The most common diagnostic methods for NSCLC are bronchoscopy, CT-guided needle biopsy, and surgery. Bronchoscopy, which is less invasive, is generally the first choice. CT-guided needle biopsy was associated with symptomatic air embolism in 0.08% of cases, and 32.7% of symptomatic patients with air embolism suffered from sequelae or died [7]. In addition, CT-guided needle biopsy for malignant lung tumors in contact with the pleura resulted in pleural dissemination in 11% of cases [8]. CT-guided needle biopsy for early-stage lung cancer is not generally chosen because of the risk of cancer dissemination, where complete surgical resection is impossible. Diagnosis by surgery requires general anesthesia, which has a mortality rate of 0.5% and frequency of complications of 9.6% [9]. The mortality rate of bronchoscopy is 0.003%[10], and that of CT-guided biopsy is 0.07% [11]. Surgical diagnosis is more invasive than bronchoscopy or CT-guided biopsy. Other complications specific to surgery include postoperative pain, pneumonia, pulmonary fistula, bronchial fistula, and lymphatic fistula.
Therefore, the indications for surgical biopsy are limited. Surgical biopsy is selected for patients in good general condition in cases where a diagnosis is difficult to achieve using bronchoscopy, CT-guided biopsy, and other minimally invasive tests such as sputum cytology and pleural effusion cytology. However, even if cancer is diagnosed by cytology, it may be difficult to assess PD-L1 expression or related genes because the amount of tumor cells is small. Although some diagnostic items can be tested using cell blocks from pleural effusion, they do not encompass the entire tumor, so they are not suitable for the accurate evaluation of the TPS. The diagnostic accuracy of TBLB and CT-guided biopsy for malignant tumors was reported to be 70.6–87.74% [6, 8] and 91.61% [6], respectively, whereas the diagnostic rate of surgery was reported to be 100% [9].
Bronchoscopy is less invasive than surgery and has a lower risk of cancer seeding and air embolism than CT-guided biopsy, but its diagnostic rate is lower. However, the diagnostic rate has been improved by ultrasound bronchoscopy, but it is difficult to diagnose cases in which the tumor is not exposed in the bronchus or small peripheral lesions.
In this study, the diagnostic rate of bronchoscopy was 45.2%. One of the reasons for the low diagnostic rate might be that, because surgical cases were the focus, many cases of early lung cancer and small peripheral lesions were included. The diagnostic sensitivity of peripheral lung cancer with a tumor diameter less than 2 cm was reported to be 34% [12]. In our hospital, early-stage lung cancer (p-Stage 0-IA2) accounted for 19.8% of all cases. All p-Stage 0-IA2 cases had tumors less than 2 cm in diameter, and the bronchoscopic diagnostic rate at our hospital was 16%. This rate is lower than the diagnostic rate of general bronchoscopic procedures.
In this study, the difference in diagnosis between bronchoscopic specimens and surgical biopsies was 10.5%. Adenosquamous carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, and pleomorphic carcinoma exhibited heterogeneous histological images, which makes their accurate evaluation difficult by preoperative bronchoscopic examination.
Cancer is heterogeneous, and bronchoscopic specimens can only evaluate a small portion of the tumor; therefore, an accurate diagnosis cannot be made. Test items evaluated by TPS, such as PD-L1, cannot be evaluated correctly because only a portion of the tumor is reflected in tissues collected by bronchoscopic examination.
Previous studies reported no difference in the expression rate of PD-L1 before and after surgery [13–15]. The concordance rate of TPS between biopsy and surgical materials was reported to be 86.7% [16]. With heterogeneous tumor cell populations, it is difficult to evaluate the overall tumor picture by preoperative testing. In cases where preoperative and postoperative diagnoses differ, as in this study, the evaluation of PD-L1 may also change.
Depending on the histological type of tumor in which PD-L1 is measured, the entire tumor cannot be evaluated, so bronchoscopy may not be able to accurately evaluate the TPS. In addition, PD-L1 may not be evaluated if the amount of specimen collected is small. In this study, PD-L1 could not be measured in one case of bronchoscopic specimen. For resectable NSCLC, the most accurate method to accurately evaluate the TPS is the measurement of PD-L1 immediately after surgery in surgical specimens with a large tumor burden. Furthermore, even in cases where PD-L1 was measured preoperatively, cases with histological types such as AdSq, LCNEC, large cell carcinoma, spindle cell carcinoma, and pleomorphic carcinoma, the diagnoses may differ before and after surgery, and we think that PD-L1 should be reevaluated after surgery. In Case 6, if PD-L1 had been remeasured in the resected specimen, it might have influenced the outcome (Table 2).
Study limitations
Because this was a retrospective study, the suitability of bronchoscopy was left to the discretion of each attending physician, which may have resulted in bias. Because of the limitations in health insurance coverage in Japan, PD-L1 could only be measured once at our facility. Therefore, the change in PD-L1 before and after surgery could not be evaluated in this study. In addition, our hospital tended to have a higher proportion of early-stage lung cancer that was operable. Early-stage lung cancer includes peripheral lesions with a small tumor size, which may be involved in the reduced diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy. In addition, there were no cases diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasonography guided transbronchial needle aspiration, which may have affected the diagnostic yield.
Study advantages
Because the study was performed at a single facility, the equipment and personnel used were consistent, and it was possible to consistently follow the patients from bronchoscopy to surgery and throughout the postoperative course.
To date, there have been no reports on the appropriate timing for measuring PD-L1, with reference to the difference between diagnosis by preoperative bronchoscopy and postoperative surgical pathology. Testing at the appropriate time with the appropriate specimen is extremely important for the increasingly complex treatment of lung cancer, and will contribute to the personalized treatment of NSCLC.