To determine the best time and conditions for the synthesis of ZnNPs, after confirming the initial results related to the color change and the Tyndall effect, as well as the DLS test, several analytical tests were performed, and the data obtained related to the synthesis of ZnNPs by the hydroalcoholic extract of the lavender plant. It shows that the best concentration of synthesized NPs was determined to be 3 mM.
Amount of plant extract and the production of ZnNPs
To achieve optimal NPs in terms of diameter and particle size distribution, the optimal synthesis time for producing ZnNPs is determined. Determining this time is related to the amount of proteins produced and phenolic compounds in the plant and will play an influential role in the production of NPs.
The color change due to the Tyndall effect indicates the formation of colloidal particles and the synthesis of ZnNPs (Figure 1).
UV-Vis
UV-Vis spectrometer images of ZnNPs synthesized by the lavender plant, the obtained absorption curve shows the synthesis of ZnNPs.
The synthesis of ZnNPs is carried out in the UV-Vis spectroscopic spectrum at a wavelength of 300 to 400 nm, and the obtained curve shows the formation of NPs in the above range; it can be stated that ZnNPs (Figure 2) have been synthesized.
Evaluation of the production of ZnNPs
DLS
The hydrodynamic diameter size of synthesized NPs at pH=10 and with a final concentration of 3 mM of zinc salt in lavender plant extract was recorded as 50 nm (Figure 3). Also, the drawn peak shape shows the uniform dispersion of produced NPs. In addition, the dispersion index of NPs produced by plant extract was calculated as 0.308, and their Zeta-P was calculated as 1.72 mV.
FT-IR
Based on the analysis of the results obtained from the infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, the binding of different functional groups to the surface of NPs was proved (Figure 4). Although this type of spectrometry cannot provide a clear and precise structure of the conjugated compounds of ZnNPs, it can reveal the kinds of functional groups present in the sample.
Image analysis shows that Peaks 3424.92 and 2921.38 are respectively associated with O–H bonds and alcohol group, peaks 1580.19 are associated with N–H bonds or C=O of the amino group, peak 1407.73 are associated with C–H bonds and alkane group, and finally, peak 1026.63 are associated with C–N bonds. Like the rest of the peaks, the amino group indicates the presence of intermediary groups in the NPs composition. The presence of alcohol, amine, and alkane groups in the analysis confirmed the synthesis of NPs; also, the above links are used as practical tools in the synthesis of NPs to improve the stability, active compounds, and physicochemical properties of NPs and the existence of these groups. The test results show the quality and stability of the synthesized NPs.
Zeta potential (Zeta-P)
Zeta potential analysis is used to check the stability of particles (Figure 5). In zeta potential analysis, particles with zeta potential more positive than +30 mV or negative than -30 mV are usually considered stable. However, if the particle density is greater than the dispersant, even though they are dispersed, they will eventually settle and form a closed bed (i.e., a hard cake).
The data obtained from examining the zeta potential of ZnNPs synthesis showed that this particle has relative stability with a zeta potential of -27 mV.
Investigating the synthesis of ZnNPs using Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy determines the material's structure by using light radiation on the material, which is one of the most critical applications of this measurement to check the size of particles and the crystallization of NPs. The Raman spectrum describes matter using light scattering. The Raman spectrum of the ZnNPs (Figure 6) shows the size of the formed NPs, and in Table 1, the specifications of the ZnNPs, including the wavelength and size of the synthesized NPs, are given in the range of nanometers. According to the obtained graph of the Raman spectrum of ZnNPs synthesis, it is impossible to say in what range the largest amount of NPs is formed, but it can be said that the particles are formed in the range of 3 to 25 nm.
Table 1. Interpretation of the Raman graph of the synthesized ZnNPs
NPs size
|
wavelength
|
3.90
|
2113.7961
|
8.72
|
2559.0518
|
7.61
|
2413.1362
|
18.30
|
2600.7688
|
23.69
|
2774.0364
|
20.58
|
2678.0928
|
SEM and AFM
The SEM images of the produced ZnNPs show that the synthesis NPs were spherical, homogeneous, and of the same size (Figure 7). Also, particles can accumulate in some areas; however, the particles in the accumulated areas are separate, and the border between them is apparent. The presence of these boundaries in the range of particle accumulation indicates the favorable stability of NPs synthesized with masking agents. In addition, the AFM images also confirmed the SEM image and reported the size of the produced NPs below 100 nm (Figure 8).
In Figure 7, the formed NPs can be seen in different sizes between 10 and 50 nm, which proves that ZnNPs were synthesized by the lavender plant in the nanometer range.
AFM images related to the synthesis of ZnNPs (Figures 8-10) show the formation of NPs in the nanometer range in the lavender plant.
Based on the obtained results, it can be seen that the size of NPs calculated in SEM photography and dynamic light diffraction analysis (DLS) were not equal. The particles in the solution have a surface charge; in any case, they cover the surrounding particles. In addition, ions with the opposite charge can be seen on the surface of the particles. Therefore, the particle has two layers: one on the surface and the other around it. These outer and inner layers move along with the particle when the particle moves in the solution. Therefore, a hypothetical distance between the particle and the fluid medium can be imagined. This distance is called hydrodynamic distance, and it is known as zeta potential. Therefore, according to the zeta potential of the produced ZnNPs, it can be concluded that the electrostatic agent alone could not ensure the stability of the NPs. However, apart from repulsive and attractive forces, other effects are also involved in the stability of NPs. In this regard, we can mention the effect of steric hindrance 1 as one of the most important factors affecting the stability of NPs. This agent is formed by the absorption of polymer materials on the surface of NPs. The mentioned agent formed on the particle acts like a resistant barrier and prevents the particles from coming together and causing coagulation. Unlike electrostatic stability, which is seen in the range of zeta potential greater than +30 and less than -30, there is not much repulsive force in this case. When molecules come into contact, the particles are exposed to the attraction force. This is even though the electrostatic repulsion force typically repels them from each other.
Therefore, according to the observations, a combined state resulting from electrostatic repulsion and steric hindrance has been created in the produced ZnNPs. Hence, the difference in the average size of the particles reported in the SEM images compared to the zeta size of each plant extract was related to the difference caused by the hydrodynamic diameter of the NPs. The actual diameter of the NPs has been displayed in the presence of the dynamic diameter. Based on this figure, electron imaging has calculated the actual diameter of NPs, and dynamic light diffraction analysis has reported the diameter of NPs along with the bio-stabilizing factors attached to NPs.
XRD
The spectrum of energy distribution of synthesized ZnNPs is also shown in SEM and AFM images (Figures 7-10). Also, this figure shows the peak related to the Zinc element.
ZnNPs, due to their surface plasmon resonance properties, have a distinct optical absorption peak in the range of 2.2 keV, and the formation of a peak in this range indicates the formation of NPs. The peaks formed in Figure 11 indicate the formation of ZnNPs.
Cytotoxicity of ZnNPs
The cytotoxic effect of NPs (A2) on the proliferation of HT 29, MCF7, MCF10a, and HGF cells was evaluated using the MTT method. These cells were treated with six different concentrations of NPs (50, 100, 150, 250, and 300 µg/ml) for 24, 48 and 72 hours.
Considering that in 24 hours, the drugs did not have enough time to affect the cells, and in 72 hours, due to the consumption of the culture medium by the cells, the obtained data could not be relied upon, here Only the results of the test are reported within 48 hours.
As shown in Figure 12, A2 inhibits the growth of different cells in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner. By examining the results of the MTT test, it was observed that with the increase in the concentration of NPs and with the rise in the treatment time, the survival percentage of cancer cells has decreased significantly compared to the control. IC50 values calculated from dose-response curves in different cell lines are shown in Figures 12-15.
In Table 2, the IC50 value in the examined cell lines during the use of A2, C2, and Cisplatin after 48 hours is given in order.
Table 2. IC50 value in the examined cell lines during the use of A2, C2, and Cisplatin after 48 hours is given in order
IC 50 (µg/ml)
|
Cell line
|
140.2
|
A2
|
HGF
|
155.2
|
C2
|
76.38
|
Cisplatin
|
65.42
|
A2
|
HT29
|
94.68
|
C2
|
155.2
|
Cisplatin
|
54.65
|
A2
|
MCF 7
|
168.9
|
C2
|
65.19
|
Cisplatin
|
100.1
|
A2
|
MCF 10a
|
132.8
|
C2
|
55.48
|
Cisplatin
|
By examining the results of the MTT test, it was observed that the effect of A2 NPs on normal cells is much lower than on cancer cells. A2 NPs had significant cytotoxic effects in most tested concentrations in human breast cancer (MCF7) and human colon cancer (HT29) cells and inhibited the growth of cancer cells. Normal human gingival fibroblasts (HGF) and healthy breast cells (MCF10a) showed more resistance to NPs than human breast and colon cancer cells. As a result, the above NPs can find many biomedical applications with therapeutic importance to deal with breast and colon cancer.