Malaria, a vector borne and a climate sensitive disease, is still a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. By 2022, an estimated 249 million malaria cases in 85 malaria endemic countries were recorded globally, with over 233 million cases (94%) documented in the WHO African Region[1]. It is further revealed that in 2022, the WHO African Region accounted for about 95.4% of deaths globally and approximately 78.1% of all deaths in this region, were among children aged under 5 years. The African countries which accounted for almost half of all malaria cases globally, include Nigeria (27%), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (12%), Uganda (5%) and Mozambique (4%). Although Uganda accounts for 5% of the 249 million global malaria cases[1], it is also a leading host country for refugees in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), accommodating over 1.7 million refugees, of which 57% are children[2]. The refugees in Uganda come from various neighboring countries in East Africa and the Great Lakes region, primarily due to political instability, persecution, ethnic tensions, human rights abuses, and calamities.
By 2023, South Sudan made up the largest refugee population in Uganda (57%), followed by the Democratic Republic of Congo (D.R. Congo) (31%), while other refugees constituting 12% came from Somalia, Rwanda, Burundi, and Sudan[2]. Most of the refugees (92%) live in settlement camps, while 8% live in Kampala, the capital city of Uganda. Refugee settlements in Uganda are associated with overcrowding, inadequate and temporary shelters, limited vector control efforts, and poor access to water and sanitation which enable rapid malaria spread[3]. This situation makes children in refugee settlements vulnerable to malaria infections. A recent study conducted across nine refugee settlements in Uganda utilizing the 2018–2019 Malaria Indicator Survey (UMIS) dataset, indicates that malaria prevalence among children under five years is 32.8%.[3] and this constitutes an emerging challenge for humanitarian response which requires urgent attention.
The malaria burden in endemic countries is further being amplified by climate change. The individual and complex interacting effects of temperature, rainfall and humidity have been shown to expand the geographical limit of malaria, increase transmission intensity, reintroduce malaria in areas where malaria was eliminated recently, enhance larval development, mosquito survival, human biting rate and parasite development rate among others[1, 4, 5]. There is increasing evidence that refugee settlements in Uganda are highly exposed to extreme weather conditions, particularly high temperatures, extreme and erratic precipitation [6]. This high level of exposure in combination with their limited abilities to cope and adapt to climate change has heightened malaria risks in these already marginalized populations. Children in refugee settlements are already experiencing multiple life threatening risk including high rates of malnutrition, public health emergencies such, measles, cholera, typhoid fever, and hepatitis. Since the refugee population is steadily increasing in Uganda, malaria prevention among children must be given urgent attention to reduce any potential malaria humanitarian crisis.
The use of insecticide treated nets (ITNs) is one of the most effective ways to prevent malaria transmission and has proven to show significant reduction in malaria morbidity and mortality across a range of transmission settings in Africa [7–9]. By 2022, a total of 254 million ITNs were distributed in all malaria endemic countries with about 235 million (93%) distributed in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)[1]. Half of the ITNs distributed to SSA were received by six countries which include the Democratic Republic of the Congo (33.6 million), Nigeria (28.4 million), Ethiopia (21.4 million), Sudan (18.9 million), Uganda (13.8 million) and Mali (12.5 million)[1].The Government of Uganda adopted the policy of mass distribution of ITNs as one of the significant interventions for malaria prevention. Three mass campaigns across Uganda including refugee settlements, have already been implemented in 2013–2014, 2017–2018, and 2020–2021[10]. On arrival, the refugees are given free ITNs by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugee (UNHCR) in collaboration with Uganda’s Malaria Control Division of the Ministry of Health. Since 2023, over, 1.1 million ITNs have successfully been distributed to refugees[11]. This effort has further led to free distribution of ITNs in homes, health centres, antenatal clinics and children’s clinics to promote access and increase utilization among refugees and the general population. ITNs have the ability to kill or repel mosquitoes which feed and rest indoors as well as preventing night mosquito bites.
Despite this high level of investment in ITN distribution in SSA, incidences of malaria infections and associated deaths have continued to be a significant development challenge among vulnerable populations in SSA[12]. Two recent studies conducted on refugee settlements of Uganda based on the 2018–2019 MIS data [3, 13] identified various malaria risk factors including (1) age of child; (2) roof materials (i.e., thatch roofs); (3) wall materials (i.e., poles with mud and thatch walls); (4) lack of insecticide-treated nets; (5) type of toilet facility used (i.e., no toilet facility, (6) distance to water sources, limited knowledge on the causes and prevention of malaria, mother’s level of education among others. It should be noted the utilisation of ITNs in any community is influenced by varied individual, household, and community-level factors that probably have not been adequately considered during the distribution of ITNs. Studies have shown that the key determinants of ITN utilization in SSA include hot weather, absence of visible mosquitoes, poor attitude to use ITNs, lack of ownership of ITN, negligence among households, suffocation caused by ITNs, and unpleasant odor associated with ITNs among others [12]. In Uganda, the factors influencing the use of ITNs include: access to ITNs, age of household head, sex of household head, number of sleeping rooms, wealth, malaria prevalence, mother’s level of education, mother’s knowledge of malaria transmission, residence, and region [14–16].
Although these, and recent studies provide valuable insights on the factors influencing the utilization of ITN, they provide no evidence on the determinants of ITN usage in refugee settlements of Uganda, yet context specific behavioral and social cultural information are key in understanding the interactions that propel the utilization of ITNs within these unique local dynamic settings. Given the fact that malaria remains a significant health threat in refugee settlements, where resources are often limited and vulnerable populations face heightened risks, exploring ITN utilization among children under five years is essential. In refugee settings, where access to healthcare services may be constrained and living conditions can exacerbate the risk of malaria transmission, the effective use of ITNs can be a life-saving intervention. It should also be noted that refugee populations in Uganda are structurally disadvantaged which could potentially influence their access to ITN and their utilisation. Additionally, the diverse social, cultural, and economic backgrounds of refugee populations can influence perceptions, beliefs, and practices related to malaria prevention, including ITN usage. Studying ITN utilization among children under five in refugee settlements provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of interventions and helps identify barriers to ITN utilization specific to this vulnerable group. By understanding these barriers and tailoring interventions to address them, we can improve ITN coverage and compliance among children in refugee settings, ultimately reducing the burden of malaria and improving health outcomes within these populations. Specifically, this study aimed to analyse the individual and household level factors are associated with ITNs utilization among children under five in refugee settlement of Uganda.
This study has contributions to the growing body of literature on malaria and has some policy implications. This is the first study to concentrate on the utilization of ITN in refugee settlements of Uganda based on nationally representative datasets. Studying the factors that determine ITN utilisation in these unique communities characterized by overcrowding, inadequate and temporary shelters, limited vector control efforts and being occupied by people from diverse socio-economic and cultural backgrounds, can lead to a better understanding of the actions that can increase ITN use in these settings. Well informed targeted actions will make it possible to improve the fight against malaria, which is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in these refugee settlements. The results of this study will provide important answers on ITN usage, and will inform decisions on ITN distribution, access and utilisation campaigns, the development of ITN replacement strategies, and the development and deployment of tools that include behavior change communication activities. The results of this study will further form a basis on assessing the kinds of behavior change strategies that might provide health co-benefits of ITN utilisation in refugee settlements.