GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates cancer-induced bone pain in rats

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4820333/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates cancer-induced bone pain in rats

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4820333/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is a complex chronic pain with poorly understood mechanisms. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a critical role in processing and modulating chronic pain. This study investigates how the GluR2 receptors (calcium impermeable AMPA receptors) in ACC glutamatergic neurons regulate CIBP.

Methods

The CIBP models were established by injecting Walker 256 cells into the tibia of SD rats. Paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) were used as indicators of hyperalgesia. The immunofluorescence staining was employed to detect the expression of c-Fos in ACC and identify the subtypes of co-labeled c-Fos⁺ neurons. Real-time monitoring of calcium activity in ACC glutamatergic neurons was achieved through the fiber photometry. The excitability of glutamatergic neurons in ACC was modulated using chemicalgenetics and optogenetics techniques. The expression of GluR2 at the mRNA and protein level in ACC were assessed using RT-qPCR and Western blotting.

Results

There were significant reductions in PWT and PWL of CIBP rats after Walker 256 cell injection. The ACC of CIBP rats showed increased c-Fos expression compared to sham rats, with mainly activated c-Fos co-localized with glutamatergic neurons. Optogenetic or chemogenetic activation of ACC glutamatergic neurons led to increased hyperalgesia in sham rats, while suppression of their activity alleviated hyperalgesia in CIBP rats. Calcium activity in ACC glutamatergic neurons of CIBP rats was increased with suprathreshold stimulation of von Frey filament. Notably, surface GluR2 protein and mRNA were reduced in ACC of CIBP rats. Furthermore, overexpression of GluR2 by AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 injection was decreased c-Fos expression in ACC and alleviated hyperalgesia in CIBP rats.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that decreased surface GluR2 receptors in ACC glutamatergic neurons contribute to calcium activity and excessive excitability, thereby inducing CIBP in rats. Conversely, GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates CIBP in rats. This study provides a new potential therapeutic approach for targeting the GluR2 receptor to alleviate CIBP for cancer patients.

Cancer-induced bone pain

Anterior cingulate cortex

Glutamatergic neurons

AMPA receptors

GluR2

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is a persistent and worsening pain resulting from the cancer metastasis to the spinal cord cavity or bone tissues [1]. In breast cancer cases, about 75% involve bone metastasis, with a 5-year survival rate of 22.8% [2]. Skeletal-related events (SREs), including CIBP, affect up to 43% of patients with bone metastases, with 75% of advanced breast cancer patients experiencing SREs [3]. Patients with CIBP often face a persistent pain that worsens gradually, with unpredictable episodes of breakthrough pain, especially during activities like walking, exercise, and at night [4], This pain significantly impacts their quality of life and can worsen symptoms of depression and anxiety [5]. Despite systemic treatment, around 50% of CIBP patients still struggle with inadequate pain control and poor response to therapy [6, 7]. The traditional 'step analgesia' approach, while effective in managing pain, does not prevent fractures, maintain mobility, or extend survival, and can have side effects [8, 9]. Therefore, there is a critical need for new therapies to provide palliative care for cancer patients, easing pain and improving their quality of life.

The Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which encompasses Brodmann areas 24, 32, and 33, is a critical component of the limbic system in the brain [10]. It functions as a central hub for pain regulation [11] and is involved in emotional processes like fear [12], empathy [13, 14], cognition [15], and reward behavior [16]. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) has revealed abnormal activation in the cingulate, prefrontal cortex, and ventral striatum as part of the central nervous system's regulation of CIBP [17]. Recent studies have revealed that the ACC-NAc pathway is specifically linked to empathic responses related to pain and analgesia, emphasizing the connection between the ACC and human pain empathy [18]. Nevertheless, the precise mechanism by which pain stimulation triggers neuronal activity in the ACC and perpetuates the development and progression of CIBP remains unclear.

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are widely distributed in the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nervous system. They act as ligand-gated ion channels, responding to glutamate release from presynaptic terminals. These receptors are crucial for excitatory synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system, contributing to various neurological disorders [19]. iGluRs are categorized into N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA), and kainate (KA) receptors [20]. The AMPA receptors consist of subunits GluR1, GluR3, and GluR4 with Ca²⁺ permeability and GluR2 lacking Ca²⁺ permeability [21]. Following peripheral nerve injury, there are lasting changes in excitatory synaptic transmission in ACC glutamatergic neurons, leading to increased presynaptic glutamate release and enhanced postsynaptic glutamatergic AMPA receptor response, these changes are implicated in the maintenance of pain [22]. In a model of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity, it was observed that GluR2-containing AMPA receptors transitioned to a GluR2-lacking form, resulting in heightened Ca²⁺ permeability mediated by AMPA receptors at synapses in spinal dorsal horn neurons, this process contributes to the development and persistence of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity [23]. These findings suggest that alterations in AMPA receptor subunits on postsynaptic neurons may be involved in maintaining pain sensitization. However, the specific mechanism by which GluR2-containing AMPA receptors regulate and sustain CIBP through ACC neurons remains unclear.

Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that CIBP would activate ACC glutamatergic neurons, causing downregulation of AMPA receptors containing GluR2 on the postsynaptic membrane. This downregulation would result in increased permeability of the postsynaptic membrane to Ca²⁺, excessive excitability and hyperalgesia in rats with CIBP. The study may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying hyperalgesia in CIBP, and potentially identify a clinical therapeutic target for managing cancer patients for pain relief.

2.1. Animals

Female Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 180–200 g were housed in groups of four per cage in temperature- (24 ± 1°C) and light-controlled (12-h light/dark cycle) room with access to standard rodent chow and water ad libitum. Animals were randomly assigned to different groups, and experiments were performed in blind manner. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University (SYXK 2022-0043). Animal experiments were conducted in strict accordance with the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).

2.2. Rat model of cancer-induced bone pain

Implantation of Walker 256 cells was performed as previously described [24–27]. Briefly, Walker 256 cells were grown in SD rats (60–80 g) by intraperitoneal injection of 2×10⁷ cells. One week later, the ascites was collected and resuspended with normal saline (1×10⁸ cells/mL). After establishing isoflurane anesthesia, a small incision was made in the right leg of SD rats exposing the tibial plateau. A hole was drilled into the tibia cavity, and 10 µL tumor cells or NS was slowly injected into the hole using a 10 µL microinjection syringe. To prevent leakage of cells outside the bone, the injection site was closed with bone wax. The incision was then sutured, and the rats were transferred to a warm pad to wake.

2.3. Pain behavioral assessments

The measurement of paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) described by our previous report [24–26]. In brief, the rats were habituated to a transparent Plexiglas box for 30 minutes before testing. PWT was assessed using the von Frey up-down method. The rat’s foot withdrawal in response to tactile stimulus was used to detect tactile allodynia using a series of calibrated nylon von Frey filaments. PWL was measured by heat radiation method for the thermal hyperalgesia of rats. The interval between the two tests was more than 5 minutes, and the test was repeated 5 times for each rat.

2.4. Immunofluorescence staining

Rats were transcardially perfused with 0.9% normal saline and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) under deep anesthesia at 14 days after induction of the CIBP model. The brains were removed and immersed for post-fixation in PFA at 4℃ for 12 hours. After dehydration with sucrose gradient, brains were embedded in OCT and then cut into sections with 25–30 µm thickness. Brain sections were washed with PBS and blocked with blocking buffer containing 7% normal donkey serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 0.05% sodium azide for 1 hour at room temperature. After blocking, brain sections were incubated with primary antibodies solution diluted with donkey serum blocking solution overnight at 4℃. The following primary antibodies were purchased from commercial suppliers: anti-Mouse-c-Fos (Santa Cruz, 1: 200), anti-Rabbit-Glutamate (Cell Signaling Technology, 1: 100), anti-Mouse-CaMKIIα (Cell Signaling Technology, 1: 100), anti-Rabbit-GABA (Santa Cruz, 1: 200), anti-Mouse-NeuN (Millipore, 1: 50), anti-Rabbit-GluR2 (Abmart, 1: 200), anti-Mouse-GFAP (Cell Signaling Technology, 1: 100), anti-Goat-Ib1 (Abcam, 1: 200). After washing with PBS 3 times (10 minutes each time), the brain sections were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. The following secondary antibodies were purchased from commercial suppliers: Alexa Fluor TM 488 Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1: 500), Alexa Fluor TM 555 Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1: 200), Alexa Fluor TM 555 Donkey Anti-Goat IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1: 200).

2.5. Stereotaxic virus injection and optical fiber implantation

Following deep anesthesia, rats were head fixed on a stereotaxic apparatus (RWD Life Science, China) with a bite bar and ear bars. After disinfection with iodophor solution, rat scalps were cut with a longitudinal midline incision to expose the skull. The skull above the target left ACC was removed carefully with a skull drill (RWD Life Science, China). The virus injection was made via a micro syringe (Gaoge, China) modified with glass micropipettes pulling by a Sutter Instrument P-97 micropipette puller. 300 nL of the virus was injected into the left ACC of the rat brain using a microsyringe pump (Longer Pump, China) at a rate of 30 nL/min. Front fontanelle as the origin of coordinates, virus injection coordinates are AP, + 1.0 mm; ML, + 0.5 mm; DV, -2.5 mm. To prevent virus backflow, the micropipette was left in place for approximately 10 minutes after virus injection and then retracted from the brain slowly. Optical fiber implantation was conducted immediately after virus injection. The optical fiber (diameter, 400 µm, Newdoon, China) were secured to the skull of each rat using 3–4 screws and dental cement.

2.6. Optical Stimulation

One week prior to modeling, the CIBP group had been injected with AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-eNPHR-eGFP or AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-eGFP (from Gene Biotechnology, China, titer: 6.27×10¹² genome copies/ml) into the left ACC, with CON group injected with AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-ChR2-mCherry or AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-mCherry (from Gene Biotechnology, China, titer: 5.2×10¹² genome copies/ml). The behavioral tests were performed at 14 days after induction of the CIBP model. The delivery of a 20-s pulse of blue (473 nm, 2–5 mW, 20-ms pulses, 10 Hz) or yellow (594 nm, 3–5 mW, constant) light was controlled by optogenetic system (Alpha Omega Engineering, Israel).

2.7. Chemogenetic Manipulations

One week prior to modeling, the CIBP group had been injected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry (from BrainVTA, China, titer: 2.44×10¹² genome copies/ml) into the left ACC, with CON group injected with AAV-CaMKIIα-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry (from BrainVTA, China, titer: 5.40×10¹² genome copies/ml). At 14 days after induction of the CIBP model, the behavioral tests were measured before and at various time points (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8h) after interperitoneal injection of clozapine-N-oxide (CNO, 3mg/kg, BrainVTA, China).

2.8. Fiber photometry system

AAV-CaMKIIα-GCaMP6f (from Taitool Bioscience, China, titer: 3.6×10¹² genome copies/ml) was injected into the left ACC of the SD rats. GCaMP consists of an enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) fused to calmodulin (CaM) and myosin light-chain kinase (M13) [28]. CaM is a target of Ca2⁺ within the cell can bind to Ca²⁺ [29].This binding is believed to cause a conformational change in eGFP, transforming eGFP into a more efficient configuration. Fiber photometry system (ThinkerTech Nanjing Bioscience Inc.) allows for real-time excitation and recording of fluorescence from GCaMP in freely moving rats. Two excitation wavelengths, 405 and 470 nm, were used in this system, coupled into a 400 µm optical fiber by a commutator. The laser intensity was adjusted at the tip of the optical fiber to 10 to 20 mW. The photometry data were analyzed with custom-written MATLAB codes (MATLAB R2017b, MathWorks).

2.9. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for mRNA analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the left ACC from the CON and CIBP rats using TRIzol (Ambion), and cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using an EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit (TransGen Biotech, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The expression level of mRNAs was normalized by the Ct value of GAPDH using the 2^∆∆Ct relative quantification method. The mRNAs of GluR1, GluR2, GluR3, GluR4 and GAPDH (internal control) were measured in the quantitative polymerase chain reaction using the following primers:

GluR1 forward primer: 5’-AATGTGGCAGGCGTGTTCTA-3’,

reverse primer: 5’-GGATTGCATGGACTTGGGGA-3’;

GluR2 forward primer: 5’-GCCAGAGTCCGGAAATCCAA-3’,

reverse primer: 5’-CCGCACTCTCCTTTGTCGTA-3’;

GluR3 forward primer: 5’-AGCCGTGCGATACGATGAAA-3’,

reverse primer: 5’-ATAGAACACGCCTGCCACAT-3’;

GluR4 forward primer: 5’-TACGACAAAGGAGAATGTGGCAG-3’,

reverse primer: 5’-CAATGACAGCCAATCCCGAA-3’;

GAPDH forward primer: 5’-TGGAGTCTACTGGCGTCTT-3’,

reverse primer: 5’-TGTCATATTTCTCGTGGTTCA-3’.

2.10. Extraction of membrane protein and Western blotting

Expressions of GluR1, GluR2, GluR3, GluR4, GAPDH and Na⁺-K⁺-ATPase in left ACC from CON and CIBP rats were measured using western blotting. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, membrane proteins were extracted by the Mem-PER™ Plus Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Supernatants of ultrasonic disruption were carefully prepared and the protein concentration was measured using a BCA Protein Quantitation Kit (Beyotime, China). The primary antibodies in the present study included anti-Rabbit-GAPDH (Goodhere, China, 1: 1000), anti-Rabbit-GluR1 (Abmart, China, 1: 2000), anti-Rabbit-GluR2 (Abmart, China, 1: 2000), anti-Rabbit-GluR3 (Abmart, China, 1: 2000), anti-Rabbit-GluR4 (Abmart, China, 1: 2000), Anti-Sodium Potassium ATPase (Abcam, USA, 1: 2000). The secondary antibody in the present study included anti-rabbit peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, USA, 1: 2000). The densities of protein bands were analyzed using Image J (National Institutes of Health, Betheseda, MD).

2.11. Data analysis

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 and MATLAB software. All data are presented as mean values ± SEM. Normality was checked for all data before comparison. The t-test was used to determine significance of changes between 2 groups. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test were performed where appropriate. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

3.1. Injection of Walker 256 cells into the tibia cavity induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia accompanied by an increased in c-Fos expression in ACC

The paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) and paw withdrawal latency (PWL) were measured before modeling (pre), 7 d, 14 d and 21 d after modeling to examine whether Walker 256 cell injection induces pain hyperalgesia. The results showed that the PWT and PWL in the ipsilateral hind-paw of the CIBP group were lower than that in the CON group at 7 d, 14 d and 21 d after modeling (Fig. 1A, B). However, there was no significant difference in the contralateral PWT and PWL between the CON and CIBP groups (Fig. 1C, D). These data showed that injection of Walker 256 cells into the tibia cavity induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in rats, consistent with previous studies [24–26]. To investigate whether the ACC is involved in CIBP, we compared the expression of c-Fos in the ACC after rats were given suprathreshold stimulation using von Frey filament. The steps of suprathreshold stimulation are shown in Fig. 1E. The results showed that the number of c-Fos⁺ neurons was dramatically increased in the ACC of CIBP group as compared with CON group (Fig. 1F, G). These results suggested that increasing neuronal activity in the ACC may be involved in the development and maintenance of CIBP in rats.

3.2. ACC glutamatergic neurons were the main type of neurons involved in CIBP

To explore which type of neurons in the ACC were involved in CIBP, we double-labeled c-Fos⁺ neurons with the glutamatergic neuron marker Glutamate and GABAergic neuron marker GABA. Immunostaining of c-Fos two week after CIBP showed that c-Fos⁺ cells activated by CIBP were mainly co-localized with glutamate (Fig. 2A), whereas only a few c-Fos⁺ neurons were co-labeled with GABA (Fig. 2C). The ratio of Glutamate + c-Fos to c-Fos was 81.75% (Fig. 2B), and the ratio of GABA + c-Fos to c-Fos was 11.83% in ACC of CIBP rats (Fig. 2D). These data indicated that glutamatergic neurons, but not GABAergic neurons were the main type of neurons involved in CIBP.

3.3. Optogenetic or chemogenetic inhibition of ACC glutamatergic neurons attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia in CIBP rats, whereas optogenetic or chemogenetic activation of ACC glutamatergic neurons promoted mechanical hyperalgesia in sham rats

To further verify the role of ACC glutamatergic neurons in CIBP, we used optogenetic and chemogenetic technologies in vivo to selectively and temporarily inhibit glutamatergic neurons. The experimental procedure is depicted in Fig. 3A and D. We injected AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-eNPHR-eGFP or AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-eGFP as a control into the ACC of CIBP rats to inhibit glutamatergic neurons (Fig. 3B). The results showed that inhibition of ACC glutamatergic neurons by yellow-light significantly produced an acute and rapid attenuated in mechanical hyperalgesia in CIBP rats (Fig. 3C). Meanwhile, we injected AAV-CaMKIIα-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry into the ACC of CIBP rats to inhibit glutamatergic neurons (Fig. 3E). We found that 1h, 2h and 4h after CNO injection significantly attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia in CIBP rats (Fig. 3G). However, there was no significant effect in thermal hyperalgesia (Fig. 3H).

Furthermore, we injected AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-ChR2-mCherry or AAV2/9-CaMKIIα-mCherry as a control into the ACC of sham rats to activate glutamatergic neurons (Fig. 3B). The results showed that blue-light activation of the ACC glutamatergic neurons expressing ChR2-mCherry, but not those expressing mCherry, induced marked mechanical hyperalgesia, as manifested by a drastic decrease in PWT in sham rats (Fig. 3F). At the same time, we injected AAV-CaMKIIα-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry into the ACC of sham rats to activate glutamatergic neurons (Fig. 3E). We found that PWT was decreased from 1h to 4h after CNO injection (Fig. 3I). However, there was no significant effect in thermal hyperalgesia (Fig. 3J). Consequently, these data indicated that ACC glutamatergic neurons contributed to mechanical hyperalgesia in CIBP rats.

3.4. Calcium activity of ACC glutamatergic neurons was increased in CIBP rats

To investigate dynamic activity of glutamatergic neurons in ACC of CIBP rats, we recorded their Ca²⁺ levels in awake behaving rats using in vivo fibro photometry. Rats were stereotactically injected with AAV-CaMKIIα-GCaMP6f into ACC. One weeks after virus injection, rats were subjected to CIBP or sham-operation (Fig. 4A, B). We found that a suprathreshold stimulation by von Frey filament stimulation induced a dynamic Ca²⁺ fluctuation in both CIBP and sham rats (Fig. 4C, D). However, the same suprathreshold stimulus induced dramatic Ca²⁺ elevation in ACC glutamatergic neurons of CIBP rats (Fig. 4E-G). These results confirmed that Ca²⁺ activity in ACC glutamatergic neurons were selectively activated by CIBP.

3.5. Surface GluR2 receptors were decreased in the ACC of CIBP rats

The levels of GluR1-4 mRNA in ACC of CIBP rats were detected by qPCR. Compared with the CON rats, the GluR2 mRNA in the left ACC of CIBP rats was reduced (Fig. 5A). At the level of total protein, there was no significant alteration observed in the expression of GluR1-4 receptors in the left ACC between the CIBP and CON groups (Fig. 5C-F). However, at the level of membrane proteins, the expression of GluR2 receptor in the left ACC was reduced in the CIBP group compared to the CON group (Fig. 5B), while there were no significant changes observed in the expression of GluR1, GluR3 and GluR4 receptors (Fig. 5G-I).

3.6. Overexpression of GluR2 alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity in CIBP rats

To validate the impact of GluR2 on CIBP, we injected a virus that overexpresses GluR2 or a control virus into the left ACC of the rats. Compared to the AAV-CaMKIIα-NC group, the AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 group exhibited a significant upregulation in the mRNA level of GluR2, thereby indicating the efficacy of GluR2-overexpressing virus (Fig. 6D). The experimental results demonstrated that there was no significant change in the PWT of rats in the AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 group on 7d, compares to the AAV-CaMKIIα-NC group; however, a significant increase was observed on 14d (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the PWL remained unchanged in the AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 group at both 7d and 14d (Fig. 6C). Meanwhile, in comparison to the AAV-CaMKIIα-NC group, the AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 group exhibited a significant reduction in the number of c-Fos⁺ cells in the left ACC (Fig. 6A, E, F). These results indicate that decreased expression of the GluR2 receptors contributed to mechanical hyperalgesia, and GluR2 overexpression alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity in CIBP rats.

3.7. GluR2 receptors were mainly expressed in ACC glutamatergic neurons and negatively regulated mechanical hypersensitivity

We investigated the distribution of GluR2 receptors in the ACC of normal rats by examining their co-localization with various cellular markers. The results showed that the GluR2 receptors were mainly co-expressed with NeuN (Neuronal nuclei) and glutamatergic neuron marker CaM-dependent protein kinase Ⅱ (CaMKⅡ), but they were not associated with Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in astrocyte, and Ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) in microglia (Fig. 7A, B). These results suggested that GluR2 receptors were mainly expressed in ACC glutamatergic neurons. In order to further verify the effects of GluR2 receptors in ACC glutamatergic neurons on PWT and PWL in CIBP rats, we injected GluR2 overexpression virus and AAV-CaMKIIα-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry virus (AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 + hM3D group) into the left ACC of rats (Fig. 7C). The results showed that the PWT of CIBP rats in AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 + hM3D group was reduced at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h after the administration of CNO-activated glutamatergic neurons (Fig. 7D), but the PWL had no significant change (Fig. 7E).

Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) is a severe clinical condition that occurs when cancer cells spread to the spinal cord and bone tissue [30]. The pathophysiology of CIBP is complex, involving inflammatory factors, neuropathic components, and cancer-specific mediators [31]. Current pharmacological treatments for CIBP encompass nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), potent opioid analgesics, bisphosphonates, and monoclonal antibodies targeting osteoclast activity [32]. While opioids are recommended as the first-line therapy by the World Health Organization (WHO), their use can be limited by adverse effects like gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue, decreased consciousness, and respiratory depression [33]. Even with adherence to WHO guidelines, around 10–20% of CIBP patients still do not experience relief [34]. Therefore, understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of CIBP and identifying new treatment targets are crucial. This study established a CIBP model in rats by injecting Walker 256 cells into the tibial bone marrow cavity, closely mimicking bone cancer pain from human breast cancer bone metastasis [35–39].

The results of PWT and PWL in the ipsilateral hind-paw of the CIBP group showed a gradual decrease as CIBP progressed. while no significant changes were observed in the contralateral hind-paw, the results indicate that the CIBP model has been successfully established. The ACC has been implicated in sensory processing, including pain perception [40], as well as motor and cognitive functions [41]. Early study revealed that cingulotomy provided pain relief to 60% of patients with advanced cancer or non-malignant tumors [42]. However, the specific role of ACC in various pain states, particularly CIBP, remains underexplored. By utilizing the immunofluorescence technique, a significant augmentation in the quantity of c-Fos⁺ neurons within the ACC were observed in rats experiencing CIBP compared to those in the control group. The c-Fos⁺ neurons were found to be co-localized with Glutamate-positive neurons This suggests a pivotal role of ACC glutamatergic neurons in CIBP regulation. Further validation was done through optogenetic and chemogenetic techniques, showing that inhibition of glutamatergic neurons in the ACC led to pain relief in CIBP rats, while activation resulted in increased pain perception in control rats. Additionally, in vivo fibro photometry revealed a significant increase in calcium activity of ACC glutamatergic neurons in CIBP rats. These findings collectively demonstrate ACC glutamatergic neurons contribute CIBP and their significant role in pain modulation.

Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian cerebral cortex [43]. Glutamate receptors are classified into two main categories: ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) [44]. AMPA receptors, a type of iGluR, have been shown through pharmacological, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies to play a vital role in regulating neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission in the central nervous system [45]. Specifically, AMPA receptors are crucial in transmitting pain signals. These receptors consist of subunits GluR1, GluR2, GluR3, and GluR4 [46]. The GluR2 subunit is particularly important, influencing the assembly, transport, and various forms of long-term potentiation (LTP) [47]. In the brain, most GluR2 exists in a Q/R-edited form that blocks Ca²⁺ permeation [48]. Thus, AMPA receptors containing edited GluR2 subunits exhibit impermeability to Ca²⁺, whereas those lacking GluR2 or possessing unedited GluR2 are permeable to Ca²⁺ [49]. Studies have linked GluR2 receptors at synapses to the development and progression of neuropathic pain, aversion, and depression following spinal cord nerve ligation (SNL) in rats [50]. The study examined the potential involvement of AMPA receptors in the development and maintenance of CIBP. RT-qPCR technology was used to detect the mRNA level of AMPA receptors in the left ACC of rats with CIBP. The results showed a significant decrease in GluR2 receptor mRNA levels, which was further confirmed by Western blotting demonstrating a reduction in GluR2 receptor membrane protein levels. These findings suggest that GluR2 receptors negatively regulate the occurrence and progression of CIBP. Immunofluorescence staining was then utilized to show the co-expression of GluR2 receptors with glutamatergic neurons, indicating that the downregulation of GluR2 receptors in ACC glutamatergic neurons' postsynaptic membranes may enhance Ca²⁺ permeability and increase synaptic excitability, ultimately leading to heightened pain sensitivity in rats with CIBP.

To further investigate the impact of GluR2 receptor on CIBP, we conducted experiments where AAV virus overexpressing GluR2 receptor was administered into the left ACC of CIBP rats. The results showed a significant decrease in c-Fos expression within their ACC. Behavioral tests revealed a notable increase in PWT following the microinjection of AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 into the left ACC, although no significant change was observed in PWL. Subsequent chemogenetic techniques indicated that activating glutamatergic neurons in the left ACC of CIBP rats could reverse the heightened PWT induced by AAV-CaMKIIα-GluR2 overexpression. These findings suggested that GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates cancer-induced bone pain.

This study demonstrates that reducing surface GluR2 receptors in ACC glutamatergic neurons contribute to pain hypersensitivity in rats with CIBP, while overexpressing GluR2 receptors in ACC glutamatergic neurons could alleviate pain hypersensitivity in rats with CIBP. These findings provide a new theoretical basis for targeted treatment involving the GluR2 receptors and propose a potential clinical approach to alleviate CIBP for cancer patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all study participants, researchers, technicians, administrative staff, editors and reviewers who contributed to this study.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

F.B. and J.W. performed experiments, analyzed data, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript. Q-Y.F., C-Y.Y. and M-X.S. performed experiments. S.H. and G-Y.X. edited the manuscript. G-Q.J. and H-L.Z. designed the study, supervised the work, and finalized the paper. All the authors have read and approved the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873730 and 82201575).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University (SYXK 2022-0043). Animal experiments were conducted in strict accordance with the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).

Competing interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Yang, Y., et al., Peripheral Mechanism of Cancer-Induced Bone Pain. Neuroscience Bulletin, 2023.
Macedo, F., et al., Bone Metastases: An Overview. Oncology Reviews, 2017. 11(1): p. 321.
Gillespie, E.F., et al., Prophylactic Radiation Therapy Versus Standard of Care for Patients With High-Risk Asymptomatic Bone Metastases: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023: p. JCO2300753.
Muralidharan, A. and M.T. Smith, Pathobiology and management of prostate cancer-induced bone pain: recent insights and future treatments. Inflammopharmacology, 2013. 21(5): p. 339-63.
Michaelides, A. and P. Zis, Depression, anxiety and acute pain: links and management challenges. Postgrad Med, 2019. 131(7): p. 438-444.
Sulistio, M., et al., The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain in Patients with Bone Metastasis: a descriptive cohort study. Supportive Care In Cancer : Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care In Cancer, 2023. 31(5): p. 305.
Michael, N., et al., Methadone rotation versus other opioid rotation for refractory cancer induced bone pain: protocol of an exploratory randomised controlled open-label study. BMC Palliative Care, 2023. 22(1): p. 42.
Zajączkowska, R., et al., Bone Pain in Cancer Patients: Mechanisms and Current Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019. 20(23).
Desandre, P.L. and T.E. Quest, Management of cancer-related pain. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2009. 27(2): p. 179-94.
Gasquoine, P.G., Localization of function in anterior cingulate cortex: from psychosurgery to functional neuroimaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013. 37(3): p. 340-8.
Ntamati, N.R., M.A. Acuña, and T. Nevian, Pain-induced adaptations in the claustro-cingulate pathway. Cell Reports, 2023. 42(5): p. 112506.
Bian, X.-L., et al., Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Ventral Hippocampus Circuit Mediates Contextual Fear Generalization. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience, 2019. 39(29): p. 5728-5739.
Li, L., et al., Dorsal raphe nucleus to anterior cingulate cortex 5-HTergic neural circuit modulates consolation and sociability. ELife, 2021. 10.
Smith, M.L., N. Asada, and R.C. Malenka, Anterior cingulate inputs to nucleus accumbens control the social transfer of pain and analgesia. Science, 2021. 371(6525): p. 153-159.
Brockett, A.T., et al., Anterior cingulate cortex is necessary for adaptation of action plans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. 117(11): p. 6196-6204.
Young, M.E., et al., Temporally specific patterns of neural activity in interconnected corticolimbic structures during reward anticipation. Neuron, 2023. 111(22).
Buehlmann, D., et al., Longitudinal resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in a mouse model of metastatic bone cancer reveals distinct functional reorganizations along a developing chronic pain state. Pain, 2018. 159(4): p. 719-727.
Smith, M.L., N. Asada, and R.C. Malenka, Anterior cingulate inputs to nucleus accumbens control the social transfer of pain and analgesia. Science (New York, N.Y.), 2021. 371(6525): p. 153-159.
Hansen, K.B., et al., Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels. Pharmacological Reviews, 2021. 73(4): p. 298-487.
Fu, H., et al., Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Ligand Development for Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors: Challenges and Opportunities for Radiotracer Targeting N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA), α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA), and Kainate Receptors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2019. 62(2): p. 403-419.
Zhou, J.-J., et al., α2δ-1 protein promotes synaptic expression of Ca2+ permeable-AMPA receptors by inhibiting GluA1/GluA2 heteromeric assembly in the hypothalamus in hypertension. Journal of Neurochemistry, 2022. 161(1): p. 40-52.
Xu, H., et al., Presynaptic and postsynaptic amplifications of neuropathic pain in the anterior cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience, 2008. 28(29): p. 7445-7453.
Park, J.-S., et al., Persistent inflammation induces GluR2 internalization via NMDA receptor-triggered PKC activation in dorsal horn neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience, 2009. 29(10): p. 3206-3219.
Sun, R.M., et al., Upregulation of lncRNA-NONRATT021203.2 in the dorsal root ganglion contributes to cancer-induced pain via CXCL9 in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2020. 524(4): p. 983-989.
Kong, X., et al., Upregulation of Spinal Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 1 Contributes to Bone Cancer Pain Hypersensitivity in Rats. Neurosci Bull, 2017. 33(6): p. 711-721.
Wei, J., et al., Overexpression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 in dorsal root ganglion attenuates cancer-induced pain in rats. Mol Pain, 2017. 13: p. 1744806916688901.
Zhou, Y.L., et al., Enhanced binding capability of nuclear factor-kappaB with demethylated P2X3 receptor gene contributes to cancer pain in rats. Pain, 2015. 156(10): p. 1892-1905.
Luo, J., et al., Intraorganellar calcium imaging in Arabidopsis seedling roots using the GCaMP variants GCaMP6m and R-CEPIA1er. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2020. 246-247: p. 153127.
Chin, D. and A.R. Means, Calmodulin: a prototypical calcium sensor. Trends In Cell Biology, 2000. 10(8): p. 322-328.
Lin, M., et al., Upregulation of Nav1.6 Mediated by the p38 MAPK Pathway in the Dorsal Root Ganglia Contributes to Cancer-Induced Bone Pain in Rats. Cells, 2022. 11(21).
Cao, F., et al., Regulation of spinal neuroimmune responses by prolonged morphine treatment in a rat model of cancer induced bone pain. Brain Research, 2010. 1326: p. 162-173.
Jing, D., et al., Management of pain in patients with bone metastases. Frontiers In Oncology, 2023. 13: p. 1156618.
Sindhi, V. and M. Erdek, Interventional treatments for metastatic bone cancer pain. Pain Management, 2019. 9(3): p. 307-315.
Christo, P.J. and D. Mazloomdoost, Interventional pain treatments for cancer pain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008. 1138: p. 299-328.
Segelcke, D., et al., Behavioral Voluntary and Social Bioassays Enabling Identification of Complex and Sex-Dependent Pain-(-Related) Phenotypes in Rats with Bone Cancer. Cancers, 2023. 15(5).
Yang, Y., et al., Activation of the spinal EGFR signaling pathway in a rat model of cancer-induced bone pain with morphine tolerance. Neuropharmacology, 2021. 196: p. 108703.
Diaz-delCastillo, M., et al., Modulation of Rat Cancer-Induced Bone Pain is Independent of Spinal Microglia Activity. Cancers, 2020. 12(10).
Liu, X., et al., PRG-1 relieves pain and depressive-like behaviors in rats of bone cancer pain by regulation of dendritic spine in hippocampus. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 2021. 17(14): p. 4005-4020.
Ge, M.-M., et al., Naringenin promoted spinal microglia M2 polarization in rat model of cancer-induced bone pain via regulating AMPK/PGC-1α signaling axis. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie, 2022. 149: p. 112912.
Tu, Y., et al., Pain-preferential thalamocortical neural dynamics across species. Nature Human Behaviour, 2023.
Seamans, J.K. and S.B. Floresco, Event-based control of autonomic and emotional states by the anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2022. 133: p. 104503.
Ballantine, H.T., et al., Stereotaxic anterior cingulotomy for neuropsychiatric illness and intractable pain. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1967. 26(5): p. 488-495.
Petroff, O.A.C., GABA and glutamate in the human brain. The Neuroscientist : a Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry, 2002. 8(6): p. 562-573.
Henley, J.M. and K.A. Wilkinson, Synaptic AMPA receptor composition in development, plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2016. 17(6): p. 337-50.
Bleakman, D., A. Alt, and E.S. Nisenbaum, Glutamate receptors and pain. Seminars In Cell & Developmental Biology, 2006. 17(5): p. 592-604.
Zanetti, L., et al., Presynaptic AMPA Receptors in Health and Disease. Cells, 2021. 10(9).
Isaac, J.T.R., M.C. Ashby, and C.J. McBain, The role of the GluR2 subunit in AMPA receptor function and synaptic plasticity. Neuron, 2007. 54(6): p. 859-871.
Verdoorn, T.A., et al., Structural determinants of ion flow through recombinant glutamate receptor channels. Science (New York, N.Y.), 1991. 252(5013): p. 1715-1718.
Hestrin, S., Different glutamate receptor channels mediate fast excitatory synaptic currents in inhibitory and excitatory cortical neurons. Neuron, 1993. 11(6): p. 1083-1091.
Jiang, H., et al., Contribution of AMPA Receptor-Mediated LTD in LA/BLA-CeA Pathway to Comorbid Aversive and Depressive Symptoms in Neuropathic Pain. The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society For Neuroscience, 2021. 41(34): p. 7278-7299.

No competing interests reported.

OriginalImagesforBlots.pdf

Download PDF

Reviewers agreed at journal
04 Oct, 2024
Reviews received at journal
19 Aug, 2024
Reviewers agreed at journal
08 Aug, 2024
Reviewers invited by journal
08 Aug, 2024
Editor assigned by journal
02 Aug, 2024
Submission checks completed at journal
02 Aug, 2024
First submitted to journal
29 Jul, 2024

You are reading this latest preprint version

GluR2 overexpression in ACC glutamatergic neurons alleviates cancer-induced bone pain in rats

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals

2.2. Rat model of cancer-induced bone pain

2.3. Pain behavioral assessments

2.4. Immunofluorescence staining

2.5. Stereotaxic virus injection and optical fiber implantation

2.6. Optical Stimulation

2.7. Chemogenetic Manipulations

2.8. Fiber photometry system

2.9. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for mRNA analysis

2.10. Extraction of membrane protein and Western blotting

2.11. Data analysis

3. Results

3.2. ACC glutamatergic neurons were the main type of neurons involved in CIBP

3.4. Calcium activity of ACC glutamatergic neurons was increased in CIBP rats

3.5. Surface GluR2 receptors were decreased in the ACC of CIBP rats

3.6. Overexpression of GluR2 alleviated mechanical hypersensitivity in CIBP rats

3.7. GluR2 receptors were mainly expressed in ACC glutamatergic neurons and negatively regulated mechanical hypersensitivity

4. Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Supplementary Files

Status:

Version 1