The present study reports the development of a mouse model of anti-RAKNL antibody discontinuation and demonstrated that discontinuation of anti-RANKL treatment caused uncoupled bone remodeling in which bone formation remained suppressed despite rapid acceleration of bone resorption, resulting in prolonged bone loss and bone fragility. Osteoclast precursor cells were expanded across not only the physiological cell population, but also across other cell populations, including c-kit-negative cells and Ly6C-positive cells during the treatment period. The accumulated precursor cells also contributed to the osteoclastic burst that occurred in response to the increased RANKL-bearing EVs once the anti-RANKL treatment had been discontinued. Furthermore, osteoblast progenitors were reduced and did not recover long after the discontinuation of treatment. Thus, even after the transient increase in bone resorption was restored, the coupled bone remodeling remained disrupted, leading to long-term bone loss.
Several population-based cohort studies have reported that a longer duration of treatment with denosumab and an increased time interval since the last denosumab injection are associated with greater bone loss and fracture risk. Consistent with these findings, the most severe bone loss was observed in mice that underwent discontinuation after multiple doses in the present study. In addition, consistent with previous reports (27), the ovariectomized mice showed a significant reduction in cortical and vertebral BMD after discontinuation compared to pre-treatment, but not in trabecular BMD. It is likely that trabecular bone volume and BMD were so reduced by ovariectomy that no further reduction was observed. Notably, however, ovariectomized mice exhibited TRAP overshoot even after a single dose of anti-RANKL antibody, suggesting that increased turnover in the postmenopausal background was associated with acceleration of bone loss after discontinuation.
Denosumab, like the anabolic agent teriparatide, has a reversible effect on BMD after treatment discontinuation, and is markedly different in nature from bisphosphonates, which lose their anti-resorptive effect very slowly due to their affinity for hydroxyapatite. Consistent with previous report (28), we have indeed found that bisphosphonate did not cause bone loss below pre-treatment levels, although it gradually decreased after treatment discontinuation. In addition, there was no accumulation of osteoclast precursor cells and EVs in bisphosphonate-treated mice, suggesting that the bone loss following discontinuation of anti-RANKL antibody therapy might be due to a breakdown of the RANKL specific biological system. However, the mechanism responsible for RANKL-specific rebound remained unclear.
In the present study, it was demonstrated that the anti-RANKL antibody suppressed the phagocytosis of EVs by macrophages, possibly resulting in a delayed clearance of RANKL-bearing EVs from the circulation and acceleration of osteoclastogenesis through the accumulated EVs. In recent years, intensive studies have revealed the role of EVs in the physiological and pathological bone microenvironment through their bioactive cargo (23, 29), and it is now known that the RANKL-bearing EVs derived from osteoblast lineages are involved in osteoclast-osteoblast communication in bone metabolism (30), which fully supports the present study. Future studies will clarify the extent to which quantitative changes in RANKL-bearing EVs contribute to bone metabolism, and may be one of the triggers of TRAP overshoot after discontinuation of anti-RANKL antibody therapy.
A recent study using intravital imaging reported that multinucleated osteoclasts on the bone surface into smaller daughter cells that are recycled and fused into larger osteoclasts in response to soluble RANKL administration. In addition, during suppression of RANKL signaling by OPG-Fc administration, these daughter cells are accumulated and re-fused after OPG administration is interrupted (31). It is possible that such recycling of osteoclast-derived cells may contribute to the overshoot of bone resorption observed in mice after the discontinuation of anti-RANKL antibody treatment in the present study. However, during anti-RANKL antibody treatment, we observed an expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, including HSC, CLP and CMP as well as osteoclast progenitors, indicating that inhibition of the RANKL signaling not only suppresses bone resorption, but also broadly affects the homeostasis of the bone marrow environment.
The present study also demonstrates that inhibition of RANKL signaling with an anti-RANKL antibody decreases the number of osteoblast progenitor cells, resulting in decreased bone formation. In a recent clinical study, human biopsies revealed higher number of empty osteocyte lacunae, which indicates a lack of viable osteocytes during denosumab treatment, and number of empty osteocyte lacunae remained high after discontinuation (14). The primary pathogenesis of bone loss and high fracture risk after discontinuation of anti-RANKL antibody therapy would be characterized by a disruption of the coupling between bone resorption and formation, that would have occurred thereafter overshoot. The reverse signaling of RANKL into osteoblasts is reported to promote bone formation (32), but the anti-RANKL antibody did not act directly on osteoblasts in the present study (S8D Fig). On the other hand, RANK is also reported to be expressed on BMSCs, including PαS cells, and to inhibit commitment from BMSC to the osteoblast lineages (33). Although further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism by which RANKL antibodies decrease BMSCs and osteoblasts, the finding that G-CSF levels were elevated in mice treated with the anti-RANKL antibody may help to explain the disruption of bone metabolism in these mice.
G-CSF is widely used clinically to mobilize HSCs from the bone marrow niche to the peripheral blood stream for transplantation. G-CSF directly regulates the proliferation and differentiation of HSCs, resulting in an expansion of phenotypic HSCs, including LSK. G-CSF also acts on mesenchymal stem cells to suppress their differentiation into osteoblasts, while simultaneously downregulating CXCL12 expression, which is essential for HSC maintenance in the niche (34). Furthermore, G-CSF strongly inhibits osteoblast differentiation and function and also causes osteoblast ablation (35, 36). Thus, G-CSF is associated with dynamic changes in the bone marrow microenvironment along with decreased bone volume.
Taken together, the unknown functions of RANKL in directly regulating the bone marrow environment, such as EV clearance and maintenance of hematopoietic and mesenchymal bone marrow cells, may be a clue to the specific bone loss that occurs after anti-RANKL antibody discontinuation.
Patients with osteoporosis require lifelong medical care, and therefore alternative treatments should be recommended if denosumab therapy is discontinued. However, in studies of drug switching after long-term denosumab use, bisphosphonate treatment did not completely prevent bone loss and fracture (37). Given the defects of bone formation after discontinuation in the present study, a catalytic agent such as romosozumab, an anti-sclerostin antibody, may be a good option after denosumab discontinuation, but clinical investigation is still ongoing (38). Thus, the present study may provide a molecular basis for future therapeutic approaches to the long-term management of osteoporosis.