Animals and models
A total of 24 male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–220 g, purchased from Shanghai JieSiJie Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd.) were selected for the study. The rats were housed in standard plastic cages at 24 ± 1°C and 50–70% humidity. All rats were individually housed in cages according to a standard 12:12 h light/dark cycle, provided with unlimited water and food and acclimatized for 1 week in advance. All experimental manipulations followed the regulations of Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University. The study was conducted in accordance with the regulations published in the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
To investigate neuropathic pain following nerve injury, we created a unilateral sciatic nerve CCI rat model based on Bennett's method[12]. Briefly, a 10% chloral hydrate solution was injected intraperitoneally at a dosage of 30 mg/kg. A curved incision, approximately 4 cm in length, was made from the right buttock to the posterior lateral aspect of the rat's thigh. The skin was then incised, and the right sciatic nerve was exposed from the gluteal muscular space. A nerve defect was created by resecting approximately 10 mm of the nerve, starting 1 cm away from the beginning of the sciatic nerve. In the sham-operated group, the sciatic nerve was exposed without injury, and the incision was closed routinely.
Animal grouping
After establishing the CCI model and sham operation groups, all experimental rats were divided into three groups, each consisting of eight rats. These three groups were the sham operation group (sham), the model group (CCI), and the EGFL7 knockdown group (CCI + shEGFL7).
For the knockdown group, a recombinant shRNA-EGFL7 (shEGFL7) lentiviral plasmid was constructed by Genepharma (Shanghai, China). 1×108 lentivirus particles were injected around the L5 dorsal root ganglion ipsilateral to the trauma 24 hours after CCI modeling. All rats were euthanized immediately after the behavioral tests, and sciatic nerve tissue from the surgical site was collected for the study.
Behavioral evaluation
For the determination of mechanical withdrawal threshold (MWT), we used an electronic tactile tester (38450, Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy) to examine the MWT values of each group of rats before modelling and 3, 7 and 14 days after modelling, respectively. Briefly, a glass box was positioned on a metal screen. After the rats had acclimated to the box for 15 minutes, the central area of the plantar foot on the hind limb of the rats was vertically stimulated using Von Frey filaments. The intensity of the pinprick was incrementally raised, and the occurrence of foot lifting or licking was considered a positive response and recorded as a value. Conversely, if there was no response, it was considered a negative response.
In addition, thermal withdrawal latency (TWL) was determined using the thermal radiation method. A plexiglass box was placed on a 3-mm-thick glass plate, and the soles of the rats were exposed to a thermal pain stimulator. The TWL was measured as the time from the beginning of the exposure to the point when the rats lifted their legs to avoid the stimulus. The automatic stopping time was 25 seconds to prevent tissue damage. The TWL was measured three times, with each measurement taken at a 3-minute interval. The average value of these measurements was considered as the TWL value of the rats. TWL was used to evaluate the nociceptive hypersensitivity of rats before modeling and at 3, 7, and 14 days after modeling, respectively.
Histologic hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining
At the conclusion of the behavioral experiments, the sciatic nerves of the rats in each group were collected and preserved in 10% neutral formaldehyde. Subsequently, they were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Subsequently, the samples were cut into 5 µm tissue sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma-Adrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Three sections were randomly selected from each tissue sample. Each section was observed in five fields of view using a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Toluidine blue staining
Sciatic nerves from various rats were collected and post-fixed overnight in a solution containing 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in a 0.1% cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). These sciatic nerve samples were then dissected and washed three times with cacodylate buffer. The nerves were subsequently cut into 2-mm-long segments and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 2 hours. After washing several times with distilled water, the samples were dehydrated using ethanol at various concentrations and then embedded in Agar 100 resin. A semi-thin cross-section (0.5 µm) of the sciatic nerve, located 1 mm proximal to the injury site, was stained with 0.5% toluidine blue (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and observed using an Olympus BX 40 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
TUNEL staining
After collecting the rat sciatic nerve, the tissue will be fixed, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. Sections were incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes under light protection using the TUNEL kit, following the manufacturer's instructions (Beyotime, C1088, Shanghai, China). Finally, the tissue sections were washed three times with PBS and observed using a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Sciatic nerve tissues were routinely paraffin-embedded, sectioned, deparaffinized, and hydrated. They were then subjected to antigen retrieval using proteinase K (0.2 mg/mL) and a 10 mM sodium citrate solution (pH 6.0). It was closed with normal goat serum and then incubated with EGFL7 primary antibody (1:200, ab256451, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and VWF (1:200, ab287962, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) overnight at 4°C. Next, they were incubated with HRP-labelled secondary antibodies (1:200, S0001, Affinity, Changzhou, China) for 2 hours and observed under a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blotting (WB)
Total protein samples were obtained from sciatic nerves after being processed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). 20 µg of protein extracts were separated using SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels and then transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). 5% non-fat milk was used to block these membranes, which were then incubated with specific antibodies overnight at 4°C. The specific antibodies used in this study were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). These included anti-EGFL7 (1:2000, ab256451), anti-Notch1 (1:2000, ab167441), anti-Delta4 (1:2000, ab183532), and anti-VEGF (1:2000, ab214424). The internal reference antibody used was anti-GAPDH (1:3000, AF7021, Affinity, Changzhou, China). Protein levels were detected using an Immobilon Western Chemilum HRP Substrate (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of data and image generation were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Normality testing was conducted using a Shapiro-Wilk test, and statistically significant differences were determined by a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Additionally, all experiments were repeated three times. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.