The Causes of Infertility in Women Presenting to Gynaecology Clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe; A Cross Sectional Study

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-47445/v1

Download PDF

Research

The Causes of Infertility in Women Presenting to Gynaecology Clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe; A Cross Sectional Study

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-47445/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background Infertility affects 48.5 million couples globally. It is defined clinically as failure to conceive after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. The contribution of various aetiological factors to infertility differs per population. The causes of infertility have not been assessed in Zimbabwe. Our objectives were to determine the reproductive characteristics, causes and outcomes of women presenting for infertility care.

Methods A retrospective and prospective study of women who had not conceived within a year of having unprotected intercourse presenting in private and public facilities in Harare was done. A diagnosis was made based on the history, examination and results whenever these were deemed sufficient. Data was analysed using STATA SE/15.

Results A total of 216 women were recruited. The mean age of the women was 32.9±5.7 years. Two thirds (144) of the women had primary infertility. The overall period of infertility ranged from 1-21 years with an average of 5.6±4.7 years whilst 98 (45.4%) of the couples had experienced 2-4 years of infertility and 94 (43.5%) had experience 5 or more years of infertility. About 1 in 5 of the women had irregular menstrual cycles with 10 of them having experienced amenorrhoea of at least 1 year. Almost half of the participants (49%) were overweight or obese. The most common cause for infertility was ‘unexplained’ in 22% of the women followed by tubal blockage in 20%, male factor in 19% and anovulation in 16%. Of the 49 (22.7%) women who conceived 21(9.7%) had a live birth while 23 (10.7%) had an ongoing pregnancy at the end of follow up. Thirty-seven (17.1%) had ART in the form of IVF/ICSI or IUI. Assisted Reproduction was significantly associated with conception.

Conclusion Most women present when chances of natural spontaneous conception are considerably reduced. This study shows an almost equal contribution between tubal factors, male factor and unexplained infertility. Almost half of the causes are female factors constituted by tubal factors, anovulation and a mixture of the two. Improved access to ART will result in improved pregnancy rates. Programs should target comprehensive assessment of both partners and offer ART.

Sexual & Reproductive Medicine

Causes of Infertility

Subfertility

Aetiology of infertility

Infertility outcomes

Infertility which is defined clinically as failure to conceive after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse affects approximately 48.5 million couples globally. Contribution of common aetiological factors to its burden differs per population. The causes of infertility and outcomes of investigations and treatment have not been assessed in Zimbabwe. We aimed to determine the reproductive characteristics, causes of infertility and outcomes in women presenting with infertility in public and private gynaecology clinics in Harare. Recruitment and follow up was from the 5th of June 2019 to the 30th of April 2020.

Of the 216 women recruited, just over half of them were aged 30–39 years and had experienced an average of 5.6 years of infertility with 94 of them having experienced more than 5 years on infertility. Two out of three women had never fallen pregnant before. Half of them were overweight. Just less than half of the women had their male partners tested for sperm dysfunction and 63% of tested men showed varying degrees of sperm dysfunction. Cause of Infertility was ‘unexplained’, tubal blockage and male factor in 1out 5 women respectively. Of the 49 women who fell pregnant, 21 of them delivered a live birth by the end of follow up. Thirty-seven women had Assisted Reproduction and this was significantly associated with conception.

In conclusion, most women present when chances of natural spontaneous conception are considerably reduced and there is almost an equal contribution between tubal, male and unexplained factors to infertility.

Infertility is a worldwide problem mainly affecting sub-Saharan Africa. The World health Organisation (WHO) recognizes it as a major public health problem(1). Infertility is involuntary childlessness and is either primary if conception has never been achieved or secondary if conception has been experienced before. WHO clinically defines infertility as a disease of the reproductive system characterised by failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. The prevalence of infertility is variable depending on the definition (clinical – 1 year, epidemiological – 2 years, demographic – 5 years) and on whether the outcome is pregnancy or births(2)(3).The latest estimate of the prevalence of infertility globally using the demographic definition and live birth as an outcome estimated that 48.5 million couples were affected by infertility. Prevalence of primary infertility was 1.9% and secondary infertility 10.5% (3).WHO estimates that these figures go up 2.5 fold using an epidemiological definition of infertility(1). The prevalence of infertility using a clinical definition and conception as an outcome is much higher as more couples conceive naturally with progression of time. Identifying clinical infertility allows earlier assessment of affected women, however up to 15% of normal couples might fail to conceive just by chance in the first year of attempting (4).The contribution of male and female factors is about 40% each. For women, ovulatory failure is the commonest factor (25%), followed by tubal factors (20%). For men the commonest cause is sperm defects or dysfunction (30–40%). Unexplained infertility may be as high as 25% (5). Prospects of pregnancy in unexplained infertility are good for women younger than 35 years and when the duration of infertility is < 2 years (4). The contribution of various infertility aetiological factors differs per population.

There is limited access to infertility care in the developing world (6). No study has analysed the contribution of sperm dysfunction, tubal blockage, uterine abnormalities, ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility in Zimbabwe. Likewise, the number of patients with a conclusive diagnosis and those who achieve conception is presumed to be low. Understanding causes of infertility amongst women will help clinicians to focus management to options that are relevant and cost effective.

We aimed to explore the contribution of known aetiological factors in women accessing infertility care in Harare and the adjoining city of Chitungwiza. Harare the capital city of Zimbabwe has a population of about 1.5 million(7). Chitungwiza city which is 30 kilometres from Harare has a population of 1.2 million(8). Both cities are serviced by three tertiary hospitals which offer specialist gynaecology services. There are several private gynaecology clinics in the cities. A retrospective and prospective study of women who had not conceived within a year of having unprotected intercourse presenting in private and public facilities in Harare and Chitungwiza was done. The decision to retrospectively recruit in the private sector was based on the fact that records tend to be more complete as compared to the public sector. At commencement of the study, we had hoped to enrol equal numbers in both the public and private sector clinic but however, a crippling doctors’ strike and later the Covid-19 pandemic disturbed accrual in the public sector. Private sector recruitment was not affected as sampling was retrospective. Women who could not afford investigations such as hysterosalpingogram (HSG), laparoscope and dye, ovulation test and semen analyses for their partners were assisted with money to pay. More effort for the male partner to have a semen analysis was made when there was no obvious female factor identified. Nurses working in the gynaecology out–patient department in each hospital and all gynaecologists working in private and public facilities were notified about the study. The principal investigator and a research nurse from each participating hospital administered a questionnaire to all consenting participants and additional information was obtained from their hospital cards, laboratory and radiological reports. Consenting private gynaecologists were asked to retrieve records on infertile patients under their care for the previous two years and a questionnaire completed with data similar to what was being sought in the prospective arm of the study. Women with bilateral tubal blockage on either HSG or laparoscope and dye studies were classified as having tubal factor infertility. If the male partner had abnormalities in sperm concentration, motility or morphology the woman was classified as having male factor infertility or as male/female factor if there was a co-existent female cause of infertility. All women with regular cycles were considered ovulating whereas women with irregular infrequent scanty and sometimes absent cycles were considered anovulatory (9). Women with classic diagnosis of Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), diminished ovarian reserve and low luteal phase progesterone were also considered anovulatory (10). Recruitment and follow up of participants was from the 5th of June 2019 to the 30th of April 2020. Information on their demographic profile, period of attempting to conceive, medical history and examination, prior investigations and current investigations was obtained on enrolment and follow up. A final diagnosis was made based on the history, examination and results. Some diagnoses were already apparent at recruitment depending on how conclusive prior history, examination and investigations were while others became apparent after further investigations and follow up.

The sample size calculated using the single proportion formula based on a study which had assessed causes of infertility in Bauchi district of Northern Nigeria was 205(11). Overall, 216 women were enrolled. Data was collected using a questionnaire and captured into Redcap software(12) and exported to STATA/SE 15(10) for analysis. Descriptive summary statistics were reported as frequencies and percentages for categorical data and means and standard deviations for continuous normally distributed data. Tests for association were conducted using the chi-square test between categorical variables. Where sample size was small in some cells the Fisher’s exact test was used. Missing data was recorded in tables as a variable choice labelled ‘not stated’/ ‘not recorded’/ ‘not done’/ ‘not weighed’.

Ethical clearance was granted by the Joint Research Ethics Committee for the University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences and Group of Parirenyatwa (JREC), Harare hospital ethics committee, Chitungwiza hospital ethics committee and the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ).

A total of 216 women were recruited prospectively from the public sector (22%) and retrospectively from the private sector (78%) hospitals respectively in Harare, Zimbabwe. The mean age of the women was 32.9 ± 5.7 years. The youngest woman was 21 years and the oldest 48 years. The majority (92.6%) of the participants were married. Table 1 shows the participants’ demographic profile.

Table 1

Demographic profile of participants
Characteristic	Frequency (%)
Source Public Private	47(21.8) 169(78.2)
Age group (years) < 30 30–39 40+	67(31.0) 117(54.2) 32(14.8)
Marital status Single Married Cohabiting Divorced	6(2.8) 200(92.6) 5(2.3) 5(2.3)
Level of education Primary Secondary Tertiary Not stated	4(1.9) 38(17.6) 58(26.9) 116(53.7)
Income Low Medium High Not stated	9(4.2) 28(13.0) 40(18.5) 139(64.4)
Residence Rural Urban Not stated	10(4.6) 144(66.7) 62(28.7)

Two thirds (144) of the participants had primary fertility (never conceived before) while three quarters (164) did not have living children. The overall period of infertility ranged from 1–21 years with an average of 5.6 ± 4.7 years whilst 98 (45.4%) of the couples had experienced 2–4 years of infertility and 94 (43.5%) had experience 5 or more years of infertility. About 1 in 5 of the participants had irregular menstrual cycles with 10 of them having experienced amenorrhoea of at least 1 year (Table 2).

Table 2

Reproductive characteristics
Characteristic	Frequency, n(%)
Number of pregnancies Zero One Two Three Four	144(66.7) 43(19.9) 14(6.5) 13(6.0) 2(0.9)
Living children Zero One Two or more	164(75.9) 39(18.1) 13(6.0)
Period of infertility (years) 1 2–4 5 and above	24(11.1) 98(45.4) 94(43.5)
Period in current relationship (years)¹ 1 2–4 5 and above	26(12.0) 103(47.7) 87(40.3)
Menstrual cycle Regular Irregular Not stated	158(73.2) 47(21.8) 11(5.1)
Irregular cycle Not defined Infrequent Amenorrhoea > 1 year Not stated Not applicable	15(6.9) 22(10.2) 10(4.6) 11(5.1) 158(73.2)
Contraception Nil Coc³ Implant Injectable POP³ IUCD³ Condom	170(78.7) 25(11.6) 5(2.3) 7(3.2) 3(1.4) 4(1.9) 2(0.9)
1. Period of infertility in current relationship 2. Not applicable because they had regular cycles 3. Coc = combined oral contraceptive pill; POP = progesterone only pill; IUCD = Intra-uterine contraceptive pill

One hundred and thirty-nine (64.4%) of the participants had a known HIV status with 19(8.8%) being positive. Most (80.6%) of the participants did not have chronic medical conditions. Almost half of the participants (49%) were overweight or obese and 48 (22%) did not have a recorded weight (Table 3).

Table 3

Medical history and examination
Characteristic	Frequency, n(%)
HIV Positive Negative Not stated	19(8.8) 120(55.6) 77(35.6)
Medical history Nil¹ Hpt/DM² HIV³ Others	174(80.6) 17(7.9) 16(7.4) 9(4.2)
Body mass index⁴ 21–24/50–75 25–29/76–89 ≥ 30/90 < 21/50 Not weighed	58(26.9) 60(27.8) 46(21.3) 4(1.9) 48(22.2)
1. Nil means no recorded medical illness 2. Hpt/DM means participant either had hypertension or diabetes mellitus or both 3. Three of the HIV positive participants were recorded under Hpt/DM leaving 16 instead of 19 in this category 4. Body Mass Index: Normal = BMI 21-24 kg/m²or weight 50-75kg; Overweight = BMI 25-29kg/m²or weight 76-89kg; Obese = BMI≥30kg/m² or weight ≥90kg; Underweight = BMI< 21kg/m²or weight <50kg

Only 97 (45%) women had their spouses undergo a semen analysis. The most common cause for infertility was ‘unexplained’ in 47(22%) of the women followed by tubal blockage affecting 44(20%), male factor [41(19%)], anovulation (34(16%)], mixed female factors (27(13%) and mixed male/female in 23(10%) (Fig. 1).

There was no association between person characteristics and cause of infertility (Table 4).

Table 4

Association between cause and person characteristics
Characteristic	Total	Cause						χ² p-value
Characteristic	Total	Tubal blockage	Anovulation	Male factor	Male/ female	Mixed female	Unexplained	χ² p-value
Period of infertility (years) 1 2–4 5 and above	24(11.1) 98(45.4) 94(43.5)	5 20 19	5 13 16	8 15 18	0 12 11	3 12 12	3 26 18	0.491^ϯ
Age group (years) < 30 30–39 40+	67(31.0) 117(54.2) 32(14.8)	14 22 8	12 18 4	12 22 7	6 13 4	7 17 3	16 25 6	0.992^ϯ
Any pregnancy Yes No	72(33.3) 144(66.7)	14 30	9 25	11 30	8 15	13 40	17 30	0.493
Any children Yes No	52(24.1) 164(75.9)	10 34	6 28	6 35	4 19	11 16	15 32	0.107
^ϯFisher’s exact p-value

A total of 49 (22.7%) women conceived/fell pregnant during the follow up period. Of these women who conceived 21(9.7%) had a live birth while 23 (10.7%) had an ongoing pregnancy at the end of follow up. Thirty-seven (17.1%) had Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART) in the form of Invitro-fertilisation/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (IVF/ICSI) or Intra-Uterine Insemination (IUI). There was no association between cause of infertility and final outcome. ART was significantly associated with conception (p < 0.001 – fisher exact test) (supplementary table 1).

Period of infertility and age group were significantly associated with conception (p = 0.006, p = 0.002 respectively) and in both cases it had a negative correlation, meaning less women conceived when the period of infertility became longer or with increasing age. There was no association between having had children and previous pregnancy with conception (supplementary table 2).

This study of a largely urban population shows that 2/3 of the women had primary subfertility, an average period of infertility of 5.6 years. This average period encompasses the clinical definition of infertility (1 year), the epidemiological definition (2 years) and the demographic definition (5 years) meaning that most couples present when chances of natural spontaneous conception would have considerably waned off(4). This is in agreement with a study amongst Sudanese couples were the mean duration was 4.9 years and 68.9% had primary subfertility (13) and with a study in Marrakech-Safi region of Morocco where about 2/3 of infertile couples had primary subfertility (14).This in sharp contrast to a study in Bauchi district of Nigeria where 38% (about 1/3) had primary subfertility(15) and in Erode were primary subfertility accounted for 90% of cases(15). This difference in proportion of women with primary or secondary infertility in these countries is likely influenced by the causes of infertility peculiar to that region. Secondary subfertility tends to be higher in regions with high infectious morbidity such as tubal infections, post abortion and puerperal sepsis and hence likely low resource set ups. This study seems to have selected women in a higher socio-economic stratum by having a disproportionately higher number of participants from private gynaecologists. The subgroup of women mainly affected in this study was 30–39 years. This does suggest delayed presentation or failed intervention. Most of the participants tried to conceive with only one partner as shown by the similarity in period of total infertility and period of infertility in the current relationship (Table 2). This could mean that either infertility does not lead to increased divorce or that presenting for care selects out women in stable relationships in this population.

This study shows an almost equal contribution between tubal factors (21%), male factor (19%) and unexplained (22%) infertility. This differs with the study in Bauchi which had 27% tubal factors, 18% male factors and 12% unexplained(11). Another study in Erode India also showed a different profile of contributory causes with male factors being 26% and unexplained 6%(15). Almost half of the causes are female factors constituted by tubal factors, anovulation and a mixture of the two. This is in close agreement with the studies in Erode-India and Bauchi-Nigeria and Sudan which showed 45.5% and 51%and 49% female factors respectively(15)(11)(13).This is higher than the contribution of female factors often quoted as 30–40% in the USA(5)(16). Unexplained infertility was the biggest single cause of infertility in this study and is in agreement with the proportion found in other studies (4)(5).This proportion is largely dependent on the thoroughness of investigations. The contribution of male factor infertility in this study can go up to 29% if we add the 10% who had both male and female factors. This falls within the range estimated for Sub-Saharan Africa in one systemic review (17) and in close agreement to studies in India and Sudan where male factors contributed to 26% and 36% respectively (15)(13).The contribution of male factors is understated as only 97 (45%) women had their spouses undergo a semen analysis. This means that for women who had other causes, sperm dysfunction could also have been a co-existent factor. The study in Bauchi Nigeria had higher male participation (61.3%)(11).This calls for more counselling to encourage male participation when screening for causes of infertility. Several studies have shown reluctance of male partners to participate in evaluation for infertility(18). This is further compounded by cultural paternalistic beliefs which attribute infertility solely to female factors(17). The most common cause of female infertility was tubal blockage even in women who had never conceived before. This in agreement with the study in Bauchi(11)but differs from studies in India (15) and Sudan (13)where PCOS and anovulation were the greatest contribution amongst female factors respectively. Tubal factor infertility is mainly of infectious aetiology and can be prevented by early reproductive life interventions such safe sex and prompt treatment for pelvic infections. Rarely it is due to endometriosis which is suspected in women with dysmenorrhoea and pelvic pain. There is therefore need for community education to seek medical intervention early to prevent long term sequelae from these conditions. Anovulation presented a lesser burden than either tubal and male factor infertility. Almost half of the women who had recorded weights were overweight or obese and this is explained by the fact that the majority of participants were in the wealthier class as shown by their area or residency and level of education. This is almost similar to findings in the Bauchi district of Nigeria where 40% of the women were overweight or obese. This provides an opportunity to manage anovulation through weight control(5). This calls for community interventions to curb the tide of obesity. Efforts must be taken to tackle obesogenic lifestyles which are characterised by limited physical activity and excess calories consumption.

There wasn’t much documented comorbidity in this population. The HIV prevalence in those with a known status was 13.7% which is in agreement with the HIV prevalence in the country of 12.7% (19). This either means that infertility is not selecting out women with HIV or most women with HIV have their disease well controlled and hence not impacting on their fertility.

There was low access to ART in this study as is typical of low resource set ups(20).

The study provides the first ever calculation of the contribution of common aetiological factors to infertility in Zimbabwe. Its main limitation was failure to recruit an equal proportion of participants in private and public sectors. A larger number of patients in the public sector might have changed the proportion of causes of infertility and outcomes. It would also have allowed statistical comparison between the two groups. There was incompleteness of some of the retrospectively collected data especially the demographic variables as sometimes practitioners would not record these. This made it impossible to compare causes and outcomes against these variables. The main strength was in assisting completion of investigations in some couples and hence allowing a diagnosis to be made. These results can only be generalised to an urban population where majority of patients afford private care. This is the case in many developing countries as governments rarely subsidise infertility treatments in the face of competing demands from high maternal morbidity and mortality (21). This forces infertile couples to seek care in the private sector clinics.

Most women present when chances of natural spontaneous conception are considerably reduced. This study shows an almost equal contribution between tubal factors, male factor and unexplained infertility. Males are often not evaluated. Programs should target comprehensive assessment of both partners by encouraging male participation. Prevention and early treatment of sexual transmitted infections should remain a priority to reduce tubal factor infertility. Physical activity and low caloric intake should be encouraged to prevent obesity. Reproductive health programs must educate couples on the reduced chances of infertility with advancing age and the need to seek medical care early. Improved access to ART will result in improved pregnancy rates.

ART – Assisted Reproduction Technology

HIV – Human Immunodeficiency Virus

HSG – Hysterosalpingogram

ICSI – Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

IVF – Invitro-Fertilisation

IUI – Intra-Uterine Insemination

PCOS – Poly-Cystic Ovarian Syndrome

WHO – World Health Organisation

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was granted by the Joint Research Ethics Committee for the University of Zimbabwe, College of Health Sciences and Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals (JREC) on 8/05/2020, Harare hospital ethics committee on 15 April 2019, Chitungwiza hospital ethics committee on 15 April 2019 and the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ).

Consent for publication

Consent signed by participating patients and doctors allowed us to disseminate anonymised study findings through publications

Availability of data and materials

Data sets and materials available for sharing and uploading into a repository

Competing interests

There are no competing interests

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Fogarty International Center (Office Of The Director, National Institutes Of Health (OD), National Institute Of Nursing Research (NINR), National Institute Of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute Of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS), National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute (NHLBI), Fogarty International Center (FIC)) of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number D43 TW010137. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health

Authors' contributions

MGM conceived the idea, designed the study protocol, carried out field work, did analysis and drafted the manuscript. TM assisted in protocol design, supervised field work. VC did statistical analysis. TMh did field work and critical review of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the final manuscript

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge research midwives Sr M Chiwara and Sr O Mutumhe for the meticulous work in participant recruitment, consenting, data collection and follow up.

WHO | Infertility is a global public health issue [Internet]. WHO. World Health Organization; [cited 2020 May 31]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/perspective/en/
WHO | Infertility definitions and terminology [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2018 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/definitions/en/
Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2012 Dec 18 [cited 2018 Aug 7];9(12). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525527/
Abdelazim IA, Purohit P, Farag RH, Zhurabekova G. Unexplained infertility: prevalence, possible causes and treatment options. A review of the literature. J Obstet Gynecol Investig. 2018;1(1):17–22.
Gibbs RS. Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. 1168 p.
Asemota OA, Klatsky P. Access to Infertility Care in the Developing World: The Family Promotion Gap. Semin Reprod Med. 2015 Jan;33(1):17–22.
Harare, Zimbabwe Population (2020) - Population Stat [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jul 5]. Available from: https://populationstat.com/zimbabwe/harare
Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe Population (2020) - Population Stat [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jul 5]. Available from: https://populationstat.com/zimbabwe/chitungwiza
Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):e44–50.
Infertility Workup for the Women’s Health Specialist [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/Clinical Guidance/Committee Opinion/Articles/2019/06/Infertility Workup for the Womens Health Specialist
Dattijo LM, Andreadis N, Aminu BM, Umar NI, Black KI. The prevalence and clinical pattern of infertility in Bauchi, northern Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan 1;33(1):76–85.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr 1;42(2):377–81.
Elhussein OG, Ahmed MA, Suliman SO, Yahya leena I, Adam I. Epidemiology of infertility and characteristics of infertile couples requesting assisted reproduction in a low-resource setting in Africa, Sudan. Fertil Res Pract [Internet]. 2019 Jul 18 [cited 2020 May 31];5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6637545/
Benksim A, Elkhoudri N, Ait Addi R, Baali A, Cherkaoui M. Difference between Primary and Secondary Infertility in Morocco: Frequencies and Associated Factors. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018;12(2):142–6.
Baby A, Varghese Aa, Jose C, Kandasamy K, Sundaram S. A Prospective Evaluation Of Causes And Treatment Of Infertility In A Tertiary Care Hospital, Erode. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2018;11(2):149–153.
hhs.gov. Female Infertility [Internet]. HHS.gov. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/opa/reproductive-health/fact-sheets/female-infertility/index.html
Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE [Internet]. 2015 Apr 26 [cited 2020 May 24];13. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424520/
Gerrits T, Shaw M. Biomedical infertility care in sub-Saharan Africa: a social science review of current practices, experiences and view points. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2010;2(3):194–207.
Zimbabwe [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/countries/zimbabwe
Botha B, Shamley D, Dyer S. Availability, effectiveness and safety of ART in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open [Internet]. 2018 Mar 26 [cited 2019 Mar 22];2018(2). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276690/
Widge A, Cleland J. The public sector’s role in infertility management in India. Health Policy Plan. 2009 Mar 1;24(2):108–15.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

The Causes of Infertility in Women Presenting to Gynaecology Clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe; A Cross Sectional Study

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Plain English Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Availability of data and materials

Competing interests

Funding

Authors' contributions

Acknowledgements

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1