Among 200 (150 miscarriage women, 50 control ) women with a mean age of 29 years (range, 18-40 years), all of them had both IgM and IgG test results as common serum tests IgG and IgM for (Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, Rubella virus, Anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-phospholipid antibody) also an Anticoagulants human blood test such as (protein C, protein S, lupus) are negative, The differences between Toxoplasma, Rubella, ACA, APL, and CMV IgM IgG rates were found to be statistically no significant”. Similarly, the differences between protein C, protein S, and lupus differences rates were determined to be statistically no significant (p<0.01). in addition, from the table (2) explain There are no significant differences between the studied groups) patient and control). This supports the fact that the studied groups are homogeneous .where when (sig) p = 0,000 this experiment is repeated 100 times, and every time the researcher rejects the null theory (the arithmetic mean is equal) there is no single decision of his decisions is wrong. This means that the data study is real
Table (2): Distribution of CMV, Rubella, ACA, APL, Toxo (IgG,IgM) Protein C, Protein S, Lupus according to group study.
ANOVA
|
|
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
ms
|
F
|
Sig.
|
CMV IgG
|
Between Groups
|
342.413
|
2
|
171.206
|
3.611
|
0.029
|
CMV IgM
|
Between Groups
|
5.924
|
2
|
2.962
|
0.671
|
0.512
|
Rubella IgG
|
Between Groups
|
116633.45
|
2
|
58316.725
|
0.660
|
0.518
|
Rubella IgM
|
Between Groups
|
272.172
|
2
|
136.086
|
12.285
|
0.000
|
ACA IgG
|
Between Groups
|
120.477
|
2
|
60.239
|
13.123
|
0.000
|
ACA IgM
|
Between Groups
|
106.637
|
2
|
53.318
|
14.681
|
0.000
|
APL IgG
|
Between Groups
|
5.387
|
2
|
2.694
|
0.669
|
0.514
|
APL IgM
|
Between Groups
|
6.877
|
2
|
3.438
|
1.108
|
0.332
|
Protein C
|
Between Groups
|
69.870
|
2
|
34.935
|
0.132
|
0.876
|
Protein S
|
Between Groups
|
88.535
|
2
|
44.267
|
0.117
|
0.889
|
Lupus
|
Between Groups
|
69.210
|
2
|
34.605
|
1.170
|
0.312
|
MTHFR
|
Between Groups
|
21.415
|
2
|
10.708
|
16.986
|
0.000
|
MTHFR_A
|
Between Groups
|
74.190
|
2
|
37.095
|
69.274
|
0.000
|
Toxo IgG
|
Between Groups
|
2.160
|
2
|
1.080
|
10.074
|
0.000
|
Toxo IgM
|
Between Groups
|
0.000
|
2
|
0.000
|
|
|
MTHFR polymorphism genotypes of the 50 cases of miscarriage women in group A, 14 heterozygotes, and 1 homozygote genotype for C677T were identified, while 30 heterozygotes and 1 homozygote for A1298C were identified. A total of 12 were compound heterozygotes, and 16 were without mutation. the 100 miscarriage women in group B, 11 homozygotes for C677T and 35 heterozygotes were identified. For the A1298C variant, 18 were homozygous and 64 were heterozygous. 15 subjects were compound heterozygotes genotypes. Table (3) show The analysis of allele distribution in group A for C677T showed that there were 16 cases with T and 84 cases with C in the case group, while in the control group, allele C was found in 97 cases, and T was found 3 in cases. Significant less allele C was observed in the case group (OR = 0.16, CL95= 0.04-0.57 P < 0.05).whereas distribution allele of A1289C show total A 68 in case group and 96 in control and C found 32 in cases and 4 in control this show high significant p=0.0001, CL=0.03-0.26).
Table (3): Distribution of genotypes and alleles of MTHFR gene C677T and A1289C of A group
SnpC677T
|
Patients(50)
|
Control(50)
|
P value
|
OR
|
(CI)95
|
CCa
|
35
|
48
|
|
TT
|
1
|
1
|
0.67
|
0.72
|
(0.04-12.06)
|
TC
|
14
|
1
|
<0.0001*
|
0.05
|
(0.007-0.41)
|
total
|
50
|
50
|
|
C
|
84
|
97
|
|
T
|
16
|
3
|
0.001*
|
0.16
|
(0.04-0.57)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snp A1289C
|
Patients(50)
|
Control(50)
|
P value
|
OR
|
(CI)95
|
AAa
|
19
|
47
|
|
|
AC
|
30
|
2
|
<0.0001*
|
0.02
|
(0.006-0.12)
|
CC
|
1
|
1
|
0.50
|
0.40
|
(0.02-6.80)
|
total
|
50
|
50
|
|
|
A
|
68
|
96
|
|
C
|
32
|
4
|
0.0001*
|
0.08
|
(0.03-0.26)
|
*P ≤ 0.05; OR= (95%CI)
Whereas, statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was detected in the frequency of MTHFR SNPs C677T and A1289C in women as show in table (4). Combined heterozygosity and homozygosity of MTHFR polymorphisms for two SNP was a common phenomenon in the women suffer abortion more than two times was (29 %) of women .also combined heterozygosity for both SNPs in all studied groups was observed. Combined 677TT/1298AC ,677CT/1298CC or 1298CC/ 677TTgenotypes, which contain three or four mutant alleles, were also identified in our study groups, 15% from the cases study show combined heterozygosity in both SNP This refer to the heterozygosis is more risk.
However, there was a substantial difference between the multiple abortion and control groups when the detected frequencies of the 677CT/1298AC and 677TT/1298AA genotypes were combined; this indicates that these genotypes are involved in multiple abortion pathogenesis.
Table (4): allelic Distribution of genotypes MTHFR gene A1289C and C677T of B group
SnpC677T
|
Patients(50)
|
Control(50)
|
P value
|
OR
|
(CI)95
|
CCa
|
54
|
45
|
|
TT
|
11
|
1
|
0.01*
|
0.1
|
(0.01-0.87)
|
TC
|
35
|
3
|
0.0001*
|
0.1
|
(0.03-0.35)
|
total
|
100
|
49
|
|
C
|
143
|
93
|
|
T
|
57
|
5
|
<0.001*
|
0.13
|
(0.05-0.34)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNPA1289C
|
Patients(50)
|
Control(50)
|
P value
|
OR
|
(CI)95
|
AAa
|
16
|
44
|
|
|
AC
|
64
|
3
|
0.001*
|
0.01
|
(0.005-0.06)
|
CC
|
18
|
2
|
<0.001*
|
0.04
|
(0.008-0.19)
|
total
|
100
|
49
|
|
|
A
|
96
|
91
|
|
C
|
100
|
7
|
<0.0001*
|
0.07
|
(0.03-0.16)
|
*P ≤ 0.05; OR= (95%CI)