Study Participants characteristics
Between June 2021 and November 2021, 89 HCPs participated in the survey. The median age of the participants was 35 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29- to 45), and 62% of them were female. The majority of the HCPs were nurses (37%) or clinical officers (27%), with a median clinical practice duration of 9 years (IQR, 5–16).(Table 3).
Table 3
Key characteristics of HCPs participating in the formative study at selected HIV clinics in Kampala and Wakiso districts.
Variable | n(%) | p-value |
| Overall (n = 89) | Kampala (n = 45) | Wakiso (n = 44) | |
Sex | | | | |
Female | 54 (61.8) | 22 (48.9) | 33 (75) | 0.01 |
Male | 34 (38.2) | 23 (51.1) | 11 (25) | |
Median age (IQR)a | 35 (29, 45) | 35 (30, 45) | 34.5 (28, 43) | 0.43 |
Profession | | | | |
Medical Doctor | 12 (13.5) | 11 (24.4) | 1 (2.3) | 0.02 |
Nurse | 33 (37.1) | 13 (28.9) | 20 (45.5) | |
Clinical officer | 24 (27) | 10 (22.2) | 14 (31.8) | |
HIV counsellor | 7 (7.9) | 3(6.7) | 4 (9.1) | |
Other* | 13 (14.6) | 8 (17.8) | 5(11.4) | |
Years of clinical practice (IQR)a | 9 (5, 16) | 10 (5, 17) | 8.5 (5, 15.5) | 0.35 |
aWilcoxon rank sum test, Categorical variables – χ2 *Other include; laboratory technicians(7) pharmacy technicians(3), nurse assistants (3) | |
Among forty HCPs who took part in the KII, the median age was 35 (range 29.5–43.5), with 23 (58%) being female. The median years of practice were 10 (interquartile range 5–17).
Knowledge about risk factors for HTN, diagnosis, treatment, and complications
The study showed that most HCPs had not received training on HTN care, with 60.7% stating that they had never received any training throughout their careers. Only 20% of clinics had received relevant training in HTN in the past two years. Despite this, 64% of HCPs reported using guidelines for HTN care, with the Uganda Clinical guidelines being the most commonly used reference. However, only 44.9% and 60.7% of HCPs correctly identified the diagnostic thresholds for HTN (140 mmHg systolic and 90 mmHg diastolic), while 76% and 48% correctly identified the control targets (< 140 mmHg systolic and < 90 mmHg diastolic) for adults being treated for HTN (Table 4).
Table 4
HCP knowledge about HTN diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and complications
Variable | n(%) | p value |
Variable | Overall (n = 89) | Kampala (n = 45) | Wakiso (n = 44) | |
HCP refers to HTN guidelines | 57 (64) | 26 (57.8) | 31 (70.5) | 0.21 |
Guidelines used (n = 57) | | | | |
Uganda clinical guidelines (UCG) | 37 (64.9) | 13 (50) | 24(77.4) | 0.01 |
Consolidated HIV guidelines | 10 (17.5) | 5 (19.2) | 5 (16.1) | |
Others | 6 (10.5) | 6 (23.1) | 0 | |
Do not know | 4 (7.1) | 2 (7.7) | 2 (6.5) | |
HTN training outside formal medical training | | | | |
Received no training | 54 (60.7) | 26 (57.8) | 28 (63.6) | 0.44 |
Within the last 12 months | 17 (19.1) | 10 (22.2) | 7 (15.9) | |
Between 1 and 2 years | 7 (7.9) | 3 (6.7) | 4 (9.1) | |
Between 2–5 years | 9 (10.1) | 6 (13.3) | 3(6.8) | |
Over 5 years | 2 (1.3) | 0 | 2 (4.5) | |
Knows SBP Cut off for diagnosis of HTN | | | | |
140 mmHg | 40 (44.9) | 22 (48.9) | 18 (40.9) | 0.44 |
Do not know | 49 (55.1) | 23 (51.1) | 26 (59.1) | |
Knows DBP Cut off for diagnosis of HTN | | | | |
90 mmHg | 54 (60.7) | 29 (64.4) | 25 (56.8) | 0.46 |
Do not know | 35 (39.3) | 16 (35.6) | 19 (43.2) | |
Knows SBP goal in most adult clients | | | | |
< 140 mmHg | 68 (76.4) | 34 (75.6) | 34 (77.3) | 0.84 |
Does not know | 21 (23.6) | 11 (24.4) | 10 (22.7) | |
Knows DBP goal in most adult clients | | | | |
< 90 mmHg | 43 (48.3) | 23 (51.1) | 20 (45.5) | 0.59 |
Does not know | 46 (48.3) | 22 (48.9) | 24 (54.5 | |
Knows circumstances when a lower BP goal is desired | | | | |
Yes | 58 (65.2) | 35 (77.8) | 23 (52.3) | 0.012 |
Conditions with lower BP goal (n = 58) | | | | |
Diabetes | 17 (29.3) | 9 (20) | 8 (18.2) | 0.478 |
Ischemic heart disease | 10 (17.2) | 4 (8.9) | 6 (13.6) | 0.798 |
Chronic kidney disease | 10 (17.2) | 8 (17.8) | 2 (4.5) | 0.048 |
Prior heart attack | 13 (22.4) | 7 (13.6) | 6 (15.6) | 0.798 |
Cardiovascular risk > 20% | 8 (13.8) | 5 (11.1) | 3 (6.8) | 0.479 |
Prior stroke | 11 (19) | 5 (11.1) | 6 (13.6) | 0.717 |
Stoppage of medication if BP is controlled | | | | |
Yes | 14 (15.7) | 8 (13.6) | 8 (17.8) | 0.592 |
Risk factors for HTN | | | | |
Genetics/ family related | 65 (73) | 31 (68.9) | 34 (77.3) | 0.373 |
Eating excessive salt | 25 (28.1) | 8 (17.8) | 17 (38.6) | 0.029 |
Excessive consumption of alcohol | 41 (46.1) | 24 (53.3) | 17 (38.6) | 0.164 |
Physical inactivity | 52 (58.4) | 29 (64.4) | 23 (52.3) | 0.244 |
Obesity /overweight | 46 (51.7) | 25 (55.6) | 21 (47.7) | 0.460 |
HCP Knowledge of hypertension diagnosis and treatment.
HCPs reported that they had insufficient knowledge about the care and treatment of HTN. They believed that receiving in-service training on HTN would be beneficial for them to provide optimal HTN care. HCPs also mentioned that their current practices in HTN care were based on what they had learned during pre-graduation medical training. As a result, they relied on this knowledge to make clinical decisions regarding HTN care.
“For most of us [HCP], the knowledge we are using to manage HTN is what we acquired during our medical training. We receive mentorship and refresher training on other disease conditions but we have never received one on HTN care.” (Nurse, Clinic H)
“We need some kind of training to address the knowledge gaps that we have. I’m very sure the knowledge gaps are quite many because we are clinicians of different training backgrounds, with different experiences and we are all interacting with these clients independently without being supervised and there’s no clear guideline addressing HTN as a whole”( HIV clinic head, Clinic A)
BP measurement, HTN treatment and monitoring practices
Most of the HCPs reported that they would synchronize HIV and HTN clinic visits, only 64% provided both HIV-HTN care within the HIV clinics and only 42% attended to HTN clients on most days of the week (Table 5).
Table 5
HCPs’ practices regarding HTN treatment, monitoring and complications.
Variable | n(%) | p value |
| Overall (n = 89) | Kampala (n = 45) | Wakiso (n = 44) | |
Frequency of managing HTN | | | | |
Most of the days | 37 (41.6) | 18 (40) | 19 (43.2) | 0.66 |
At least weekly | 31 (34.8) | 16 (35.6) | 15 (34.1) | |
At least monthly | 4 (4.5) | 1 (2.2) | 3 (6.8) | |
Less than monthly | 17 (19.1) | 10 (22.2) | 7 (15.9) | |
Management of HIV-HTN comorbidities | | | | |
Provide HIV clinical assessment only | 3 (3.4) | 0 | 3 (6.8) | 0.1 |
Provide clinical assessment for HIV and HTN | 57 (64) | 30 (66.7) | 27 (61.4) | |
Provide care for HIV and refer to HTN clinic | 16 (18) | 6 (13.3) | 10 (22.7) | |
Provide HIV care and refer to another facility | 6 (6.7) | 3 (6.7) | 3 (6.8) | |
Others* | 7 (7.9) | 6 (13.3) | 1 (2.3) | |
Synchronization of HIV and HTN clinic visits | | | | |
No | 27 (30.3) | 9 (20) | 18 (40.9) | |
Yes | 61 (68.5) | 35 (77.8) | 26 (59.1) | 0.07 |
HCPs responsible for BP measurement | | | | |
Doctor | 43 (48.3) | 30 (66.7) | 13 (29.5) | < 0.01 |
Nurse | 69 (77.5) | 33 (73.3) | 36 (81.8) | 0.34 |
Clinical officer | 68 (76.4) | 32 (71.1) | 36 (81.8) | 0.23 |
HIV counsellors | 17 (19.1) | 5 (11.1) | 12 (27.3) | 0.05 |
Other** | 27 (30.3) | 19 (42.2) | 8 (18.2) | 0.01 |
*Others client education and lifestyle counselling, referral for further management and encouraging self-monitoring ** Expert clients, peer educators, pharmacy technicians. |
BP measurement and monitoring
More than a third of the available BP machines at these health facilities were non-functional (Fig. 1).
Figure 1: Availability of BP monitoring devices at the selected HIV clinics in the Kampala and Wakiso districts
HCPs reported inconsistent practices related to BP measurement and these varied across the 10 HIV clinics. For example, in public health facility-based HIV clinics, HCPs mentioned that not all clients had a BP measurement taken during clinic visits. Instead, measurements were selectively performed for individuals who self-advocated, presented with symptoms suggestive of HTN (such as headache, swollen feet, chest pain), or were otherwise deemed by HCPs to be at high risk. Additionally, HCPs reported that BP measurements were mostly taken on less busy clinic days and were often not done when the clinics were busier.
“We measure BP, especially for elderly clients and others who also have symptoms [suggestive of HTN], you have to go ahead and take their BP” (Clinical officer, Clinic I )
“If a client complains about some of the signs and symptoms like persistent headache, palpitations abnormal tiredness that is when the BP is taken. If someone doesn’t complain given that the clinic has long queues, we do not usually go the extra mile to take BP. [We] do not usually screen everyone… (Nurse, Clinic G )
HCPs mentioned lack of BP devices and batteries as barriers to BP screening for all clients attending a given clinic. One HCP noted that he often uses his personal BP device in the clinic.
“The first challenge is lack of equipment such as BP machines because I personally use mine [BP machine] and not for the clinic - my personal one. So that is one of the most challenges we have faced” (Clinical officer, Clinic F)
“The triage area could be missing the BP machines, if the BP machines are available, the batteries are not available…” (Clinical Officer, Clinic F)
Availability of anti-hypertensive medication
Thiazides (typically bendroflumethiazide) and calcium channel blockers (typically nifedipine) tended to be more available at the HIV clinics compared to other medication classes (Table 6). Nine out of 10 clinics did not have any medication in the class of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).
Table 6
Anti-hypertensive medication availability at selected HIV clinics
| Some medications within the medication class are always available | At least one medication within the class is always available, but not always the same medication | At least one medication within the medication class is sometimes available | No medications in the medication class are available at all | Stockout in the medication class in the last 3 months |
Thiazide diuretic | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
CCB | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Beta-blocker | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
ACEIs | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
ARB | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
Other medications | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
CCB – Calcium channel blocker, ACEIs -Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB- Angiotensin receptor blockers, Other medications include methyldopa and hydralazine |
HCPs at public HIV clinics reported frequent stock out and unavailability of anti-hypertensive medications. PLHIV with HTN received a prescription for HTN medications and were referred for refills to either other clinic points within the same health facility or encouraged to purchase medications at private pharmacies or clinics. HCPs at PNFP at HIV clinics reported that anti-hypertensive medications were available at the main hospital pharmacies, but clients could only access them at a cost.
“The HIV clinic does not have anti-hypertensive medications…. when anti-hypertensive treatment is prescribed, clients have to pay for it at the main pharmacy within the hospital or purchase them from a private facility” (Clinical Officer, Clinic I)
“Some of the medications are not available here and these clients don’t have money to buy them. So you find they can spend some time when they are off HTN treatment and by the time they come back, their BP is high” (Nurse, Clinic A)
Prioritization of HTN care in HIV clinics
Most HCPs mentioned that HTN care were deemed of lower priority compared to other services provided in the clinic. Consequently, HTN services received less attention, as they were not a core component of the HIV care package. Furthermore, HCPs highlighted the lack of support received from the MoH to facilitate the integration of HIV and HTN services, as elucidated in the following excerpts:
I would say priority for HTN care was low in the HIV program overall. The Uganda MoH guidelines encourage [HIV-HTN] integration, however, no practical support is given to clinics to integrate HTN care.(Medical officer, Clinic E )
And even when you’re reporting, no one is even interested. You’re not even putting it in the report, you’re not, no one is interested in knowing, how many high blood pressure clients do you have in the clinic, how many received treatment, you know, whereas other things we actually report on them very specifically but here it’s like said in passing. (Medical officer, Clinic C)
Perceived benefits of integrated HIV -HTN care
HCPs believed that provision of integrated HTN-HIV would address several challenges experienced in the HIV clinics including improving HCP knowledge on the management of HTN and their ability to provide holistic care to clients. Additionally, they believed clients would greatly benefit from integrated HIV-HTN care through reduced clinic visit-associated travel costs and would receive holistic care by the same HCP as shown below.
“The clients will be able to receive one service at the same place without having to be referred to other departments like general out-patient to get their medications or see a clinician. [HIV-HTN] Integration is good because the client gets holistic services and it also reduces transport costs. When somebody comes for HIV and then you give another appointment for HTN, it increases the burden” (Clinical Officer, Clinic K)
“We will benefit in that our clients will be managed well and will also be able when we get knowledge to manage it [HTN] will make it easier for us to work on our clients” (Clinical officer, Clinic K)
Similarly, reduction of time clients often spend at facilities was perceived to be an anticipated benefit under the integrated HIV-HTN service approach. A HCP describes how integration of HTN and HIV services may redeem client time.
[HIV -HTN ]Integration is good because it will reduce on the time that a client spends at the facility. So when someone is screened and is found to be hypertensive, he is managed in the same clinic without the need to refer them to another service point within the health facility (Nurse, Clinic K)
“I believe it is very important for us to integrate these services into the HIV setting so that we can save on clients’ time and even not frustrate them because when they go to many different service points, the clients get frustrated. I think [HIV-HTN] integration is very important and it's worth trying” (Clinical Officer, Clinic C)
A nurse explained how client management is expected to improve when clients are equipped with knowledge on how to manage HTN and how this could make HCPs’ work easier as expressed in the excerpt below.
Our clients will be managed well and will also be able when we get knowledge to manage [HTN], it will make it easier for us to work on our clients (Nurse, Clinic K)
“ [HIV-HTN] integration is good because the client gets holistic services and it also reduces transport costs. When somebody comes for HIV and then you give another appointment for HTN, it increases the burden of coming back. So this [HIV-HTN] integration will reduce the costs of the client to keep moving up and down. (Clinical Officer, Clinic D)
Perceived barriers to integrated HIV-HTN care
From quantitative data, insufficient training on HTN care and treatment, inadequate number of functional BP devices, inconsistent supply of anti-hypertensive medications as well as perception that PLHIV could not afford HTN treatment were identified as major impediments to the integration of HIV and HTN. Despite these challenges, HCP noted that HTN care in HIV settings is important and did not believe that it would result in an excessive workload (Fig. 2). Table 7: summarizes the different barriers and facilitators to integrated HIV-HTN care.
Table 7
Mapping barriers to and facilitators of integrated HIV-HTN care using the CFIR framework
| Description | Barriers (B)/ facilitators (F) |
Outer Setting Domain |
B. Local | Sociocultural values (e.g., shared responsibility in helping recipients) and beliefs (e.g., convictions about the worthiness of recipients) encourage the Outer Setting to support implementation and/or delivery of the innovation. | Desire to provide holistic and patient-centred care (F) Perceived belief that integrated HIV-HTN care will reduce client waiting time and reduce transportation costs incurred during multiple and fragmented appointments (F) |
C. Local conditions | Economic, environmental, political, and/or technological conditions enable the Outer Setting to support implementation and/or delivery of the innovation. | Inadequate technical support from the policy and program officials regarding the integration of HIV-HTN in primary healthcare clinics (B). Low priority is given to hypertension care by the HIV program implementing partners and programs (B) |
D. Partnerships and connections | The Inner Setting is networked with external entities, including referral networks, academic affiliations, and professional organization networks. | No clear and streamlined referral patterns for clients with hypertension (B). No clear guidelines for blood pressure measurement at the clinics (B). |
G3. Performance-Measurement Pressure | Quality or benchmarking metrics or established service goals drive implementation and/or delivery of the innovation. | No clear metrics for monitoring the integration of HIV-HTN care (B) Existing monitoring and evaluation reports for HIV programs do not include NCD care (B) |
Inner Setting Domain |
A2. Information Technology Infrastructure | Technological systems for tele-communication, electronic documentation, and data storage, management, reporting, and analysis support functional performance of the Inner Setting. | HTN care metrics are not included in the available registries and other source documents (B). Existing electronic systems do not capture hypertension-related indicators |
E. Tension for Change | The current situation is intolerable and needs to change. | Desire to provide patient-centred care (F) |
E3. Materials & Equipment | Supplies are available to implement and deliver the innovation. | Unavailability of antihypertensive medications (B). Inadequate BP monitoring devices (B) |
K. Access to Knowledge & Information | Guidance and/or training is accessible to implement and deliver the innovation. | Unavailability of standardized and easy-to-use protocol for HTN treatment (B). Low knowledge about hypertension care among healthcare providers (B) Inadequate training on hypertension care for healthcare providers involved in HIV care (B) |
Figure 3: Perceived barriers to HTN screening, treatment, and monitoring among HCPs
HCPs reported that perceived benefits outweighed perceived barriers to successful integrated HIV-HTN care. An anticipated increased workload and added responsibility were identified as a key potential barrier to implementing integrated HTN-HIV services, however, HCPs believed they would be able to manage the integrated activities.
“Of course, the [HIV-HTN] integration will be good although it may cost us time. It is going to affect our time to attend to the client - what we call the turnaround time. The duration of time you take to attend to one client will be affected but I think that can be silent. For HIV, there are things you are supposed to do for the client and HTN should be one of them. I think we can still integrate those [HIV-HTN] services. But the turnaround time for seeing one client will be increased” (H13009, Senior Nurse, Clinic C)
It [HIV-HTN integration] also reduces on workload for the staff because HTN cases will be managed at one place….” (Clinical Officer, Clinic D)
Policy and decision makers’ perspectives on HTN integration into HIV services
Policymakers at the MoH and healthcare managers from the two districts shared their perceptions regarding current HTN practices and their views on the integration of HIV and HTN care. They pointed out the need for training and capacity building of HCPs on HTN if successful integration of these services is to be realised.
“The critical gaps that need to be addressed are the capacity building of the HCPs themselves (20003, Policy Maker, MOH)
Alignment of integrated HIV-HTN care with differentiated service delivery models was highlighted as a key consideration to allow for dispensing of anti-hypertensive medications to clients who typically accessed their ART medications in a differentiated manner. This would facilitate the development of a one-stop shop where clients would receive both ART and anti-hypertensive medications an integrated manner. This was highlighted especially for public HIV clinics within the KCCA jurisdiction.
“I request that if this project [HTN-HIV integration] is to come in, we need extra support. For example, if someone is on anti-hypertensives and we need to go into the community to look for them even if it is not their clinic day, this differentiated model should be included in this project.” (HIV Program lead, Clinic I)
The practice of multi-month dispensing of anti-hypertensive medications, which is already done for ART, was also seen as a crucial factor that could influence the successful integration of HIV and hypertension care. There was a perception among some policy and decision-makers that BP monitoring for PLHIV with HTN would require more frequent visits to the health facility.
“My view is that the health practice is inadequate because if you look at the provision of HIV or ART services especially for those clients getting their refills, quantities that may last them 2–3 months which is too much of a time for someone who is on hypertensive care and need regular frequent monitoring to assess whether the medications are working or not. So due to the large number of client s in the ART clinic it is difficult to change the schedule. The best that can be done currently is to advise the ART HCP to follow-up on their clients in the clinic or the general out- patients’ clinic. So the schedule cannot allow us to reschedule the number of the outpatient clients to the regular routine for more frequent follow up” (Policy maker, MOH)
Integration would reportedly address time constraints faced by HCPs especially with clients frequently visiting the HIV clinics to access different services.
“On the side of health workers, it reduces time. If today you are in the HIV clinic, tomorrow you come back to the DM clinic it doesn’t make sense but if you have all the medications on one side, see this client once, tomorrow you do other things. I think it also improves client care because now we are talking about holistic approach to care on HIV and NCDs, so you are able to interact with this person more because you are dealing with more than one ailment…leading to better management of this condition(Policy Maker, MOH)
…..So if you are talking about integration, it means you would lift HTN control to the level HIV is at. With the same answer I have given; - the training of health workers and avail them, provide equipment, infrastructure, provide medication, provide monitoring tools and review performance. If you don’t do that, then you can’t talk about integration (Policy maker, MoH, NCD)
HCP satisfaction from providing comprehensive services was perceived to be a benefit of integrated HIV-HTN services. A policymaker describes this perceived benefit in the excerpt below;
“HCPs will draw satisfaction from a comprehensive care intervention that improves the outcome for the clients without having to send the client to another clinic” (Health Manager, KCCA)
Holistic client management was mentioned as a potential advantage to integrated HIV-HTN services with clients being managed in one place.
“It is actually advantageous because you get to manage the client in one place and all these people who have been falling through the cracks suppressed but have may be died due to heart attacks….all those you can manage because you are managing their illnesses in one place” (Policy maker, MoH, NCD)