Descriptive statistics of basic attributes
A total of 365 subjects participated in this study. The average age was 43.86 years (SD = 11.74). The majority were not smokers (64.4%), with an average cigarette consumption of only 3.70 cigarettes per day (SD = 7.11). Most participants did not consume alcohol (72.3%). The average daily sleep duration was 6.61 hours (SD = 0.98). A significant portion of the participants were shift workers (63.3%). The majority worked ≤40 hours per week (67.4%), were non-supervisory staff (86%), and had a high school education (51.8%). Detailed information is provided in Table 1.
Descriptive statistical analysis results of health promotion behavior, occupational burnout, and sleep disturbances
Health promotion behavior
The original scale had a maximum average score of 4 points. The overall average score on the scale was 2.34 points, with a standard deviation of 0.48. The average scores of each sub-dimension, listed from highest to lowest, were as follows: "oral hygiene behavior" with an average of 2.56 points (SD = 0.69), "life appreciation behavior" with an average of 2.46 points (SD = 0.68), "healthy eating behavior" with an average of 2.44 points (SD = 0.58), "health responsibility behavior" with an average of 2.32 points (SD = 0.78), "stress management behavior" with an average of 2.28 points (SD = 0.56), and the lowest was "exercise behavior" with an average of 2.01 points (SD = 0.75). The scores for the first five sub-dimensions fell between "occasionally" and "frequently," while exercise behavior was rated as "occasionally," indicating 2–3 days per week.
Occupational burnout
The original scale had a maximum average score of 4 points. The overall average score on the scale was 1.96 points, with a standard deviation of 1.09. The total scores for each sub-dimension, listed from highest to lowest, were as follows: "personal burnout" with an average of 2.30 points (SD = 0.78), "work-related Burnout" with an average of 2.16 points (SD = 0.81), and "overcommitted to work" with an average of 2.07 points (SD = 0.75). All three sub-dimensions fell between "sometimes" and "often."
Sleep disturbance
A total score of less than or equal to 3 indicated no sleep disturbance, accounting for 32.3% of the subjects. A total score of 4 to 5 indicates suspected sleep disturbance, accounting for 19.7%. A total score of 6 or greater indicates the presence of sleep disturbance, with 47.9% of the subjects experiencing sleep disturbances. Details are shown in Table 2.
Bivariate analysis of factors affecting sleep disturbance
A bivariate analysis was conducted to understand the relationship between the study subjects' basic attributes, health promotion behaviors, occupational burnout, and sleep disturbance. The dependent variable was the presence or absence of sleep disturbances, while the independent variables included basic attributes, health promotion behaviors, and occupational burnout. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-Squared Test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Independent t-test. The results are as follows: significant differences were found for shift work (p < 0.001), shift groups (p = 0.004), weekly working hours (p = 0.027), stress management behavior (p = 0.001), exercise behavior (p < 0.001), health responsibility behavior (p < 0.001), life appreciation behavior (p < 0.001), healthy diet behavior (p < 0.001), oral hygiene behavior (p < 0.001), personal burnout (p < 0.001), work-related burnout (p < 0.001), and overcommitment to work (p = 0.001). Details are shown in Table 3.
Analysis of factors associated with sleep disturbances
Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the factors influencing sleep disturbance, incorporating basic attributes, work patterns, health promotion behaviors, and occupational burnout. The analysis was divided into four models: Model 1: The relationship between basic attributes, work patterns, and sleep disturbances. Model 2: The relationship between basic attributes, health promotion behaviors, and sleep disturbances. Model 3: The relationship between basic attributes, occupational burnout, and sleep disturbances. Model 4: The relationship between basic attributes, work patterns, health promotion behaviors, occupational burnout, and sleep disturbances.
For Model 1, logistic regression analysis was conducted using basic attributes and work patterns as independent variables and sleep disturbances as the dependent variable. The results are as follows:
smoking quantity, odds ratio (OR) = 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00~1.07), p = 0.048; shift work (yes/no), OR = 2.78 (95% CI 1.69~4.54), p < 0.001; weekly working hours (41~48 hours/≤40 hours), OR = 4.11 (95% CI 1.21~14.01), p = 0.024; and weekly working hours (˃48 hours/≤40 hours), OR = 2.41 (95% CI 1.45~4.01), p = 0.001. These results indicate that less smoking, non-shift work, and weekly working hours less than or equal to 40 hours are associated with a lower likelihood of sleep disturbance. The explanatory power (R²) of this model was 0.11. See Table 4 for detailed results.
Logistic regression analysis was conducted for Model 2, using basic attributes and health promotion behaviors as independent variables and sleep disturbance as the dependent variable. The results are as follows: health responsibility behavior, OR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.77~0.99), p = 0.030; life appreciation behavior, OR = 0.76 (95% CI 0.66~0.89), p < 0.001; and healthy eating behavior, OR = 0.86 (95% CI 0.76~0.97), p = 0.017. These results indicate that higher scores in health responsibility behavior, life appreciation behavior, and healthy eating behavior are associated with a lower likelihood of sleep disturbances. The explanatory power (R²) of this model was 0.21. See Table 4 for detailed results.
Logistic regression analysis was conducted for Model 3, using basic attributes and occupational burnout as independent variables and sleep disturbances as the dependent variable. The results are as follows: personal burnout, OR = 1.05 (95% CI 1.03~1.08), p < 0.001, and work-related burnout, OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.01~1.05), p = 0.010. These results indicate that lower personal and work-related burnout scores are associated with a lower likelihood of sleep disturbances. The explanatory power (R²) of this model was 0.33. See Table 4 for detailed results.
For Model 4, logistic regression analysis was conducted using basic attributes, work patterns, health promotion behaviors, and occupational burnout as independent variables and sleep disturbances as the dependent variable. The results are as follows: shift work (Yes/No), OR = 3.03 (95% CI 1.64~5.56), p < 0.001; weekly working hours (>48 hours/≤40 hours), OR = 1.98 (95% CI 1.03~3.81), p = 0.040; health responsibility behavior, OR = 0.85 (95% CI 0.73~1.00), p = 0.049; and personal burnout, OR = 1.06 (95% CI 1.03~1.09), p < 0.001. These results indicate a lower likelihood of sleep disturbances associated with non-shift work, higher scores in health responsibility behavior, weekly working hours of 40 or less, and lower scores in personal burnout. The explanatory power (R²) of this model was 0.49. See Table 4 for detailed results.