FM originates from the falcine with wide tumor base, growing along with cerebral longitudinal fissure cistern and being buried deeply below the cortex and SSS and there are a variety of numbers and types of cortical draining veins situated on the surface of the tumor, which drain into the SSS[17–19]. Therefore, the injury to any of the overlying cortical veins will lead to postoperative venous infarction, even a disastrous result[20]. Because of the above eloquent cortex, surgical removal of deep-seated FM, particularly in the mid-to-posterior third of the SSS poses a challenge. Even with a minimally invasive neurosurgery, a complete removal of tumor without comlications remains a challenge for neurosurgeons.
Numerous surgical approaches for FM have been reported, ranging from the transcortical approach with naked-eyes to the interhemispheric transfalcine approach with microneurosurgerical techniques[1, 3, 14, 15, 21]. However, the transcortical approach has largely been discarded due to the damages of brain tissue. The interhemispheric transfalcine approach can be further categorized into ipsilateral[3, 15] and contralateral[14, 21] approaches, each presenting its unique advantages. The fundamental principle guiding the selection of surgical approaches remains the safety in tumor resection. In our study, the ipsilateral interhemispheric transfalcine approach was chosen for unilateral localization in 6 out of 11 patients, while the contralateral approach via the non-dominant hemisphere was advocated for bilateral localization in the remaining 5 patients. The second representative case involved a giant FM with a diameter exceeding 9 cm. During surgery, the right non-dominant interhemispheric approach was adopted, enabling the resection of the bilaterally growing tumor through an unilateral approach.
endoscope offers a completely different view in comparison with that using traditional microscope. Complete endoscopic resection of FM offers greater flexibility in surgical approach selection due to the multi-angles and proximal observation capabilities, regardless of tumor size or location. Furthermore, with the development of auxiliary instruments, especially endoscopic holders such as a pneumatic arm, the operations of endoscope facilitate neurosurgeons has become handy. Lesions in regions of CPA, pineal and petrous clival have been reported to be operated with complete endoscope[22–26]. Furthermore, we can shift the lens of endoscope backward or forward freely to obtain an optical surgical vision. Sometimes, 30°, 45° of angled endoscope can be used to enlarge the exposure. Special position is not necessary for the patient.
Rigid endoscope with different lens offers a panoramic view which shows more detailed anatomical structures around the tumor, especially in a narrow and deeply surgical corridor[6]. Therefore, this panoramic view of the endoscope can confer significant advantages to the resection of FM via interhemispheric longitudinal fissure and transfalcine approach. Firstly, endoscope enables manipulation in the narrow corridor between the cortex and the SSS through a sparsely vascularized region. It facilitates the release of cerebrospinal fluid, brain relaxation and excision of the tumor base without traction, and thereby maximize the interruption of tumor blood supply as early as possible. Notably, the surgical corridor does not necessarily need to be established on the tumor's superior surface. It can be accessed obliquely, either anteriorly or posteriorly, a maneuver that is particularly challenging under the microscope. Except for a wide view field, endoscope facilitates close-up observation so that a clear surgical visual field can be achieved by adjusting the pneumatic arm. It can minimize the risk of the damage to adjacent blood vessels, nerves as well as brain tissue, and finally improves the rate of tumor resection.
IOUS has been shown to be a valuable imaging tool for localizing tumors and assessing the extent of resection[8, 27, 28]. In comparison with other intraoperative imaging techniques, such as MRI, CT, and neuronavigation systems, IOUS has the advantages of financial feasibility, ease of use, and availability without ionizing radiation exposure or major workflow interruption. In addition, IOUS also assesses the vascular architecture of tumoral and peritumoral tissues[29], and it plays a pivotal role in relocalization at the time of brain shift which is induced by the process of neuronavigation[10]. The experience of meningiomas showed hyperechogenic on IOUS with the 3rd grade[30]. Aside from localization of tumors,, we also used IOUS to measure tumor size and distance from the cortex and understand the relationships with surrounding structures. Furthermore, we tentatively located veins draining into the SSS and evaluated blood vessels adjacent to deep-seated tumors using this technique. This precision-guided approach facilitated the dural incision and tumor resection processes, thus expedite the surgical workflow, enhance the protection of surrounding tissue, and ultimately minimized the occurrence of complications.
Motor-sensatory deficit and seizure are the common postoperative complications for FM resection. Giombini et al.[31] reported that in the series containing 342 FM patients, the patient numbers with the complications of motor-sensatory and seizure were 30 and 42, respectively. Zuo et al.[21] observed 3 patients with motor-sensatory deficit and 2 patients with seizure in 20 FM patients. Murrone et al.[3] also found 4 patients had complications of motor-sensatory and seizure in the series of 95 FM patients. Interestingly, we found that the FM patients in these reported received the neurosurgery with the assistance of microscope, but the 6 cases receiving endoscope assistance showed no complications (Table 2). In our report, all patients also did not have any neurological deficit and approach-related complications postoperatively. We inferred that the less complications, which complete endoscope technique caused, might attributed to the minimization of brain retraction, perfect surgical field of vision and early devascularization. Beside, bridging veins to the SSS should be preserved. To prevent damage to crucial blood vessels on the cortical surface, we cut the dura away from tumor forwards or backwards and subsequently resected the tumor via an oblique surgical corridor which was much easily performed under endoscope than microscopy[32].
Table 2
Literature summary of resection of falcine meningiomas using complete endoscopic techniques. GTR: Gross total resection,
Year/Author | Case (n) | Tumor location (n) | Extent of resection | Simpson Grade |
Spektor et al. 201613 | 1 | Anterior 1/3 | GTR | Not available |
2022, Sakaeyama et al. 202214 | 4 | Anterior 2/3 (3) Posterior 1/3 (1) | GTR | I |
Zhang et al. 202315 | 1 | Middle 1/3 | GTR | I |
Present study | 11 | Anterior 2/3 (4) Middle 1/3 (5) Posterior 1/3 (2) | GTR | I |
Generally, this technique using the combination of complete endoscope and IOUS offers numerous advantages, including precise dural incision, avoidance of draining veins, early tumor devascularization, minimal brain retraction, a wider surgical field of view, a higher rate of tumor resection, and fewer complications. However, this technique also has some limitations. Firstly, unlike microscope, endoscope offers a two-dimensional image that lacks depth perception, necessitating continuous training and adjustment for surgeons. It is crucial to follow the sequential learning process, progressing from anatomical research under a endoscope in the laboratory to clinical practice, from transnasal endoscope to transcranial endoscope, and from endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive neurosurgery to fully endoscopic minimally invasive neurosurgery. Additionally, the current study involved a relatively small number of cases. A research with an augmented sample size should be performed to further validate the effectiveness and safety of this technique.