Synthesis of the ZW-FA compound
Synthesis of ZW-FA is composed of eight steps in all (shown in Fig. 1a). The detailed steps and characterisation of each step are illustrated in Table S1. In this part, 3-methyl-2-butanone and 4-hydrazinobenzenesulfonic acid were purchased from Aladdin; 4-(2-carboxyethyl) phenylboronic acid and 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane were purchased from Alfa Aesar; and 3-Bromo-N,N,N-trimethylpropan-1-aminium bromide was purchased from Ark Pharm. All solvents and other reagents were of reagent grade quality and purchased commercially.
Characterisation
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian unity INOVA-400 spectrometer at 400, using TMS as an internal standard for 1H NMR spectra. Mass spectra were performed with a Bruker micrOTOF-Q II ESI-Q-TOF LC/MS/MS spectrometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded by a Hitachi F-4500 (Tokyo, Japan) instrument. Photostability of ZW-FA was evaluated in a variety of biological media, including water, PBS, serum and blood at 37 °C under continuous 650 nm laser exposure (Cary series UV-Vis; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA).
Uptake of ZW-FA and FR-α targeting verification
The FR-α positive cell line human ovarian cancer SKOV3 and human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), and the FR-α negative cell line HUVEC was obtained from ATCC (USA). The SKOV3 and HUVEC were grown in folate-free RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, IL) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 U/mL penicillin and 10 mg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37 °C under humidified conditions with 5% CO2. To compare the uptake and verify the FR-α targeting efficiency in SKOV3 and HUVEC, cells were cultured on coverslips in a 24-well plate at 105/well overnight. Each well was washed three times with PBS, treated with 0.5 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min to fix the cells and then washed with PBS. They were then incubated in ZW-FA only or human FOLR1 antibody (R&D, USA, catalogue #MAB5646) overnight and followed by ZW-FA for one hour, washed by PBS again and incubated with DAPI (Roche, Switzerland, catalogue #10236276011) for 30 minutes. Cells incubated with human FOLR1 antibody then needed to be incubated with Alexa Fluor 488 (Abcam, Australia, catalogue #ab150117) later. Finally, the antifade mounting medium (Beyotime, China, catalogue #P0126) was used for sealing, and the fluorescent inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti, Japan) and laser confocal microscope (C2, Nikon, Japan) were used to take photos. The excitation wavelengths of 408 nm, 488 nm and 633 nm were used to assess the fluorescence of DAPI, human FOLR1 antibody and ZW-FA, respectively. Of note, the steps of incubation and afterwards needed to be protected from light.
Patients and sample collection
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (October 13, 2017), and informed written consent was obtained from all subjects before this study. In all, 92 patients who underwent total hysterectomies or D&Cs were enrolled in this study during a 15-months period (07/2018 to 10/2019). The patients’ final diagnoses were confirmed by postoperative histological examination. The histological diagnostic types, according to the International Society of Gynecological Pathology Classification, included endometrial carcinoma, hyperplasia with atypia, hyperplasia without atypia, atrophic endometrium, proliferative endometrium and secretory endometrium. The cytological diagnosis was made according to the criteria formulated by Fox, ranging from benign cells (including atrophic, proliferative and secretory endometrium), non-atypical hyperplastic cells and atypical hyperplastic cells to malignant cells. The diagnoses of endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia with atypia were grouped into the Positive Group and, vice versa, others were grouped into the Negative Group.
Cytological preparation
Endometrial cytological samples were all collected from patients by using the Li Brush (20152660054, Xi’an Meijiajia Medical Technology Co. Ltd., China). The following procedures were performed as described in a previous study [8, 25–27].
Two-step staining for endometrial slides
First, the clips were taken out of the alcohol and washed for five minutes three times by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The clips of endometrial cells were incubated with ZW-FA (500 ug/ml) for two hours and washed with PBS five minutes three times again. The clips were then incubated with DAPI (CST) for one hour (h). Finally, they were washed three times and prepared for imaging. They were examined immediately using an appropriate excitation wavelength. After interpreting the slides, H&E staining was performed as described in a previous study [8], and cytological diagnoses were finally processed.
Data analysis and statistics
After performing ZW-FA staining, the slides were evaluated and typical photos were later taken using the laser confocal microscope. We used the excitation wavelength of 408 nm to assess DAPI fluorescence, and the excitation wavelength of 633 nm to assess ZW-FA fluorescence. The cytological and histopathological results of all slides were evaluated by two experienced pathologists, using conventional optical microscopy. The fluorescence in the photos of every slide was analysed using Image J, and finally we got the intensity data of all slides. To obtain a cut-off value of the intensity data to differentiate endometrial cancer and precancerous endometrial lesions from benign endometrium, we introduced a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve to analyse. Comparison of ZW-FA and histopathology was performed subsequently to calculate sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), false-negative rate (FNR), false-positive rate (FPR), positive predictive value (PV+) and negative predictive value (PV–).