Down-regulation of FOXC2 expression in aorta of patients with atherosclerosis
In order to explore whether FOXC2 is a key factor in regulating atherosclerosis, we performed differential gene expression analysis using the GDS3018 dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO), and found that FOXC2 expression was down-regulated in aortas of atherosclerotic patients, indicting that FOXC2 is expected to become a new therapeutic target for atherosclerosis (Fig. 1A-C).
Low levels of FOXC2 are associated with atherosclerosis in ApoE mice
To determine whether FOXC2 levels are dysregulated in atherosclerosis, we measured its expression in aortas with atherosclerosis-prone ApoE−/− mice. Firstly, ApoE−/− mice were fed with HFD to establish an atherosclerosis animal model. Atherosclerosis was diagnosed with thoracic aortic and carotid ultrasonography. As shown in Fig. 2A, ultrasound results demonstrated thickened blood vessel walls and plaque formation in both the carotid artery and aortic arch in the model group compared to the control group. We further investigated the pathological changes in the aortic arch in model group, which showed an distinct accumulation of lipid and atherosclerotic lesions, indicating successful establishment of the model (Fig. 2B-D).
Next, we examined FOXC2 protein expression in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice. As shown in Fig. 2E-F, a downregulation of FOXC2 in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice compared with control group. The subcellular localization of a protein is closely related to its function and the activated FOXC2 remained mainly in the nucleus fraction (14–15). As shown in Fig. 2G-H, the nucleic/cytoplasm localization of FOXC2 was lower in model group but higher in control group, indicating FOXC2 activation is significantly inhibited during the progression of atherosclerosis. Taken together, these findings showed that reduced levels of FOXC2 and in inhibition of FOXC2 activation are a common feature in atherosclerosis.
FOXC2 overexpression inhibits aortic inflammation and alleviates atherosclerotic lesions in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice
Given the aforementioned results, we postulated that overexpression FOXC2 in HFD-induced ApoE-/- mice could minimize atherosclerotic lesions. In order to test whether this hypothesis is true, we delivered FOXC2 cDNA to the abdominal aorta of HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice using AAV8 vector through the tail vein (Fig. 3A-B). In the AAV-FOXC2 group, the levels of lipid accumulation and atherosclerotic lesions significantly decreased in the aorta (Fig. 3C-E). Next, evaluation of inflammatory cytokines in the aorta after overexpression of FOXC2 in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice showed a striking inhibition of the release of TNF-α, ox-LDL, IL-1β and IL-18 (Fig. 3F). Futhermore, the levels of TNF-α and VCAM-1 expression were increases during the development of atherosclerosis but decreases after treating with FOXC2 overexpression (Fig. 3G-I). Collectively, these results implied that FOXC2 could inhibit aorta inflammation and thus alleviate atherosclerotic lesions.
FOXC2 overexpression promotes lymphatic drainage in HFD-induced ApoE mice
To clarify the exact role of FOXC2 in atherosclerosis, we used immunostaining experiment to determine in which layer of the atherosclerotic arterial wall FOXC2 levels are downregulated. As shown in Fig. 4A-B, a decrease in FOXC2 staining in adventitial layer of model group compared with the control group. Previous studies have shown that the adventitia of arteries is rich in lymphatic vessels and insufficient lymphatic drainage could thus exacerbate atherosclerotic lesions. Given the inhibitory effect of effective lymphatic drainage in the aortic adventitial on atherosclerosis and the role of FOXC2 in promoting lymphatic vessel development, we hypothesized that FOXC2 might exert its anti-atherosclerotic effect by restoring lymphatic drainage in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice.
To test this hypothesis, periaortic lymph nodes and the lymphatic vessels between periaortic lymph nodes can be clearly visualized by Evans Blue staining. In model mice, transport of Evans Blue from footpad to aortic lymphatic vessels was inhibited and no blue dye was visible and only the lymph nodes were stained with blue dye, indicting lymphatic drainage dysfunction in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice. However, after AAV-mediated FOXC2 overexpression, the transport of Evans Blue dye was recoverl and lymphatic vessels was visible in aortic (Fig. 4D). Meanwhile, lymph vessel contraction frequency has now been shown to be another important indicator of lymphatic drainage function. After injecting mice with ICG in the footpad, we quantified lymph vessel contraction frequency by measuring the fold-change in the mean fluorescence intensity of the lymphatic vessels from before to after mechanostimulation. Consistent with Evans blue staining result, NIR fluorescence imaging system also found that the lymphatic clearance by increasing the lymph vessel contraction frequency in aortic in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice after AAV-mediated FOXC2 overexpression (Fig. 4E-F). Collectively, we demonstrate that FOXC2 is required for lymphatic drainage function in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice.
FOXC2-mediated atherosclerotic plaque regression depends on effective lymphatic drainage in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice
To further evaluate the implication of the lymphatic drainage contribution of FOXC2 and whether adequate lymphatic drainage is necessary to mediate regression of atherosclerosis by FOXC2. First, we ligated the left carotid artery (LCA) and removed the left carotid artery (LCA)-draining deep cervical lymph nodes to disrupt lymphatic drainage in atherosclerotic mice after AAV-mediated FOXC2 overexpression (Fig. 4C) (6). As shown in Fig. 4D, after LCA ligation, there were no blue dye was visible around aorta and only the lymph nodes were stained with blue dye. Furthermore, LCA ligation significantly decreased the lymph vessel contraction frequency in aortic (Fig. 4E-F), indicting LCA ligation reversed he promoting effects of FOXC2 overexpression on lymphatic drainage function in HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice.
Next, we studied the impact of LCA ligation on atherosclerosis. As shown in Fig. 5A-C, LCA ligation abolished the beneficial effects of AAV-mediated FOXC2 overexpression in inhibiting atherosclerosis, and remarkably increased the lipid deposition and plaque area of aortic arch. Lymphatic vessels were stained by podopliain and CD68+ were used to label macrophages. LCA ligation reduced the podopliain and increased CD68+ in aortic adventitia, which indicated that effective lymphatic drainage inhibits aortic adventitia inflammatory cell accumulation (Fig. 5D-E). Moreover, LCA ligation significantly promoted the level of TNF-α, ox-LDL, IL-1β and IL-18 in lymph fluid (Fig. 5F). In addition, as shown in Fig. 5G, para-aortic draining lymph nodes of LCA ligation had significantly higher percentage of CD11c + and CD45 + compared to AAV-mediated FOXC2 overexpression. Collectively, these findings showed that the efficiency of the regression of atherosclerosis induced by FOXC2 treatment relies on a functional aortic lymphatic drainage.
Expression and functional inhibition of FOXC2 in TNF-α-induced LECs inflammatory injury
The lymphatic vasculature originates from a network of vessels composed of tubular LECs and involves the proliferation, migration and sprouting of LECs. To investigate the effect of FOXC2 on lymphatic drainage function in vitro, TNF-α was used to induce LECs to establish a LECs inflammatory injury model. First, we cultured LECs with different concentrations and times of TNF-α. As shown in Fig. 6A, CCK8 analyses demonstrated that TNF-α-treatments significantly reduced the cell viability and presented a dose-dependent and time-dependent. It is worth noting that cell viability was maintained at 50% at TNF-α 10 ng/mL and 24h, which indicated that LECs inflammatory injury model was established successfully (16). Moreover, TNF-α-treatments significantly upregulated the expression levels of inflammatory factors VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IL-18 and IL-1β in LECs (Fig. 6B-6D). Next, we further examine the effects of TNF-α-induced inflammatory injury on the function of LECs to form lymphatic vessels. Compared to control group, a significantly decreased number of Ki67 positive cells in the TNF-α-treated group, which indicated that the TNF-α-treatments obviously inhibit LECs proliferation in time and concentration-dependent (Fig. 6F and H). Transwell results show that the migration of LECs decreased when TNF-α concentration and time increases (Fig. 6G and I).
Subsequently, we examined the changes in the level of FOXC2 in TNF-α induced LECs. Western blot analysis showed that the FOXC2 levels decreased in time and concentration-dependent manners (Fig. 6J). Meanwhile, TNF-α decreased FOXC2 expression in nucleus and increased in cytoplasm (Fig. 6K). Immunofluorescence results were consistent with the results mentioned above. As shown in Fig. 6L-6M, TNF-α treatment led to significant inhibition of FOXC2 nuclear translocation in a concentration- and time-dependent manners. Collectively, these results showed that the expression and function of FOXC2 are significantly reduced in TNF-α induced LECs, suggesting that FOXC2 may be involved in inflammatory injury of LECs.
FOXC2 improves TNF-α-induced inflammatory injury in LECs
To further verify whether FOXC2 regulating LECs inflammation, we explored the influence of FOXC2 on TNF-α-induced LECs. First, we overexpressed or knock down FOXC2 expression in LECs and verified changes in protein abundance by Western blot (Fig. 7A-D). As shown in Fig. 7E, FOXC2 overexpression significantly enhanced the cell vitality stimulated with TNF-α. Furthermore, FOXC2 overexpression inhibited the expression and release of TNF-α-induced inflammatory cytokines VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IL-18 and IL-1β in LECs (Fig. 7F-H). At the same time, FOXC2 overexpression expression increased the number of ki-67 positive cells in TNF-α-induced LECs and enhanced cells proliferative ability (Fig. 7I-J). Transwell results also showed that FOXC2 overexpression enhanced TNF-α-induced cell migration (Fig. 7K-L). However, when FOXC2 was knocked down in LECs, which further aggravated TNF-induced LECs proliferation and migration reduced, and increased expression and release of inflammatory cytokines, indicating that FOXC2 could inhibit the inflammatory injury of LECs and promote the recovery of LEC function.
TRAF2 targetes at binding with TNF-α and induces inflammation in LECs
TNF-α is an important mediator of inflammatory processes, which mediates its inflammatory signals by binding with high affinity to two distinct cell surface receptors, known as TRAF1 and TRAF2 (17). We found that the TRAF2 expression were markedly increased in concentration-dependent manners in LECs induced by TNF-α, while no statistical difference was detected in the expression levels of TRAF1 (Fig. 8A-B). Then, we quantified TRAF2 expression in aortic adventitia, as expected, atherosclerotic mice exhibited elevated TRAF2 expression levels, compared with normal mice (Fig. 8C-D). To further examine whether TRAF2 affected inflammatory response of TNF-α-induced LECs, we silenced TRAF2 by specific siRNA (Fig. 8E), and then detected the molecular interaction between TNF-α and TRAF2 in LECs. As shown in Fig. 8F, decreasing TRAF2 expression significantly restrained the interaction between TNF-α and TRAF2 in TNF-α-stimulated LECs. At the same time, LECs-specific knockout of TRAF2 expression notably decreased the inflammatory cytokines VCAM-1, ICAM-1, IL-18 and IL-1β expression and release in TNF-α-induced LECs (Fig. 8G-H). Moreover, knockout of TRAF2 significantly promoted the number of ki-67 positive cells in TNF-α-induced LECs (Fig. 8I-J). Consistently, TRAF2 knockdown increased the migration capability of LECs stimulated by TNF-α (Fig. 8K-L). It is worth noting that decreasing TRAF2 significantly promoted FOXC2 nuclear translocation in TNF-α-induced LECs (Fig. 8L-M). These results suggest that TRAF2 is critical in the TNF-induced inflammatory response of LECs and FOXC2 might suppress the development of cellular inflammatory responses by regulating TRAF2.
FOXC2 attenuates inflammatory damage in LECs and atherogenesis by inhibiting TNF-α-TRAF2 interaction
Based on the above results, we further examined the effect of FOXC2 on TRAF2 expression in aortic adventitia of HFD-induced ApoE−/− mice. As expected, we found that FOXC2 overexpression significantly inhibits TRAF2 protein levels in atherosclerotic aortic adventitia (Fig. 9A-B). Similarly, FOXC2 overexpression inhibited TRAF2 expression in TNF-α-mediated inflammation in LECs, but this effect was reversed by TRAF2 overexpression (Fig. 9C).
The formation of lymphatic valves is necessary for promoting lymphatic drainage (18). Next, we measured the lymphatic valves formation-related proteins Laminin α5 and Integrin α9 levels. Western blot assays showed the Laminin α5 and Integrin α9 expression was significantly upregulated in TNF-α-induced LECs after overexpression of FOXC2 treatment, while this effect was inhibited after TRAF2 overexpression (Fig. 9D-E).
To further clarify whether the effect of FOXC2 in regulating TNF-α-mediated inflammation in LECs and promoting lymphatic valve formation is related to inhibition of TNF-α and TRAF2 interactions. As shown in Fig. 9F, FOXC2 overexpression displayed inhibitory effects on the interaction between TNF-α and TRAF2 in TNF-α-mediated inflammation in LECs, indicating that FOXC2 overexpression suppresses inflammatory damage in LECs and atherogenesis by preventing TNF-α-TRAF2 interaction.