According to the latest WHO classification of lung neoplasms in 2021, s-NSCLC can be categorized into three pathological subtypes: pleomorphic carcinoma (formed by spindle or/and giant cells), carcinosarcoma, and pulmonary blastoma [15]. s-NSCLC is a rare subtype of NSCLC but possesses distinct characteristics. Our study has shown that s-NSCLC patients were more likely to be male smokers, with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. Among the s-NSCLC patients, the mean age at diagnosis was 62 years, and the mean tumor size was 5.8 cm. Median survival time of s-NSCLC patients was only 9 months (95% CI: 7, 11), 48/135 (35.6%) of s-NSCLC cases had stage IV disease at diagnosis and the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in s-NSCLC patients were 28.9%, 11.9% and 5.9%, respectively. Our clinical findings are similar to previous studies [7, 8, 13, 16, 17], which reveals that these tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to missed opportunities for surgical treatment. Our study revealed that surgical treatment was associated with decreased mortality, consistent with the findings of previous studies [14, 19]. Interestingly, this study revealed that the TNM stage was not an independent risk factor for prognosis. Most s-NSCLC patients (96/135, 71.1%) in this study died within one year. Regardless of the TNM stage, this highly malignant tumor progresses rapidly, recurs postoperatively and early metastasis, leading to short-term mortality.
In our study, preoperative CT findings showed that calcification (19 of 135, 14.1%) and vacuole/cavity (22 of 135, 16.3%) were rare in s-NSCLC patients, which was consistent with the findings of previous studies [12, 16]. Previous studies have reported that s-NSCLC is prone to pleural invasion: Kim et al.[10] showed that pleural invasion occurred in 7/10 (70%) of s-NSCLC patients. In the study of Fujisaki et al. [13] found that pleural invasion was present in 19/44 (43%) of the patients. In our study, 75/135 (55.6%) of the s-NSCLC patients had pleural invasion. This may be due to the larger size of s-NSCLC: when the tumor is large enough, the pleural invasion is theoretically occurred.
Our study revealed that the majority of s-NSCLC lesions presented with LAA (87 of 108, 80.6%). Kim et al. [10] reported that 8/10 (80%) of s-NSCLC lesions had LAA lesions. Fujisaki et al. [13] showed the presence of LAA in 40/44 (91%) of s-NSCLC patients, which was similar to the findings of our study. Furthermore, the median of LAA ratio was 30.8% in s-NSCLC patients. The pathological manifestations of LAA were mucinous degeneration, necrosis, and hemorrhage, suggesting that rapid proliferation exceeded the blood supply [10, 12].
In previous studies, the LAA ratio was found to be an independent risk factor for s-NSCLC: LAA ratio > 25% was associated with shorter OS and disease-free survival than LAA ratio < 25% [13]. A study by Nishida et al. [12] reached a similar conclusion. However, the LAA ratio was not associated with OS in our study. In previous studies, all s-NSCLC patients included underwent surgical resection. However, in our study, the majority of patients with s-NSCLC were in an advanced stage. We analyzed surgical cases individually but did not find a correlation between LAA and prognosis, either. This may be due to the fact that s-NSCLC is prone to metastasis, and these lesions have not yet grown large enough to form LAA when distant metastasis occurs, leading to death in the short term.
In our study, peritumoral GGO, nodule or atelectasis found to be independent risk indicators associated with prognosis in s-NSCLC patients. This distinctive CT findings indicates tumor invasion into surrounding tissues, bronchial involvement, and peritumoral metastasis, all of which are indicative of the tumor's high degree of aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Nishida et al. [12] discovered that GGO can be observed across all subtypes of s-NSCLC, the pathological features associated with GGO are hemorrhage, vascular invasion, and aerogenous metastases. However, this study did not found a relationship between GGO and prognosis. This could be attributed to the fact that the study focused solely on surgically treated cases, excluding those advanced-stage patients with more severe peritumoral invasion.
Our study found that the SUVmax was not associated with the prognosis in s-NSCLC patients. Our results are similar to those of Rapicetta et al. [18]. However, Kim et al.[19] pointed out that a high SUVmax is associated with poor prognosis in s-NSCLC patients. Interestingly, the SUVmax was useful for evaluating PD-L1 and KRAS expression in s-NSCLC [20]. The correlations among the SUVmax, molecular findings and prognosis of s-NSCLC patients warrant further study.
In recent years, the molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy have attracted much attention in clinical applications among s-NSCLC patients. EGFR and ALK are well-known examples where appropriate tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy improves patient quality of life and survival [21]. EGFR mutations were detected in 16% of s-NSCLC patients, the EGFR exon21-L861Q mutation is a rare subtype and may benefit from afatinib [22, 23]. Lococo F et al. [24] showed that TP53 gene mutations occur in 55% of s-NSCLC patients but are not the driver gene for s-NSCLC; the increased genetic instability of TP53 gene may lead to the occurrence of s-NSCLC. MET exon14 skipping mutation (31.8%) and high-level MET amplification (13.6%) was found in s-NSCLC patients, leading to epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of cells and resistance chemotherapy and TKIs [21, 22]. Furthermore, MET exon14 skipping mutation and PD-L1 overexpression are considered crucial genetic events contributing to the sarcomatoid transformation of c-NSCLC [25–27], which revealed the importance of molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy for s-NSCLC patients. KRAS mutations were found to be a marker of poor prognosis in s-NSCLC patients [24]. However, two patients in our study with KRAS (G12C) + PD-L1 overexpression had relatively long survival after targeted and immunotherapy therapy, this indicates that the combination of molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy has achieved favorable benefits in this population. PIK3CA-H12047R expression alone cannot promote tumor formation but significantly enhances tumorigenesis initiated by KRAS, considered a direct effector that promotes KRAS-driven lung tumorigenesis [28]. The molecular findings in this study hold the potential to deepen our understanding of s-NSCLC.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, this is a retrospective study and selection bias is inevitable, prospective and randomized study is still needed. Secondly, treatment were not included in the prognostic analysis. This retrospective study dates back more than 10 years, and the treatment guidelines have changed greatly. Prospective studies with uniform treatment standards are needed in the future.
In conclusion, the presence of large intratumoral LAA ratio and peritumoral GGO, nodule or atelectasis were a distinctive CT sign for s-NSCLC. Moreover, Peritumoral GGO, nodule or atelectasis is an independent risk indicator associated with poor prognosis, while complete surgical resection is essential for improving the prognosis in s-NSCLC patients. However, the LAA ratio was not a prognostic indicator for s-NSCLC. These findings are helpful for preoperative CT diagnosis of s-NSCLC and provide a reference for clinical treatment strategies and prognostic evaluation.