Pollen dispersal pattern from the mediterranean shrub Cistus ladanifer L. to its congener C. laurifolius L.: ecological and conservation implications

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4808689/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Pollen dispersal pattern from the mediterranean shrub Cistus ladanifer L. to its congener C. laurifolius L.: ecological and conservation implications

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4808689/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Gene flow between congeners in natural systems can have important consequences for the species involved. Cistus ladanifer plays a significant role in natural ecosystems and is also considered a valuable source of natural resources. The objective of this study is to investigate the pollen dispersal pattern from this species to its congener, Cistus laurifolius. To this end, an analysis of pollen analog dispersal (using fluorescent dye) was conducted in a mixed population of both species. The pollen dispersal pattern of C. ladanifer to C. laurifolius was estimated, and the relationship between the dispersal distance and the distance from the pollen analog source of C. ladanifer plants was investigated. The results showed the ability of C. ladanifer to pollinate C. laurifolius. Cistus laurifolius plants closer to the particle emission source provided by C. ladanifer individuals received a greater amount of pollen analogs (fluorescent dye) on their stigmas than those farther away. Most of the detected pollen analogs (80%) dispersed within 60 meters of the donor plants. The evidence of pollen transfer from C. ladanifer to C. laurifoliushighlights the importance of studying pollen dispersal patterns in species that are potential candidates for exploitation and use as new crops. This is crucial to avoid impacts on populations of other wild congeners.

Cistus

fluorescent dye

hybridization

pollen dispersal

pollen flow

pollination

The genus Cistus L., belonging to the family Cistaceae (eight genera and 180 species), is composed of perennial shrubs primarily distributed in the Mediterranean region (Arrington and Kubitzki 2003). One of the most abundant and widely distributed species in the genus is Cistus ladanifer L., whose distribution area ranges from Portugal and Morocco to the French Riviera and Algeria (Guzmán and Vargas 2009). This species is of great interest both for its ecological role in maintaining Mediterranean ecosystems and for its value as a natural resource. Regarding its ecological importance, it is considered a pioneer plant, capable of quickly colonizing disturbed areas, such as those affected by forest fires, thanks to its high resprouting and germination capacity. Its recovery after fires is faster compared to other shrub species, due to its heat resistance and the breaking of seed dormancy by high temperatures (Luna et al. 2022). This makes it the dominant species after the first or second-year post-fire (Correia and Ascensão 2017). As a natural resource, the species' trunk, branches, and leaves are impregnated with labdanum, a viscous substance This compound is highly valued in the perfume industry for its warm and sweet aroma, as well as its excellent fixative properties that help prolong the duration of other fragrances in perfumes (Papaefthimiou et al. 2014). In fact, it is an essential component in many modern perfumes. Additionally, this species is also known to have applications in human and animal food, medicine, veterinary, fuel, construction, crafts, and environmental uses (Frazão et al. 2024)

The exploitation of wild C. ladanifer populations to obtain labdanum is a common practice with a long tradition in Mediterranean countries (Pardo de Santayana et al. 2018). In fact, these exploitation practices are being studied to improve them through the promotion of mechanization and the development of cultivation (Mariotti et al. 1997; Mediavilla et al. 2021). The ecological breadth of the species makes it susceptible to being successfully cultivated under a wide variety of environmental conditions (Raimundo et al. 2018). This is reflected in the species' ability to survive in a wide range of altitudes and soil types, and in dry areas with high insolation (Núñez-Oliveira et al. 1996). It also shows high stress tolerance, allowing it to compete in diverse environmental conditions (Rossini-Oliva et al. 2016). These include soils poor in organic matter, low pH, and high concentrations of trace elements, water stress, high temperatures, and solar radiation (Alados et al. 1999; Kidd et al. 2004).

The present study aims to explore the reproductive ecology of C. ladanifer in their natural populations, specifically its ability to interact with other species of the genus. This knowledge is of interest in the current context of developing the potential of this species as a natural resource. Evidence exists of hybrid individuals appearing in natural areas where C. ladanifer coexists with other congeners (Demoly 1996; Demoly and Montserrat 1993). This could indicate an ability of C. ladanifer to pollinate and fertilize them. It is known that pollen transfer from one species to another can have genetic and demographic consequences for the recipient species (Allendorf et al. 2001; Rieseberg et al. 1989). One of them is genetic introgression, which can alter the genetic composition of native populations (Ellstrand 1992; Rhymer and Simberloff 1996). Another is the reduction of the reproductive capacity of the pollen recipient species, which can diminish its offspring and affect the maintenance of natural populations (Levin et al. 1996; Wolf et al. 2001). The demographic and genetic effects can cause ecosystem alterations by changing population dynamics (Todesco et al. 2016).

The objective of this study is to investigate the pollen dispersal pattern from C. ladanifer to C. laurifolius L. Specifically, it aims to answer the question of whether the pollen of the former species can be transferred its congener, and if so, to understand the dispersal pattern. To this end, pollen flow from C. ladanifer to C. laurifolius was investigated in a mixed natural population with individuals of both species to determine: 1) if there is a possibility of pollen dispersal from C. ladanifer to C. laurifolius; and 2) if applicable, whether the pollen dispersal pattern is related to the distance from the pollen-emitting plant. The main hypothesis of this work is that C. ladanifer and C. laurifolius share common pollinators, allowing these pollinators to transport C. ladanifer pollen to C. laurifolius plants. The interest in exploiting and cultivating C. ladanifer underscores the need to delve into the mechanisms of gene transfer between these species and its congeners.

Study species

Cistus ladanifer inhabits shrublands on siliceous or calcareous soils, within an altitudinal range of 0-1500 m.a.s.l., and is distributed across the Iberian Peninsula, France, and North Africa (Guzmán and Vargas 2009). Cistus laurifolius is typical of oak and holm oak forests on slopes and rocky, siliceous, and decalcified calcareous soils, ranging from 400–1900 m.a.s.l. Its distribution includes Greece, Turkey, Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, and Morocco (Astuti et al. 2017).

Both species are woody shrubs up to 2 m tall with clear morphological differences. Cistus ladanifer has reddish-brown stems and sessile, lanceolate leaves that are sticky due to the presence of labdanum. Cistus laurifolius has grayish stems and larger, ovate-lanceolate leaves with wavy margins and petioles (Demoly and Montserrat 1993). Cistus ladanifer presents solitary terminal flowers with short peduncles, while those of C. laurifolius are grouped in cymose, pubescent inflorescences of 1–9 flowers. The flowers of C. ladanifer have large petals (30–55 mm) and there are two color varieties: albiflorus (white petals) and maculatus (white petals with a reddish spot). The flowers of C. laurifolius are smaller and always white. Both species have numerous stamens and produce abundant pollen. Cistus ladanifer has a tomentose ovary with a large, sessile stigma, while C. laurifolius has a silky ovary with a pentagonal stigma. Cistus ladanifer blooms from March to June, and C. laurifolius from May to July, with partial overlap between the two species (Demoly and Montserrat 1993). Both taxa are xenogamous and require pollinators to produce seeds, primarily insects from the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera (Astuti et al. 2017; Talavera et al. 1993; Teixido and Valladares 2014). They produce lignified, globose capsule fruits with numerous seeds lacking long-distance dispersal structures (Demoly and Montserrat 1993).

Study site

Fieldwork was conducted between March and June 2023 in two locations situated in the Sierra de Guadarrama, northwest of the Community of Madrid (Spain): Miraflores (latitude: 40,752332º, longitude: -3,991522º; municipality: Miraflores de la Sierra, 1362–1389 m.a.s.l.), and La Barranca (latitude: 40,856541º, longitude: -3,743657º; municipality: Navacerrada, 1193–1204 m.a.s.l.) (Fig. 1). Both study sites contain mixed populations of Cistus ladanifer and C. laurifolius. Specimens of both species are often found in clusters of several plants, rarely isolated (Fig. 2). In preliminary observations before conducting the pollen analogue dispersal experiment (fluorescent dye) (described in the next section), C. x cyprius (= C. ladanifer x C. laurifolius) individuals were detected at the two study sites. In La Barranca and Miraflores, plants of both species appear in clearings, surrounded by sclerophyllous vegetation and bordered by deciduous forests or meadows, in sloping areas.

Pollen dispersal experiment using fluorescent dye

To study pollen dispersal from Cistus ladanifer to C. laurifolius within the period of floral synchrony of both species, periodic visits were made to the two study sites in 2023. These visits took place between March and May (every 15–20 days in March and April, and every 3–5 days in May). In Miraflores, the period of floral synchrony began the week of May 8, while in La Barranca it began the week of May 29. Between 5–8 days after, pollen flow from C. ladanifer plants to C. laurifolius plants was estimated by studying the dispersal of pollen analogues (fluorescent dye). This methodology has proven effective in estimating the distribution of dispersed pollen in natural populations and has been employed in numerous studies (Huais et al. 2022; Van Rossum and Triest 2010, 2012). For this experiment, the following steps were followed here and was repeated three times at each study site (Table 1): 1) application of pollen analogues (fluorescent dye) on C. ladanifer flowers; 2) collection of C. laurifolius flowers and observation of the stigmas under epi-fluorescence microscope.

Table 1

Study site and start date of the pollen analogue dispersal experiment (fluorescent powder) along with the geographic coordinates of the emission source and the number of treated flowers (*Cistus ladanifer*) and collected flowers (*C. laurifolius*) at the two study sites.
Study site	Date	Emission source (C. ladanifer)			Nº of sampled flowers (C. laurifolius)
Study site	Date	Latitude	Longitude	Nº of treated flowers with fluorescent dye	Nº of sampled flowers (C. laurifolius)
Miraflores	13/05/2023	40,752686º	-3,991242º	171	251
Miraflores	14/05/2023	40,751490º	-3,991065º	183	230
Miraflores	15/05/2023	40,752267º	-3,991051º	175	253
La Barranca	05/06/2023	40,856516º	-3,743815º	101	182
La Barranca	11/06/2023	40,856548º	-3,743675º	125	76
La Barranca	14/06/2023	40,856153º	-3,744032º	112	116
				Total = 867	Total = 1108

Fluorescent dye was applied to all flowers of one or two randomly selected C. ladanifer individuals (hereafter referred to as the emission source). Yellow fluorescent dye (Radiant Color Corp.) was chosen for the experiment. Before applying it, it was tested whether flowers treated with fluorescent dye attracted species from the main pollinator groups visiting the species. A previous study in the area recorded visits from five functional groups: bumblebees (Bombus spp.), solitary bees (Andrenidae, Colletidae, and Halictidae), honeybees (Apis mellifera), hover flies (Syrphidae), and beetles (Coleoptera) (Teixido and Valladares 2014). After confirming visits to the flowers by the mentioned pollinator groups, the fluorescent dye was applied using fine-tipped brushes (size 0–2) or wooden sticks with blunt tips on the flower anthers. The application of fluorescent dye was done on sunny days between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. (Fig. 3a). All selected C. ladanifer plants were georeferenced using a GPS (Garmin Etrex 32x).

After treating the C. ladanifer flowers with fluorescent dye, C. laurifolius plants (8–14 plants) with open flowers at different distances from the emission source were selected and marked. Random walks from the emission source were conducted for this purpose. The selected plants were representative of the spatial distribution at the study site and covered a wide range of distances from the emission source (8-167 m). Although the initial aim was to sample C. laurifolius plants up to 200 m from the emission source, limitations due to fencing or the absence of flowering plants reduced this distance. The geographic position of the selected plants was recorded using a GPS, and between 5 and 20 open flowers from each plant were tagged. These flowers were not treated to allow free pollination by insects. After one day (the observed lifespan of the flower at the study site), the flowers were collected and stored for 24–48 hours at 4°C. Subsequently, the stigma from each flower was separated, mounted on a slide, and observed under an epi-fluorescence microscope under UV light to check for the presence of fluorescent dye (200x) and to count the number of fluorescent dye particles (400x).

Data analysis

To investigate pollen flow from Cistus ladanifer to C. laurifolius within and between study sites, data on particle deposition (fluorescent dye) observed on the stigmas of C. laurifolius were used. For this purpose, deposition rate and deposition intensity were obtained. Deposition rate was the proportion of stigmas on each sampled plant that contained pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye). Deposition intensity was calculated as the average number of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) counted on the stigmas of the collected flowers from each plant. Finally, the deposition rate and intensity for each plant were associated with the distance (in meters) of the plant from the emission source, which was calculated using ArcGIS Pro (v. 3.0). These data were used to generate a dataset for each study site by combining all data obtained during the three days that the experiment was repeated at each study site. The minimum and maximum dispersal distances of pollen analogues (fluorescent dye) were obtained. The minimum dispersal distance was considered the distance of the C. laurifolius plant with pollen analogues found closest to the emission source, while the maximum dispersal distance was the distance of the C. laurifolius plant with pollen analogues found farthest from the emission source.

To estimate the general pattern of pollen dispersal, descriptive statistics and frequency histograms were obtained for the deposition rate and deposition intensity at each study site. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between populations in these parameters. To evaluate the relationship between deposition rate and intensity, a Spearman correlation analysis was performed. Finally, the deposition rate and intensity per plant at each study site were analyzed in relation to the distance of the plants to the emission source using a Generalized Linear Model. For the model, a binomial distribution and logit link function were used to analyze the deposition rate; and a Poisson distribution and log link function were used to evaluate the deposition intensity (Zuur et al. 2009). These analyses were performed using the Past4 software (version 1.0.6).

Additionally, the proportion of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) deposited on the stigmas of C. laurifolius plants in relation to their distance from the emission source was calculated. Each dataset was ordered by the distance variable (distance of each sampled C. laurifolius plant to the emission source, from the lowest to the highest observed distance). Then, an accumulated particle number was calculated using the average particle count value for each increasing distance. The accumulated number of particles at each observed distance was divided by the total number of particles (obtained by summing the average particle count value for each distance). This analysis allowed the determination of specific particle percentages (Huais et al. 2022) and served to determine the distances at which 50% (D50), 80% (D80), and 90% (D90) of the particles deposited on C. ladanifer flowers were observed at each study site.

To assess whether there was a spatial pattern of pollen analogue (fluorescent dye) dispersal, a Moran's I spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed for deposition rate and intensity using inverse Euclidean distance values (Bivand and Wong 2018). The analysis was conducted for each study site using the ArcGIS Pro (v. 3.0).

Overall, 90.27% of the sampled Cistus laurifolius plants had at least one stigma with pollen analogues (Fig. 3b). The percentage was higher in Miraflores de la Sierra (97.27%) than in La Barranca (78.57%). Table 2 shows the statistics for the deposition rate and deposition intensity of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) at the two study sites. Both the deposition rate and intensity were notably higher in Miraflores compared to La Barranca. In Miraflores, the average value for the deposition rate was 0.783 and for deposition intensity was 79.588, while in La Barranca, these values were 0.355 and 6.493, respectively. Lower variability, as reflected in the standard errors of both parameters in Miraflores, indicated greater consistency in the deposition measurements of pollen analogue particles at this site. Statistical analysis of these data revealed significant differences between the two sites for both measurements (deposition rate: Mann-Whitney U = 162.5, z = 5.270, P < 0.001; deposition intensity: Mann-Whitney U = 5.46, z = 5.460, P < 0.001).

Table 2

Mean (± standard error), median, range (minimum-maximum), and the number of sampled plants and flowers for the deposition rate and deposition intensity at the two study sites: Miraflores de la Sierra and La Barranca.
	Deposition rate		Deposition intensity
	Miraflores	La Barranca	Miraflores	La Barranca
Mean±s.e.	0.783±0.038	0.355±0.052	79.588±19.356	6.493±4.351
Median	0.875	0.375	18.185	0.874
Range (minimum-maximum)	0–1	0-0.889	0-498.384	0-122.611
Nº of sampled plants (C. laurifolius)	41	25	41	25
Nº of sampled flowers (C. laurifolius)	734	374	734	374

The comparison of frequency histograms for the deposition rate and deposition intensity highlighted differences between the populations (Fig. 4). In Miraflores, there was a higher frequency of plants with high deposition rates. Most observations were concentrated in deposition rates ranging from 0.5 to 1.0, with the highest number of observations in the 0.8 to 1.0 range. In contrast, in La Barranca, the distribution of values was more uniform, and low deposition rates were more frequent. Regarding deposition intensity, the frequency histogram in Miraflores showed that most deposition intensity values were concentrated in the 0 to 50 range, with few observations at higher intensities, while in La Barranca, most observations were also concentrated at low values, within the 0 to 10 range, with few observations at higher intensities.

A significant positive correlation between the deposition rate and deposition intensity was observed at both study sites, although higher in La Barranca (Miraflores: r_s = 0.701, P < 0.01; La Barranca: r_s = 0.920, P < 0.01), indicating that C. laurifolius plants with a higher deposition rate also showed a higher deposition intensity of pollen analogues (fluorescent dye).

The maximum and minimum dispersal distances of pollen analogues (fluorescent dye) detected at both study sites are shown in Table 3. In Miraflores, pollen analogues (fluorescent dye) were found on C. laurifolius plants situated at distances between 9.56 m and 144.91 m from the emission source. This range coincided with the distances of the nearest and farthest sampled plants from the emission source. In La Barranca, the nearest sampled individual to the emission source was at 8.60 m, but the minimum dispersal distance obtained was greater (19.84 m). In contrast, the maximum dispersal distance was similar to that of the farthest sampled plant from the emission source.

Table 3

Distance of sampled *Cistus laurifolius* plants from the *C. ladanifer* emission source, detected dispersal distance of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye), and D50, D80, and D90 values for the two study sites: Miraflores de la Sierra and La Barranca. The D50, D80, and D90 variables correspond to the distances at which 50%, 80%, and 90% of the accumulated pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) deposited on the stigmas of *C. laurifolius* were observed, respectively.
	Miraflores	La Barranca
Distance of the nearest sampled C. laurifolius plant to the emission source (m)	9.56	8.60
Minimum detected dispersal distance (m)	9.56	19.84
Distance of the farthest sampled C. laurifolius plant from the emission source (m)	144.91	166.22
Maximum detected dispersal distance (m)	144.91	165.41
D50 (m)	16.70	18.20
D80 (m)	51.00	56.00
D90 (m)	74.00	81.00

The analysis of the accumulated pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) in relation to the distance from the emission source is shown in Table 3. In Miraflores, the results showed that 50%, 80%, and 90% of the pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) deposited on the stigmas of C. laurifolius were concentrated, respectively, at distances up to 16.70 m (D50), 51.00 m (D80), and 74.00 m (D90). In La Barranca, these results were similar, with 50%, 80%, and 90% of the particles observed concentrated at distances up to 18.20 m (D50), 56.00 m (D80), and 81.00 m (D90) from the emission source.

The deposition intensity of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) on C. laurifolius plants was affected by the distance to the emission source of C. ladanifer at both Miraflores and La Barranca (Miraflores: G = 1635.1, P < 0.00001; La Barranca: G = 117.74, P < 0.00001) (Fig. 5). Conversely, statistical analysis did not support an effect of the distance to the emission source on the deposition rate of pollen analogue particles (fluorescent dye) at either study site (Miraflores: G = 1.5373, P = 0.2150; La Barranca: G = 0.6298, P = 0.4274).

Results from the Moran's I spatial autocorrelation analysis evidenced spatial patterns in both deposition rate and intensity at both study sites (Table 4). In both Miraflores and La Barranca, the deposition rate and intensity followed a spatial clustering pattern. This pattern was statistically significant in all cases except for the deposition rate in Miraflores, although the probability that the obtained spatial clustering pattern could be due to chance was less than 10%.

Table 4

Summary of the results of the Moran's I spatial autocorrelation analysis for deposition rate and deposition intensity at the two study sites: Miraflores de la Sierra and La Barranca.
	Deposition rate		Deposition intensity
	Miraflores	La Barranca	Miraflores	La Barranca
I	0.3060	0.3561	0.1625	0.1222
z	2.8458	2.7463	1.6595	4.5598
P	0.0044	0.0060	0.0970	0.0000

Pollen analog dispersal pattern

In the present study, pollen grain analogs of Cistus ladanifer were detected on the stigmas of C. laurifolius. This result evidences the capability of C. ladanifer to pollinate C. laurifolius. This ability can be attributed to the high morphological similarity of the flowers of C. laurifolius to those of C. ladanifer, which facilitates the attraction of the same species of insect pollinators. Both species present large, hermaphroditic flowers with white petals that produc significant amount of pollen and are visited by generalist pollinators of the orders Coleoptera, Diptera (mainly syrphids), and Hymenoptera (mainly Apis mellifera and solitary bees) (Astuti et al. 2015, 2017; Talavera et al. 1993).

The similarity of floral traits between species facilitates a greater degree of pollinator sharing (Bergamo et al. 2020; Fornoff et al. 2017), as they respond to similar sensory stimuli (Faegri and Van der Pijl 1979; Suárez-Mariño et al. 2022). Thus, when species within the same community bloom simultaneously, exhibit morphologically similar flowers, and share pollinators, cross-pollination between them is common (Fang et al. 2019; Johnson et al. 2019). Consequently, the ability of C. ladanifer to pollinate C. laurifolius was predictable, considering the reproductive biology and shared pollination ecology between both species.

Cistus ladanifer plants were able to pollinate C. laurifolius plants located at least 165 meters away. This distance is consistent with the distances measured in previous studies on pollen dispersal in entomophilous pollination systems, which also used fluorescent dye (Van Rossum et al. 2013). Moreover, in the two sites where the present study was conducted, the same dynamics of pollen analog dispersal were evidenced. This was characterized by a downward trend, meaning that C. laurifolius plants closest to the focal C. ladanifer plants received a greater amount of pollen analogs on their stigmas than those further away. Specifically, 80% of the pollen analogs found on the flowers of C. laurifolius were transferred from donor plants within a distance of less than 60 meters.

The pattern of pollen analog dispersal observed in this study is consistent with most research on pollen dispersal in entomophilous pollinated plants, which indicates that pollen dispersal follows a leptokurtic distribution, with the majority of pollen deposited near the source of emission (Kameyama et al. 2000; Tonsor 1985). This phenomenon is attributed to the propensity of pollinators to make short flights between adjacent plants (Klinger et al. 1992). The behavior and movements of pollinators result in the predominant deposition of their pollen load on the first individuals visited from the source (Cresswell et al. 1995; Morris et al. 1995).

Ecological and conservation implications

The transfer of pollen by pollinators from a species to a congener can have significant negative repercussions on the latter. Firstly, it can affect various stages of reproduction, such as conspecific pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and ovule fertilization, consequently reducing seed production (Ashman and Arceo-Gómez 2013; Ashman et al. 2020) and impacting population size. Secondly, pollen transfer can also result in spontaneous hybridization (Fan et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2019), which may lead to population and/or species extinction through genetic assimilation (Levin et al. 1996; Wolf et al. 2001) or the generation of highly invasive genotypes (Schierenbeck and Ellstrand 2009). Due to the potential negative consequences mentioned and given that this study has demonstrated the ability of C. ladanifer to pollinate C. laurifolius plants, future cultivation experiences of C. ladanifer should avoid affecting wild populations of C. laurifolius.

These findings provide a preliminary basis for proposing a series of practical preventive recommendations in case of the establishment of C. ladanifer crops. First, the cultivation of C. ladanifer should be prioritized in areas outside the distribution range of C. laurifolius. This recommendation is particularly important in Italy, where C. laurifolius is considered a threatened species that could be seriously impacted by the proximity of nearby C. ladanifer crops. Second, if cultivation is to be established within the distribution area, a minimum preventive separation distance from wild populations of C. laurifolius should be maintained. This distance should be assessed through a detailed study to measure the true pollen dispersal distance of C. ladanifer when the plants are under cultivation conditions. In these circumstances, there may be a variation in local pollinator assemblages (Alarcón et al. 2008), which could generate spatial and temporal variations in the movement rates between species by the pollinators (Fang et al. 2019), and consequently could affect the pollen dispersal distance.

This study on the pollen analog dispersal is one of the few attempts made so far (Van Rossum et al. 2013) to estimate pollen dispersal patterns between congeners in natural populations. Our findings demonstrate the potential of C. ladanifer plants to pollinate nearby C. laurifolius plants. Therefore, our results emphasize the importance of considering pollen dispersal experiments when establishing new cultivations of wild species within the distribution range of other congeners.

Acknowledgements We thank to Marta Huertas and Carlos Ruiz for technical advice. This study was supported by the proyects P2420260060, P2420260100 and P2420260156.

Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.

Alados CL, Navarro T, Cabezudo B (1999) Tolerance assessment of Cistus ladanifer to serpentine soils by developmental stability analysis. Plant Ecol 143:51–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1009841216449
Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796-1807. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16987.x
Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613-622. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X
Arrington JM, Kubitzki K (2003) Cistaceae. In: Kubitzki K (Ed.) Flowering Plants Dicotyledons: Capparales Malvales and Non-Betalain Caryophyllales (pp. 62-70). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-07255-4_15
Ashman TL, Arceo-Gómez G (2013) Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities. Am J Bot 100:1061-1070. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200496
Ashman TL, Arceo-Gómez G, Bennett JM, Knight TM (2020) Is heterospecific pollen receipt the missing link in understanding pollen limitation of plant reproduction? Am J Bot 107:845-847. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1477
Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D’Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): Demographic structure, reproductive success, and population genetics. Nat Conserv 22:169-190. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809
Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D’Antraccoli M, Gennai M, Villani M, Peruzzi L (2015) Schede per una Lista Rossa della Flora vascolare e crittogamica: Cistus laurifolius L. subsp. laurifolius. Infor Bot Ital 47:245-289.
Bergamo PJ, Streher NS, Wolowski M, Sazima M (2020) Pollinator-mediated facilitation is associated with floral abundance, trait similarity, and enhanced community-level fitness. J Ecol 108:1334-1346. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13348
Bivand R, Wong DWS (2018) Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST 27:716-748. doi: 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x
Correia O, Ascensão L (2017) Summer semi-deciduous species of the Mediterranean landscape: A winning strategy of Cistus species to face the predicted changes of the Mediterranean climate. In: Ansari AA, Gill SS, Abbas ZK, Naeem M (Eds.) Plant Biodiversity: Monitoring, Assessment and Conservation (pp. 195-217). CABI. doi: 10.1079/9781780646947.0000
Cresswell JE, Bassom AP, Bell SA, Collins SJ, Kelly TB (1995) Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oil-seed rape: A comparison of three models. Funct Ecol 9:829-841. doi: 10.2307/2389980
Demoly JP (1996) Les hybrides binaires rare du Genre Cistus L. (Cistaceae). An Jard Bot Madrid 54:241-254.
Demoly JP, Montserrat P (1993) Cistus. In: Castroviejo S et al. (Eds.) Flora Iberica (Vol. III pp. 319-337). Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid.
Ellstrand NC (1992) Gene flow by pollen: Implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77. doi: 10.2307/3545517
Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Fan Q, Chen S, Li M, Guo W, Jing H, Wu W, Zhou R, Liao W (2014) Molecular evidence for natural hybridization between wild loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) and its relative E. prinoides. BMC Plant Biol 14:275. doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0275-6
Fang Q, Gao J, Armbruster WS, Huang S-Q (2019) Multi-year stigmatic pollen-load sampling reveals temporal stability in interspecific pollination of flowers in a subalpine meadow. Oikos 128:1739-1747. doi: 10.1111/oik.06447
Fornoff F, Klein A-M, Hartig F, Benadi G, Venjakob C, Schaefer HM, Ebeling A (2017) Functional flower traits and their diversity drive pollinator visitation. Oikos 126:1020-1030. doi: 10.1111/oik.03869
Frazão DF, Martins-Gomes C, Díaz TS, Delgado F, Gonçalves JC, Silva AM (2024) Labdanum resin from Cistus ladanifer L. as a source of compounds with anti-diabetic, neuroprotective, and anti-proliferative activity. Molecules 29:2222. doi: 10.3390/molecules29102222
Guzmán B, Vargas P (2009) Long-distance colonization of the Western Mediterranean by Cistus ladanifer (Cistaceae) despite the absence of special dispersal mechanisms. J Biogeogr 36:954-968. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02040.x
Huais PY, Grilli G, Galetto L (2022) Forest connectivity boosts pollen flow among populations of the oil-producing Nierembergia linariifolia. Landscape Ecol 37:2435-2450. doi: 10.1007/s10980-022-01483-z
Johnson SD, Balducci MG, Bijl A, Castañeda-Zárate M, Cozien RJ, Ortmann CR, van Der Niet T (2020) From dusk till dawn: Camera traps reveal the diel patterns of flower feeding by hawkmoths. Ecol Entomol 45:751-755. doi: 10.1111/een.12827
Kameyama Y, Isagi Y, Naito K, Nakagoshi N (2000) Microsatellite analysis of pollen flow in Rhododendron metternichii var. hondoense. Ecol Res 15:263-269. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00347.x
Kidd PS, Díez J, Monterroso Martínez C (2004) Tolerance and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in five populations of Cistus ladanifer L. subsp. ladanifer. Plant Soil 258:189-205. doi: 10.1023/B.0000016550.49264.f3
Klinger T, Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1992) Crop-weed hybridization in radish (Raphanus sativus): Effects of distance and population size. Am J Bot 79:1431-1435. doi: 10.2307/2445143
Levin DA, Francisco-Ortega J, Jansen RK (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv Biol 10:10-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010010.x
Luna B, Piñas-Bonilla P, Zavala G, Pérez B (2022) Effects of light and temperature on seed germination of eight Cistus species. Seed Sci Res 32:86-93. doi: 10.1017/S0960258522000149
Mariotti JP, Tomi F, Casanova J, Costa J, Bernardini AF (1997) Composition of the essential oil of Cistus ladaniferus L. cultivated in Corsica (France). Flavour Fragr J 12:147-151.
Mediavilla I, Blázquez MA, Ruiz A, Esteban LS (2021) Influence of the storage of Cistus ladanifer L. bales from mechanised harvesting on the essential oil yield and qualitative composition. Molecules 26:2379. doi: 10.3390/molecules26082379
Morris WF, Mangel M, Adler FR (1995) Mechanisms of pollen deposition by insect pollinators. Evol Ecol 9(3):304-317. doi: 10.1007/BF01237776
Núñez-Olivera E, Martinez-Abaigar J, Escudero JC (1996) Adaptability of leaves of Cistus ladanifer to widely varying environmental conditions. Funct Ecol 10:636-646. doi: 10.2307/2390174
Papaefthimiou D, Papanikolaou A, Vasiliki F, Givanoudi S, Kostas S, Kanellis AK (2014) Genus Cistus: A model for exploring labdane-type diterpenes' biosynthesis and a natural source of high value products with biological, aromatic, and pharmacological properties. Front Chem 2:35. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00035
Pardo de Santayana M, Morales R, Tardío J, Molina M (Eds.) (2018) Inventario Español de los Conocimientos Tradicionales Relativos a la Biodiversidad. Fase II (1). Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
Raimundo JR, Frazão DF, Domingues JL, Quintela-Sabarís C, Dentinho TP, Anjos O, Alves M, Delgado F (2018) Neglected Mediterranean plant species are valuable resources: The example of Cistus ladanifer. Planta 248:1351-1364. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2997-4
Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83-109. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83
Rieseberg LH, Zona S, Aberbom L, Martin TD (1989) Hybridization in the Island endemic Catalina mahogany. Conserv Biol 3:52-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00224.x
Rossini-Oliva S, Mingorance MD, Monaci F, Valdés B (2016) Ecophysiological indicators of native Cistus ladanifer L. at Riotinto mine tailings (SW Spain) for assessing its potential use for rehabilitation. Ecol Eng 91:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.078
Schierenbeck KA, Ellstrand NC (2009) Hybridization and the evolution of invasiveness in plants and other organisms. Biol Invasions 11:1093-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10530-008-9388-x
Suárez-Mariño A, Arceo-Gómez G, Albor C, Parra-Tabla V (2022) Co-flowering modularity and floral trait similarity help explain temporal changes in plant-pollinator network structure. Plant Ecol 223:1289-1304. doi: 10.1007/s11258-022-01275-0
Talavera S, Gibbs PE, Herrera J (1993) Reproductive biology of Cistus ladanifer (Cistaceae). Plant Syst Evol 186:123-134. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2013.801369
Teixido AL, Valladares F (2014) Pollinator-mediated phenotypic selection does not always modulate flower size and number in the large-flowered Mediterranean shrub Cistus ladanifer (Cistaceae). Ann Bot 113:503-512. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1587-3
Todesco M, Pascual MA, Owens GL, Ostevik KL, Moyers BT, Hübner S, Heredia SM, Hahn MA, Caseys C, Bock DG, Rieseberg LH (2016) Hybridization and extinction. Evol Appl 9:892-908. doi: 10.1111/eva.12367
Tonsor SJ (1985) Leptokurtic pollen-flow, non-leptokurtic gene-flow in a wind-pollinated herb, Plantago lanceolata L. Oecologia 67:442-446. doi: 10.1007/BF00384953
Van Rossum F, Triest L (2010) Pollen dispersal in an insect-pollinated wet meadow herb along an urban river. Landscape Urban Plan 95:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.004
Van Rossum F, Triest L (2012) Stepping-stone populations in linear landscape elements increase pollen dispersal between urban forest fragments. Plant Ecol Evol 145:332-340. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2012.737
Van Rossum F, Vereecken NJ, Brédat E, Michez D (2013) Pollen dispersal and fruit production in Vaccinium oxycoccos and comparison with its sympatric congener V. uliginosum. Plant Biol 15:344-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00646.x
Wang X, Chen L, Ma J (2019) Genomic introgression through interspecific hybridization counteracts genetic bottleneck during soybean domestication. Genome Biol 20:22. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1631-5
Wolf DE, Takebayashi N, Rieseberg LH (2001) Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv Biol 15:1039-1053. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.0150041039.x

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Pollen dispersal pattern from the mediterranean shrub Cistus ladanifer L. to its congener C. laurifolius L.: ecological and conservation implications

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials y methods

Study species

Study site

Pollen dispersal experiment using fluorescent dye

Data analysis

Results

Discussion

Pollen analog dispersal pattern

Ecological and conservation implications

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1