Ethics
The article research adopts the methods of literature review, questionnaire survey, and factor analysis, and does not involve any ethical issues. The questionnaire survey adheres to the principle of voluntariness, and the preface expresses that the survey subjects voluntarily participate in the survey behavior. All participants in the survey are working adults, and their informed consent and data confidentiality have been ensured. All investigations have been confirmed to have obtained informed consent from all subjects. Therefore, the Academic Committee of Chongqing Jiaotong University, responsible for ethical review, agrees to allow the author to conduct research on the competency model for fire facility operators.The experimental protocol was approved by Academic Committee of Chongqing Jiaotong University.
Research methodology
The article research adopts the methods of literature review, survey, and factor analysis, all methods are performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, It does not involve any ethical issues. The literature research method mainly reviews and studies the competence of fire protection facility operators at home and abroad, and analyzes the competence characteristics of fire protection facility operators. The investigation method mainly involves conducting research on the fire rescue teams, fire supervision leaders, technical leaders of fire technology companies, project managers of property companies, and heads of property security departments in the four regions of Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Chongqing, to construct a conceptual model of competency for fire facility operators. Using factor analysis method, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis are conducted to optimize and test the competence model of fire protection facility operators. Finally, this model is used to evaluate the competence of fire protection facility operators in Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Chongqing.
Overview of research on fire protection facility operators' abilities
The concept of competency was first proposed by McClelland in 1973. It mainly refers to personality traits that can distinguish excellent performers from ordinary performers, including personality traits8-9 such as knowledge, skills, abilities, traits or motivations. Since then, competency theories and models have continued to develop and provide a new research perspective for the evaluation of personnel abilities and qualities.
Through literature review, it is found that currently, there is no research on the competency of fire protection facility operators at home and abroad. Only a small amount of literature has studied the competency of firefighters and fire commanders among firefighting personnel. Ph.D. thesis of Lynn M. Wojcik10: Pursuing professionalism: A preliminary research on fire officer competency evaluation. A three-stage qualitative research analysis method has been used in the development of a performance evaluation tool to evaluate fire officer performance. The results show that the overall work performance of fire officials reaches a good level. Guangli Li et al.11 have constructed a firefighter competency model that includes five dimensions: Psychological quality, professional skills, self-development, professional quality and interpersonal cooperation, and 19 competency characteristics. Based on the competency theory, the combination of theoretical analysis and questionnaire methods, and application of measurement and statistical techniques, a public security fire commander competency model has been constructed by Yi Hou6 that contains six factors, such as cognitive and emotional will characteristics, knowledge and skill characteristics, organization and command ability, and troop leading ability6. Using behavioral event interviewing, psychometrics and statistics, Yexing Zheng and Shen Huang12 have constructed a competency model12 for grassroots fire commanders that includes six competency characteristics including subordinate orientation, concentration, responsibility and flexibility, and ranked the relative importance of the six competency characteristic items. A relational model of the influence of personality traits on the competency of airport fire commanders has been constructed by Xin Fu13. A competency model for fire rescue personnel has been constructed by Yisha Liu14 based on the iceberg theory, which includes three dimensions: knowledge and ability, values, traits and motivations, a total of 12 competency elements, and 40 competency indicators, and an empirical research has been carried out with SPSS 25 statistical software 14. To sum up, these literatures' research on the connotation and structure of firefighters and fire commanders' competencies has laid a good foundation for this study9. However, due to the particularity of fire protection facility operators, their work content and nature are essentially different from firefighters and fire commanders, so it is not suitable to directly apply these research results to the research of fire protection facility operators competency.
Moreover, the research on the occupational skills of fire protection facility operators, is closest to the research on the competency of fire protection facility operators, and is also a preliminary research on the key skill setting15 and professional skill improvement4 of fire protection facility operators, most of which are empirical summaries and suggestions. There is a lack of theoretical analysis and quantitative research on the structure and evaluation of fire facilities operator competency. Therefore, the competency model structure of fire protection facilities operator is constructed in this study to evaluate and analyze the competency of fire protection facilities operator quantitatively.
Analysis of competency characteristics of fire protection facility operators
In order to analyze the competency characteristic indicators of fire protection facility operators, a preliminary analysis of the competency characteristics of fire protection facility operators was firstly conducted through the work task analysis method, and then the new requirements for operator competency in the context of smart firefighting were further analyzed.
Analysis of work tasks of fire protection facility operators.The job task analysis method is a convenient and effective method to study individual competency characteristics16. Based on the work tasks of fire protection facility operators, the competency characteristics of fire protection facility operators was analyzed in this paper through their work responsibilities, work processes and situations.
After searching for Fire protection facility operator recruitment information, on-duty operation manuals, management systems and other information through search engines, the property company project managers, security department directors, and fire protection facility operators from 7 key fire safety units in Chongqing have been investigated through interviews or phone calls. Based on relevant literature, the main work tasks of fire protection facility operators were summarized in detail, see Table 1. Among them, emergency response is the key of its work. Based on the above task analysis results and competency related theories, the competency characteristics of fire protection facility operators were preliminarily analyzed from the aspects of knowledge, skills, abilities, traits, motivations, etc. The analysis results are shown in Table 1.
New requirements for operator competency in the context of smart fire protection.Smart fire protection is an important part of smart cities. With the acceleration of smart city construction, the requirements for fire protection intelligence are constantly increasing. Relevant national policies and guidance have also been released one after another. In 2017, the Work Points of the Fire Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security in 2017 was issued by the Fire Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security, which required promoting the construction of smart fire protection and striving to improve the technological and informatization level of fire protection work17. In October 2017, the Guiding Opinions on Comprehensively Promoting the Construction of "Smart Firefighting" was issued by the Ministry of Public Security, requiring to accelerate the transformation and upgrading of fire service to intelligence.
It was put forward in the opinions the key construction tasks and work goals of smart fire protection17. On February 14, 2022, the National Emergency System Plan for the 14th Five-Year Plan (Guofa 2021 No. 36) was issued by the State Council. All localities were required to build a smart emergency management system for public security, fire protection, civil air defense, medical rescue, communications, environmental protection, government, and urban management services. In the context of intelligent fire protection, a series of changes such as the acceleration of the replacement of fire control equipment and the emergence of new fire alarm systems put forward new requirements for operator competence.
Fire control equipment such as fire alarm controllers and fire linkage controllers controlled by fire protection facility operators are being updated at an accelerating rate for there are many brands and models, and even imported products with full English interfaces. This requires fire protection facility operators to continuously learn new knowledge and master new skills through vocational training, self-research, etc., and higher requirements have been put forward regarding continuous learning ability, environmental adaptability, and vocational training. Traditional fire alarm systems can be divided into regional, centralized, and control center alarm systems 18.Thanks to high technologies such as big data, the Internet of Things, and cloud computing, new fire alarm system forms such as smart fire protection systems, urban fire protection Internet of Things remote monitoring systems, and multi-fire control room integrated network transformation have been gradually promoted and applied. The new system uses more new technologies and has a wider range of system control. At the same time, information transmission, communication and collaboration with the fire brigade, corps, and government administrative departments are more frequent. Higher requirements are put forward for fire protection facility operators in terms of their professional qualification level, years of experience in the profession, education level, vocational training hours, organizational and coordination abilities, and teamwork abilities.
In order to adapt to the development needs of smart fire protection, the career direction and professional qualification level of fire protection facility operators has been further refined in the new Standard, and the career development path of fire protection facility operators is gradually becoming clear. Fire protection facility operators can obtain higher-level certificates through examinations and assessments, so as to expand their career paths, and even seek for management positions. Of course, this also puts higher demands on their own career planning capabilities.
Construction of competency model for fire protection facility operators
Dimensional composition of fire protection facility operators' competency.Taking into account the completeness, accuracy, and systematicness of competency characteristic indicators8, combing with the preliminary analysis results of competency characteristics obtained through job task analysis method and the new competency requirements in the context of smart fire protection, a pre-survey questionnaire on competency characteristics was developed, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 5 fire rescue corps and detachment fire supervision directors, 3 technical directors of fire protection technology companies, 7 project managers of property companies, and 6 directors of property security departments located in 4 places in Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan and Chongqing (face-to-face or telephone interview). At the same time, about 50 pre-survey questionnaires were distributed to the security department director and fire control room employees regarding 7 property management projects. Based on the results of semi-structured interviews and pre-surveys, the competency characteristics were supplemented, refined and adjusted. Finally, 21 competency characteristics indicators were summarized including five major dimensions: professional knowledge and skills, communication and collaboration ability, learning and adaptability, physical and mental quality and personality traits, and career development motivation. On this basis, a conceptual model of Fire protection facility operator competency was constructed, as shown in Figure 1.
(1)Professional knowledge and skills. Professional knowledge and skills refer to the professional knowledge and professional skills related to the work of fire protection facility operators. Fire protection facility operators are required to have certain professional knowledge, operational skills, fire protection capabilities and emergency response capabilities for effective monitoring, operation and emergency response of fire control equipment. There is a certain correlation between job professional knowledge, job operation skills and the Fire protection facility operators' professional qualification level, years of experience in the profession, education level, and vocational training hours. Therefore, in order to measure the professional knowledge and skills of fire protection facility operators, eight indicators are selected in this study, including job expertise, job operation skills, fire protection ability, response ability, professional qualification level, years of experience in the profession, education level and vocational training hours.
(2) Communication and collaboration skills. Communication and collaboration ability refers to the awareness and ability of fire protection facility operators to communicate, coordinate, and cooperate with colleagues in the fire control room work team, other colleagues and superior leaders in the project department, and staff of the fire protection competent department. Therefore, to measure the communication and collaboration ability of fire protection facility operators, three indicators are selected in this study: communication and coordination ability, teamwork ability, and language expression ability.
(3) Learning and adaptability. Learning and adaptability refers to the awareness and ability of fire protection facility operators to continuously learn new knowledge and new technologies, constantly reflect on and improve problems and difficulties encountered in their work, and to adapt to changing working conditions, scenes, places, etc. Therefore, in order to measure the learning and adaptability of fire protection facility operators, three indicators were selected in this study: learning ability, reflection and improvement ability, and environmental adaptability.
(4) Physical and mental quality and personality traits. Physical and mental quality is a combination of physical quality and psychological quality, which is a relatively stable trait that a person shows in different situations. Since personality traits refer to a person's relatively stable way of thinking and emotions, some common characteristics shown in different situations are their internal and external measurable traits. In the interview and questionnaire survey, many interviewees agreed that the sense of responsibility, ability to bear hardships and stand hard work and professional ethics are important competency characteristics of fire protection facility operators. Due to the particularity and importance of the fire control room itself, the fault tolerance rate of fire protection facility operators is extremely low, which requires them to have a strong sense of responsibility. At the same time, a high degree of concentration is also required. And long time on duty is no small test for physical and mental strength. Fire protection facility operators are required to withstand fatigue, loneliness, and concentration. Considering that physical quality, psychological quality, sense of responsibility, ability to bear hardships and stand hard work and professional ethics are relatively stable characteristics of individuals, they are combined into the fourth dimension and named as physical and mental quality and personality traits.
(5) Career development motivation.
Career planning refers to the combination of individuals and organizations, and based on the analysis of the subjective and objective conditions of an individual's career and an individual's own situation, the best career goal can be determined while corresponding arrangement is made according to the goal19. Professional role identity refers to an individual's behavior and attitude that are consistent with the job role, and he is willing to perform his duties according to the requirements of the job, which is demonstrated through his external behaviors7. Career planning and professional role identification both belong to career development motivations.
Fire protection facility operator competency model inspection
(1) Questionnaire design
Verify the structural dimensions of the constructed conceptual model of Fire protection facility operator competency, and design the final survey questionnaire. The questionnaire includes two parts: The first part is a basic personal information survey, mainly including gender, age, whether you are a veteran, and whether you were a firefighter; the second part is the fire protection facility operator competency measurement scale, with a total of 21 test items, corresponding to 21 competency characteristic indicators under the five major dimensions of fire protection facility operators' competency. The established competency dimensions and test items for fire protection facility operators in the fire control room are shown in Table 2 for details.
A 5-point Likert scale is used to score on a scale of 1 to 5 points. Among them, the professional qualification levels are calculated as 1-5 points respectively for fire protection facility operators (fire protection facility monitoring operations): level 5, level 4, level 3, level 2, level 3 or above and those who have obtained the fire protection engineer certificates; vocational training hours are calculated as 1-5 points based on the average training hours in the previous year from ≤ 5 hours, 5~10 hours, 10~30 hours, 30~60 hours, to > 60 hours; educational level is calculated as 1-5 points respectively based on junior high school, high school or technical secondary school, junior college, part-time undergraduate degree, or full-time undergraduate degree and above; years of experience in this profession are calculated as 1-5 points respectively based on ≤1 year, 1~3 years, 3~5 years, 5~8 years, and >8 years. The remaining test items are evaluated on a scale of 5 and scored as 1~5 points 9 according to "very inconsistent" to "very consistent" .
Table 2 Dimensions and test items of competency of fire protection facility operators in fire control room
Dimension
|
Measurement Item
|
Measurement Item Characteristic Description
|
Professional knowledge and skills (A)
|
Job professional knowledge A1
|
Combustion and fire, building fire protection, electrical fire protection, fire protection facilities, computer applications, initial fire treatment and other basic knowledge
|
Job operation skills A2
|
Operation, monitoring, daily inspection, troubleshooting and abnormal handling of fire control equipment and fire communication equipment in the fire control room
|
Fire fighting capability A3
|
Able to use fire extinguishers, fire hydrants and other fire protection equipment to extinguish small initial fires
|
Adaptability A4
|
Ability to assess the situation and respond to emergencies
|
Professional qualification level A5
|
Fire facilities operator (fire protection facility monitoring operation) qualification level
|
Years of experience in this profession A6
|
Number of years working in fire control room
|
Education level A7
|
Educational qualifications obtained so far
|
Vocational training hours A8
|
Effective learning time for participating in training related to fire protection facility operation and fire safety management
|
Communication and collaboration ability (B)
|
Communication and coordination ability B1
|
Communicate and coordinate with colleagues, superiors and subordinates
|
Teamwork ability B2
|
Awareness and ability to collaborate with other colleagues in the work team
|
Language expression ability B3
|
Ability to express language verbally or in writing
|
Learning and adaptability (C)
|
Learning ability C1
|
Awareness and ability to learn new knowledge and new technologies
|
Reflection and improvement ability C2
|
The ability to reflect on and improve problems and difficulties encountered at work
|
Environmental adaptability C3
|
Adapt to changing working conditions, scenes, locations, new equipment, new systems, new knowledge, and new skills
|
Physical and mental quality and personality traits (D)
|
Physical fitness D1
|
Strength, speed, endurance, agility and other functional abilities demonstrated at work
|
Psychological quality D2
|
An individual quality that is developed in real life over a long period of time and is displayed when encountering emergencies.
|
Responsibility awareness D3
|
Loyalty and adherence to one's responsibilities and mission
|
Ability to bear hardships and stand hard work D4
|
Able to be on duty for long periods of time and able to adapt to the intensity of physical and mental work at work
|
Professional ethics level D5
|
Be dedicated to work, be honest and trustworthy, abide by the organizational disciplines of the unit, and abide by the rules and regulations of the fire control room8
|
Career development motivation (E)
|
Career planning E1
|
Determine their best career goals and make corresponding arrangements based on the goals19
|
Professional role identity E2
|
The individual's behavior and attitude are consistent with the job role, and is willing to perform his duties according to the job requirements.
|
A questionnaire survey was conducted on fire protection facility operators by combining an online questionnaire survey with on-site distribution of questionnaires.From February 2022 to November 2023, 550 questionnaires were randomly distributed to fire protection facility operators in Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan and Chongqing, and 432 questionnaires were recovered. Among them, 405 questionnaires are valid questionnaires, and the effective questionnaire recovery rate is 73.64%.
(2) Exploratory factor analysis
SPSSAU software was used to conduct exploratory factor analysis on 21 competency indicators. It is shown by the test results that: The KOM value is 0.728>0.7, and the significance level of Bartlett's sphericity test is less than 0.001, indicating that the sample data is relevant and suitable for factor analysis. Factor analysis has extracted a total of 5 characteristic root values, all of which are greater than 1 factor, and the cumulative variance explanation rate after rotation is 62.73%>60%920. Except for "environmental adaptability", the loading coefficients of other factors are all greater than 0.5, and the factors can reflect more than 60% of the information, indicating that the questionnaire has good validity. According to the meaning of each observed variable, the five factors extracted are named: Professional knowledge and skills (A), communication and collaboration ability (B), learning and adaptability (C), physical and mental quality and personality traits (D), career development motivation (E) 9.
The questionnaire reliability test shows that the Cronbach's α coefficients of the five dimensions are all greater than 0.6, and the overall value is 0.768, all exceeding 0.6, indicating that the reliability quality of the questionnaire data is acceptable. See Table 3 for details.
Table 3 Results of exploratory factor analysis
Factor number
|
Factor name
|
Element number
|
Components
|
Loading coefficient
|
Cronbach´s α value
|
A
|
Professional knowledge and skills
|
A1
|
Job professional knowledge
|
0.615
|
0.684
|
A2
|
Job operation skills
|
0.566
|
A3
|
Fire fighting ability
|
0.612
|
A4
|
Adaptability
|
0.663
|
A5
|
Vocational qualification level
|
0.648
|
A6
|
Years of experience in this profession
|
0.520
|
A7
|
Educational level
|
0.592
|
A8
|
Vocational training hours
|
0.607
|
B
|
Communication and collaboration ability
|
B1
|
Communication and coordination ability
|
0.629
|
0.623
|
B2
|
Teamwork ability
|
0.585
|
B3
|
Language expression ability
|
0.580
|
C
|
Learning and adaptability
|
C1
|
Learning ability
|
0.641
|
0.675
|
C2
|
Reflection and improvement ability
|
0.625
|
C3
|
Environmental adaptability
|
0.483
|
D
|
Physical and mental quality and personality traits
|
D1
|
Physical quality
|
0.605
|
0.662
|
D2
|
Psychological quality
|
0.636
|
D3
|
Sense of responsibility
|
0.639
|
D4
|
Ability to bear hardships and stand hard work
|
0.583
|
D5
|
Professional ethics level
|
0.572
|
E
|
Career development motivation
|
E1
|
Career planning
|
0.643
|
0.660
|
E2
|
Professional role identity
|
0.598
|
Table 4 Confirmatory factor analysis model fitting index
Common indicator
|
p
|
χ²/df
|
CFI
|
IFI
|
GFI
|
RMSEA
|
RMR
|
PGFI
|
SRMR
|
Judgment criteria
|
>0.05
|
<3
|
>0.9
|
>0.9
|
>0.9
|
<0.10
|
<0.05
|
>0.9
|
<0.1
|
Value
|
0.000
|
2.233
|
0.911
|
0.913
|
0.898
|
0.063
|
0.044
|
0.923
|
0.064
|
Table 5 Confirmatory factor analysis AVE and CR indicator results
Factor serial number
|
Factor name
|
Average variance extraction AVE value
|
Combined reliability CR value
|
A
|
Professional knowledge and skills
|
0.494
|
0.744
|
B
|
Communication and collaboration ability
|
0.411
|
0.633
|
C
|
Learning and adaptability
|
0.562
|
0.714
|
D
|
Physical and mental quality and personality traits
|
0.435
|
0.689
|
E
|
Career development motivation
|
0.438
|
0.695
|
(3) Confirmatory factor analysis
Based on the results of exploratory factor analysis, a second-order confirmatory factor analysis9 has been performed on the sample data. The model fitting index is shown in Table 4 in detail. The results show that the chi-square degree of freedom ratio (χ²/df), CFI, IFI, GFI and other indicator values meet the criteria. Based on comprehensive judgment, the model fits well with the actual data 9. The combined reliability CR value and average variance extraction AVE value of the five factors are shown in Table 5 in detail. The CR values are all around 0.7, indicating that the questionnaire has high internal consistency and overall reliability. The AVE value does not meet the judgment criterion of 0.5, but it is close to 0.5. According to the suggestion of Bettencourt (2004), when the combined reliability is high, it is acceptable for the AVE value to be close to 0.5. To sum up, the questionnaire has high convergent validity, the data can be used for further analysis, and this second-order competency model can be accepted89.