2.1 Study area
The Department of Animal Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria, was the site of the experiment. Regarding GPS data from 2023, the laboratory is situated between latitudes 4o57'N and longitudes 7o76'E and 7o45'E.
2.2 Acquisition and processing of coating materials
Fresh roots and tubers of cassava, cocoyam, and sweet potato were purchased from Abak market. They were washed thoroughly in clean water to remove any dirt or debris. Afterward, the root and tubers were peeled and finely chopped into little bits using a manual kitchen food processor before drying in an oven at a low temperature (65 oC) for two days. After drying, they were milled into flour and stored in airtight containers to maintain freshness and prevent moisture re-absorption (Calverley, 1998). The flour representing treatments were designated as WF (Wheat flour), SPF (Sweet potato flour), CF (Cassava flour), and CYF (Cocoyam flour).
2.3 Chicken sample processing and marination
Broiler chickens (24 in total) of 8 weeks of age were purchased at Akwa Ibom State University Commercial Farm for the study. All the birds were slaughtered (by severing the neck, allowing bleeding to occur for 2 minutes. This process was immediately followed by scalding, de-feathering, and thorough cleaning). Samples were taken from the breast muscle (approximately 300 g). Using a clean and sharp kitchen knife, the breast was cut into chunks 14 cm long and 5 cm wide in the same direction as the muscle fiber. The chunk was further cut into sizeable portions (7 x 5 cm2) in length and width before marination, as described by Jiya et al. (2014). A standardized marinade mixture was prepared for priming of the meat. The marinade formula consisted of water (1000 ml), salt, ginger, garlic, pepper, nutmeg, and mixed spices at about 5 % (each) of the weight of the chicken muscle. The meat was kept in the marinade mixture for 12 hours in a refrigerator at 4°C until ready for use (USDA, 2023).
2.4 Coating preparation and meat breading
The flour from the various treatments (1 kg) was mixed in deionized water (1000 ml) to create multiple batter formulas. The egg white was used as binders to give the batter a firm consistency following methods described by Adegoke et al. (2022). The batter slurry was applied to the pre-weighed chicken breast slices for ten seconds, and then they were let to drain for fifteen seconds. Until the liquid drainage stopped, the immersion procedure was repeated. The meat was then rolled in the flour of each treatment until a uniform coverage was attained (Adegoke et al., 2022).
2.5 Meat frying process
The breaded chicken breast muscle was fried in a frying pot with vegetable oil purchased at a grocery store at 180 - 200°C using a gas cooker as a heat source. The breaded chicken breast strips in the hot oil were turned at intervals of two minutes to obtain uniform frying (Gokalp et al., 1999). The oil temperature was regulated using a thermometer as Latif and Abdel-Aal (2011) recommended.
2.6 Coating yield and Frying yield
The formula presented by Labropoulos et al. (2013) was used to calculate the coating yield of meat. Where:
The weight of the sample before and after frying, given as a percentage, was used to determine the frying yield of chicken breasts (Adegoke et al., 2022).
2.7 Proximate and mineral analysis
The meat samples with the breading were taken to the laboratory and analyzed for proximate composition. Parameters studied include crude protein, ash, moisture, and ether extract. Another set of samples was taken from the breaded meats in each treatment and analyzed for mineral contents such as phosphorus, zinc, calcium, potassium, and iron according to the procedures outlined by AOAC (1990).
2.8 Color measurements
According to methods described by Bah et al. (2022), using a calorimeter chroma meter, the instrumental color values of the fried chicken breast samples, lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) were determined.
2.9 pH measurement
A 10 g sample of fried chicken meat, including the coating from each treatment, was ground and mixed with 9 ml of distilled water to obtain a uniform mixture. The mixture was filtered using filter paper to get a clear mixture, and the pH was measured using a pH meter. Standard buffers of 4.0 and 7.0 at 25°C were used to calibrate the pH meter before use (Alakhrash et al., 2016).
2.10 Experimental design and analytical procedure
Four treatment groups—WF (wheat flour), which was used as the control—SPF (sweet potato flour), CF (cassava flour), and CYF (cocoyam flour)—were included in the fully randomized design of the trial. The breast muscle from the slaughtered birds was breaded in the flour from each treatment. Data obtained was analyzed for the differences due to the coating medium using the One-Way Analysis of Variance technique of the GraphPad Prism Software (Version 10.20.0, 392). The Tukey pairwise comparison with a 95% confidence interval was used to separate means when there was a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).