and education on health issues should be done among religious leaders in clear and concise language so that these leaders can have a fundamental understanding. This may help reduce misinformation about health conditions, including SCD, and empower these leaders to apply the gained understanding in their social interaction with PLWSCD and their families on the condition and its associated community impact during premarital counseling in the churches.
Again, although most participants in this study attributed SCD to be a genetic disease, a few also associated SCD with a spiritual disease caused by evil spirits, poor dietary intake, and lifestyle habits such as smoking cigarettes. These misconceptions, such as the belief that evil spirits cause SCD, highlight the need for accurate information dissemination among religious leaders (Dennis-Antwi et al., 2011; de Montalembert et al., 2019; Okoibhole & Ebenso, 2023). A religious leader’s misconceptions about SCD, its management, and prevention may translate to the wider context of society because many of them are in a social relationship with their members in Ghana (Okoibhole & Ebenso, 2023). Furthermore, getting Christian leaders to understand the causes of SCD may help broaden their knowledge of SCD, which may translate to communal and societal beliefs about the disease because many of the followers of these leaders and their families form the basic unit of society (Makiwane & Kaunda, 2018). Health education among Christian leaders could help bridge the knowledge gap and increase the public’s understanding of SCD.
It is suggested that health educators, in their engagement with these leaders, should consider utilizing a socioecological approach as such leaders are in social interactions and are seen as social figures with the individual, families, institutions, and communities while considering the societal norms, religious values, and policies (Ibemere et al., 2021; McLeroy et al., 1988). Most participants became aware of SCD through friends, relations, and church members within their social network. This is understandable because religious leaders often socialize with families, friends, and congregants and are often consulted on almost every matter for spiritual and physical direction. This corroborates a study that cited family and friends as a source of information on SCD in Uganda (Tusuubira et al., 2018). Others learned about SCD through public lectures by health workers during church services and other programs. This is congruent with the findings that churches can be used as health promotion avenues for awareness creation and education on health matters (Anshel & Smith, 2014). The sources of information for SCD must be strengthened within the churches and communities so that information on health issues can be disseminated effectively. Social institutions such as churches and religious organizations can set up health information desks within the facilities manned by trained health personnel to disseminate accurate health information to congregants and users of such facilities. Health education and awareness creation should be culturally appropriate and written with the appropriate consideration of literacy levels for laypersons. This will empower the population, including religious leaders, on health matters, including SCD.
Social network with PLWSCD, referring to individuals who have been diagnosed with sickle cell disease and their family leaders relate with family, friends, church, and community members and act as confidantes in times of difficulties and health challenges. These people are important sources of influence in individuals’ health-related behaviors. Social relationships affect how individuals cope with stress. A little over half of the participants confirmed that people confided in them about SCD and its related issues. Participants had an excellent social network with PLWSCD and families within their catchment areas. Some participants had family members, friends, church members, and colleagues diagnosed with SCD, and they were constantly interacting with them. These findings are analogous to those in literature, which suggests that religious leaders inhabit the communities forming part of society, and they are seen as confidantes in times of distress (Campbell, 2021; Campbell & Szaflarski, 2021; Osafo et al., 2021).
Derlega et al. (2018) identified some reasons for sickle cell disease disclosure to specific persons; self-related reasons (receiving support and venting feelings), others-related reasons (educating others about sickle cell disease, forewarning others about sickle cell disease-related problems), and situational reasons (mainly focusing on another person being physically close or available to talk to. It is therefore not surprising that the Christian religious leaders in this study became aware of SCD based on the social relationships with such individuals and their families and, more importantly, their ability to provide the necessary support, be it spiritual, physical, or financial, when the need arises. McPherson et al. (2006) also found that people preferred to discuss sensitive matters only with people who are very close and vital in their lives. These could be domestic, wellbeing, professional, or business issues. This is in contrast with the findings of Small (2013), who found that people do not always reserve intimate matters for their confidantes or people with strong ties. Instead, it is a combination of the people we are close to, people we are not close to but knowledgeable about the matters we regularly find essential, and people we are not close to but who are available because of our routine activities. Secondly, people tend to discuss important matters with knowledgeable people, regardless of whether the latter are close or not. It is a reminder that this is a two-way process. Religious leaders must be knowledgeable about the causes of SCD and its clinical consequences along with its social, economic, and emotional impact. This is two different sets of knowledge and understanding. People then must trust them to seek advice and see them as a source of information and comfort. This is, therefore, a negotiated relationship. Thus, according to Small (2006), the strength of a tie is neither a necessity nor a sufficient condition for the pursuit of confidence. This implies that when religious leaders are seen as available, approachable, and knowledgeable on issues bothering individuals or families, they may be consulted on such matters irrespective of their relationship. Religious leaders should, therefore, commit themselves to lifelong learning and should not be limited to only theological tenets so that their socioecological impact can be fully harnessed, more so when it comes to a health condition like SCD, where in the Ghanaian context, individuals with the condition and their families are often stigmatized and discriminated against.
Findings from this study also suggest that some people do not disclose their SCD status to others, including their religious leaders, but rather, they prefer to keep it to themselves. This is consistent with literature that has indicated that people do not disclose their SCD status because they fear stigmatization (Bulgin et al., 2018; Leger et al., 2018). Similarly, Derlega et al. (2018) found that some reasons for SCD nondisclosure were self-related (fear of denunciation, being labeled, maintaining privacy) or other-related (lack of assistance, not disturbing someone). Religious leaders can, therefore, use their social influence to encourage PLWSCD and families to verbalize their apprehensions about the disease and encourage them to seek treatment and comply with their treatment regimen. Religious leaders can also initiate conversations about SCD in the churches and communities to increase public awareness about the disease while ensuring that the families, friends, church, and community accord PLWSCD the necessary social support they need to improve their health and quality of life.
All the study participants perceived SCD to harm the overall well-being of the patients with SCD and family. This includes the socioeconomic, psychological, and financial burdens adversely affecting the well-being of PLWSCD and their families. This perception could have been formed because of the religious leader’s characteristics, such as knowledge and beliefs about SCD, and the social interaction between the religious leader and the individuals, families, church, community, and society. This is in line with the findings of the study, which found that when making sense of chronic illness, people generate their true-life experience within the framework of their broader social and cultural context, and this results in multiple discourses operating (Dennis-Antwi, 2011; Kahissay, 2017). Similarly, another study found that people uneducated about SCD form a belief about the disease from their own conceived ideas, beliefs, and cultural and social interactions, which may result in an undesirable perception of PLWSCD (Royal et al., 2011). Consequently, where religious leaders do not have much understanding of SCD, this may have some implications on how they perceive PLWSCD, as they may have negative attitudes toward the patients and their families. Therefore, continuous education of religious leaders about SCD and other health-related disabilities is essential to dispel all preconceived ideas, myths, and misconceptions surrounding the disease among such individuals of influence within the society in the context of Ghana.
Apart from the negative socioeconomic impact of SCD, most participants reported that they perceived that SCD has a psychological burden on people diagnosed with the condition. Several studies have documented fear, indecision, apprehension, and depression to impact the psychological well-being of PLWSCD and families (Buser, 2021; Mumuni, 2023; Quasie-Woode, 2021). Religious leaders can offer psychological support to assist PLWSCD and families as they navigate their health. The churches can also financially support them to meet the financial demands of quality care by setting up a support fund from the church’s internally generated funds.