The first parameter studied in the univariate method was the type of the carboxylic acid (formic acid and acetic acid) in different concentrations evaluating the magnitude of the Se absorbance signal. Figure 2 shows that the better response for Se (IV) was obtained using acetic acid. This result is in agreement with the obtained by NOVÁKOVÁ et al. (2017). In this study, acetic acid showed an increase of almost 50% in the maximum absorbance of Se when compared to formic acid. Therefore, acetic acid was chosen for the measurements. Regarding the concentration of the organic acid, the range between 2.0% and 6.0% of acetic acid was chosen, due to the better absorbance signal for Se observed in Fig. 2.
Figure 2 here
The parameters "irradiation time, acetic acid concentration and flow rate of the carrier gas" were optimized using the multivariate method of surface methodology known as Box Behnken Design.
Table 1 shows the independent variables and levels used in the Box-Behnken experimental design. The response variable used was the absorbance value. The symbol − 1 indicates the minimum level, 0 the central point and + 1 the maximum level.
The UV irradiation time of the sample solution was observed by varying the sample flow rate of the peristaltic pump in the photochemical reactor (flow through lamp). The results were obtained with the irradiation time varying between 16.42 and 22.56 seconds, and were estimated by rotation per minute (rpm) of the peristaltic pump, varying between 3 and 4 rpm.
Table 1
Variables and levels used in the box-behnken design.
Variable | Variable code | Level |
---|
-1 | 0 | + 1 |
---|
UV Irradiation time (s) | X1 | 22.56 | 20.31 | 16.42 |
Acetic acid % (v v− 1) | X2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Carrier flow rate (mL min− 1) | X3 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
The response surface plots (Fig. 3) were built using the data obtained by the Box Behnken experimental design. Figures 3(I) and 3(II) show the acetic acid concentration versus irradiation time and carrier gas flow rate versus acetic acid concentration. The response (absorbance signal of Se) is increasing as the acetic acid concentration increases and the irradiation time and carrier gas flow decrease. The same occurs in Fig. 3(III), which represents the carrier gas flow rate versus irradiation time, in which the maximum response is obtained with the minimum values obtained for these variables. Therefore, the maximum absorbance response can be obtained for the optimized values of the variables, which are: 6.0% v v− 1 of acetic acid, 10 mL min− 1 for the carrier gas flow and 16.42 s for the irradiation time. However, due to the high solution consumption, the irradiation time used was 20.31 s.
Figure 3 here
Table 2 summarizes the estimated values of the analytical figures of merit of the method for Se analysis by PVG-AAS developed in this work. The accuracy was tested using the green beans sample purchased in Ceara state (Caucaia) and analyzed by the proposed PVG-AAS and the HG-AAS methods.
Table 3 shows a comparison between some methods described in the literature and the one presented in this work. It is worth mentioning that even though the estimated values were close (LOD and LOQ) or even slightly worse than those obtained for HG-AAS, the proposed PVG-AAS method confirms itself as a green analytical method when we consider the 12 parameters developed by by PENA-PEREIRA et al. (2020) known as “Analytical GREEnness metric approach”.
Table 2
Analytical figures of merit for Se determination by PVG-AAS and HG-AAS.
Figures of merit | PVG-AAS | HG-AAS |
---|
Linear range | 50–175 | 25–125 |
RSD (%) | (n = 8) 15.1 | (n = 9) 7.57 |
LOD (µg kg− 1) | 1.60 | 1.07 |
LOQ (µg kg− 1) | 5.33 | 3.57 |
Accuracy (mg kg− 1) | 2.24 ± 0.38 a | 2.84 ± 0.24a |
a standard deviation for triplicate analysis |
Table 3
Limits of detection for methods of total Se analysis using different techniques.
Method | Reagent | LOD (µg kg− 1) | Reference |
---|
PVG-AAS | Acetic acid | 1.60 | This work |
HG-AAS | NaBH4 | 1.07 | This work |
HG-AAS | NaBH4 | 7.0 | SIGRIST et al. (2012) |
HG-AFS | NaBH4 | 0.7 | MATOS-REYES et al. (2010) |
PVG-GFAAS | Formic acid | 0.65 | DA LUZ POTES et al. (2019) |
The detection and quantification limits obtained in this work (PVG-AAS) are better when compared to methodologies that also use flame atomic absorption (AAS) techniques. When using higher sensitivity techniques, we observed lower LOD, which is expected; however, the costs related to analyses using more sensitive techniques must be considered. Methods using hydride generation also present slightly better sensitivity than that obtained by PVG-AAS; however, it should be noted that these methods use unstable reducing agents and, therefore, must be prepared daily, and thus, present higher reagent costs, as well as generate more waste.
The GREEnness method was proposed in 2020 by PENA-PEREIRA et al. and it aims to evaluate, with 12 questions to be answered, how green the analytical method in question is. We evaluated the proposed PVG-AAS methods and the HG-AAS used to estimate its accuracy. The result is shown in Fig. 4, which has a pictogram with a number that the closer to 1, the greener the method evaluated. An analytical method with a value above 0.59, such as the PVG-AAS (0.69) proposed in this work, can be considered a green analytical method and the pictogram presents a green color. It is worth mentioning that the HG-AAS method presented a value of 0.49 in the pictogram (yellow).
Figure 4 here
Bean samples from the states of Ceará and Pará were analyzed using the proposed PVG-AAS method, and the results are summarized in Table 4. We compared the total Se levels found in the samples with those obtained in studies presented in the literature for other types of beans. By comparing the data obtained with those from other studies, it is possible to note that the selenium content in the samples is quite varied, due to several factors, such as the region, the climate, and the soil used. According to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and the US Institute of Medicine, it was established that the maximum content for the acceptable daily intake of selenium for an adult is 55 µg/day, with a tolerable limit of up to 400 µg/day (INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE, 2006). Therefore, the values obtained fit within these limits and are in agreement with the concentrations found by other authors.
Table 4
Results of the analysis of total Se of selenium in different beans from Brazil.
| Se (mg kg− 1) | Region | Reference |
---|
Green beans | 2.24 ± 0.38 | Ceara state (Caucaia) | This work |
Green beans | 2.00 ± 0.15 | Ceara state (Fortaleza) | This work |
Green beans | 0.88 ± 0.02 | Para state (Belem) | This work |
Beans | 1.73 ± 0.06 | North region | SHALTOUT et al. (2011) |
Beans | < 5 µg kg− 1 | Nine states | SHALTOUT et al. (2020) |
The difficulty in analyzing low Se concentrations in complex samples (high protein contents) limits the number of articles reporting on such subjects. SHALTOUT et al. (2020) carried out a study using a high-resolution, continuous-source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (HS-CS-GF-AAS) system to implement a method for routine analysis of beans. The authors used 14 different samples of beans (Faseolus Vulgaris L.) collected in 9 states of Brazil and found concentrations lower than 5 µg kg− 1. LODs of 30 ng kg− 1 were estimated and even so, the authors concluded that methods with in situ trapping hydride generation for pre-concentration and subsequent analysis of Se should be used to achieve sufficient sensitivity. It is worth mentioning that this is another type of bean that, unlike green beans, is harvested ripe.