We engaged 60 participants who qualified for inclusion criteria and were eligible to participate in the interviews. This group comprised 20 patients (with an average age of 52 years; 50% female), 10 nursing staff members (average age 40 years; 90% female), 10 physicians (average age 45 years; 30% female) and 20 pharmacists (10 of whom were clinical pharmacists and 10 were heads of pharmacy departments; average age 44 years; 60% female). All medical professionals had over three years of work experience. The demographic characteristics of the participants are detailed in Table 3.
3.1 Perspective of Physicians
Variations in awareness of standardized intravenous infusion practices were observed among the interviewed doctors. Half of the physicians were not aware that improving the standardized use of intravenous infusions is one of the national medical quality and safety improvement goals. As one doctor stated, "I am indeed not very clear about the specific requirements and strategies for the standardized use of intravenous infusions." This indicates that despite national guidelines, there are still barriers in the dissemination and comprehension of information. Meanwhile, those who have participated in relevant training demonstrated a deeper understanding of the standardized use of intravenous infusions, highlighting the importance of education.
In clinical decision-making, two-thirds of the doctors typically opt for intravenous infusions based on the severity of the patient's condition. One physician emphasized, "For critically ill patients, intravenous infusions are a key intervention to rapidly address their medical conditions." Additionally, the dependency of patients on intravenous infusions also influences the prescribing decisions of doctors. Another doctor mentioned, "Patients expect to receive infusion treatments; sometimes, even when it is not necessary, I will comply with their expectations to avoid medical-patient conflicts."
Medical insurance policies also impact the prescribing decisions of doctors. The majority expressed concerns, saying, "During medical insurance audits, if patients have not received infusion treatments, they might be judged as being admitted under low standards, leading to economic penalties for the hospital." This could lead doctors to opt for intravenous infusions even when they are not necessary.
Physicians believe that more education and clear policy guidance are needed to enhance the standardized use of intravenous infusions. As one doctor pointed out, "We need more education and clear policy guidance to assist us in making better decisions in clinical treatment."
3.2 Perspective of Nursing Staff
Half of the nursing staff were not aware that improving the standardized use of intravenous infusions has been included as one of the national medical quality and safety improvement goals. One nursing staff member stated, "I am aware that intravenous infusions are one of the routes of administration with the most adverse reactions, but I was not informed that it has been listed as a national goal for improving medical quality and safety."
Nursing staff widely believe that the standardized use of intravenous infusions can help reduce work intensity. A nurse commented, "If we can reduce unnecessary infusions, we will have more time and energy to provide more meticulous nursing services, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction."
In terms of patient education and trust-building, nursing staff play a crucial role. One nurse mentioned, "We need to patiently explain to patients why, in some cases, oral medications might be a better therapeutic choice." Another nurse emphasized, "Through education, we help patients understand the treatment plan, and the establishment of trust makes them more willing to accept our recommendations." This indicates that nursing staff, through education and communication, contribute to patients accepting and trusting standardized treatment regimens.
3.3 Perspective of Pharmacists
Pharmacists widely recognize the importance of standardized intravenous infusion practices but encounter numerous challenges in implementation. One pharmacist noted, "Changing medical habits faces multiple obstacles, including the prescribing habits of doctors and the expectations of patients." While assisting physicians in rational drug treatment, pharmacists also bear supervisory responsibilities. A clinical pharmacist expressed his dilemma: "We need to ensure the rational use of drugs while also wishing to support the work of doctors; this dual role sometimes puts us in a difficult position."
The pharmacy department strives to promote standardized use through participation in working groups and multi-departmental collaboration. One pharmacist emphasized, "This requires the support of hospital management and coordination between departments." However, a pharmacist pointed out, "In actual work, the pharmacy department often bears the burden of promoting standardized use alone, increasing the difficulty of the task." A senior pharmacist mentioned, "Developing clinical pathways is an effective measure for standardized intravenous infusions, but due to the limited clinical knowledge of pharmacists, only a minority of pharmacists participate in the development of clinical pathways."
To reduce reliance on intravenous infusions, hospitals have established a list of diseases that do not require intravenous medication, and the pharmacy department has optimized drug supply to ensure the rationality of various routes of administration. A pharmacist mentioned, "We have increased the supply of oral and topical medications." Pharmacists generally agree that implementing specialized drug management is an effective approach to reducing unnecessary intravenous infusions, such as targeted management of antimicrobials, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), traditional Chinese medicine injections, parenteral nutrition, antiemetics, and other medications.
The pharmacy department has set target values for the use of intravenous infusions in clinical departments and linked them to the performance of these departments. A pharmacist explained, "This increases the motivation to implement standards but also requires us to continuously communicate with clinical departments to reach a consensus." Pharmacists use regular data analysis to identify and solve problems in a timely manner. A pharmacist described, "Continuous monitoring helps us maintain the standardization of treatment."
Pharmacists play a key role in standardized use but face the challenge of insufficient human resources. A pharmacist pointed out, "The shortage of clinical pharmacists in secondary medical institutions limits the depth and breadth of our work." Pharmacists working in secondary medical institutions often feel a lack of confidence in their clinical skills. "This may be because we have fewer opportunities for professional training and continuing education, or because the types and complexity of cases we encounter in daily work are limited. This lack of confidence may affect our communication with doctors and our initiative and decisiveness in the supervision of rational drug use."
Pharmacists actively participate in patient education, using materials such as popular science videos to improve patients' understanding of treatment plans. A pharmacist shared, "This helps patients make wiser treatment choices."
Pharmacists are aware of the necessity for continuous learning to improve professional communication skills. One pharmacist stated, "A deep understanding of diseases and drug knowledge allows us to communicate more effectively with doctors." Pharmacists are passionate about their work but also face pressure and challenges. A senior pharmacist said, "We love our work, but we also need to cope with work pressure and professional burnout."
3.4 Perspective of Patients
Patients exhibit a range of attitudes towards intravenous infusions, with two-thirds willing to follow their doctors' advice. One-third prefer intravenous infusions, believing in their rapid therapeutic effects: "If I'm hospitalized, why not have an infusion? I think infusions are more effective." There is a divergence in patients' awareness of the potential risks and side effects associated with intravenous infusions. Half of the patients are unaware of the risks involved, stating, "I always thought infusions were a safe and effective method of treatment." In contrast, those who are aware of the risks mention various issues: "I've heard that infusions can cause infusion reactions and other side effects." Additionally, some patients mention the inconvenience of infusions: "You can't move around freely when you're on an infusion, which is very inconvenient."